Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Car Audio

Car Audio Car audio related questions and helpful hints for building the best sound system for your car or getting the most out of what you have.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-03-2009, 08:05 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
bd_slim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: michigan
Posts: 52
Car: 89 iroc vert-91z-28
Engine: 305 tpi-305 tpi
Transmission: 700r-4-700r-4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi-3.73 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
6x9 vs. component

i'm looking to upgrade my speakers in my 91z. wondering if i'm better off getting a good set of 6x9s or going with a 6.5 or 6.75 component set. i have already upgraded the dash speakers and i'll be running an amp with which ever setup i go with. i would like to keep the price of the speakers under $200.
thanks
This ad is not displayed to registered members.
Register your free account today and become a member on ThirdGen!
bd_slim is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 06-03-2009, 10:11 PM   #2
Junior Member
 
Civerus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 91

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Civerus Send a message via MSN to Civerus
Re: 6x9 vs. component

http://www.crutchfield.com/p_1366W3V...ures_and_specs

6x9's were designed to get the most volume out of the size, they distort at higher volumes due to a irregular shaped cone.

Round speakers will always get better quality, but may not be as loud, but I run a pair of these in my RX-7 and have nothing but good to say about them, especially amplified, these rattle the windows, shake the seats, and make people say WTF.
Civerus is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2009, 10:27 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
bd_slim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: michigan
Posts: 52
Car: 89 iroc vert-91z-28
Engine: 305 tpi-305 tpi
Transmission: 700r-4-700r-4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi-3.73 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6x9 vs. component

thanks for the input, but i'd like to stay away from subs. i'd like to keep the cargo room. i'm looking at either a good set of 6x9s or something like this

http://www.crutchfield.com/p_107DB65...ures_and_specs
bd_slim is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2009, 07:44 AM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Thunderbird falls Alaska
Posts: 217
Car: 1992 RS
Transmission: Automatic

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6x9 vs. component

I'd love to do component in my car.... but I really really really really don't want to hack the tweeters to fit in there. The idea of cutting up my baby makes me cringe.
ThePain is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2009, 08:18 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
theimpaler68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Palm Coast, FL
Posts: 598
Car: 86 T/A & 88 T/A
Engine: 305 LB9 TPI & 350 LO5 TPI
Transmission: Jasper 4L60 x2
Axle/Gears: 2.77?/posi LSD & 2.73/posi LSD

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: 6x9 vs. component

i currently have a component type setup and i didnt have to hack or cut anything. i have a factory option performance sound package.

http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/at...s-dscf1402.jpg


this is in the '88, i am going to be putting all that in the '86 and trying to custom fit something bigger in all the stock locations. all you would have to do is build a plate that fits where the 6*9 plate is and cut out holes for a speaker of choice size and the tweeter. believe me when i say you dont want a tweeter next to your ear unprotected running oon an amp. but yes components are something i will never give up. i like quality and sound.
__________________
L8TER,

Mikey



Check out my vBGarage for Details of BOTH cars!!!!!
theimpaler68 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2009, 09:49 AM   #6
Junior Member
 
bd_slim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: michigan
Posts: 52
Car: 89 iroc vert-91z-28
Engine: 305 tpi-305 tpi
Transmission: 700r-4-700r-4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi-3.73 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6x9 vs. component

if i go the component route i will also have an adapter plate to mount the speaker and tweeter in the stock 6x9 location. my dad is a tool & die maker so that won't be a problem, and i think if you buy the speakers from crutchfield they give you an adapter plate for free.
and i am the same way when it comes to my music...i like it clean and crisp, and when i want to crank it i still want it to be clear and sound good.
how would the components be with bass? i'm not looking to have everything rattle and shake, but i would like some, and like i said earlier, i really don't want to go the sub route.
bd_slim is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2009, 10:18 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
theimpaler68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Palm Coast, FL
Posts: 598
Car: 86 T/A & 88 T/A
Engine: 305 LB9 TPI & 350 LO5 TPI
Transmission: Jasper 4L60 x2
Axle/Gears: 2.77?/posi LSD & 2.73/posi LSD

