tell me what you think
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: west michigan
Car: 89 RS
Engine: lo3
Transmission: 700R4 w/ B&M shift improver
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt posi
tell me what you think
I've always liked how cars looked with bigger rims in the back then up front. I photoshopped this up earlier. Its got the equivalent of 15's up front and 17's in the rear. Let me know what you think. I couldnt get the pic to upload as an attatchment so its linked to my cardomain site.
-chillen

(sorry shifty, stole your car, hope you dont mind
)
-chillen

(sorry shifty, stole your car, hope you dont mind
) Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: west michigan
Car: 89 RS
Engine: lo3
Transmission: 700R4 w/ B&M shift improver
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt posi
maybe i'll try to pshop a 16, but i thought 16-17 wouldnt be enough to really notice it.
stock 89rs rims are 15's right? (cars in stoarage, cant check)
-chillen
stock 89rs rims are 15's right? (cars in stoarage, cant check)
-chillen
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: west michigan
Car: 89 RS
Engine: lo3
Transmission: 700R4 w/ B&M shift improver
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt posi
Originally posted by TraviZ28
Nice photoshop work by the way.
Nice photoshop work by the way.
Well, i re-did it with 16's up front. I actually can still see the difference. Maybe this is the way to go.
-chillen
terrible idea... ruins the look of the car as the body isn't built for it unlike a c5/c6 where the wheel area is designed to keep it in proportion.
to each their own though, it's your car.
to each their own though, it's your car.
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,494
Likes: 0
From: Markham
Car: 1990 Camaro
Engine: 355ci
Transmission: TKO-600 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10 bolt
would look awful.
The only sports cars that have that are ones designed to have it, hence they have a larger wheel well in the back that looks like its designed to have it. Third gens are not like that. If you really want that stance id sugest 15" rims all around with fat tires on the back and lower profile tires on the front.
The only sports cars that have that are ones designed to have it, hence they have a larger wheel well in the back that looks like its designed to have it. Third gens are not like that. If you really want that stance id sugest 15" rims all around with fat tires on the back and lower profile tires on the front.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: west michigan
Car: 89 RS
Engine: lo3
Transmission: 700R4 w/ B&M shift improver
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt posi
wow, i cant believe i'm the only one who likes how this looks? Its not like i'm going for a funny carish stance, i'd still like it to be level, i just like how it looks with the bigger rim out back. well, i guess i'll throw the idea around a little bit more, still got till next winter till i buy rims so at least ive got plenty of time to think about it.
-chillen
-chillen
if u're gonna go with different sizes front to back, i'd agree that the wheels shud stay the same size, but use taller tires in the back. Maybe like 26" in the front n' 28" in the back or something... kinda like a drag set-up i guess. But as far as different size wheels, i dun think it looks too flattering.
Thread Starter
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: west michigan
Car: 89 RS
Engine: lo3
Transmission: 700R4 w/ B&M shift improver
Axle/Gears: 3.27 9-bolt posi
yeah, i got one not bad.
got a link to the purple car you're talking about? i searchd offset wheels, almost everything was about spacers and 4th gen rears. Did find some helpful stuff though.
-chillen
got a link to the purple car you're talking about? i searchd offset wheels, almost everything was about spacers and 4th gen rears. Did find some helpful stuff though.
-chillen



