Whats Stick Shifts for a T-5 do you guys like?
Whats Stick Shifts for a T-5 do you guys like?
Im putting in a new WC T-5 in my 87 Trans Am cuz i blew up the NWC that was in it. I figured that because im putting the new tranny that i should get a new stick shift. I was looking at the Pro 5.0 Power Tower and the B&M Sport Shifter. If any of you have had experience with these or others that you think are awesome i'd like to know. I'd like the shortest throw with the smoothest shift. I know that the Pro 5.0 has some shift mechanism that allows it to have a real smooth 2-3 shift but i want something that will be smooth through all of the gears. I just dont want to spend another 150-200 bucks and then find that i dont like it. well thanks
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: '86 Camaro, '02 WRX, '87 K5, '67
Engine: 350 TPI, 2.0turbo, 383 in the works, 289-4BBL, 232, A-head 4-cylinder
Transmission: T56, 5-speed, 700R4, C4, T176, semi-auto 2-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73, 3.90, 4.88, 3.55, 3.54, 7.00
Pro 5.0 all the way. They are the toughest, highest quality shifters I've ever seen.
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: Clifton, NJ
Car: 84 Trans Am
Engine: 350
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 9in 4.30's
im more than happy with my hurst billit plus..its half the length of the stock shifter and can be rebuilt if things every break...ive been beating on it for 3 months and it feels brand new.
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
From: Ithaca, NY - 10 sq mi surrounded by reality - I'm SOL!
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 TPI in stock trim
Transmission: T-5 w/ Hurst B/P shifter
Only wish I could provide you with some comparison of my own - would be more objective - but not too many people buy more than one just to try them out. My Hurst Billet Plus is a huge improvement over stock (as one might expect) and it's a pretty smooth operator too. I like it because it has a nice tension to it helping the 2-3 shift; helps return the stick to the center gates - very little chance of a miss-shift in my opinion. And, if it means anything at all, the fiance who does not drive manual on a daily basis but it pretty adept at it, thought it was great and she did really well with it her first time driving the B/P shifter.
Just my two-pennies..........
Oh, one draw back might be the **** that comes with it - a pretty generic 5-spd ****. Hurst has some others you can use and I wrote a little blurb on the message boards about how I installed a NOS Leather-covered GM **** onto this shifter as well - here's the link, FYI:
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...highlight=****
Thought the admins might want it as a "How-To" also but I don't have any pics unfortunately......
Good Luck
K
Just my two-pennies..........
Oh, one draw back might be the **** that comes with it - a pretty generic 5-spd ****. Hurst has some others you can use and I wrote a little blurb on the message boards about how I installed a NOS Leather-covered GM **** onto this shifter as well - here's the link, FYI:
https://www.thirdgen.org/techbb2/sho...highlight=****
Thought the admins might want it as a "How-To" also but I don't have any pics unfortunately......
Good Luck
K
hmm....
ok well i get that alot of people like the pro 5.0 here a question. when i look it up under google i get a return for a "gold" version but when i looked farther into it i found that the "gold" version is cheaper than the normal version. Any reason for that? the gold looks pretty but is it worth it to spend the extra 10-20 bucks for the non-gold version?
Trending Topics
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Re: hmm....
Originally posted by 87t-5.0transam
ok well i get that alot of people like the pro 5.0 here a question. when i look it up under google i get a return for a "gold" version but when i looked farther into it i found that the "gold" version is cheaper than the normal version. Any reason for that? the gold looks pretty but is it worth it to spend the extra 10-20 bucks for the non-gold version?
ok well i get that alot of people like the pro 5.0 here a question. when i look it up under google i get a return for a "gold" version but when i looked farther into it i found that the "gold" version is cheaper than the normal version. Any reason for that? the gold looks pretty but is it worth it to spend the extra 10-20 bucks for the non-gold version?
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 4,211
Likes: 3
From: GO PACK GO
Car: 83Z28 HO
Engine: Magnacharged Dart Little M 408
Transmission: G Force 5 speed
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/Detroit Trutrac
Interesting....I didn't know there was a gold and non-gold version.
I know the handle has a goldish tint to it, but it's a real thin coat and you can tell it's really steel. AFAIK - they're all the same as mine.....
I know the handle has a goldish tint to it, but it's a real thin coat and you can tell it's really steel. AFAIK - they're all the same as mine.....
