Engine Swap Everything about swapping an engine into your Third Gen.....be it V6, V8, LTX/LSX, crate engine, etc. Pictures, questions, answers, and work logs.

2.8L Injected to 305 Carb

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2016, 11:12 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Alex Fields's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: V6 awaiting 305 swap
Transmission: 700R4
2.8L Injected to 305 Carb

I know the title is repetitive, but I'm now looking for a bit more input than the v6->v8 sticky gives.
I will soon be getting a computer controlled, carbed 305 with all accessories, radiator, computer, wiring, and matching transmission. Basically all the moving bits of the donor car will be transplanted to my car. I want to know what else I would need besides a new fuel system and exhaust, and if this swap with everything I have will be a 'simple' switch like I'm thinking it is.
Old 01-21-2016, 11:20 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
58mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Mesquite, Texas
Posts: 4,009
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Car: 89 rs, 86 Trans Am
Engine: RS-V6... Trans Am-LG4
Transmission: RS-T5... Trans Am 700r4
Re: 2.8L Injected to 305 Carb

Front springs

If i were doing the same thing, ditch the computer controlled carb and make it a traditional carb, in the end it will be a lot easier

The CC carb had a block mounted fuel pump, but in 87 it actually used two pumps (one in the tank)

I would suggest keeping your tank mounted pump, but add a FPR to regulate the pressure down to where it need to be
Old 01-22-2016, 03:09 AM
  #3  
Supreme Member

 
novaderrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Howard Lake, MN
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 86 Camaro
Engine: 355- hopefully a 5.3 this summer
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 2.8L Injected to 305 Carb

i did this exact swap back in 2012, except i ditched all the elctronic crap and just ran an old school quadrajet and HEI..

ditch the in tank pump and just run the stock block mounted one... not only do you save yourself from the cost of buying and installing a regulator, but you also get rid of one more potential failure point in the process..

you don't need to swap springs- the front of my car only dropped about 1/2" when going from the 2.8 to the 305, and it handled pretty decently.

the hardest part of the whole swap was bolting the motor mounts to the frame..
Old 01-22-2016, 05:11 PM
  #4  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Re: 2.8L Injected to 305 Carb

Originally Posted by 58mark
If i were doing the same thing, ditch the computer controlled carb and make it a traditional carb, in the end it will be a lot easier
And I contend that a "traditional" carb, in the beginning, middle, and end, is a lot harder.
Old 01-27-2016, 04:50 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Alex Fields's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: V6 awaiting 305 swap
Transmission: 700R4
Re: 2.8L Injected to 305 Carb

What exactly is the difference between traditional and computer controlled carbs, and why would one be more or less difficult to handle than the other?
Old 01-28-2016, 09:50 AM
  #6  
Member
 
stephenscamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Hermiston, Oregon
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro
Engine: 2.8 to 383
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 2.8L Injected to 305 Carb

Originally Posted by Alex Fields
What exactly is the difference between traditional and computer controlled carbs, and why would one be more or less difficult to handle than the other?
Take a look at Kurt and Derek's sticky, they have a lot of discussion over the two. The traditional carb is easy to setup and run on the car. Eliminating the ECU and the wiring leaves the rest of the car pretty much dead. No gauges, ect. The CC Carb is essentially the same mechanically as a traditional carb, but is managed by the ecu. There is no easy way to go in either direction, you will put time and effort into each. My opinion, 6 one way and half a dozen the other.
Old 02-01-2016, 04:26 PM
  #7  
Moderator

iTrader: (14)
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
The computer controlled carb adjust the fuel/air mixture for the primaries based on preset calibration when in open loop, and exhaust O2 levels when in closed-loop (the secondaries are still open-loop mechanical).

The "traditional" carb adjusts fuel/air mixture mechanically. It is only "correct" under the conditions under which it was originally set, if ever - mostly it will be a compromise in order to run the best under the broadest range of conditions.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
85c1500
Tech / General Engine
50
01-01-2016 11:30 PM
Djmathis123
Cooling
6
12-03-2015 08:14 PM
custom85
Mid-West Region
7
11-09-2003 10:11 AM
LilJayV10
Engine Swap
8
08-23-2002 07:33 PM



Quick Reply: 2.8L Injected to 305 Carb



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:02 AM.