Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Exhaust
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Exhaust Post your questions and suggestions about stock or aftermarket exhaust setups. Third Gen exhaust sound files and videos!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-11-2007, 11:30 PM   #1
Jed
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: NY
Posts: 292
Car: 89 Formula 350
Engine: 360 / HSR
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Opinions wanted: Hooker 2460 vs 2055 vs Mac TF8690

I'm shopping around for a new header and y-pipe combo to replace my rusty 9 year old Edelbrock headers. I've learned my lesson and this time whatever I end up getting will be coated. I need something that will support 350 - 400 hp. I've been searching and reading all weekend.

I like the Hooker 2055's, but I can't get myself around that collector issue. I haven't seen anyone else concerned about it in any of the posts I've read... why not? It looks like a great header restricted by what can be made to be, at best, a 2.25" collector. There are even some good pics in the Jan 07 issue of High Performance Pontiac, and I've been staring at them, and it seems like a big drawback. If not for that, they'd be great, but am I missing something? I'm thinking if it is going to be bolted up to a 2.5" pipe, then it has to have a 2.5" collector. No one else seems to think its a problem.

Then I read about the 2460, which doesn't have the small collector problem that the 2055 does. You just have to be creative with the y-pipe, which means either I make my own, or I buy the one from Summit, cut off the 2.5" outlet and replace it with a 3" piece. I have a chop saw and a welder, so for me, it's not a big deal.

Then I found the Mac headers, which have 2.5" collectors, a great looking y-pipe that I don't think I'd have to modify at all, and an AIR tube setup that makes way more sense. But I haven't been able to find many people on here using them.

So I guess what I'm asking is... can any one comment on the Mac headers? They seem like the best option, assuming they are well made.... And how badly will those 2.25" collecters on the 2055's restrict power? Would I be better off buying the 2460's and modifying the y-pipe instead?
__________________
Jed

1989 Formula 350/T56 6 speed
Jed is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2007, 02:15 AM   #2
Junior Member
 
smallblock383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 95
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 383 TPIS Mini Ram
Transmission: D&D Perf Viper/GM T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73's Eaton Posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Hey I just read your posting, and first off...I NEVER knew that Mac made a set of headers for a 3rd gen. Thats news to me.....(scratching my head...) I'm running a set of Hedman shorty headers.. 1 5/8 primary tubes, and 3'' collectors...sent them to Jet-Hot coatings and have been on for 6 years now..they still look great.
smallblock383 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2007, 10:51 AM   #3
Jed
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: NY
Posts: 292
Car: 89 Formula 350
Engine: 360 / HSR
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Jed is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2007, 03:19 PM   #4
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,562
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
Where are you getting this "2.25 inch collector" stuff? http://www.holley.com/2055-1HKR.asp

2.5" pipe is O.D. The I.D. is closer to 2.25". The opening of the ball flange is less than that, so open it up to match the downpipe I.D. Doing this after fitting them up on the car is what I would recommend (and what I did).

Supporting around 360 GFWHP with the 2055's.
__________________
See detail on my cars in My vBGarage

I'm a racing fool. Not necessarily in that order.
five7kid is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2007, 07:35 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
smallblock383's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 95
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 383 TPIS Mini Ram
Transmission: D&D Perf Viper/GM T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73's Eaton Posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
WOW...I guess the sayin' is true that you learn something new everyday. The MAC header and y-pipe combo looks really nice. Although I'm not really liking the right side just dumping into the pipe the way it does. My y-pipe has a seperate pipe from each collector then coming to a common junction at a "y" connection. The collectors are set up very much like the Edelbrock TES, a design that I just don't like. If I did it over I'd stay with my Hedmans, and second choice would be the Hookers.
smallblock383 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2007, 11:07 AM   #6
Jed
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: NY
Posts: 292
Car: 89 Formula 350
Engine: 360 / HSR
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by five7kid View Post
Where are you getting this "2.25 inch collector" stuff?

2.5" pipe is O.D. The I.D. is closer to 2.25". The opening of the ball flange is less than that, so open it up to match the downpipe I.D.
I think I got that 2.25" stuff from being tired. I wish that HPP article was online, but if it is I can't find it. It says that in untouched form, the collector openings on their 2055's measured 1 and 15/16 inches. Using marking paint and a die grinder, they were able to increase the collector openings to 2.125 inches. I read that and I couldn't help but think... "that's it?"

I understand that the I.D. of 2.5" pipe will be smaller, but it isn't going to be reduced to 2.125". I'm not seeing how they can be opened to match the I.D. of the downpipe, unless they can be opened more than what HPP did.