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 4,211
Likes: 3
From: GO PACK GO
Car: 83Z28 HO
Engine: Magnacharged Dart Little M 408
Transmission: G Force 5 speed
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/Detroit Trutrac
Wow - Shifty and i responded at the same time!!! Mine looks like the one above....
See, the handle's gold tinted. Not the base. Can't see that anyway once it's installed w/the boot..
See, the handle's gold tinted. Not the base. Can't see that anyway once it's installed w/the boot..
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by Confuzed1
Wow - Shifty and i responded at the same time!!! Mine looks like the one above....
See, the handle's gold tinted. Not the base. Can't see that anyway once it's installed w/the boot..
Wow - Shifty and i responded at the same time!!! Mine looks like the one above....
See, the handle's gold tinted. Not the base. Can't see that anyway once it's installed w/the boot..
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 1
From: Roscoe, IL
Car: 1991 Trans Am
Engine: LQ4
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.70
where to get the pro 5.0?
thunder racing=$179.99
thirdgen resource=$189.00
hawks=$199.99
https://acorn.he.net/~pro50/enter.html=$209.99
who else has em?
thunder racing=$179.99
thirdgen resource=$189.00
hawks=$199.99
https://acorn.he.net/~pro50/enter.html=$209.99
who else has em?
Last edited by KagA152; Jan 8, 2004 at 10:57 PM.
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,132
Likes: 1
From: Grand Island, NY
Car: 1990 Formula
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: WC T5
Originally posted by KagA152
where to get the pro 5.0?
who else has em?
where to get the pro 5.0?
who else has em?
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Jegs and summit sell them as well. I think they sell them for right around the dsame prices as listed above. I would wait till thunder racing has a sale. They are a site sponser and I got mine for $150 brand new.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 4,211
Likes: 3
From: GO PACK GO
Car: 83Z28 HO
Engine: Magnacharged Dart Little M 408
Transmission: G Force 5 speed
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/Detroit Trutrac
Originally posted by ShiftyCapone
Yea you can't see it but it is so much beafier than the other ones out there on the market. It does have a goldesh hue to the shaft but the rest is billet aluminum. This is the way it only comes for the T5.
Yea you can't see it but it is so much beafier than the other ones out there on the market. It does have a goldesh hue to the shaft but the rest is billet aluminum. This is the way it only comes for the T5.
G Force only carried the Pro 5.0 shifters because they deal with Mustangs alot. That's how I ended up with mine.
But I'd say you can't go wrong between the Hurst and 5.0.....
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 2
From: Prince George, BC, Canada
Car: 89 GTA
Engine: 5.7L Supercharged
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" 3.70
Well I had a B&M Ripper for the t-5 when it was in and now I have the Pro 5.0 for the t-56 trans and I have to say I liked the B&M much better. Lets just say I never missed a shift with the B&M even power shifting and now with the Pro 5.0 I don't do so well, of course this is on two completely different transmissions but hey take it for what's it worth. Also don't let that shift mechanism talk fool you like it did me, there's no difference between that and any other good shifter. One other thing you might want to think about is the stick on the B&M is a nice aluminum that is made to be seen compared to the ugly gold stick that's on the Pro 5.0 that they want you to cover up with the boot like they do in the mustangs.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
From: Pueblo Co
Car: 1989 C4
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 307
I like the OEM shifter, works just fine! 
Actually I had a Pro 5.0 dident like it shiped it back and got a poly body mount kit for my Malibu.

Actually I had a Pro 5.0 dident like it shiped it back and got a poly body mount kit for my Malibu.
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,521
Likes: 91
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Pro 5.0s are overrated in my opinion.
Hurst Comp Plus is the way to go; I had one and it was perfect.
Hurst Comp Plus is the way to go; I had one and it was perfect.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 4,211
Likes: 3
From: GO PACK GO
Car: 83Z28 HO
Engine: Magnacharged Dart Little M 408
Transmission: G Force 5 speed
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" w/Detroit Trutrac
The proof is in the reading....do a search. I think you'll find the Pro 5.0 is liked by many here, along with the Hurst.
cool
i want to thank everyone for their input. It is greatly appreciated, i guess first ill say is that the only reason i mentioned a gold/ non-gold version is because when i did the search under google it came back with that. It's a mustang site, knowing that both f-body's and stangs use t-5's i decided to check it out. I wanted to read up more about it other than the manufacturers site. This site is hosted by yahoo so i figured there might have been a feedback area but their isnt but it intrigued me to see "gold" within the headlines.
http://shop.store.yahoo.com/mustangw...towergold.html
Figures that a mustang website would be ignorant enough to have something like that.(Not to offend any pony loving freaks out there....
