New times with new engine, not so good....
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lowell, Michigan
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am, 2005 Sierra 2500
Engine: Vortec 357
Transmission: Built TH700R4 with 26-2800 Stall
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt 3.73 Posi
New times with new engine, not so good....
Im heading to the local drag strip after work tommrow nite. They are having their normal fun and grudge test and tune with a Midnight Madness at 9-11. I just worked the last of the many electrical gremlins out of my new engine I hope. Here are my engine specs:
1975 350 2 main bolt engine bored .40" (357)
Edelbrock Performer ESP Vortec Dual Plane Squarebore intake manifold
1999 Vortec 350 cylinder heads (062 casting #) new seals, stock.
Edelbrock Performer Plus Camshaft Flattappet .442" total lift on intake/exhaust
Edelbrock 600CFM Carburator with Vaccum secondaries
Hooker Super Competition Headers
Full 3" exhaust with single 3" cutout
K&M Open Element 14x3" Filter
1LE A/C delete Pulley
Smog pump bypassed
MSD "Ready to Run" E- Curve Distributor
Eagle Steel Crankshaft machined .10/.10
Keith Black Hypertenetic Teflon coated Aluminum Pistons w/ Cast Iron rings
Transmission Specs:
TH700R4 with complete overhaul/rebuild.
B&M Transgo Shift kit stage 2 with Corvette Servo
BullyDog 2400-2800 Stall Converter
High pressure/12 fin transmission pump
Kevlar Clutch band
Hi-performance clutch kit (dont remember brand name at this time)
Now Im running the stock gears in the rear for now, 2.73 (drum brakes). Im looking for a low to mid 14 second time slip but what do you all think i will run. Im running Nitto 555R Extreme Drag Radials for traction. All stock suspension setup as well. I believe a low 14 second time slip is possible with the right reaction time, but everyone ive talked to says a low 15 at best. Weather should be around the 60's to high 50's come 9pm. Cam isnt as big as i wanted but money got tight and it was free from a good friend and being brand new never used i couldnt say no. Ill post pics and vids as soon as i get them tommrow night.
1975 350 2 main bolt engine bored .40" (357)
Edelbrock Performer ESP Vortec Dual Plane Squarebore intake manifold
1999 Vortec 350 cylinder heads (062 casting #) new seals, stock.
Edelbrock Performer Plus Camshaft Flattappet .442" total lift on intake/exhaust
Edelbrock 600CFM Carburator with Vaccum secondaries
Hooker Super Competition Headers
Full 3" exhaust with single 3" cutout
K&M Open Element 14x3" Filter
1LE A/C delete Pulley
Smog pump bypassed
MSD "Ready to Run" E- Curve Distributor
Eagle Steel Crankshaft machined .10/.10
Keith Black Hypertenetic Teflon coated Aluminum Pistons w/ Cast Iron rings
Transmission Specs:
TH700R4 with complete overhaul/rebuild.
B&M Transgo Shift kit stage 2 with Corvette Servo
BullyDog 2400-2800 Stall Converter
High pressure/12 fin transmission pump
Kevlar Clutch band
Hi-performance clutch kit (dont remember brand name at this time)
Now Im running the stock gears in the rear for now, 2.73 (drum brakes). Im looking for a low to mid 14 second time slip but what do you all think i will run. Im running Nitto 555R Extreme Drag Radials for traction. All stock suspension setup as well. I believe a low 14 second time slip is possible with the right reaction time, but everyone ive talked to says a low 15 at best. Weather should be around the 60's to high 50's come 9pm. Cam isnt as big as i wanted but money got tight and it was free from a good friend and being brand new never used i couldnt say no. Ill post pics and vids as soon as i get them tommrow night.
#2
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lowell, Michigan
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am, 2005 Sierra 2500
Engine: Vortec 357
Transmission: Built TH700R4 with 26-2800 Stall
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt 3.73 Posi
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
Well the track was so busy that i only got to make 2 passes in 4 hours!
but the car didnt make the times i was hoping for: here are my passes in order:
Pass #1
RT- +.1794
60 ft- 2.3388
330 ft- 6.6288
ET @ 594 ft- 9.4721
1/8 ET- 10.1036
1/8 MPH- 71.25
1000' ET- 13.085
1/4 ET- 15.6204
1/4 MPH- 88.88
The first pass was bad as i only stalled it at 2100 and the car started missing bad around 4k so i had to let out and get back into it. before the 2nd pass i jumped the timing up, dropped my rear tires to 25psi and took my air cleaner off.
pass #2
RT- +.4201
60 ft- 2.2719
330 ft- 6.3770
ET @ 594 ft- 9.1876
1/8 ET- 9.8151
1/8 MPH- 71.71
1000' ET- 12.7805
1000' MPH- 82.56
1/4 ET- 15.2931
1/4 MPH- 89.74
2nd pass was better, was able to stall the car at 2400rpm this time, engine didnt miss at all but bogged a little bit in 3rd. I definelty think a bigger carb and some 3.73 gears would give me an impovement. Car weights 3150 lbs with me in it. I was ruinning premium and tank was 1/2 full. I havent tested the stall with the new tires to see if the tires will hold around 3k. Might go back later this weekend and try and make some more runs. If anyone has any imput on what i can do to get better times it would be appreciated. I have 2 vidoes and will get them up asap. they were taken on a camera phone tho. Talked to a guy who had a 1987 GTA with a 96" LT1 with a ProChager pushing 850 Hp. He ran mid 9's at 136mph. In all i counted 7 thirdgens all together. Got alot fo good ideas for the next motor build hehe....
