TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

stock heads, stock cam, stock intake, 13.15

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 07:08 PM
  #1  
GTA matt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 769
Likes: 51
From: Zebulon, nc
Car: 1990 GTA/1989 Iroc
Engine: L98/383
Transmission: 700r4/t56 magnum
Axle/Gears: 9"
stock heads, stock cam, stock intake, 13.15

Went to the track today as i had posted in my sig. Ran a 13.15 @ 102.78. The track was so cold that i couldn't hook up at all. I was launching it at idle and still wheel hopping like crazy. It may be a little faster once warmer weather hits. The car still has stock heads, cam and intake.... the only mod was that i ground down the ridges behind the TB. Other mods are listed in my sig.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 08:04 PM
  #2  
GTA matt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 769
Likes: 51
From: Zebulon, nc
Car: 1990 GTA/1989 Iroc
Engine: L98/383
Transmission: 700r4/t56 magnum
Axle/Gears: 9"


timeslips, nice light, huh? Wheel hopped bad on that run.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 08:07 PM
  #3  
brutalform's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,387
Likes: 2
With a 100 hp shot?
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 08:11 PM
  #4  
GTA matt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 769
Likes: 51
From: Zebulon, nc
Car: 1990 GTA/1989 Iroc
Engine: L98/383
Transmission: 700r4/t56 magnum
Axle/Gears: 9"
nope. all motor.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 08:14 PM
  #5  
Floor guy's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
From: Nanticoke, Pa
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 406 CI
Transmission: Pete K 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:55
Re: stock heads, stock cam, stock intake, 13.15

Originally posted by GTA matt
Went to the track today as i had posted in my sig. Ran a 13.15 @ 102.78. The track was so cold that i couldn't hook up at all. I was launching it at idle and still wheel hopping like crazy. It may be a little faster once warmer weather hits. The car still has stock heads, cam and intake.... the only mod was that i ground down the ridges behind the TB. Other mods are listed in my sig.