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: 6x9 vs. component

find 4ohm mid bass speakers 100hz- 250hz frequency i believe. and then just make sure the rms from your amp will power the rms wattage on the speaker and they should perform great. i think i am going to go with 6.5 in the sail panels for my '88 and i haven't decided on 1in or 2in tweeter. clean and crisp. but still have to hear the bass. i listen to a variety of music.
theimpaler68 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2009, 10:57 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
paul_huryk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Ahead of you...
Posts: 968
Car: 1984 LG4 Camaro
Engine: 350 Roller Motor
Transmission: Level 10 700R4
Axle/Gears: Strange 12 bolt 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to paul_huryk
Re: 6x9 vs. component

Personally I wouldn't waste an ounce of time or $ to change the rear speakers. You should either get kick panels or install components into the front doors and spend your money there.
__________________
Paul's home page

1984 Camaro 350 LG4 Best: 11.44s at 126.9mph
2002 Acura TL Type S
paul_huryk is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2009, 12:01 PM   #9
Junior Member
 
bd_slim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: michigan
Posts: 52
Car: 89 iroc vert-91z-28
Engine: 305 tpi-305 tpi
Transmission: 700r-4-700r-4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi-3.73 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6x9 vs. component

i thought about that, but i don't really want to cut up my door, and i put 5.5s in the kick panels of my truck, and i don't hear much difference between them and the 2.5s in the dash. i thought that was kind of a waste of time and money. but maybe it would be different in the camaro.

i don't currently have any rear speakers in my camaro, so i'm going to have to get something. and the price for either option is basically the same. i'm just looking for what would give me better bang for my buck. as stated earlier, i want something clean and crisp that still has some bass (i don't listen to rap/hip-hop, but still want some bass) and sounds good when cranked.
bd_slim is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2009, 12:43 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
theimpaler68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Palm Coast, FL
Posts: 598
Car: 86 T/A & 88 T/A
Engine: 305 LB9 TPI & 350 LO5 TPI
Transmission: Jasper 4L60 x2
Axle/Gears: 2.77?/posi LSD & 2.73/posi LSD

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: 6x9 vs. component

i am 6'2" my seat is all the way back and tilted a alittle to make myself comfortable. the rear speakers are about all i hear. the front speaker give a little depth. not having rear speaker takes away the surround feeling. i would go with clean install personally. dont need leg room wasted on anything but legs. my opinion though.
__________________
L8TER,

Mikey



Check out my vBGarage for Details of BOTH cars!!!!!
theimpaler68 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2009, 01:43 PM   #11
Junior Member
 
Civerus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 91

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Civerus Send a message via MSN to Civerus
Re: 6x9 vs. component

The speakers I linked earlier are mid-bass speakers, 6 1/2", not subs, just get foam backing, and make sure you can fit them where they go, being 4 1/16" deep, they wont fit in alot of places. measure twice buy once?...
Civerus is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2009, 02:24 PM   #12
Junior Member
 
bd_slim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: michigan
Posts: 52
Car: 89 iroc vert-91z-28
Engine: 305 tpi-305 tpi
Transmission: 700r-4-700r-4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi-3.73 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6x9 vs. component

Quote:
JL Audio 6W3v3-4
W3v3 Series 6.5" 4-ohm subwoofer
that was taken from the link you posted. maybe the wrong link?

i think at this point i'm leaning twards the component setup. has anyone had both setups in their car (not at the same time of course) and preferred one or the other for whatever reason?
bd_slim is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009, 12:07 AM   #13
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: ct
Posts: 44
Car: 90 gta
Engine: 5.slow
Transmission: tremec tko

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via Yahoo to BANDITSBC
Re: 6x9 vs. component

go components! i have comp. kick panels and they are great! i have 6/9's in my sail panels and they are great for volumn but i use them as a filler between the comp. and the 12s in the back
__________________
90 GTA 5.0, tremec TKO, GEN 7, borla exhaust, edlebrock coated headers
stealthram and new bumpstick coming real soon!
BANDITSBC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009, 11:14 PM   #14
Junior Member
 
red83TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15
Car: '83 Trans Am
Engine: too slow 5.0 carb'd
Transmission: 5-speed
Axle/Gears: stock open