but the car didnt make the times i was hoping for: here are my passes in order:
Pass #1
RT- +.1794
60 ft- 2.3388
330 ft- 6.6288
ET @ 594 ft- 9.4721
1/8 ET- 10.1036
1/8 MPH- 71.25
1000' ET- 13.085
1/4 ET- 15.6204
1/4 MPH- 88.88
The first pass was bad as i only stalled it at 2100 and the car started missing bad around 4k so i had to let out and get back into it. before the 2nd pass i jumped the timing up, dropped my rear tires to 25psi and took my air cleaner off.
pass #2
RT- +.4201
60 ft- 2.2719
330 ft- 6.3770
ET @ 594 ft- 9.1876
1/8 ET- 9.8151
1/8 MPH- 71.71
1000' ET- 12.7805
1000' MPH- 82.56
1/4 ET- 15.2931
1/4 MPH- 89.74
2nd pass was better, was able to stall the car at 2400rpm this time, engine didnt miss at all but bogged a little bit in 3rd. I definelty think a bigger carb and some 3.73 gears would give me an impovement. Car weights 3150 lbs with me in it. I was ruinning premium and tank was 1/2 full. I havent tested the stall with the new tires to see if the tires will hold around 3k. Might go back later this weekend and try and make some more runs. If anyone has any imput on what i can do to get better times it would be appreciated. I have 2 vidoes and will get them up asap. they were taken on a camera phone tho. Talked to a guy who had a 1987 GTA with a 96" LT1 with a ProChager pushing 850 Hp. He ran mid 9's at 136mph. In all i counted 7 thirdgens all together. Got alot fo good ideas for the next motor build hehe....
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hou. TX
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
That thing is trapping like a turd, something wrong there.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lowell, Michigan
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am, 2005 Sierra 2500
Engine: Vortec 357
Transmission: Built TH700R4 with 26-2800 Stall
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt 3.73 Posi
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
Ya it feels like it makes good power in the 2800-3500 rpm range after that it just dies. idk what to do i spent well over $2400 in just the engine build alone. I could of beefed up the stock 305 and proably run better times. Can anyone give me a hint on where i should start?
#7
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hou. TX
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
An intake and carb are calling your name.
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lowell, Michigan
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am, 2005 Sierra 2500
Engine: Vortec 357
Transmission: Built TH700R4 with 26-2800 Stall
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt 3.73 Posi
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
This is a guess but could a possibly have a vaccum problem and my secondaries not opening all the way or even at all? Im limited when it comes to intakes since im running Vortec heads, and yes i agree a bigger carb is in order. I was looking into a 650 or 700 cfm carb, but from who ive talked to they say anything above 650cfm is too much for my motor. Im really itching on buying a Holley 670 Street Avenger.
#10
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
My '88 IROC had a very small Crane cam with similar lift, 1 1/2" shorty headers, and lower control arms with the same tire and gear you're running with and no stall and turned out 14.40's all day with way faster trap speeds. Granted it was a TPI motor, but I would agree that you should start with your intake and carb.
#11
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hou. TX
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
This is a guess but could a possibly have a vaccum problem and my secondaries not opening all the way or even at all? Im limited when it comes to intakes since im running Vortec heads, and yes i agree a bigger carb is in order. I was looking into a 650 or 700 cfm carb, but from who ive talked to they say anything above 650cfm is too much for my motor. Im really itching on buying a Holley 670 Street Avenger.
What is the cam specs?
#12
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hou. TX
Posts: 5,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 TA, 91 B4C
Engine: 5.3, 4.8
Transmission: 4L80 4000, T56
Axle/Gears: 4.30 M12, 23.42 10 bolt
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
This is a guess but could a possibly have a vaccum problem and my secondaries not opening all the way or even at all? Im limited when it comes to intakes since im running Vortec heads, and yes i agree a bigger carb is in order. I was looking into a 650 or 700 cfm carb, but from who ive talked to they say anything above 650cfm is too much for my motor. Im really itching on buying a Holley 670 Street Avenger.
What is the cam specs?
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lowell, Michigan
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am, 2005 Sierra 2500
Engine: Vortec 357
Transmission: Built TH700R4 with 26-2800 Stall
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt 3.73 Posi
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
I dont remember the specs off the top of my head right now, but i have the spec sheet in my toolbox at work. Ill bring it home and post the specs. If i cant get this car to break into the 14's before I put it away for winter, looks like I may be doing a whole top end rebuild, new cam intake and carb. But I believe I may be loosing most of my power at my y pipe in the exhaust. I will post a pic of how the exhaust shop built the y pipe and tell me what you all think.