Wow!!!! Amazing et's for the minimal mods.
Hats off to you, my friend.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 08:16 PM
  #6  
GTA matt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 769
Likes: 51
From: Zebulon, nc
Car: 1990 GTA/1989 Iroc
Engine: L98/383
Transmission: 700r4/t56 magnum
Axle/Gears: 9"
Originally posted by brutalform
With a 100 hp shot?
A few guys from TGO were there today. Camaro05 and dennis91rs can vouch for my mods/times.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 09:06 PM
  #7  
gmgod's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,176
Likes: 0
From: Springfield, MO
Car: 92 T/A VERT
Engine: LB9
Transmission: AUTO
Axle/Gears: 7.5 / 3.42's
How much weight have you taken out of the car?
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 09:06 PM
  #8  
SLP IROC-Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 5
From: Salem, NH
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10 Bolt
excellent times!
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 09:08 PM
  #9  
GTA matt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 769
Likes: 51
From: Zebulon, nc
Car: 1990 GTA/1989 Iroc
Engine: L98/383
Transmission: 700r4/t56 magnum
Axle/Gears: 9"
Originally posted by gmgod
How much weight have you taken out of the car?
Actually, i did my first wheight reduction last night. i removed the spare tire and CO2 canister and jack. about 30 pounds. the car weighs 3700 with me in it. i only weigh 170, so.....
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 09:33 PM
  #10  
brutalform's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,387
Likes: 2
3700 lbs to boot. My old combo 350, ZZ-9, heads , intake, went 13.00s, at 3500lbs. I must have done somthing wrong.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 09:37 PM
  #11  
Floor guy's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
From: Nanticoke, Pa
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 406 CI
Transmission: Pete K 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:55
Originally posted by brutalform
3700 lbs to boot. My old combo 350, ZZ-9, heads , intake, went 13.00s, at 3500lbs. I must have done somthing wrong.
Hey Brutalform,
This is an excellent forum for info on quick combos. Pay attention, you can learn from these guys. Keep an open mind, maybe we can both learn something.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 09:41 PM
  #12  
GTA matt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 769
Likes: 51
From: Zebulon, nc
Car: 1990 GTA/1989 Iroc
Engine: L98/383
Transmission: 700r4/t56 magnum
Axle/Gears: 9"
Originally posted by brutalform
3700 lbs to boot. My old combo 350, ZZ-9, heads , intake, went 13.00s, at 3500lbs. I must have done somthing wrong.
yeah, it would be cool to find a bare bones camaro with manual windows/locks/seats,ect, and drop my motor into. they weigh a few hundred pounds less. it would definitely be in the 12's then! I was actually hoping to run 12's today, but i guess i will have to wait for my torque converter to get here.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 09:47 PM
  #13  
Floor guy's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
From: Nanticoke, Pa
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: 406 CI
Transmission: Pete K 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:55
If traction was an issue today, you may have a twelve sec combo already. The right converter could get you into the mid 12's. My buddy shaved a lot of weight by swapping in manual windows and locks. Also converted to s-10 manual steering. These mods plus padding under carpet removal, sway bars removed etc was worth 1/2 a second when all was said and done. Total cost to do was less than $60 at the local "pick a part". I would not be suprised if low 12's is a realistic goal considering the converter, traction, and some weight loss.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 10:02 PM
  #14  
GTA matt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 769
Likes: 51
From: Zebulon, nc
Car: 1990 GTA/1989 Iroc
Engine: L98/383
Transmission: 700r4/t56 magnum
Axle/Gears: 9"
Yeah, but im not a big fan of wieght loss. I believe in running what you drive in with. You should have seen the r i c e r section at the track today. looked like a swap meet! seats, tires, door panels, a full exaust system on the ground! While i agree that the car would go faster if i removed some stuff, to me thats cheating. Since my car is a GTA that means it comes fully loaded with everything, if i removed that stuff then it wouldn't be a GTA anymore. It's not my daily driver but i do enjoy a little comfort when i take it for cruises.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 10:39 PM
  #15  
brutalform's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,387
Likes: 2
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2005 | 11:38 PM
  #16  
GTA matt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 769
Likes: 51
From: Zebulon, nc
Car: 1990 GTA/1989 Iroc
Engine: L98/383
Transmission: 700r4/t56 magnum
Axle/Gears: 9"
Originally posted by brutalform
What the BS flag all about. thats why I posted pics of the timeslips and motor. I figured everyone on here would think it was pretty cool to get a TPI car to run low 13's with only bolt ons.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 03:09 AM
  #17  
MdFormula350's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 11,634
Likes: 3
From: Maryland; USA
nice, i just need more traction, more timing, and tuning.

i hope to get down to mid 13s soon.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 05:39 AM
  #18  
TunedPort 335's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 1
From: Paxton, MA
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28
Engine: 335 TPI Stroker
Transmission: Tremec TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt / 3.42
that is insanely awesome
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 07:32 AM
  #19  
Chrome's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Shelbyville, IN
Car: 92' RS Camaro
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Nice times, how cold was the air that night?? I'm sure thay had a /lot/ to do with it being up in Maryland. Coldddddddddddddddddd hehe. Best Power Adder you can do is make a run in 30deg weather vs 70deg, automatic HP Adder .

I've been told the 3.73 gears are too much for TPI, you may be convincing me to go that route w/ my car. Everybody says 3.42 and any more is too much, You have a pretty good running combo w/ those 3.73s!!! Let me know your thoughts on how those gears run!?!?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 09:37 AM
  #20  
Guest
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Am I the only one who doesnt think a 1.85 60' is that bad?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 11:23 AM
  #21  
CHEVY_EATER's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh,NY
Car: 93 Mustang GT
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-5
Originally posted by madmax
Am I the only one who doesnt think a 1.85 60' is that bad?
Yea..lol...spinning bad! I was thinking like 2.3 is spinning bad!! A 1.8x is damn good. Thats a low trap speed for the ET though....
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 11:33 AM
  #22  
1MeanZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,984
Likes: 37
From: North Central Indiana
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44 IRS
the reason people have thrown the BS flag, is because you are running about .5 sec too fast for the mods you have. and your trap speed is almost that of an LS1 car. personally i am even more skeptical about this than i am about TunedPort335 running 13.4, but at least he has a reasonable trap speed and he is runnin slicks and cuts a hell of a 60' time.

