floor pan mount torque arm
09-21-2007, 08:11 PM
#4
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: previously OKINAWA JAPAN,georgia, now new england
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC--1989 T/A
Engine: 5.7 TPI in both
Transmission: W/C T-5 in both
Axle/Gears: B/W 3.27 in both
Re: floor pan mount torque arm
Just a bump for you.... I used to hae one of those. Bought it brand new from MAC, before they got out of the f body biz. shawn
09-21-2007, 11:46 PM
#7
Re: floor pan mount torque arm
For install: The unit bolts into the driveshaft tunnel, usually the center console has to be removed and the carpet has to be peeled back. Then you have to drill through the sheetmetal to run the bolts through. This is the only drawback, can't refill the holes so be carefull.
This model is better then the Jegster version as it does not have a slip joint at the bushing. I went through 3 of the Jeggster units on my V6 3.4l 5spd Camaro, they REALLY take a beating, and did definately IMPROVED the handling of the car. It was just a bad design on Jeggsters part.
This model is better then the Jegster version as it does not have a slip joint at the bushing. I went through 3 of the Jeggster units on my V6 3.4l 5spd Camaro, they REALLY take a beating, and did definately IMPROVED the handling of the car. It was just a bad design on Jeggsters part.
Trending Topics
09-22-2007, 11:46 AM
#8
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: floor pan mount torque arm
For install: The unit bolts into the driveshaft tunnel, usually the center console has to be removed and the carpet has to be peeled back. Then you have to drill through the sheetmetal to run the bolts through. This is the only drawback, can't refill the holes so be carefull.
This model is better then the Jegster version as it does not have a slip joint at the bushing. I went through 3 of the Jeggster units on my V6 3.4l 5spd Camaro, they REALLY take a beating, and did definately IMPROVED the handling of the car. It was just a bad design on Jeggsters part.
This model is better then the Jegster version as it does not have a slip joint at the bushing. I went through 3 of the Jeggster units on my V6 3.4l 5spd Camaro, they REALLY take a beating, and did definately IMPROVED the handling of the car. It was just a bad design on Jeggsters part.
09-23-2007, 01:34 AM
#9
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: mid GA
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI w/ l98 cam
Transmission: T5 5-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.45 posi disc 9 bolt
Re: floor pan mount torque arm
i am interested but i am worried about the pan mount. can i get some more pics of the unit if you dont mind?
09-23-2007, 07:15 AM
#10
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: floor pan mount torque arm
I'll try to get another couple of shots of it but I work two hours from home so it's a PITA to get to my storage sometimes. To add to the list I also have a brand new set of weld-in LCA relocators as well from BMR. I'll take $75 for them too. All my stuff needs to go!!
09-24-2007, 10:40 AM
#11
Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: floor pan mount torque arm
also have to add my extra th350. Has a full-manual forward pattern TCI valve body in it. Stock truck internals. worked great when pulled from the car. Hasn't been used in a shade over a year. Fluid is clean. $150
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ambainb
Camaros for Sale
11
04-25-2016 09:21 PM
Thirdgen89GTA
NW Indiana and South Chicago Suburb
0
08-20-2015 03:11 PM