Heres 2 videos from the track, first video is my 2nd pass me in the right lane against a friend of mine in his 93 k1500 350 TBI with a few mods, 2nd video is me against a 90 Camaro RS with a 396 BB.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9B1L4ZZbMHc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFCQUL0lJi0
Heres 2 videos from the track, first video is my 2nd pass me in the right lane against a friend of mine in his 93 k1500 350 TBI with a few mods, 2nd video is me against a 90 Camaro RS with a 396 BB.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9B1L4ZZbMHc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFCQUL0lJi0
Last edited by TADailyDriver; 09-06-2009 at 04:32 PM.
#14
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
Something is very, VERY wrong here... with the exception of the cam and carb, assuming the rest is put together right you should be very close to 400hp. Even that cam and carb you should still be in roughtly the 350hp range with everything else right.
OTOH, your times, both 1/8 and 1/4, and your mph add up to ~175hp (at the crank). You say that it's better down low, but your times don't really show that, with a decent launch that hp/weight combination should be able to run a 1.85-1.9 60', so I unless you're getting a ton of wheelspin I'd guess you're even worse down low, the only reason it feels OK is the low first gear in the tranny and the converter. It's not the gears also, since the stall should cover up the lack of gear. Since all your numbers match up so well it's not like you have one or 2 things out of whack that just don't match up, you're just not making the power.
Do you know what compression ratio you ended up with, how far in the hole the pistons are...? Is it running OK? Cranking compression? I suppose it could be just very bad tuning, but I have a hard time believing that you're that far off. Disconnect any vacuum advance, hook up a timing light, you should be seeing something in the low/mid 30 something degrees advance (I'd like to see it by 25-2800, but as long as it's in by 3200-3400 or so it's OK. I can't imagine that if the fuel is significantly off one way or the other you wouldn't have noticed other problems.
Even an old school goodwrench replacement truck engine with compression in the 8's and crappy heads would have given you at least 250hp or more for about the same $ with much lesser parts, which should be enough to get a 3150 car into the mid 13's @ 100mph.
You tell us, you're so down on power there should be something obviously wrong.
OTOH, your times, both 1/8 and 1/4, and your mph add up to ~175hp (at the crank). You say that it's better down low, but your times don't really show that, with a decent launch that hp/weight combination should be able to run a 1.85-1.9 60', so I unless you're getting a ton of wheelspin I'd guess you're even worse down low, the only reason it feels OK is the low first gear in the tranny and the converter. It's not the gears also, since the stall should cover up the lack of gear. Since all your numbers match up so well it's not like you have one or 2 things out of whack that just don't match up, you're just not making the power.
Do you know what compression ratio you ended up with, how far in the hole the pistons are...? Is it running OK? Cranking compression? I suppose it could be just very bad tuning, but I have a hard time believing that you're that far off. Disconnect any vacuum advance, hook up a timing light, you should be seeing something in the low/mid 30 something degrees advance (I'd like to see it by 25-2800, but as long as it's in by 3200-3400 or so it's OK. I can't imagine that if the fuel is significantly off one way or the other you wouldn't have noticed other problems.
Even an old school goodwrench replacement truck engine with compression in the 8's and crappy heads would have given you at least 250hp or more for about the same $ with much lesser parts, which should be enough to get a 3150 car into the mid 13's @ 100mph.
You tell us, you're so down on power there should be something obviously wrong.
#15
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
#2103
ENGINE: CHEVY 400 V8
RPM RANGE: 1500-5500
Duration at 0.006" Lift: Intake: 288° Exhaust: 288°
Duration at 0.050" Lift: Intake: 214° Exhaust: 214°
Lift at Cam: Intake: 0.295" Exhaust: 0.295"
Lift at Valve: Intake: 0.442" Exhaust: 0.442"
Timing at 0.050" lift: Open Close
Intake: 0° ATDC 34° ABDC
Exhaust: 44° BBDC 10° BTDC
Centerlines: Lobe Separation - 112° Intake Centerline - 107°
#16
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
I'd say his problem is more in the tune or something mechanically wrong.
No way upping his carb is going to magically free up the 50 horses he's missing.
My guess is the timing is skewed, the carb is physically out of whack, and possibly not enough fuel pressure.
The combo itself should be trapping 94-98 mph or so.
(There's no way that combo should be making 400hp though, as someone stated)
No way upping his carb is going to magically free up the 50 horses he's missing.
My guess is the timing is skewed, the carb is physically out of whack, and possibly not enough fuel pressure.
The combo itself should be trapping 94-98 mph or so.
(There's no way that combo should be making 400hp though, as someone stated)
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lowell, Michigan
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am, 2005 Sierra 2500
Engine: Vortec 357
Transmission: Built TH700R4 with 26-2800 Stall
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt 3.73 Posi
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
Something is very, VERY wrong here... with the exception of the cam and carb, assuming the rest is put together right you should be very close to 400hp. Even that cam and carb you should still be in roughtly the 350hp range with everything else right.
OTOH, your times, both 1/8 and 1/4, and your mph add up to ~175hp (at the crank). You say that it's better down low, but your times don't really show that, with a decent launch that hp/weight combination should be able to run a 1.85-1.9 60', so I unless you're getting a ton of wheelspin I'd guess you're even worse down low, the only reason it feels OK is the low first gear in the tranny and the converter. It's not the gears also, since the stall should cover up the lack of gear. Since all your numbers match up so well it's not like you have one or 2 things out of whack that just don't match up, you're just not making the power.