I've said it before and i will say it again, if you can run a bottom 13 with exhaust, gears, and roller rockers, then how come every other L98 car out there is doin darn good to run low 14s stock? I assume you also did this with stock intake ducting? The stock intake ducting is horrible on a TA or 'bird.

I just have a hard time buying some of these times, because all the TPI cars i see run in real life are no where close to these times. I dont want to be rude and just flat out call people liars, but i'm not really sure i believe these times from such a stock GTA. you can make excuses until you are blue in the face trying to validate your calims, but the bottom line is, when compared to other cars with mods, your claims dont add up.

you are running the same times as a 6speed LS1 car in a 3700lb GTA with automatic tranny and exhaust and gears, lets get real here.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 11:51 AM
  #23  
GTA matt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 769
Likes: 51
From: Zebulon, nc
Car: 1990 GTA/1989 Iroc
Engine: L98/383
Transmission: 700r4/t56 magnum
Axle/Gears: 9"
CHROME- about the 3.73's, it took me a long time to get the courage to move to them because of every thing i have heard. They picked me up at least 2 tenths, but my MPH stayed the exact same. 1/8 MPH was faster, but TPI loses wind up top.

1mean z- yes i understand why people are skeptical, camaro05 was at the track. He had similar mods, even had SLP runners and was happy to run a 13.9. I honestly couldn't tell you why mine was so much faster. I have just been adding a few mods at a time and then running it to see improvement. I would brag and say it was driver skill but it doesn't take a rocket scientist to drive an automatic.

The intake ducting is stock. i removed the factory air canister and put a large K&N cone filter off a GMC Envoy on the end.

MIR is a good track, but i was still that much faster then camaro05 in the same conditions.

If you all want pictures of anything on the car you are curious about, just let me know, i will post them. I'm not trying to hide anything, i just want to show what can be done.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 11:56 AM
  #24  
TPIMarow6.6's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
Originally posted by CHEVY_EATER
Yea..lol...spinning bad! I was thinking like 2.3 is spinning bad!! A 1.8x is damn good. Thats a low trap speed for the ET though....
better 60ft =lower the trap speed.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 11:59 AM
  #25  
CHEVY_EATER's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh,NY
Car: 93 Mustang GT
Engine: 5.0
Transmission: T-5
Well, you would have to be making some serious HP to run that time and ET if your car weighs 3700lbs. My friends 2000 SS weighs 3565 with him in it, and it ran 13.8@103 stock and had around 305 rwhp stock. With 341rwhp he was running a 13.20@108. Something just does not add up. Either the car is WAY lighter than you think...or it has something else under the hood you do not know about.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 12:06 PM
  #26  
TPIMarow6.6's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 967
Likes: 0
From: Plattsburgh NY
Car: 85 Camaro Z-28
Engine: 6.6
Transmission: 5-speed
Originally posted by CHEVY_EATER
Well, you would have to be making some serious HP to run that time and ET if your car weighs 3700lbs. My friends 2000 SS weighs 3565 with him in it, and it ran 13.8@103 stock and had around 305 rwhp stock. With 341rwhp he was running a 13.20@108. Something just does not add up. Either the car is WAY lighter than you think...or it has something else under the hood you do not know about.
Correct, id do a compression test. run the castings on the block/heads anything to see if its actually stock. if it is damn congrats, i need to race mine in 30 degree weather id probably run mid 11's.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 12:18 PM
  #27  
Chrome's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Shelbyville, IN
Car: 92' RS Camaro
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
That 60ft helped him out alot. I imagine to hit that you had stickies on or some damn good drag radials!
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 12:33 PM
  #28  
8Mike9's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 5,183
Likes: 42
From: Oakdale, Ca
Car: 89 IrocZ
Engine: L98-ish
Transmission: 700R4
I don't understand the skeptism for those who've been around tgo for some time....there's a handful of guys that have '90-'92's SD L98's running mid 13's through factory exhaust...pretty much untouched motors.