Five7, did you ever measure your collectors after you opened them up? I'm wondering if they can be opened up more without causing them to leak. I'm not trying to be a pain, I'm just trying to find the most efficient/least restrictive set of shorty headers available for my car. Thanks for the info.

Jed
Jed is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-17-2007, 11:21 AM   #7
Jed
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: NY
Posts: 292
Car: 89 Formula 350
Engine: 360 / HSR
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Does anyone have any experience with the Mac headers?
Jed is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2007, 05:11 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
89305formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: forest hill md
Posts: 296
Car: 89 formula
Engine: 305tpi
Transmission: t-56
Axle/Gears: ford 9" 4.11s

Classifieds Rating: (5)
i have mac headers on my 305 and i there pretty nice only problem is they come with i high temp silicone coathing which scratchs pretty easy after a bout a year the started to rust where i scratched them, my car runs pretty good with them i ran a 13.8 at 99 with the headers and a few other bolt ons, and everything went together real easy everything lined up like it should
89305formula is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2007, 06:18 PM   #9
Supreme Member
 
thomas1976's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,712
Car: 91Trans am WS6
Engine: built 360 TBI
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10bolt/3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Jed, tf8692 are ceramic coated and fit perfectly on my lo3, I installed them yesterday. I cant say about longevity and 350-400hp though.
If you want I can send you some pics of them uninstalled an installed.
thomas1976 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2007, 10:49 PM   #10
Jed
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: NY
Posts: 292
Car: 89 Formula 350
Engine: 360 / HSR
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Opinions wanted: Hooker 2460 vs 2055 vs Mac TF8690

Thanks for the Mac feedback, guys. Thomas, I'd definitely be interested in seeing those pictures - thank you! Oh, and where did you two order them from? Directly from Mac?
Jed is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 01:59 AM   #11
Moderator
 
five7kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Littleton, CO USA
Posts: 39,562
Car: 82 Berlinetta(2)/57 Bel Air
Engine: LS1 (LS1)/LQ4
Transmission: 4L60E (T56)/4L80E
Axle/Gears: 10B 3.73(9" 4.11)/8.2" 4.11

Classifieds Rating: (11)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jed View Post
Five7, did you ever measure your collectors after you opened them up? I'm wondering if they can be opened up more without causing them to leak.
Sorry, didn't see this until now.

Yes. Even posted pics on here showing it. If you search this forum for threads started by me over 1 yr ago, with "2055" in the subject line, about 5 threads should come up. The latest one has the details. Came out to right at 2.2". Started out at 1.9".

I emailed Hooker about that small opening when I got them in 2001. They replied that they keep it that small to prevent leaks, and it isn't a problem because the exhaust gases have slowed down significantly by the time they reach the collector. I said (when I read it, not to them), and did the match & open thing.

No leaks.

Oh, I also asked them about the supplied flange gaskets that were smaller than the exhaust ports in the head - again they said no problem, the gasket material that sticks into the exhaust flow will burn off after a little while. I raised the flag again, and got some Fel Pro's that didn't occlude the port.

I've never said 2055's are "perfect". I do maintain that they're the best shorty/y-pipe for our cars out there, and can be improved immensely with a little bit of work.

Last edited by five7kid; 03-21-2007 at 02:18 AM.
five7kid is online now vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 06:46 AM   #12
Supreme Member
 
thomas1976's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,712
Car: 91Trans am WS6
Engine: built 360 TBI
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10bolt/3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Opinions wanted: Hooker 2460 vs 2055 vs Mac TF8690

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jed View Post
Thanks for the Mac feedback, guys. Thomas, I'd definitely be interested in seeing those pictures - thank you! Oh, and where did you two order them from? Directly from Mac?

Yes ordered directly from Mac and and used fel-pro1444 header gaskets.
PM me your e-mail adress for the pics.
thomas1976 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2007, 07:01 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
89305formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: forest hill md
Posts: 296
Car: 89 formula
Engine: 305tpi
Transmission: t-56
Axle/Gears: ford 9" 4.11s

Classifieds Rating: (5)
Re: Opinions wanted: Hooker 2460 vs 2055 vs Mac TF8690

i bought mine about two years ago from my local speed shop they couldnt get them from mac because of a backorder or something but he found a set in california for me, i only paid 389$ which i think was a lot cheaper then buying them direct
89305formula is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 03:10 PM   #14
Supreme Member
 
thomas1976's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,712
Car: 91Trans am WS6
Engine: built 360 TBI
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10bolt/3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Opinions wanted: Hooker 2460 vs 2055 vs Mac TF8690

