Final answer for Edelbrock TES vs. SLP vs. Hookers
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2015 Camaro Z/28 & 2013 Super Bee
Engine: LS7 and 392 HEMI
Final answer for Edelbrock TES vs. SLP vs. Hookers
Ok, why are Edelbrock TES's so bad? Who has switched from TES to anything else (SLP, Hooker, other) and what were the before and after timeslips/dynos? I really want to get some Hooker Super Comps, but need proof as to why the TES suck so bad to justify the $580 for the new headers, plus y-pipe.
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Warsaw, Indiana
Posts: 1,287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 427 LSX
Transmission: Turbo 400
The March 1998 issue of GM HIgh-Tech perfomance had a '91 z28 running 11.40's @ 116 mph n/a with 1 5/8 edelbrock shorties.
Does anyone have that issue to verify that above?
Does anyone have that issue to verify that above?
#3
Moderator
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 43,169
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes
on
34 Posts
Car: 82 Berlinetta/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 12B-3.73/9"-3.89
Were those their original 2-primary sizes design?
I doubt anyone would disagree that Hooker and SLP know what they're doing. Edelbrock seems to have been looking more at getting something out there that would be an improvement over stock that the average Joe could afford.
But, I can't answer your question directly, because all I've had are stock and these Hookers. If I was planning a package like you've got, I'd think I'd go with the SLP 1-3/4" primaries. Or, perhaps longtubes if emissions isn't a factor. That's based on information I've seen about the various products and what people have said on this board only, of course. The direct comparison you're seeking isn't likely from the hobbiest, and magazines won't do it because they don't want to risk making one of their advertisers look bad.
I doubt anyone would disagree that Hooker and SLP know what they're doing. Edelbrock seems to have been looking more at getting something out there that would be an improvement over stock that the average Joe could afford.
But, I can't answer your question directly, because all I've had are stock and these Hookers. If I was planning a package like you've got, I'd think I'd go with the SLP 1-3/4" primaries. Or, perhaps longtubes if emissions isn't a factor. That's based on information I've seen about the various products and what people have said on this board only, of course. The direct comparison you're seeking isn't likely from the hobbiest, and magazines won't do it because they don't want to risk making one of their advertisers look bad.
#5
Supreme Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 87 Buick GN
Engine: 3.8L (231 cid) V6
Transmission: 200-4R
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt G80/ 3.42
Re: Final answer for Edelbrock TES vs. SLP vs. Hookers
Originally posted by BuckeyeROC
Ok, why are Edelbrock TES's so bad? Who has switched from TES to anything else (SLP, Hooker, other) and what were the before and after timeslips/dynos? I really want to get some Hooker Super Comps, but need proof as to why the TES suck so bad to justify the $580 for the new headers, plus y-pipe.
Ok, why are Edelbrock TES's so bad? Who has switched from TES to anything else (SLP, Hooker, other) and what were the before and after timeslips/dynos? I really want to get some Hooker Super Comps, but need proof as to why the TES suck so bad to justify the $580 for the new headers, plus y-pipe.
One thing in favor of SLPs....the quality and construction of the headers and the Y pipe are much better than Edelbrocks. And I never had a fitment problem either the SLPs or Edelbrocks.
Not saying Edelbrock's suck as bad as everyone says, cuz I've seen some quick times from Edelbrock and SLP headers. But I wouldn't spend time and money to switch from one shorty header to another. If I had to do it all over again (and most likely will), I would've gone to Hooker LTs and custom Y pipe instead.
Bottom line, skip the SLPs and go straight to Hooker LTs.
Last edited by IROCZZ3; 10-19-2002 at 10:00 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
12-10-2019 07:07 PM
toronto formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
09-10-2015 07:31 AM