For years we've called them "Factory Freaks"...could be Matt has one...add headers and 1.6 RR's,plus his other mods, and if he had one of those mid-13 factory cars, he'd easily free up some more ponies...coupled with the cool weather, low 13's would be doable.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 12:48 PM
  #29  
brutalform's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,387
Likes: 2
I dont for one minute doubt that you ran that number. But with stock everything, come on! Matt, how long have you owned the car? Maybe the previous owner did some mods that you are unaware of. I saw the slips and believe you ran the times, but just cant swallow the fact it ran those times with the stuff you dont have. The B/S flag was not meant as an insult. I believe you are a great driver and such, but, like I said, maybe you have somthing you dont know about. Just like the guy who buys a car, and thinks its a 305, and turns out to be a 350. I have a large stroker, and I can tell the world its a 350, if I wish. Im not saying you are lying, but you might have some things done you are unaware of.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 02:01 PM
  #30  
smithtc's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
The Speed Density cars run a bit faster stock than the MAF cars...

My car seems right in line with his...a bit slower, though. Add 20 mph from 8th to qtr and there is the 100+ mph potential with mine. If an LS1 car is running that slow, somethings wrong with it or the driver. Stock LS1s in my area run closer to 85mph in the 8th...about 105+ in the qtr...and I beat them to the 8th mile more times than not...just feel slow once they pass me (after the finish line).

I'd say his gear ratio helps out that mid range power and 60' quite a bit.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 04:01 PM
  #31  
])ragonbane's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
Car: 1992 25th Anniversary Z28
Engine: 350 B2L
Transmission: 700R4
Mine ran a 13.8 @ 99 with only a cat-back, 160° thermostat, K&N's, and a 176° fan switch.

The car is a fully optioned 92 Z28(350), no weight reduction, 100 lbs of audio equipment, and me (250 lbs) with 3/4 tank of gas.

I believe that the car with me weighs in at about 3800.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 04:59 PM
  #32  
SLP IROC-Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 5
From: Salem, NH
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10 Bolt
my 305TPI 5spd car ran 13.9 @ 97 with only a 2.02 60ft back in 02 with the stock 3.08s in it on 205/75/15s. lots of people gave me **** about it, i had headers, off road y, cat back, ported plenum, ac delete, emissions delete, K&Ns. the car weighed 3350 with me in it, this however was in 35* air. the car trapped 1-1.5mph slower during the summer so thats not an extreme difference.


so in essence i wouldnt worry about what anyone has to say.


and meanZ what is so hard to believe about tunedport335s car?
i cant wait to see what people say when he hits 12s.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 05:31 PM
  #33  
1MeanZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,984
Likes: 37
From: North Central Indiana
Car: 86 IROC
Engine: 383
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44 IRS
I do believe it is possible that TunedPort335 ran 13.4. He has bone stock heads and intake, which made the ET seem a bit far fetched, but if you look at his trap speed and 60' times, you can see how he did it, his car is a rocket out of the hole, plain and simple.

You guys can chit chat on here all you want about internet times. I and many others on here just flat out dont believe you. Think and say about me what you wish, you all are fools for entertaining these kinds of claims. Get a life and move on, anyone with a brain knows a stock GTA with boltons cant go low 13s. Pardon me while I step out of this thread for good and back into reality.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 05:35 PM
  #34  
GTA matt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 769
Likes: 51
From: Zebulon, nc
Car: 1990 GTA/1989 Iroc
Engine: L98/383
Transmission: 700r4/t56 magnum
Axle/Gears: 9"
I've had the car for 2 1/2 years now. An old guy had it before me, just drove it to church on sundays or something like that. it only had 50k on it when I bought it. I can tell you its the original motor. I could tell the intake runners had never been off when i replaced the lower intake gasket a year ago.

I've been slowly modding it since i got it. Never ran it bone stock, but with the chip(off the shelf hypertec), TB airfoil and stock replacement K&N it ran 14.02. Since then, each mod i've done has netted about a tenth. I'm actually suprised at how well bolt ons work. I would have never believed manufacturers claims until i started modding my car and seeing results.