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6x9 vs. component

If budget allows, I strongly recommend components. Another set up I have seen that works well in F-bodies - if your front speakers do a nice job of setting soundstage and imaging, pop some 6x9s in back just for bass. Either cut the tweeter wire (hack) or get dedicated woofer 6x9s. That way your sound won't get pulled into the backseat. That'd be like going to a concert then sit facing away from the stage. It's harder to detect the source of lower frequencies so, given the quality of your fronts, this might improve overall sound quality.
red83TA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2009, 11:52 PM   #15
Junior Member
 
bd_slim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: michigan
Posts: 52
Car: 89 iroc vert-91z-28
Engine: 305 tpi-305 tpi
Transmission: 700r-4-700r-4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi-3.73 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6x9 vs. component

again, thanks for the input guys.
ya, i think i'm going with components. i'll probably look around for a decent set of cheap used for now, as there are other parts for the car i'd like to wrap up first before i buy a new set. but if nothing comes up here quick i'll just spring for a new set. i've only just been able to drive the car for the last few days after owning it for 3 months due to problems it had when i bought it, and driving with no rear speakers at all are drag!
bd_slim is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2009, 11:21 AM   #16
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 79
Car: 90 IROC & 92 Z28 prpl hz
Engine: stealth ram brodix track 1
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: iroc 375 lokr z28 277 pos

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6x9 vs. component

I have infinity kappa 6x9s in the sail panel and kappa plates in the dash. I also got a set of bose kick panels and put some kappas in them and I could not be happier with my system and it did not cost a fortune either. I also added the 91-92 bose rear storage deck and put infinity kappa 6.5s in them and that was the iceing on the cake. I use two kenwood excelon 4 channel amps and a kenwood x990 deck and it is awesome. I like clear not loud and you can hear people taking in a breath of air just before they sing on CDs.
abray1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2009, 07:56 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
theimpaler68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Palm Coast, FL
Posts: 598
Car: 86 T/A & 88 T/A
Engine: 305 LB9 TPI & 350 LO5 TPI
Transmission: Jasper 4L60 x2
Axle/Gears: 2.77?/posi LSD & 2.73/posi LSD

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: 6x9 vs. component

i am going to convert to all kappa components too. as money allows with others mods going on too. i love infinity speakers
__________________
L8TER,

Mikey



Check out my vBGarage for Details of BOTH cars!!!!!
theimpaler68 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2009, 07:15 PM   #18
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Thunderbird falls Alaska
Posts: 217
Car: 1992 RS
Transmission: Automatic

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6x9 vs. component

So... 6x9 is the big long ones? And you can get components with adapter plates that fit the 6x9 spot?
ThePain is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2009, 07:59 PM   #19
Junior Member
 
bd_slim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: michigan
Posts: 52
Car: 89 iroc vert-91z-28
Engine: 305 tpi-305 tpi
Transmission: 700r-4-700r-4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi-3.73 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6x9 vs. component

yes, you can bolt your mid and tweeter to the adapter plate and then bolt that to your 6x9 stock plate.
bd_slim is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 12:28 AM   #20
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 14
Car: 92 Camaro RS
Engine: HSR 355
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: Stock

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6x9 vs. component

I'm the opposite, I like 6x9s I have a pair of 4 way cheapie Pioneers that have seen 4 different vehicles, been amped for 60% of their life (had them for about 7 or 8 years) and they just refuse to blow. They're also really clear sounding, but I never turn the volume much past halfway
Vice04 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 04:31 AM   #21
Junior Member
 
red83TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15
Car: '83 Trans Am
Engine: too slow 5.0 carb'd
Transmission: 5-speed
Axle/Gears: stock open

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6x9 vs. component

Big fan of Infinity. Have spent $waytoomuch on "better" brands (like MBQuart) but love the detail of Infinities. Rock on, Vice04! I have friends with Radio Shack and Walmart systems that sound very good - it's not what you have, it's what you do with it!! It's hard to go wrong in an Fbody, the acoustics of that rear hatch just make everything work as long as you can anchor your front soundstage.
red83TA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 08:37 AM   #22
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: New York City
Posts: 11
Car: '89 Camaro RS
Engine: TBI 305
Transmission: AutO

