Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

k-member

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-28-2004, 09:54 AM
  #1  
dr1
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
dr1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird Formula
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: T5
k-member

how much weight savings do you get going to a tubular k-member? and about how much are they? i saw a cheap one on ebay the other night and it said along with the rack and pinion setup they sell you save a total of 150lbs
Old 12-28-2004, 12:16 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
slimdawson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: New Bern NC United States of America
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 RS
Engine: Procharged LT1
Transmission: T56
Re: k-member

Originally posted by dr1
how much weight savings do you get going to a tubular k-member? and about how much are they? i saw a cheap one on ebay the other night and it said along with the rack and pinion setup they sell you save a total of 150lbs
You definately will NOT save 150. I can't remember how much I saved with just the kmember. It was less than 30 lbs though. The stock kmember isn't that heavy believe it or not.
Old 12-28-2004, 05:10 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (14)
 
greezemonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The "D"
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Car: A Portly 85 Z28
Engine: 4.530 X 4.250 BBC
Transmission: under rated for this application
Axle/Gears: also under rated
What he said...the stocker does not wiegh as much as you`d think. I switched to a tube k member and it did save some wieght but the biggest advantage is the room it creates, the wieght loss is small,(maybe 30 for the K) you`d be better offf relocating the battery to the rear if wieght reduction is what your after. The A-arms are almost as heavy as the k member..the aftermarket ones are are probably 1/4 of the wieght of the stamped arms.
Old 12-28-2004, 05:49 PM
  #4  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
itsjustabird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: jacksonville fl
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 firebird
Engine: sb2.2 headed sbnos
Transmission: tsi glide
Axle/Gears: 4.30
i saw that auction and i believe they were referring to a chromoly set-up k-member a-arms manual rack which would mean no more heavy steering box and no more steering pump brackets etc as far as 150 sounds good but id like someone to find out for sure if it really is good for that much i want 2
Old 12-31-2004, 02:50 AM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
stage20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: p'cola FL
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 iroc-z/28
Engine: 408 lsx
Transmission: 5800 stall
Axle/Gears: 4.71
k member
stock 54.5 pa 19.5

a arms
stock 30.0 pa 14.5

another 40 POUNDS i took off in a lightweight aluminum drag brake kit for the front.
33 POUNDS off the back with a drag brake kit and i already had factory iron discs.
:hail:
Old 12-31-2004, 02:57 PM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
slimdawson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: New Bern NC United States of America
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 RS
Engine: Procharged LT1
Transmission: T56
I just weighed my stock kmember. 45lbs.

If my aftermarket weights 20, I only saved 25 lbs. You definately don't pay for weight savings. The increase in room is almost worth it.
Old 12-31-2004, 07:51 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
stage20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: p'cola FL
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 iroc-z/28
Engine: 408 lsx
Transmission: 5800 stall
Axle/Gears: 4.71
25lbs
the room
the looks
do it.
Old 01-01-2005, 04:45 PM
  #8  
Kat
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
Kat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Upland Pa
Posts: 1,716
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Camaro Vert
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 S60
Figure K member, a-arms, coil over kit, manual rack will prolly be about 80-100 pounds off the front

Kat
Old 01-01-2005, 06:01 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
stage20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: p'cola FL
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 iroc-z/28
Engine: 408 lsx
Transmission: 5800 stall
Axle/Gears: 4.71
i took off 79 pounds with k member a arms and drag brakes.
looking for another 30 or so when i do the manual rack.
sticking with my stock spring setup.... never liked the coilover idea, plus ive already got drag springs and struts. no sense in buying parts 2 times just to save 10 pounds.
Old 01-01-2005, 06:28 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
White91GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Trans AM GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
stage 20...where did you get your brake setup from and what was the cost of it?
Old 01-02-2005, 12:32 AM
  #11  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
stage20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: p'cola FL
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 iroc-z/28
Engine: 408 lsx
Transmission: 5800 stall
Axle/Gears: 4.71
aerospace components. www.jegs.com has them. 5 something for the front and 399 for the rears.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
matt's 91rs/tt
LSX and LTX Parts
2
10-08-2015 06:11 AM
Mdenz3
LTX and LSX
8
09-17-2015 08:36 AM
tricky1
Exhaust
4
08-23-2015 01:17 PM
overdriv
Camaros for Sale
0
08-20-2015 03:52 PM
NBrehm
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
08-05-2015 07:57 PM



Quick Reply: k-member



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:03 PM.