Do you know what compression ratio you ended up with, how far in the hole the pistons are...? Is it running OK? Cranking compression? I suppose it could be just very bad tuning, but I have a hard time believing that you're that far off. Disconnect any vacuum advance, hook up a timing light, you should be seeing something in the low/mid 30 something degrees advance (I'd like to see it by 25-2800, but as long as it's in by 3200-3400 or so it's OK. I can't imagine that if the fuel is significantly off one way or the other you wouldn't have noticed other problems.
Even an old school goodwrench replacement truck engine with compression in the 8's and crappy heads would have given you at least 250hp or more for about the same $ with much lesser parts, which should be enough to get a 3150 car into the mid 13's @ 100mph.
You tell us, you're so down on power there should be something obviously wrong.
OTOH, your times, both 1/8 and 1/4, and your mph add up to ~175hp (at the crank). You say that it's better down low, but your times don't really show that, with a decent launch that hp/weight combination should be able to run a 1.85-1.9 60', so I unless you're getting a ton of wheelspin I'd guess you're even worse down low, the only reason it feels OK is the low first gear in the tranny and the converter. It's not the gears also, since the stall should cover up the lack of gear. Since all your numbers match up so well it's not like you have one or 2 things out of whack that just don't match up, you're just not making the power.
Do you know what compression ratio you ended up with, how far in the hole the pistons are...? Is it running OK? Cranking compression? I suppose it could be just very bad tuning, but I have a hard time believing that you're that far off. Disconnect any vacuum advance, hook up a timing light, you should be seeing something in the low/mid 30 something degrees advance (I'd like to see it by 25-2800, but as long as it's in by 3200-3400 or so it's OK. I can't imagine that if the fuel is significantly off one way or the other you wouldn't have noticed other problems.
Even an old school goodwrench replacement truck engine with compression in the 8's and crappy heads would have given you at least 250hp or more for about the same $ with much lesser parts, which should be enough to get a 3150 car into the mid 13's @ 100mph.
You tell us, you're so down on power there should be something obviously wrong.
Driver side header:
http://img2.imageshack.us/i/0906091741.jpg/
Passenger side header, pipe heading to cutout:
http://img169.imageshack.us/i/0906091742.jpg/
I think i may try removing the y pipe and haul it to the track to see if that is the biggest problem. When i ran the car open headered on the street at my house, i could spin the tires in 2nd going WOT and it seemed much faster then. Now it seems slow and sluggish with the new exhaust. In all honesty i have NO IDEA where i went wrong or what is wrong. But i may start with the exhaust.
#18
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lowell, Michigan
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am, 2005 Sierra 2500
Engine: Vortec 357
Transmission: Built TH700R4 with 26-2800 Stall
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt 3.73 Posi
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
there's three performer plus cams for the sbc, the only one that matches your description is the one for a 400 small block:
#2103
ENGINE: CHEVY 400 V8
RPM RANGE: 1500-5500
Duration at 0.006" Lift: Intake: 288° Exhaust: 288°
Duration at 0.050" Lift: Intake: 214° Exhaust: 214°
Lift at Cam: Intake: 0.295" Exhaust: 0.295"
Lift at Valve: Intake: 0.442" Exhaust: 0.442"
Timing at 0.050" lift: Open Close
Intake: 0° ATDC 34° ABDC
Exhaust: 44° BBDC 10° BTDC
Centerlines: Lobe Separation - 112° Intake Centerline - 107°
#2103
ENGINE: CHEVY 400 V8
RPM RANGE: 1500-5500
Duration at 0.006" Lift: Intake: 288° Exhaust: 288°
Duration at 0.050" Lift: Intake: 214° Exhaust: 214°
Lift at Cam: Intake: 0.295" Exhaust: 0.295"
Lift at Valve: Intake: 0.442" Exhaust: 0.442"
Timing at 0.050" lift: Open Close
Intake: 0° ATDC 34° ABDC
Exhaust: 44° BBDC 10° BTDC
Centerlines: Lobe Separation - 112° Intake Centerline - 107°
#19
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: 355
Transmission: Th-400
Axle/Gears: 4.56 Richmond Gears
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
I had the same problem from my car. Except I had dart heads and a big cam and all that jaz. It ended up just being alot of little things. Check cheap stuff first, make sure your firing on all 8, a dead plug means a no power in that cylinder, then your timing, you said you dist doesn't have an advance was it welded up inside? If it was then timing can jump around. However, just for comparison I had a very similar set up except I had 305 heads and a 750 holley and ran 9.40's. Oh yeah and is your tranny slipping?
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lowell, Michigan
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am, 2005 Sierra 2500
Engine: Vortec 357
Transmission: Built TH700R4 with 26-2800 Stall
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt 3.73 Posi
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
I had the same problem from my car. Except I had dart heads and a big cam and all that jaz. It ended up just being alot of little things. Check cheap stuff first, make sure your firing on all 8, a dead plug means a no power in that cylinder, then your timing, you said you dist doesn't have an advance was it welded up inside? If it was then timing can jump around. However, just for comparison I had a very similar set up except I had 305 heads and a 750 holley and ran 9.40's. Oh yeah and is your tranny slipping?