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6x9 vs. component

YoU WanT SounD? Go on EbaY and Look uP the 6x9 Speakers theY HavE. TheN in Stall theM where the Stock Speakers are at. (Brand you shuold get is MTX, ROcksford, Alpine,) get about 250-350 watt for for the stock location. TheN, INstal Speakers where the front doors are. 150-200 watt for the front because the front is used for voice. THEN, 2 10' INcH in he bacK. systeM will be SicK.
MorenoRS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2009, 11:09 AM   #23
Junior Member
 
bd_slim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: michigan
Posts: 52
Car: 89 iroc vert-91z-28
Engine: 305 tpi-305 tpi
Transmission: 700r-4-700r-4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 posi-3.73 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6x9 vs. component

Quote:
Big fan of Infinity. Have spent $waytoomuch on "better" brands (like MBQuart) but love the detail of Infinities. Rock on, Vice04! I have friends with Radio Shack and Walmart systems that sound very good - it's not what you have, it's what you do with it!! It's hard to go wrong in an Fbody, the acoustics of that rear hatch just make everything work as long as you can anchor your front soundstage.
i haven't heard a lot of good things about infinity. mostly that they take a crap fairly quickly. but you know how that goes, people probably had them amped up too much. i've been looking at the polks myself.

Quote:
YoU WanT SounD? Go on EbaY and Look uP the 6x9 Speakers theY HavE. TheN in Stall theM where the Stock Speakers are at. (Brand you shuold get is MTX, ROcksford, Alpine,) get about 250-350 watt for for the stock location. TheN, INstal Speakers where the front doors are. 150-200 watt for the front because the front is used for voice. THEN, 2 10' INcH in he bacK. systeM will be SicK.
for now i'd like to stay away from putting speakers in the kick panels or doors. and i don't want to run subs. i might end up putting some in the doors down the road, but who knows. i'll wait and see how it sounds with just the stock front locations.
bd_slim is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2009, 12:05 AM   #24
Senior Member
 
The Project's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Canada, Eh!
Posts: 1,437
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: TPI baby!
Transmission: One that shifts...hard
Axle/Gears: 3.42....Auburn

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: 6x9 vs. component

I run 6.5" comps in custom kick panels (bought a spare kick panel set on ebay). I agree that you should spend the $$ on the front end and not worry about rear speakers (except for the sub). If you look at most car audio competition cars...that's what they do (run no rear speakers).

If you just want to replace the stock speakers, then run comps in the rear on a plate.
__________________


1989 Camaro ...beaten ...abused ...enjoyed ...driven ..since July 1994

Bought from: John_iroc, Jagevileye21, DomsIROC, 1irocz2nv, Daz, Demon355, userchemical, Zdrrguy, SheldonZ28
Sold to: Jaygt, Pearl_iroc, 1irocz2nv, Hawk92z-TDZ, The White Knight, Zdrrguy, dscott
The Project is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2009, 05:04 PM   #25
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 23
Car: 92 RS
Engine: LO3, 305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: stock 3rd gen, 2.73 ratio

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6x9 vs. component

Quote:
Originally Posted by abray1 View Post
I have infinity kappa 6x9s in the sail panel and kappa plates in the dash. I also got a set of bose kick panels and put some kappas in them and I could not be happier with my system and it did not cost a fortune either. I also added the 91-92 bose rear storage deck and put infinity kappa 6.5s in them and that was the iceing on the cake. I use two kenwood excelon 4 channel amps and a kenwood x990 deck and it is awesome. I like clear not loud and you can hear people taking in a breath of air just before they sing on CDs.

I'd like pics of the Bose rear storage deck, is it like the cargo door, but with speakers? or something else? Also, where are Bose kick panels available from?
hickman is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2009, 03:53 PM   #26
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Muncie, Indiana
Posts: 117
Car: 1983 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 2.8L, hopefully upgrading..
Transmission: BorgWarner T5, Made here in Muncie
Axle/Gears: stock

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: 6x9 vs. component

If you have decided on going component and want a decent quality set, check out the Phoneix Gold RSD 6.5" comps. You can get the whole set on ebay for about $70. Thats a fairly cheap price for components, but for anything in that price range they will out perform them everytime.
MikeSmith0890 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Car Audio

Tags
6x9, 8, 86, adapter, camaro, component, gen, locations, plates, pops, rx7, shakes, speaker, tweeters, windows
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 






1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
All content copyright © 1997 - 2009 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.