) I double checked the manufacturer's site and it said nothing about a "gold" version. Within their product catalog it's not there. So....... either this mustangweekly site is trying to pull one over on unsuspecting customers or pro-50 doesnt know how to update their site. Personally im gonna go for the "gimmick" vote. Well thanks again ill search around for a good price and check it out considering that alot more of you voted the 5.0 is the best. Well i guess last thing would be is if any of you have had experience with momo ***** and boots and would you recommend them. I want something that is blue leather and that will match my car's color as much as possible. I'm changing the interior around to be a black/blue trim and i didnt know if you guys liked them or not. well thanks again
jon
http://shop.store.yahoo.com/mustangw...towergold.html
Figures that a mustang website would be ignorant enough to have something like that.(Not to offend any pony loving freaks out there....
) I double checked the manufacturer's site and it said nothing about a "gold" version. Within their product catalog it's not there. So....... either this mustangweekly site is trying to pull one over on unsuspecting customers or pro-50 doesnt know how to update their site. Personally im gonna go for the "gimmick" vote. Well thanks again ill search around for a good price and check it out considering that alot more of you voted the 5.0 is the best. Well i guess last thing would be is if any of you have had experience with momo ***** and boots and would you recommend them. I want something that is blue leather and that will match my car's color as much as possible. I'm changing the interior around to be a black/blue trim and i didnt know if you guys liked them or not. well thanks againjon
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Re: cool
Originally posted by 87t-5.0transam
Well i guess last thing would be is if any of you have had experience with momo ***** and boots and would you recommend them.
jon
Well i guess last thing would be is if any of you have had experience with momo ***** and boots and would you recommend them.
jon
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 13,753
Likes: 560
From: Cincinnati, OH
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
here is another pic with the stock **** back on but this is with the pro 5.0. It is much easier on the eye and feels a lot nicer as well. after I cut the shaft down I can put the momo klnob back on and it will look amazing.
Supreme Member

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
From: Pueblo Co
Car: 1989 C4
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 307
Originally posted by KagA152
why didnt you like it?
why didnt you like it?
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: '86 Camaro, '02 WRX, '87 K5, '67
Engine: 350 TPI, 2.0turbo, 383 in the works, 289-4BBL, 232, A-head 4-cylinder
Transmission: T56, 5-speed, 700R4, C4, T176, semi-auto 2-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73, 3.90, 4.88, 3.55, 3.54, 7.00
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but I can't see anyone not liking the Pro 5.0. I've run them on two different cars now, and can't say enough nice things about them. I have never missed a gear with the Pro 5.0, but I missed plenty with the stock shifter, casuing me to blow 2nd gear in my 5.0 Mustang. When it came time to select a shifter for my T56 swap there was no question about which one to get. I was so pleased that they made one for the T56, because I was afraid that I'd have to run another shifter, thinking that Pro 5.0 was a Mustang only deal.
I drive the snot out of my cars too, and not just fast powershifts through the gears like in drag racing, but also high RPM heel/toe downshifting for autocross. The Pro 5.0 has never let me down.
I drive the snot out of my cars too, and not just fast powershifts through the gears like in drag racing, but also high RPM heel/toe downshifting for autocross. The Pro 5.0 has never let me down.
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,521
Likes: 91
From: Aridzona
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Originally posted by TKOPerformance
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but I can't see anyone not liking the Pro 5.0.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, but I can't see anyone not liking the Pro 5.0.
Driving a T56 Pro 5.0 back to back w/ a T5 Hurst Comp Plus, I feel that the Pro is vague, and doesn't give any more accurate shifts. With the Hurst, I knew what gear I was in, with the Pro 5.0, I had to rock it left/right in the gate to be sure.
