Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Suspension / Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-12-2006, 08:58 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
matt_p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 500
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: WC T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Presentation on shock valving Koni vs Tokico vs Bilstein vs KYB AGX

KONI Mustang presentation slide 1

The KYB AGX's have very comparable rebound compared to the Yellows but compression is the same as the Illuminas.

Lots of "hmmm"s as I went through this, even though this is for Mustangs. Have a look.

Note: The colour to number reference of the Illuminas seems to be scrambled but you get the idea.
__________________
The world's best cam combined with a poor set of heads will produce an engine that's a dog. But bolt on a set of great heads even with a poor cam, and that engine will still make great power
matt_p is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2006, 02:55 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
sully91rs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Philly, PA
Posts: 616
Car: 91 RS, 95 Z28
Engine: 305 tbi, 350 lt1
Transmission: 4l60, 4l60e
Axle/Gears: monsterous 2.73s in both

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Whats the deal with KYB AGX rears? The different dampening levels are practically identical. If I go KYB AGX struts, I'm definetly not going KYB AGX shocks. I'll probably go with Tokico for the shocks, or maybe just buck it up and go Bilstein shocks.
sully91rs is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2011, 06:47 AM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 9

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Presentation on shock valving Koni vs Tokico vs Bilstein vs KYB AGX

just buck it up and go Bilstein shocks.
iroc-z1988 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2011, 07:27 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Tobias05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: any clime or place...
Posts: 2,776
Car: 1987 Camaro SC, 1999 Z28
Engine: GMPP 350HO, LS1
Transmission: Built 700r4/EDGE 3200, T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Eaton 7.625, 3.42 Zexel Torsen

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Presentation on shock valving Koni vs Tokico vs Bilstein vs KYB AGX

Quote:
Originally Posted by iroc-z1988 View Post
just buck it up and go Bilstein shocks.
Bilstein's are nice. just wish a set for my 3rd gen cost as much as the set on my catfish.
__________________
1987 Chevrolet Camaro Sport Coupe-assorted shades of rust
13.75@102.2mph on 2.1 60'
"rust rocket"
...someday hope to install FAST EZ EFI...
1999 Chevrolet Camaro Z28-Artic White, Flame Red Cloth
Full Bolt-Ons, Tuned by Frost, Hurst Billet, Bilsteins, Zr1s
Tobias05 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 12:42 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,487

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Presentation on shock valving Koni vs Tokico vs Bilstein vs KYB AGX

Quote:
Originally Posted by sully91rs View Post
Whats the deal with KYB AGX rears? The different dampening levels are practically identical. If I go KYB AGX struts, I'm definetly not going KYB AGX shocks. I'll probably go with Tokico for the shocks, or maybe just buck it up and go Bilstein shocks.

I'll tell you what, seeing that chart from Koni is rather surprizing. That valving on the AGX fronts on position 3 to 4 range looks great.

I always stated that my car had too much front bump (compression ) valving with the Koni Yellows and I wish it was a tad lower. I ran it with full rebound settings though and I actually like AGX digressive qualities at the higher piston speeds. You want that strut getting the wheel back on the ground and Koni's high speed release is a tad too high on rebound. I used to skip my car several times across off camber compression turns (down hill bump turns when the entire ride height compresses just as the car turns, then releases in turn)THis is the only time I had trouble with steering the car.

Food for thought though- we have to remeber this chart is for the valving on the 03 Mustang strut, not the 3rd gen. I would like to see the erd gen comparisons before I go endorsing this comment any further.

Last edited by Vetruck; 03-20-2011 at 12:49 AM.
Vetruck is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 03:27 PM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Europe->Poland->Warsaw
Posts: 469
Car: CAMORRA 1987
Engine: 383 HSR Megasquirted
Transmission: T-65
Axle/Gears: GM 3.43 -4th gen F-body

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Presentation on shock valving Koni vs Tokico vs Bilstein vs KYB AGX

Vetruck can You tell me how should i set my KYB AGX front and rear (Pro-kit springs) for:
- track racing
- dragracing ??

best regards
WASyL is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2011, 07:59 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,487

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Presentation on shock valving Koni vs Tokico vs Bilstein vs KYB AGX

Quote:
Originally Posted by WASyL View Post
Vetruck can You tell me how should i set my KYB AGX front and rear (Pro-kit springs) for:
- track racing
- dragracing ??

best regards
raod course or autox- full on fronts. you want the high rebound setting to reduce body roll. Rears full also for the same reason.

Drag racing- full off fronts. you want low rebound so the front raises as quickly as possible on launch. I would still leave the rears on full on for best compression settings and rebound to keep the rear stable- even though the graph shows pretty much no adjustabilty in the AGX adjustable rear shocks- go figure, marketing scam or what? why even have them adjustable if the knob does nothing.

Last edited by Vetruck; 03-20-2011 at 08:04 PM.
Vetruck is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2011, 11:41 AM   #8
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Europe->Poland->Warsaw
Posts: 469
Car: CAMORRA 1987
Engine: 383 HSR Megasquirted
Transmission: T-65
Axle/Gears: GM 3.43 -4th gen F-body

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Presentation on shock valving Koni vs Tokico vs Bilstein vs KYB AGX

thank You very much

best regards
WASyL is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2011, 11:41 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Suspension / Chassis

Tags
advice, agx, bilstein, car, gen, koni, kyb, muscle, mustang, shock, shocks, thirdgen, tokico, valving, versus, vs
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details