Jed, pics e-mail'd.
thomas1976 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 11:16 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
dubcity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Calgary AB.
Posts: 438
Car: 85 Camaro iroc
Engine: 305ci HO
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via MSN to dubcity
Re: Opinions wanted: Hooker 2460 vs 2055 vs Mac TF8690

what you doin with your old headers?
whats the #'s on them?
dubcity is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2007, 09:02 AM   #16
Supreme Member
 
thomas1976's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,712
Car: 91Trans am WS6
Engine: built 360 TBI
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10bolt/3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Opinions wanted: Hooker 2460 vs 2055 vs Mac TF8690

thomas1976 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2007, 07:26 PM   #17
Jed
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: NY
Posts: 292
Car: 89 Formula 350
Engine: 360 / HSR
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.27

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Opinions wanted: Hooker 2460 vs 2055 vs Mac TF8690

thomas, thanks for the pics. Sorry I couldn't respond sooner, I've been working way too much. I like the flanges and the collectors on those. I love that the AIR tubes aren't in the way! How was the installation? Did you have to raise the engine to get them in? Or was it nice and easy?
Jed is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 07:01 AM   #18
Supreme Member
 
thomas1976's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 1,712
Car: 91Trans am WS6
Engine: built 360 TBI
Transmission: built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 10bolt/3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Opinions wanted: Hooker 2460 vs 2055 vs Mac TF8690

Hey Jed, the air tubes and installfriendlyness are the + of tese headers, for the rest I think they go in the upper category with SLP and Hooker.
Im going to write wat I remember in the way to also give some good tips for someone that never did it.

I used fel-pro 1444 header gaskets because the included copper ones did not convice me, but I have no experience with eighter.

The longest part was taking the old ones off because of the heat shields everywere.

I put them from the top, dont think you can get them up from below. I once read the edelbrock-TES installation instruction that sayd raise the engine, but I have a pair of TES and they are tiny compared to the MAC.

Drivers side:
--unplug oil pressure wire,
--unbolt and move valve cover aside towards the engine to get the header to pass down
(you need to unplug the battery and remove the alternator wire before),
--take the oxygen sensor wire out of the protection tube approx 3" before the original place because it takes a little more wire to get to the sensor,
--to reinstall the alternator bracket you can reuse the original bolt, its the perfect size (fixed between 2 bolts).

Passenger side:
--unbolt air pump (2 bolts) and lay on top of the engine,
--disconnect fan switch (be carefull, the socket is oval, to remove it you need to press the larger part toghetter to get a O shape. I replaced mine because it broke),
--take oil dip stick and socket out (I hat to sligtly bend it and twist it around for 5min to get it out and 15min back in. Nightmair),
--take the starter off (by reinstalling you will notice that some wires are wery close to the headers, they are held in that position by a little lip that you can snapp off, tighten the wire bolts holding the wire in the best position between engine and headers),
--unbolt valve cover and push it aside towards the engine wenn wen lowering the header in place (a 3rd hand can be handy).
--to reinstall the air condition compressor bracket you need to chamfer it sligtly on the back because it tuches the headers. The luxury would be to have a second bolt like the one that holds the alternator bracket and if not reuse an old one with the appropriet amount of spacers to not damage the cilinder head.

To tighten the rear L & R bolt of the headers I had to break a key in half, it was too long and kept it to check the the bolts every mont even tought they are never loose.

No wires should ever thuch the headers, you can fixe them to the brackets or werever it holds them in a safe distance. Stock, I had 2 long&large straight and 2 small 90° spark plug sockets on each side, the straight sockets thuch the headers a little bit and will smoke for 2min when you start up, but it is only the socket because they are large.

Since the installation I made approx 3000 miles an everithing is still fine.

Hope this can help. Have fun!

Last edited by thomas1976; 05-09-2007 at 06:41 PM.
thomas1976 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2007, 12:18 AM   #19
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: tucson
Posts: 105
Car: 1986 Trans Am
Engine: 305
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: 3.23 gears

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Opinions wanted: Hooker 2460 vs 2055 vs Mac TF8690

i'm about to install some new TES header on my TA... I've read some negative comments about the Edelbrock product and some good things too... any comments?
I'm also installing a new cat, nothing special, 3" and a 3" Edelbrock cat back...
suh_wheat_86305 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2007, 12:31 AM   #20
Senior Member
 
4playta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 455
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: Built chevy 350
Transmission: TCI Built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi 10 bolt

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Opinions wanted: Hooker 2460 vs 2055 vs Mac TF8690

I did the exact same thing 7fivekid suggested with the 2055's, I used an angle grinder and opened the collector up to 2.20 and have no leak issues.
4playta is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2007, 12:31 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Exhaust

Tags
2055, 2460, angle, chevy, collector, exhaust, header, headers, heads, hooker, installed, leak, mac, pictures, plug, size
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details