Supreme Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,391
Likes: 1
From: Newark, DE
Car: '86 Camaro, '02 WRX, '87 K5, '67
Engine: 350 TPI, 2.0turbo, 383 in the works, 289-4BBL, 232, A-head 4-cylinder
Transmission: T56, 5-speed, 700R4, C4, T176, semi-auto 2-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73, 3.90, 4.88, 3.55, 3.54, 7.00
The point about the stick attachment is valid, though I've never had the stick loosen up on me, even after many miles of hard use.
I certainly don't consider the shifter vague at all. The stock shifter was vague. Actually, that's putting it mildly. The stock shifter felt like a twig in a bowl of noodles. The way that the shifter is preloaded to the center gate never has me wondering what gear I'm in.
All things considered it really depends on your driving technique. I find the more I think about what I'm doing the worse my shifts are. I'm a lot better if I just drive intuitively and just do it, rather than thinking about how to do it.
I certainly don't consider the shifter vague at all. The stock shifter was vague. Actually, that's putting it mildly. The stock shifter felt like a twig in a bowl of noodles. The way that the shifter is preloaded to the center gate never has me wondering what gear I'm in.
All things considered it really depends on your driving technique. I find the more I think about what I'm doing the worse my shifts are. I'm a lot better if I just drive intuitively and just do it, rather than thinking about how to do it.
The stock shifter was vague. Actually, that's putting it mildly. The stock shifter felt like a twig in a bowl of noodles.
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Car: 85 Trans Am
Engine: SBC
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: Moser/Strange 9"
I had the B&M ripper in mine till i swtiched to an auto and i have nothing but good things to say about it. Of course I havent tried any others besides the stock shifter which really sucks *****> i have the B&M for sale if anyones interested, just pm me
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: ME.
Car: 1991 Z-28
Engine: TPI
Transmission: 5-speed Rear:3.73
well Im ready to buy a shifter...I was pretty set on the pro5.0
untill I read this thread
now Im seeing people say that the Hurst Comp Plus is the way to go,I know most people have only bought one or the other so its hard for an owner of Hurst to say that Pro 5 is the way to go when they only know the Hurst
and the same with Pro 5 owners but daaaamn this is getting harder to deside,does anyone have a pic of the Hurst Comp shifter??? Id like to compair the two thanks for any help!
untill I read this thread
now Im seeing people say that the Hurst Comp Plus is the way to go,I know most people have only bought one or the other so its hard for an owner of Hurst to say that Pro 5 is the way to go when they only know the Hurstand the same with Pro 5 owners but daaaamn this is getting harder to deside,does anyone have a pic of the Hurst Comp shifter??? Id like to compair the two thanks for any help!
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Oakville, Ct
Car: 1991Firebird T/A
Engine: 350
Transmission: Modified Viper t-56
Axle/Gears: dana 44, 3.55
i just chopped 4" out of my shifter... everyone that has driven my car alwasy asks what shifter is in it... bangs gears no problem for me!
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: Clifton, NJ
Car: 84 Trans Am
Engine: 350
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 9in 4.30's
Originally posted by fb305svs
i just chopped 4" out of my shifter... everyone that has driven my car alwasy asks what shifter is in it... bangs gears no problem for me!
i just chopped 4" out of my shifter... everyone that has driven my car alwasy asks what shifter is in it... bangs gears no problem for me!
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Oakville, Ct
Car: 1991Firebird T/A
Engine: 350
Transmission: Modified Viper t-56
Axle/Gears: dana 44, 3.55
cutting 4in off the top of your shifter doesnt make it a short shifter..it just makes it shorter...a short throw shifter actually makes the distance you move your hand from first to second shorter.
i don't know why you insist on splitting hairs here- i never said it was better than an aftermarket one, or whatever... i just said i did it, and like it, and am pleased with the way it is. I never made any claims about it being a short shifter, not sure where your getting off on that

secondly i didn't just "cut off the top of the stick" - i took out a center section.

Anyways, for making a throw shorter, shortening the stick also makes the shift shorter... not nearly as much, obviously, as an aftermarket one, but its still a pretty short throw... i drove another camaro with a pro 5.0 in it, and i didn't really like it all that much...
If you remember back to math class, the bigger the radius of a circle, the larger the circumferance...
this applies to arcs as well. so when you reduce the distance to the pivot point, you reduce the distance to trravel the same amount of degree's at the top. Hence, the shifter THROW is shorter than before...
