View Poll Results: Which ones?
91-92 style
54
72.97%
pre 91 style
17
22.97%
none at all
3
4.05%
Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll
Which ground effects do you like best?
10-16-2002, 10:01 PM
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: 700R4 3500 stall, TransGo shift kit
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11:1
Does this apply to Camaros only, Firebirds only, or both?
If Camaros- I like the 91/92 ones much better. I want to upgrade mine someday.
If Firebirds- I like both types of ground effects.
If Camaros- I like the 91/92 ones much better. I want to upgrade mine someday.
If Firebirds- I like both types of ground effects.
10-16-2002, 10:04 PM
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Albany, GA.
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 05 GTO, 88 GTA, 98 SS
Oops. I'm talking about Camaros.
I'm undecided. I like both. The 91-92's look good but the pre 91's give the car a really smooth clean look.
I might even switch to the earlier style oneday.
I'm undecided. I like both. The 91-92's look good but the pre 91's give the car a really smooth clean look.
I might even switch to the earlier style oneday.
10-16-2002, 10:19 PM
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 3,165
Received 54 Likes
on
40 Posts
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60e
I like the 91-92 on camaros.
I've owned both the pre 91 and the post 91 gfx on birds and to tell the truth...they both look awesome. Although the look of the 91-92 bird is just incredible. In my opinion it outshines the 4th gen 98+ easily.
I've owned both the pre 91 and the post 91 gfx on birds and to tell the truth...they both look awesome. Although the look of the 91-92 bird is just incredible. In my opinion it outshines the 4th gen 98+ easily.
10-17-2002, 12:49 AM
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Warwick,RI
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 88 IROC-Z/00 GTP/05 VUE Redline
Engine: LB9 305/3800 SC/3.5 SOHC V-TEC
Transmission: A4/A4/A5
The 91-92 style on the camaro's looks the best. And i prefer the earlier style GFX on the GTA's and trans am's.
10-17-2002, 01:00 AM
#6
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Mililani, HI USofA Search Posts: 2848.............. Whore Posts: 47.................. Magical Whore Posts: 1
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro 77K
Engine: 3.1 Vslick
Duh....
There's one one....
There's one one....
10-17-2002, 10:18 AM
#7
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
The things I like best are the ones that are different from everyone else. I used to like 91-92 style before so many switched their pre 91 style to that. My vote is for the pre 91 style becuase I don't see that style too often anymore. Those style ground effects along with the 3 piece spoiler give the Camaro a smooth look to it.
Trending Topics
10-17-2002, 05:55 PM
#8
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Chesterfield, Indiana
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
I love them all! But....I'd have to go with the 91-92 style.....especially the Z28's.....the ground effects and the Aero spoiler.....just look bad ***. Around here....there are like NO 91-92 Rs or Z28's at all.....that another reason why I like them so much. And....I have a Black 91 Z28 5.7 TPI (L98) 
10-17-2002, 09:12 PM
#12
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Here and There, Kansas
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: 2.8L V-6
Transmission: T-5
Originally posted by Black_Widdow
Oops. I'm talking about Camaros.
I'm undecided. I like both. The 91-92's look good but the pre 91's give the car a really smooth clean look.
I might even switch to the earlier style oneday.
Oops. I'm talking about Camaros.
I'm undecided. I like both. The 91-92's look good but the pre 91's give the car a really smooth clean look.
I might even switch to the earlier style oneday.
Last edited by DISTURBthePEACE; 10-17-2002 at 09:23 PM.
10-17-2002, 10:58 PM
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: See pic above
Engine: Too Small
Transmission: Broken
I think that the 91-92 looks better when the gfx and the rest of the car are the same color. But if you've got the two tone paint (like I have) I think the earlier ones look better. Otherwise I think you'd kinda look like the rice rockets around here that blow all their money on a body kit and can't afford paint so they spray paint it.
10-17-2002, 11:20 PM
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Chesterfield, Indiana
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
Yeah, me too, 91 and 92's all came one solid color. Before I was hit......I redone my 84 all in 1991-1992 ground effects, both front and back bumpers and the aero spoiler. But, I wanted to keep it the original color.....it was white and gold.....so I repainted it the same color....even when it had the 91-92 parts on it....it still looked great. But....I see where your coming from too.
10-17-2002, 11:30 PM
#16
Supreme Member
iTrader: (15)
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: 700R4 3500 stall, TransGo shift kit
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11:1
Originally posted by Black_Widdow
Oops. I'm talking about Camaros.
I'm undecided. I like both. The 91-92's look good but the pre 91's give the car a really smooth clean look.
I might even switch to the earlier style oneday.
Oops. I'm talking about Camaros.
I'm undecided. I like both. The 91-92's look good but the pre 91's give the car a really smooth clean look.
I might even switch to the earlier style oneday.
10-18-2002, 02:36 PM
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Albany, GA.