#21
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
so you have a basically stock vortec 350 on street tires and the car doesn't run well? hmm....
carb, intake, and CAMSHAFT...good lord the ramp rates on that camshaft are AWEFUL! 288* adv and only 214* @ .050! i bet it sounds like a pulp-wood truck going down the highway...especially with that y-pipe!
you just need more of everything, that's the biggest problem. you'll probably need to upgrade the valve springs and get the guides milled in the heads to clear more lift. if you're stuck with the converter you got and a hyd. flat tappet style camshaft, go with an comp XE grind, like a n XE268 or something that has more aggressive lobes. there is so much more to a camshaft then just overall lift numbers. the comp XE268 has less adv. duration then your cam, but MORE duration at .050" so that means the ramp rates are steeper, more aggressive, and that get's the valve open quicker. also, you want something with a split design to help out with the weaker exhaust flow rates of most traditional 23* small block heads. about an 8* split in duration numbers with the exhaust being the larger number.
for now, if you're not interested in doing a cam swap, do the simple things. get a better flowing exhaust, stickier tires, and get the carb/timing tuning dialed in. put fresh plugs/wires in it for cryin' out loud, lol! you just spent $X to put the motor together and skimped out on the last $80 to put fresh ignition parts on it? come on man....
carb, intake, and CAMSHAFT...good lord the ramp rates on that camshaft are AWEFUL! 288* adv and only 214* @ .050! i bet it sounds like a pulp-wood truck going down the highway...especially with that y-pipe!
you just need more of everything, that's the biggest problem. you'll probably need to upgrade the valve springs and get the guides milled in the heads to clear more lift. if you're stuck with the converter you got and a hyd. flat tappet style camshaft, go with an comp XE grind, like a n XE268 or something that has more aggressive lobes. there is so much more to a camshaft then just overall lift numbers. the comp XE268 has less adv. duration then your cam, but MORE duration at .050" so that means the ramp rates are steeper, more aggressive, and that get's the valve open quicker. also, you want something with a split design to help out with the weaker exhaust flow rates of most traditional 23* small block heads. about an 8* split in duration numbers with the exhaust being the larger number.
for now, if you're not interested in doing a cam swap, do the simple things. get a better flowing exhaust, stickier tires, and get the carb/timing tuning dialed in. put fresh plugs/wires in it for cryin' out loud, lol! you just spent $X to put the motor together and skimped out on the last $80 to put fresh ignition parts on it? come on man....
Last edited by mw66nova; 09-07-2009 at 08:43 PM.
#22
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Newington, CT
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 5.7 RamJet
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Dana44 4.10
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
This is a MAJOR problem. Completely WRONG plug. It's too short. You need a Vortec head specific plug with a longer reach. Put the right plugs in and you will see a big difference.
ACDelco R44LTS @ .035" or equivalent brand of your preference.
ACDelco R44LTS @ .035" or equivalent brand of your preference.
Last edited by Jay; 09-07-2009 at 09:18 PM.
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lowell, Michigan
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am, 2005 Sierra 2500
Engine: Vortec 357
Transmission: Built TH700R4 with 26-2800 Stall
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt 3.73 Posi
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
so you have a basically stock vortec 350 on street tires and the car doesn't run well? hmm....
carb, intake, and CAMSHAFT...good lord the ramp rates on that camshaft are AWEFUL! 288* adv and only 214* @ .050! i bet it sounds like a pulp-wood truck going down the highway...especially with that y-pipe!
you just need more of everything, that's the biggest problem. you'll probably need to upgrade the valve springs and get the guides milled in the heads to clear more lift. if you're stuck with the converter you got and a hyd. flat tappet style camshaft, go with an comp XE grind, like a n XE268 or something that has more aggressive lobes. there is so much more to a camshaft then just overall lift numbers. the comp XE268 has less adv. duration then your cam, but MORE duration at .050" so that means the ramp rates are steeper, more aggressive, and that get's the valve open quicker. also, you want something with a split design to help out with the weaker exhaust flow rates of most traditional 23* small block heads. about an 8* split in duration numbers with the exhaust being the larger number.
for now, if you're not interested in doing a cam swap, do the simple things. get a better flowing exhaust, stickier tires, and get the carb/timing tuning dialed in. put fresh plugs/wires in it for cryin' out loud, lol! you just spent $X to put the motor together and skimped out on the last $80 to put fresh ignition parts on it? come on man....
carb, intake, and CAMSHAFT...good lord the ramp rates on that camshaft are AWEFUL! 288* adv and only 214* @ .050! i bet it sounds like a pulp-wood truck going down the highway...especially with that y-pipe!
you just need more of everything, that's the biggest problem. you'll probably need to upgrade the valve springs and get the guides milled in the heads to clear more lift. if you're stuck with the converter you got and a hyd. flat tappet style camshaft, go with an comp XE grind, like a n XE268 or something that has more aggressive lobes. there is so much more to a camshaft then just overall lift numbers. the comp XE268 has less adv. duration then your cam, but MORE duration at .050" so that means the ramp rates are steeper, more aggressive, and that get's the valve open quicker. also, you want something with a split design to help out with the weaker exhaust flow rates of most traditional 23* small block heads. about an 8* split in duration numbers with the exhaust being the larger number.
for now, if you're not interested in doing a cam swap, do the simple things. get a better flowing exhaust, stickier tires, and get the carb/timing tuning dialed in. put fresh plugs/wires in it for cryin' out loud, lol! you just spent $X to put the motor together and skimped out on the last $80 to put fresh ignition parts on it? come on man....
