Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

k-member

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 09:54 AM
  #1  
dr1's Avatar
dr1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 678
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Car: '89 Firebird Formula
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: T5
k-member

how much weight savings do you get going to a tubular k-member? and about how much are they? i saw a cheap one on ebay the other night and it said along with the rack and pinion setup they sell you save a total of 150lbs
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 12:16 PM
  #2  
slimdawson's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: New Bern NC United States of America
Car: 1991 RS
Engine: Procharged LT1
Transmission: T56
Re: k-member

Originally posted by dr1
how much weight savings do you get going to a tubular k-member? and about how much are they? i saw a cheap one on ebay the other night and it said along with the rack and pinion setup they sell you save a total of 150lbs
You definately will NOT save 150. I can't remember how much I saved with just the kmember. It was less than 30 lbs though. The stock kmember isn't that heavy believe it or not.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 05:10 PM
  #3  
greezemonkey's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 4
From: The "D"
Car: A Portly 85 Z28
Engine: 4.530 X 4.250 BBC
Transmission: under rated for this application
Axle/Gears: also under rated
What he said...the stocker does not wiegh as much as you`d think. I switched to a tube k member and it did save some wieght but the biggest advantage is the room it creates, the wieght loss is small,(maybe 30 for the K) you`d be better offf relocating the battery to the rear if wieght reduction is what your after. The A-arms are almost as heavy as the k member..the aftermarket ones are are probably 1/4 of the wieght of the stamped arms.
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2004 | 05:49 PM
  #4  
itsjustabird's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
From: jacksonville fl
Car: 91 firebird
Engine: sb2.2 headed sbnos
Transmission: tsi glide
Axle/Gears: 4.30
i saw that auction and i believe they were referring to a chromoly set-up k-member a-arms manual rack which would mean no more heavy steering box and no more steering pump brackets etc as far as 150 sounds good but id like someone to find out for sure if it really is good for that much i want 2
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2004 | 02:50 AM
  #5  
stage20's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: p'cola FL
Car: 88 iroc-z/28
Engine: 408 lsx
Transmission: 5800 stall
Axle/Gears: 4.71
k member
stock 54.5 pa 19.5

a arms
stock 30.0 pa 14.5

another 40 POUNDS i took off in a lightweight aluminum drag brake kit for the front.
33 POUNDS off the back with a drag brake kit and i already had factory iron discs.
:hail:
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2004 | 02:57 PM
  #6  
slimdawson's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
From: New Bern NC United States of America
Car: 1991 RS
Engine: Procharged LT1
Transmission: T56
I just weighed my stock kmember. 45lbs.

If my aftermarket weights 20, I only saved 25 lbs. You definately don't pay for weight savings. The increase in room is almost worth it.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2004 | 07:51 PM
  #7  
stage20's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: p'cola FL
Car: 88 iroc-z/28
Engine: 408 lsx
Transmission: 5800 stall
Axle/Gears: 4.71
25lbs
the room
the looks
do it.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2005 | 04:45 PM
  #8  
Kat's Avatar
Kat
Supreme Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 1,716
Likes: 0
From: Upland Pa
Car: Camaro Vert
Engine: 355 HSR
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 S60
Figure K member, a-arms, coil over kit, manual rack will prolly be about 80-100 pounds off the front

Kat
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2005 | 06:01 PM
  #9  
stage20's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: p'cola FL
Car: 88 iroc-z/28
Engine: 408 lsx
Transmission: 5800 stall
Axle/Gears: 4.71
i took off 79 pounds with k member a arms and drag brakes.
looking for another 30 or so when i do the manual rack.
sticking with my stock spring setup.... never liked the coilover idea, plus ive already got drag springs and struts. no sense in buying parts 2 times just to save 10 pounds.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2005 | 06:28 PM
  #10  
White91GTA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Car: 1991 Trans AM GTA
Engine: 5.7L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
stage 20...where did you get your brake setup from and what was the cost of it?
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2005 | 12:32 AM
  #11  
stage20's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: p'cola FL
Car: 88 iroc-z/28
Engine: 408 lsx
Transmission: 5800 stall
Axle/Gears: 4.71
aerospace components. www.jegs.com has them. 5 something for the front and 399 for the rears.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
matt's 91rs/tt
LSX and LTX Parts
2
Oct 8, 2015 06:11 AM
Mdenz3
LTX and LSX
8
Sep 17, 2015 08:36 AM
tricky1
Exhaust
4
Aug 23, 2015 01:17 PM
overdriv
Camaros for Sale
0
Aug 20, 2015 03:52 PM
NBrehm
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
Aug 5, 2015 07:57 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 PM.