Posts: 930
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 05 GTO, 88 GTA, 98 SS
Originally posted by MetalliCamaroRS
I'd gladly trade. And they're black so you won't have to paint
I'd gladly trade. And they're black so you won't have to paint
10-19-2002, 10:23 PM
#20
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Surrey, BC, Canada
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IMO, the 82-84 Z28 are UGMO, the 85-90 are the best, and the 91-91 with the tall spoiler/big black front grill/ little scoops in sides look a little "*****" (pardon my language!).
10-19-2002, 10:33 PM
#21
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Chesterfield, Indiana
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
Originally posted by 84_CamaroBC
IMO, the 82-84 Z28 are UGMO, the 85-90 are the best, and the 91-91 with the tall spoiler/big black front grill/ little scoops in sides look a little "*****" (pardon my language!).
IMO, the 82-84 Z28 are UGMO, the 85-90 are the best, and the 91-91 with the tall spoiler/big black front grill/ little scoops in sides look a little "*****" (pardon my language!).
Dude, that's just wrong to even say that a Z28 Camaro resembles any rice car. 1991 and 1992 Z28's are the baddest Z28's made to me for the whole 3rd Gen Period. They look the meanest and they could probably pound any stock 3rd gen made. I love every Camaro made, but.....that's just wrong saying that the 91 and 92 Z28's resemble any kind of rice....
10-19-2002, 10:51 PM
#22
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,028
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
3 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Originally posted by 84customZ28
Dude, that's just wrong to even say that a Z28 Camaro resembles any rice car. 1991 and 1992 Z28's are the baddest Z28's made to me for the whole 3rd Gen Period. They look the meanest and they could probably pound any stock 3rd gen made. I love every Camaro made, but.....that's just wrong saying that the 91 and 92 Z28's resemble any kind of rice....
Dude, that's just wrong to even say that a Z28 Camaro resembles any rice car. 1991 and 1992 Z28's are the baddest Z28's made to me for the whole 3rd Gen Period. They look the meanest and they could probably pound any stock 3rd gen made. I love every Camaro made, but.....that's just wrong saying that the 91 and 92 Z28's resemble any kind of rice....
10-19-2002, 11:25 PM
#23
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Mililani, HI USofA Search Posts: 2848.............. Whore Posts: 47.................. Magical Whore Posts: 1
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro 77K
Engine: 3.1 Vslick
Originally posted by 84_CamaroBC
IMO, the 91-91 with the tall spoiler/big black front grill/ little scoops in sides look a little "*****" (pardon my language!).
IMO, the 91-91 with the tall spoiler/big black front grill/ little scoops in sides look a little "*****" (pardon my language!).
Some one been slapping you around with the silly stick, huh....
10-20-2002, 10:08 AM
#25
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Brunswick,NJ
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '91 TA Green
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
rice?????? what is your definition of muscle? c'mon now! anyway 91-92 GFX look awesome... but I don't care for the high rise z28 spoiler.
what is your definition of muscle? c'mon now! anyway 91-92 GFX look awesome... but I don't care for the high rise z28 spoiler. 
10-20-2002, 12:47 PM
#27
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Chesterfield, Indiana
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
Hey 84_CamaroBC, are you really serious that you think the 91 and 92 Z28's resemble rice?......I'm not trying to start anything but that's just stupid and insane.....
and like NickyG said.................
"rice?????? what is your definition of muscle? c'mon now!"
and like NickyG said.................
"rice?????? what is your definition of muscle? c'mon now!"
10-20-2002, 04:17 PM
#28
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Surrey, BC, Canada
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whoa... opened up a can of worms here. Perhaps "rice" was the wrong word. What I ment was it looked overdone. The camaro already looks great and you dont need to go hanging extra plastic and such on it. I personally like no ground fx or the cleaner earlier style. I certainly didn't mean to compare the 91-92 to the guy buzzing in his fart-can equiped, triple-deck spoiler civic. Sorry if I gave you the wrong idea.
10-20-2002, 06:36 PM
#29
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Chesterfield, Indiana
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
Originally posted by 84_CamaroBC
Whoa... opened up a can of worms here. Perhaps "rice" was the wrong word. What I ment was it looked overdone. The camaro already looks great and you dont need to go hanging extra plastic and such on it. I personally like no ground fx or the cleaner earlier style. I certainly didn't mean to compare the 91-92 to the guy buzzing in his fart-can equiped, triple-deck spoiler civic. Sorry if I gave you the wrong idea.
Whoa... opened up a can of worms here. Perhaps "rice" was the wrong word. What I ment was it looked overdone. The camaro already looks great and you dont need to go hanging extra plastic and such on it. I personally like no ground fx or the cleaner earlier style. I certainly didn't mean to compare the 91-92 to the guy buzzing in his fart-can equiped, triple-deck spoiler civic. Sorry if I gave you the wrong idea.
Last edited by Sickness91Z28; 10-20-2002 at 06:45 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Damon
Tech / General Engine
8
09-26-2015 04:29 PM