#24
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Newington, CT
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 5.7 RamJet
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Dana44 4.10
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
Did you make sure to get them for a Vortec head? The Vortec head is not the same as the standard SBC head in this regard. Using a standard plug for your old engine, ends up with a plug that's close to a 1/4" too short.
#25
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lowell, Michigan
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am, 2005 Sierra 2500
Engine: Vortec 357
Transmission: Built TH700R4 with 26-2800 Stall
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt 3.73 Posi
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
sure did and im glad because 4 diffrent techs at the dealership told me there was NO difference but yes infact there was. the old plug was like you said about a 1/4"too short. Put the new plugs in with new wires and i can already feel the differnece. car starts right away on first crank, idles better and the acceleration does seem a little better but I wont be able to exaclty tell how much better until I go back to the track. Going to call around and get pricing on having a new y pipe made. If no one quotes me lower then what the Hooker 2055 y pipe is off jegs then ill go that route. Ill even post a pic i took to show the difference and to show off at the shop to prove them wrong haha. thanks Jay for the imput! Now i just have to pinpoint my exhaust leak i can hear but not feel when i move my hand around the headers and y pipe.
#26
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
The 305 plugs should also be too hot… for that matter, you have a lot of hints there that your compression is low, and from some of your answers I suspect that the pistons are too far in the hole, total compression is low… I would confirm, if your compression is under 9:1 you’ll be fighting that no matter what else you do, and my and other’s suggestions will never get you where you want to go. Sounds like your engine builder is at best not very helpful, at worst possibly clueless.
I still think that there’s a major tuning problem somewhere, but obviously there are parts that are lacking in the combination also. I disagree with the thoughts about a fuel delivery problem, generally if that’s the issue you see a car that runs great till half track or the top end that all of a sudden falls over, like I said, the numbers you posted you’re just not making power anywhere.
With your added information, I’d start with a _much_ better exhaust, with those headers if you want something that will work run 2-1/2” pipes, and run the 2 sides around the passenger side frame rail and use something like the flowmaster 2.5”-3” Y (spend the money, most shops won’t do nearly as well). The matching Y is OK, but not great, I’ll attach a pic of a really beat up setup (the car was lowered a lot, and parts that were flattened were cut out and replaced multiple times, making it look worse than it is) for those headers with 2.5” tubing to 2.5” high flow cats, flowmaster Y and no muffler that worked great.
Better, if you can stand the loss of ground clearance long tube headers are the way to go.
Better cam… the cam mentioned by Matt is a good choice if you don’t want to mess with the heads, otherwise I’d consider springs and cutting down the guides and go with something more serious. Until you mess with the heads you won’t be able to run a cam that will really work with this setup.
Next you’ll want a bigger carb, something in the 750 range should be OK.
Converter choice will depend on your compression and final cam choice. Gears will help, but not as much as the right converter.
Nittos are pretty much street tires… keep the pressures high in them on the street and you’ll get 20-30K miles out of them (generally I get more miles out of them then more normal street radials, since the bit of extra traction cuts down on some of the wheel spin)
I still think that there’s a major tuning problem somewhere, but obviously there are parts that are lacking in the combination also. I disagree with the thoughts about a fuel delivery problem, generally if that’s the issue you see a car that runs great till half track or the top end that all of a sudden falls over, like I said, the numbers you posted you’re just not making power anywhere.
With your added information, I’d start with a _much_ better exhaust, with those headers if you want something that will work run 2-1/2” pipes, and run the 2 sides around the passenger side frame rail and use something like the flowmaster 2.5”-3” Y (spend the money, most shops won’t do nearly as well). The matching Y is OK, but not great, I’ll attach a pic of a really beat up setup (the car was lowered a lot, and parts that were flattened were cut out and replaced multiple times, making it look worse than it is) for those headers with 2.5” tubing to 2.5” high flow cats, flowmaster Y and no muffler that worked great.
Better, if you can stand the loss of ground clearance long tube headers are the way to go.
Better cam… the cam mentioned by Matt is a good choice if you don’t want to mess with the heads, otherwise I’d consider springs and cutting down the guides and go with something more serious. Until you mess with the heads you won’t be able to run a cam that will really work with this setup.
Next you’ll want a bigger carb, something in the 750 range should be OK.
Converter choice will depend on your compression and final cam choice. Gears will help, but not as much as the right converter.
Nittos are pretty much street tires… keep the pressures high in them on the street and you’ll get 20-30K miles out of them (generally I get more miles out of them then more normal street radials, since the bit of extra traction cuts down on some of the wheel spin)
#27
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
FYI if you would of read the first entry I have Nitto 555R Extreme Drag Radials on the rear. Since when did those be considered street tires??? Yes the cam is weak but when money got tight and the damn thing was free I was not going to complain. But yes it needs a better flowing exhaust, and yes I am going to swap a new cam in this winter as well as have the heads milled. I just picked up some Ac delco Platnuim plugs today at work and bought some MSD 8.8mm wires. I will be putting those in tonight after work along with some Copper Mr. Gasket header gaskets as ive already blwon through 2 sets of header collector gaskets and now its time for header gaskets. Anyway howd those center caps I sold you for your Firebird work out???
i'm sure the plugs/wires will show dramatic improvement since they're the right plugs now.
i HIGHLY recommend going with an aluminum collector gasket. they work far better than the copper and are nearly in-destructable.
good luck
ps-my mother is really enjoying the car, and the centercaps, once painted, looked great! though i think i told you that in a pm already when i received them.