I appreciate all the positive feedback and will keep everyone posted when i try to go 12's when i put the converter in and get better traction.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 05:37 PM
  #35  
SLP IROC-Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 5
From: Salem, NH
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10 Bolt
sorry but i will entertain what i know my car has ran, and chris's aka tunedport335, because i was at the track when he ran 13.4 and i am a good friend of his.


there is always some one faster.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 05:49 PM
  #36  
mettalicirocz's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: bryan ohio
Car: 1986 camaro, 1993 nissan altima(winter beater, 1992 mustang (summer daily driver)
Engine: 350tpi
Transmission: 700r4 with shift kit
SLP IROCZ what are you arguing for meanz said he beleived 335s time by stating that by looking at the 60ft and trap you can see hows hes pulling the et he his but he simly dont believe this other claim of 13's on a stock internal bolt on 350, I myslef have witnnessed a number of 350 third gens with bolt ons being lucky to throw down a mid 14, so I myslef am also skeptical.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 06:07 PM
  #37  
SLP IROC-Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,866
Likes: 5
From: Salem, NH
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10 Bolt
Originally posted by mettalicirocz
SLP IROCZ what are you arguing for meanz said he beleived 335s time by stating that by looking at the 60ft and trap you can see hows hes pulling the et he his but he simly dont believe this other claim of 13's on a stock internal bolt on 350, I myslef have witnnessed a number of 350 third gens with bolt ons being lucky to throw down a mid 14, so I myslef am also skeptical.
im defending myself because of this:

You guys can chit chat on here all you want about internet times. I and many others on here just flat out dont believe you. Think and say about me what you wish, you all are fools for entertaining these kinds of claims. Get a life and move on, anyone with a brain knows a stock GTA with boltons cant go low 13s. Pardon me while I step out of this thread for good and back into reality.
i simply said i will stick up for my car and chris's beacuse i know the facts. i was not arguing further, i think i made sense by saying i will only stick up for what i know. obv i dont know anythin about matts car and was simply being nice by saying "great times" in my original post, am i skeptical, yep, could he be lying yep. do i care? no i dont, its the internet, if someone wnats to lie or whatever about ETs and MPHs on a message board then thats good for them, it doesnt bother me, again i was being polite by saying way to go.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 06:17 PM
  #38  
Chrome's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Shelbyville, IN
Car: 92' RS Camaro
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
I try to give people the benefit of the doubt and at least consider peoples claims when I see them even if they seem a stretch. True some people's are just ridiculous and like ok sure, but others are borderline.

I honestly 90% believe GTA matt's claim's mostly because he went to the trouble of posting the timeslips, pictures, whatnot. If he would go to that much trouble to try to pass a false claim, then he obviously is a tard.


Last edited by Chrome; Mar 7, 2005 at 06:21 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 06:26 PM
  #39  
mettalicirocz's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: bryan ohio
Car: 1986 camaro, 1993 nissan altima(winter beater, 1992 mustang (summer daily driver)
Engine: 350tpi
Transmission: 700r4 with shift kit
Ok I now understand what you are saying about sticking up for yourslef it didnt seem thats what you meant, I just am really skeptical of his times based on my personal expierences. If it is that fast then it is a freak of nature,my
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 06:34 PM
  #40  
Acceld Z's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 1
From: Kemptville, Ontario, Canada
Car: 1992 Z28
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700R4
Some of you are such unbelievable losers that it's a wonder that *** hasn't found the time to smite you Maybe he has tried and just missed.