Never time think before you speak... everyone would appreciate a thoughtful responce, not a stupid one to try start and arguement... isn't there enough of that already?
So, cliff notes...
- 84 HO needs to revisit math class
- i didn't make any of the claims 84 HO assumed about calling it a short throw shifter
- It actually does have a shorter throw distance than stock (quite a bit actually) but OBVIOUSLY its not a short or good as a purpose built aftermarket one.
Thanks,
Steve
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: Clifton, NJ
Car: 84 Trans Am
Engine: 350
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 9in 4.30's
Originally posted by fb305svs
i don't know why you insist on splitting hairs here- i never said it was better than an aftermarket one, or whatever... i just said i did it, and like it, and am pleased with the way it is. I never made any claims about it being a short shifter, not sure where your getting off on that
secondly i didn't just "cut off the top of the stick" - i took out a center section.
Anyways, for making a throw shorter, shortening the stick also makes the shift shorter... not nearly as much, obviously, as an aftermarket one, but its still a pretty short throw... i drove another camaro with a pro 5.0 in it, and i didn't really like it all that much...
If you remember back to math class, the bigger the radius of a circle, the larger the circumferance...
this applies to arcs as well. so when you reduce the distance to the pivot point, you reduce the distance to trravel the same amount of degree's at the top. Hence, the shifter THROW is shorter than before...
Never time think before you speak... everyone would appreciate a thoughtful responce, not a stupid one to try start and arguement... isn't there enough of that already?
So, cliff notes...
- 84 HO needs to revisit math class
- i didn't make any of the claims 84 HO assumed about calling it a short throw shifter
- It actually does have a shorter throw distance than stock (quite a bit actually) but OBVIOUSLY its not a short or good as a purpose built aftermarket one.
Thanks,
Steve
i don't know why you insist on splitting hairs here- i never said it was better than an aftermarket one, or whatever... i just said i did it, and like it, and am pleased with the way it is. I never made any claims about it being a short shifter, not sure where your getting off on that

secondly i didn't just "cut off the top of the stick" - i took out a center section.

Anyways, for making a throw shorter, shortening the stick also makes the shift shorter... not nearly as much, obviously, as an aftermarket one, but its still a pretty short throw... i drove another camaro with a pro 5.0 in it, and i didn't really like it all that much...
If you remember back to math class, the bigger the radius of a circle, the larger the circumferance...
this applies to arcs as well. so when you reduce the distance to the pivot point, you reduce the distance to trravel the same amount of degree's at the top. Hence, the shifter THROW is shorter than before...
Never time think before you speak... everyone would appreciate a thoughtful responce, not a stupid one to try start and arguement... isn't there enough of that already?
So, cliff notes...
- 84 HO needs to revisit math class
- i didn't make any of the claims 84 HO assumed about calling it a short throw shifter
- It actually does have a shorter throw distance than stock (quite a bit actually) but OBVIOUSLY its not a short or good as a purpose built aftermarket one.
Thanks,
Steve
sorry. i was not trying start a argument. thanks for correcting me i just drew an arc and realized i was wrong. i dont need to revisit mathclass just pay more attention.
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
From: ME.
Car: 1991 Z-28
Engine: TPI
Transmission: 5-speed Rear:3.73
SORRY for all the questions but I want the right shifter for my car
hey guys i got another question... whats the difference between the Hurst "new billet plus" and the old version Hurst "Comp Plus"????
ALSO.....is the Pro5.0 shorter in height than the stock shifter and if so how much shorter is the pro 5.0 than stock????
thanks ....
hey guys i got another question... whats the difference between the Hurst "new billet plus" and the old version Hurst "Comp Plus"????

ALSO.....is the Pro5.0 shorter in height than the stock shifter and if so how much shorter is the pro 5.0 than stock????
thanks ....
Last edited by Z dude; Jan 19, 2004 at 08:24 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Oakville, Ct
Car: 1991Firebird T/A
Engine: 350
Transmission: Modified Viper t-56
Axle/Gears: dana 44, 3.55
no problem 84... 
zdude- i think i can answer the second question you have to some point, anything is shorter than the stock one lol...

zdude- i think i can answer the second question you have to some point, anything is shorter than the stock one lol...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dhonda200
Transmissions and Drivetrain
6
Aug 11, 2015 11:50 PM









