Power Adders Getting a Supercharger or Turbocharger? Thinking about using Nitrous? All forced induction and N2O topics discussed here.

anybody know anything about this?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-19-2003, 10:29 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
subzero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
anybody know anything about this?

www.designengineering.com
It appears to be some sort of CO2 based charged air kit and looks cool to me and actually might work...It would not cause the potential engine damage like nitrous can,although I am sure would not make that kind of power either.I like the philosophy behind it,plus it won the annual SEMA show's top award!..Somebody got some info about this,or did I stumble upon something for debate here?
Old 02-19-2003, 11:31 AM
  #2  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
CHRISMAN2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Winnipeg,MB
Posts: 431
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: 350 L98
Transmission: 700R4
It's like nitrous but you won't get the same amount of hp. But that sometimes a good thing, like when it comes to cares that don't have parts availible to make it strong.
I'll let you know how it works when I install it on my buddies car.
Old 02-19-2003, 01:34 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

 
sleepybu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: BC Canada
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 81Malibu
Engine: SBC 355
Transmission: TH400
you use that on a air to air i/c to cool the i/c making it more eficcent
Old 02-19-2003, 03:19 PM
  #4  
Member
Thread Starter
 
subzero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah it sounds as though It would do wonders to assist an intercooler further,but it also says it can be used on a normally aspirated engine..Like nitrous but maybe with less worry?...
Old 02-19-2003, 05:27 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
zerotosixtyV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MO
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Camaro
no, N2O is a extreme oxidizer, and when it's on, it floods into the engine in place of regular air or with air and it's almost as if you've got pure oxygen in your cylinders. This thing doesn't spray CO2 into the engine, that'd ruin performance completely. It cools the air coming into the engine significantly (by their claims anyways) and because cold air is more dense you're getting more oxygen into the engine to help with combustion. It seems more like a glorified cold air intake really. The intercooler thingie looks very useful though. I could see the benefits of this thing on a turbocharged engine, but not on a naturally aspirated engine.
Old 02-19-2003, 10:27 PM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
subzero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
should do great things on an intercooled car,but like you said zerotosixtyv8;The gains on a normally aspirated car would be minimal probably...I really want to see some performance data on this though as maybe it will suprise some of us...
Old 02-20-2003, 12:26 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member
 
ATOMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Indianapolis IN
Posts: 1,522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
#1 rule being ignored in most "cold air" setups. When you change the temperature of a fluid in a closed system (which is how the air can be modeled after it enters the induciton) you change the PRESSURE not the DENSITY. These are two very different things. If I heat up an aerosol can did I change the density of the stuff inside? Well, not until it explodes right? Did I change the pressure?
You only get more power when the atmospheric air is colder. It looks to me like it is injecting CO2 into the intake. Because it is so cold it reduces the air temperature. The only way this might help is that it could possibly cause the cylinder to fill better, but colder air doesn't move nearly as well as warm air. The other thing it could help is detonation. Auto ignition is a function of intake air temperature which is why boosted cars are intercooled. So on a boosted application this could work well because you could run more boost without worrying about detonation. On an NA engine you could run higher compression on cheap gas for several reason. 1. the auto ignition temperature is lowered 2. There is more inert gas in the system which will slow the burn down. It could also work well on a Nitrous system for the same reason. I say file this brilliant invention right next to the amazing fuel tornado thing and the electric super/turbo charger.

Last edited by ATOMonkey; 02-20-2003 at 12:32 PM.
Old 02-20-2003, 12:31 PM
  #8  
TGO Supporter

 
B4Ctom1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
alot of the air that flows over the IC can end up even in a very mixed way in the engine compartment. I would rather have trace amounts of nitrous floating around my engine comparment than trace amounts of CO2. There wouldnt be enough N2O to do any damage but it could do some good, the CO2 on the other hand could only work to dampen combustion if it is floating around where the filter could pick it up.
Old 02-20-2003, 06:26 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: DC Metro Area
Posts: 7,975
Received 83 Likes on 70 Posts
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Well, I can't seem to open their page, but if I'm following they're blowing a compressed gas over an intercooler to cool things farther then they could with air.

ATOMonkey, yes, that's true for a closed system, but an engine isn't a closed system. An extreme example of this is a turbo setup where the boost pressure is regulated by a wastegate. When the intake charge is cooled the turbo just keeps pumping more air till boost pressure is maintained, so essentially you get more dense air at the same pressure, which means more power.
Old 02-20-2003, 09:02 PM
  #10  
TGO Supporter

 
B4Ctom1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
This is what Im talking about, the original cryo intercooler chiller http://www.nitrousexpress.com/produc...oc=101&dealer=
Old 02-20-2003, 10:06 PM
  #11  
Member
Thread Starter
 
subzero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so,does anybody like it enough to try it?....guinea pigs anyone?
Old 02-21-2003, 11:06 AM
  #12  
Supreme Member

 
Jekyll & Hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Dallas/Fort-Worth
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI (L98)
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.45
It doesn't spray C02 into the intake. It has a bulb type system that cools the air in the intake. Think of it has a refrigerator. For the intercooled cars, it uses a line to send liquid C02, same as the bulb, but it cools the air before it passes through the intercooler.

Don't believe me, take time to read before you answer...
Old 02-21-2003, 11:14 AM
  #13  
TGO Supporter

 
B4Ctom1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
I guess you are missing my point, on most cars anything that is sprayed in the underhood area is likely to find its way into the air that is going into the engine, since this is the case. Any which way you look at it (even on cars that have cold air kits sometimes), I would rather have the under hood air on my car "contaminated" with trace amounts of nitrous instead of CO2. Im sure with a valve change to his system you could replace the CO2 bottle valve with a N2O valve to allow use of nitrous in his system, but how much cheaper than the NX one is it?
Old 02-21-2003, 01:51 PM
  #14  
Senior Member

 
sleepybu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: BC Canada
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 81Malibu
Engine: SBC 355
Transmission: TH400
it looks to me it dose bolth:lala:
http://www.designengineering.com/cry...ted_items.html
Old 02-22-2003, 12:32 AM
  #15  
Supreme Member

 
Jekyll & Hyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Dallas/Fort-Worth
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1988 Camaro IROC-Z
Engine: 350 TPI (L98)
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.45
Originally posted by B4Ctom1
I guess you are missing my point, on most cars anything that is sprayed in the underhood area is likely to find its way into the air that is going into the engine, since this is the case. Any which way you look at it (even on cars that have cold air kits sometimes), I would rather have the under hood air on my car "contaminated" with trace amounts of nitrous instead of CO2. Im sure with a valve change to his system you could replace the CO2 bottle valve with a N2O valve to allow use of nitrous in his system, but how much cheaper than the NX one is it?
I agree, I was just trying to get the point across that the engine will not run if it was sprayed directly into the plenum or intake tract. This just cools the metal, in turn, cools the air. Where would you charge the bottle up and how long will it last is my question.

They claim that it will cool the intake air 35%, and the intercooler systems 50%. Don't know about anybody else, but that is very, very hard to believe.

Last edited by Jekyll & Hyde; 02-22-2003 at 12:34 AM.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:55 PM.