#28
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lowell, Michigan
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am, 2005 Sierra 2500
Engine: Vortec 357
Transmission: Built TH700R4 with 26-2800 Stall
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt 3.73 Posi
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
by the tone of your responce, you took what i had to say the wrong way. i slapped you with some facts, don't get all wrapped around the axle because of that. i didn't call you an idiot or anything, just giving you a crash course in how to get the car down the track.
i'm sure the plugs/wires will show dramatic improvement since they're the right plugs now.
i HIGHLY recommend going with an aluminum collector gasket. they work far better than the copper and are nearly in-destructable.
good luck
ps-my mother is really enjoying the car, and the centercaps, once painted, looked great! though i think i told you that in a pm already when i received them.
i'm sure the plugs/wires will show dramatic improvement since they're the right plugs now.
i HIGHLY recommend going with an aluminum collector gasket. they work far better than the copper and are nearly in-destructable.
good luck
ps-my mother is really enjoying the car, and the centercaps, once painted, looked great! though i think i told you that in a pm already when i received them.
#29
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lowell, Michigan
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am, 2005 Sierra 2500
Engine: Vortec 357
Transmission: Built TH700R4 with 26-2800 Stall
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt 3.73 Posi
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
Well i stopped by the exhaust shop that did my exhaust for me and had a nice chat with the woner. told him I was not satisfied with the outcome of my y pipe and asked they re make it for a decent price. He looked at it, admitted it looked like crap and agreed to have one made up for my car to my liking for FREE. So I'm dropping the car off to him next week, told me he would take 2 days to get this right. Im also having them remove the Hi-Flow MagaFlow converter I had them install, as the car is too quiet with it on and I'd much rather just have a total free flowing exhaust. Im also in the process of looking for a used Holley or Demon 700-750 Carb. I'm going to attempt and re tune the engine this weekend, but even the intructions that came with my MSD distributor are hard to follw when it comes to adjusting the advancments under the cap. Would anyone have a general indea of where to set them? Ill post pics and even a link to the intructions themselves if that will help.
#30
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
i'd honestly like to see you go with a mechanical secondary 650 cfm holley. it'll have much crisper throttle response than a 700+ with that camshaft/compression combination.
you have a decent cylinder head, we just need to get you setup with more parts to help compliment what you have.
you have a decent cylinder head, we just need to get you setup with more parts to help compliment what you have.
#31
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lowell, Michigan
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am, 2005 Sierra 2500
Engine: Vortec 357
Transmission: Built TH700R4 with 26-2800 Stall
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt 3.73 Posi
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
i'd honestly like to see you go with a mechanical secondary 650 cfm holley. it'll have much crisper throttle response than a 700+ with that camshaft/compression combination.
you have a decent cylinder head, we just need to get you setup with more parts to help compliment what you have.
you have a decent cylinder head, we just need to get you setup with more parts to help compliment what you have.
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
Edelbrock 600CFM Carburator with Vacuum secondaries
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
I know how they work, its not vacuum operated like a Holley so the secondaries are opening and as long as the engine is working they are doing the job. Its not like a Quadrajet that you have adjustments to make there too, its non adjustable and really not something you would need to 'fix'.
#35
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lowell, Michigan
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am, 2005 Sierra 2500
Engine: Vortec 357
Transmission: Built TH700R4 with 26-2800 Stall
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt 3.73 Posi
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
carb acutally hasnt been adjusted much per say, just the idle screw and I adjusted the A/F adjustments on the front go the the engine to run right but with now knowing much about carbs, Im not really sure what else to adjust. Ill have to double look at the box for the carb and see exactly what it says but i know its a 600.
#36
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lowell, Michigan
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am, 2005 Sierra 2500
Engine: Vortec 357
Transmission: Built TH700R4 with 26-2800 Stall
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt 3.73 Posi
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
Alright guys, I know this is an old thread but a lot of things have changed since the last time I posted. Tons of new parts have been added and I have yet to hit the track yet this spring so I wanted to see what you all are perdicting I'm going to run this year. So here goes the new list of parts:
1. Junked the 600 Edlebrock carb and added a Holley 650 Electric Choke vaccum secondaries, Spreadbore carb with 1" adapter plate
2. GM 3.73 gears and junked the stock 2.73
3. Ported the intake and Vortec heads to match
4. Under drive pulley kit, crank, alternator, and water pump
5. Installed GM platnuim vortec plugs (didnt find out I had the wrong plugs in when I built my motor,, ran like *** at the track haha)
6. Had a pretty much basic tune done to the dizzy, still haven't gotten it figured out yet but I can tell it runs better already)
7. New Moser 10 bolt 26 spline axles
I know that ive done more but Im drawing a blank. Now last year with bad tune, wrong plugs, small carb, and stock gears I ran 15.6 best with 29psi in the drag radials. Im hoping for AT LEAST a low 13 at best. What do you all think?