Matt, great times. But is it possible that the car has some hidden mods?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 06:59 PM
  #41  
camaro05's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 935
Likes: 0
From: Southern Maryland
Car: 91 Z28
Engine: L98
Transmission: built 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
hey everyone. just thought I would step in since I was mentioned. I got to hang out with Matt and see his time slips after he ran. They are definanly impressive. And he did have drag radials too, I saw some of you ask about that.
I was hoping to run a little better than what I did last weekend. but I did have heavier wheels and smaller tires this time.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 07:26 PM
  #42  
Spectre's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
From: Montreal\Quebec|Canada
Car: Camaro Z281991 Engine: 5.7L/350 TPI Transmission: TH700R4 ··································· Car: Acura CL 1998
Engine: 3.0L/183
Transmission: 4 spd auto/OD
Ive never been drag racing ..
And congrats to the poster, but just out of curiosity,
where does it prove these are his time slips ?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 07:50 PM
  #43  
IROCZ4BD3's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
From: Oaks,Pa
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 350 HSR
Transmission: modified 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
I believe his times but also believe something else was done that he doesn't know about.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 08:10 PM
  #44  
GTA matt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 769
Likes: 51
From: Zebulon, nc
Car: 1990 GTA/1989 Iroc
Engine: L98/383
Transmission: 700r4/t56 magnum
Axle/Gears: 9"
figured i'd post some pics. the quality isn't that great because they were taken off other pictures.

This is a launch from last year.


Last edited by GTA matt; Mar 9, 2005 at 09:34 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 08:11 PM
  #45  
GTA matt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 769
Likes: 51
From: Zebulon, nc
Car: 1990 GTA/1989 Iroc
Engine: L98/383
Transmission: 700r4/t56 magnum
Axle/Gears: 9"
Me walking a LT1. he ran a 13.70.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 08:17 PM
  #46  
TunedPort 335's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 1
From: Paxton, MA
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28
Engine: 335 TPI Stroker
Transmission: Tremec TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt / 3.42
Matt I beleive you. i think it's awesome to see TPI cars running times like these. Your car may be a freak but the trap speed is still low enough to prove that its still got that "TPI" powerband.

I may have missed it but what kind of tires do you run? That thing squats pretty good.

Congrats man!
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 08:20 PM
  #47  
TunedPort 335's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 1
From: Paxton, MA
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28
Engine: 335 TPI Stroker
Transmission: Tremec TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt / 3.42
Oh and i LOVE the fact that you have Edelbrock headers, the same headers that everyone sh*ts on and makes fun of because they "sacrifice horsepower"



Bah!!
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 08:21 PM
  #48  
GTA matt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 769
Likes: 51
From: Zebulon, nc
Car: 1990 GTA/1989 Iroc
Engine: L98/383
Transmission: 700r4/t56 magnum
Axle/Gears: 9"
Originally posted by TunedPort 335
Matt I beleive you. i think it's awesome to see TPI cars running times like these. Your car may be a freak but the trap speed is still low enough to prove that its still got that "TPI" powerband.

I may have missed it but what kind of tires do you run? That thing squats pretty good.

Congrats man!
Thank you. That top picture is from last year with the 3.23's. The tires were BF Goodrich KDW's. They were decent for street tires. This year i'm running Nitto 555 Drag radials.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 08:30 PM
  #49  
TunedPort 335's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 1
From: Paxton, MA
Car: 1987 Camaro Z28
Engine: 335 TPI Stroker
Transmission: Tremec TKO 500
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt / 3.42
Originally posted by GTA matt
Thank you. That top picture is from last year with the 3.23's. The tires were BF Goodrich KDW's. They were decent for street tires. This year i'm running Nitto 555 Drag radials.
Thats awesome man.

I need to get my tranny dialed in and I should be right up there with ya. My 1/8th ET is there now i just need to get the shift points right and get that down to a 13.1-13.2


Get a 3000 stall and say hello 12's
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2005 | 08:43 PM
  #50  
GTA matt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Senior Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 769
Likes: 51
From: Zebulon, nc
Car: 1990 GTA/1989 Iroc
Engine: L98/383
Transmission: 700r4/t56 magnum
Axle/Gears: 9"
[QUOTE]Get a 3000 stall and say hello 12's

Thats what i'm saying

Oh, and i went with the edelbrocks because they were the only headers that i was 100% sure would work with duel converters. I'm sure other companies make them, but i challenge anybody to feel the difference in power from one header to another. People on TGO seem to be stuck on Hooker.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 AM.