1. Junked the 600 Edlebrock carb and added a Holley 650 Electric Choke vaccum secondaries, Spreadbore carb with 1" adapter plate
2. GM 3.73 gears and junked the stock 2.73
3. Ported the intake and Vortec heads to match
4. Under drive pulley kit, crank, alternator, and water pump
5. Installed GM platnuim vortec plugs (didnt find out I had the wrong plugs in when I built my motor,, ran like *** at the track haha)
6. Had a pretty much basic tune done to the dizzy, still haven't gotten it figured out yet but I can tell it runs better already)
7. New Moser 10 bolt 26 spline axles
I know that ive done more but Im drawing a blank. Now last year with bad tune, wrong plugs, small carb, and stock gears I ran 15.6 best with 29psi in the drag radials. Im hoping for AT LEAST a low 13 at best. What do you all think?
#37
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: projects.......
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
Any idea what spring is in the secondaries? The OE holley spring does not start to open till around 5k, and basically never fully opens. Thus with such a mild cam, it will need to be addressed, otherwise you'll basically be running on a 2-barrel.
Sounds like you should have the parts to meet your goals, whether you do or not comes down to the tuning and the launch.
Sounds like you should have the parts to meet your goals, whether you do or not comes down to the tuning and the launch.
#38
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
Alright guys, I know this is an old thread but a lot of things have changed since the last time I posted. Tons of new parts have been added and I have yet to hit the track yet this spring so I wanted to see what you all are perdicting I'm going to run this year. So here goes the new list of parts:
1. Junked the 600 Edlebrock carb and added a Holley 650 Electric Choke vaccum secondaries, Spreadbore carb with 1" adapter plate
2. GM 3.73 gears and junked the stock 2.73
3. Ported the intake and Vortec heads to match
4. Under drive pulley kit, crank, alternator, and water pump
5. Installed GM platnuim vortec plugs (didnt find out I had the wrong plugs in when I built my motor,, ran like *** at the track haha)
6. Had a pretty much basic tune done to the dizzy, still haven't gotten it figured out yet but I can tell it runs better already)
7. New Moser 10 bolt 26 spline axles
I know that ive done more but Im drawing a blank. Now last year with bad tune, wrong plugs, small carb, and stock gears I ran 15.6 best with 29psi in the drag radials. Im hoping for AT LEAST a low 13 at best. What do you all think?
1. Junked the 600 Edlebrock carb and added a Holley 650 Electric Choke vaccum secondaries, Spreadbore carb with 1" adapter plate
2. GM 3.73 gears and junked the stock 2.73
3. Ported the intake and Vortec heads to match
4. Under drive pulley kit, crank, alternator, and water pump
5. Installed GM platnuim vortec plugs (didnt find out I had the wrong plugs in when I built my motor,, ran like *** at the track haha)
6. Had a pretty much basic tune done to the dizzy, still haven't gotten it figured out yet but I can tell it runs better already)
7. New Moser 10 bolt 26 spline axles
I know that ive done more but Im drawing a blank. Now last year with bad tune, wrong plugs, small carb, and stock gears I ran 15.6 best with 29psi in the drag radials. Im hoping for AT LEAST a low 13 at best. What do you all think?
#39
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lowell, Michigan
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am, 2005 Sierra 2500
Engine: Vortec 357
Transmission: Built TH700R4 with 26-2800 Stall
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt 3.73 Posi
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
Any idea what spring is in the secondaries? The OE holley spring does not start to open till around 5k, and basically never fully opens. Thus with such a mild cam, it will need to be addressed, otherwise you'll basically be running on a 2-barrel.
Sounds like you should have the parts to meet your goals, whether you do or not comes down to the tuning and the launch.
Sounds like you should have the parts to meet your goals, whether you do or not comes down to the tuning and the launch.
#40
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: projects.......
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
If you go taller than .470 lift with vortec heads, careful attention needs to be paid the the retainer-to-guide clearance; often the guides need to be machined down.
As noted by 87WS6, the OE casting flash in the bowls right behind the valves is a flow killer on stock vortecs. A little grinding can really wake them up.
As noted by 87WS6, the OE casting flash in the bowls right behind the valves is a flow killer on stock vortecs. A little grinding can really wake them up.
#41
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lowell, Michigan
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1988 Trans Am, 2005 Sierra 2500
Engine: Vortec 357
Transmission: Built TH700R4 with 26-2800 Stall
Axle/Gears: GM 10 bolt 3.73 Posi
Re: New times with new engine, not so good....
If you go taller than .470 lift with vortec heads, careful attention needs to be paid the the retainer-to-guide clearance; often the guides need to be machined down.
As noted by 87WS6, the OE casting flash in the bowls right behind the valves is a flow killer on stock vortecs. A little grinding can really wake them up.
As noted by 87WS6, the OE casting flash in the bowls right behind the valves is a flow killer on stock vortecs. A little grinding can really wake them up.
Well I have a set to Trickflow head laying in my basement from a 383 stroker that i purchased years ago, was thinking of swapping to those and selling the Vortec's. How much more power do you think I would gain by swapping them and also installed an Air gap intake to match?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post