torque arm trans mount vs body mount
#1
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North East GA
Posts: 2,221
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes
on
40 Posts
Car: 1989 Firebird
Engine: 5.7 LS1
Transmission: T56
torque arm trans mount vs body mount
I know this has been covered somewhere on this site but I can't find it via the search.
What are the benifits between a torque arm mounted to the cross member istead of the transmission. The transmission one would think would extend to force to the engine and then to the K-member. The cross member/body mount would put the torque on the middle of the car that doesn't have alot of structure there. But the cross member is bolted to the transmission so does it just add extra spread of the force? Is it just mounting angle or does the change also add a benfit that I am missing in the way of body torque.
What are the benifits between a torque arm mounted to the cross member istead of the transmission. The transmission one would think would extend to force to the engine and then to the K-member. The cross member/body mount would put the torque on the middle of the car that doesn't have alot of structure there. But the cross member is bolted to the transmission so does it just add extra spread of the force? Is it just mounting angle or does the change also add a benfit that I am missing in the way of body torque.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sanford, FL
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 RS Camaro
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.08
Re: torque arm trans mount vs body mount
I have been wondering the same thing if one is better than the other. My auto X car is still using the original arm and I have been wanting to make a stronger one since I can't buy one.
#3
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,491
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 89' IROC-Z
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10-Bolt/2.73
Re: torque arm trans mount vs body mount
As far as I know the trans mounted arm puts stress on the tail of the trans, possibly ruining it further down the road. Whereas the x-member mount I guess "spreads" the force over a x-member instead of the actual transmission. Its an upgrade for sure.
#4
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 17,120
Likes: 0
Received 123 Likes
on
104 Posts
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Re: torque arm trans mount vs body mount
I don't think the factory system is all that abusive to the tranny. The factory torque arm fits into a rubber mount that's bolted to the side of the tranny. During hard acceleration and braking, there will be extra forces pushing up and down on the tranny case. These forces then need to be transferred through the tranny mount to the crossmember and body. That's a lot of rubber or polyurethane to move energy through.
Using an aftermarket torque arm has a few advantages. First of all, it's stronger than a factory arm so it won't flex and it's adjustable. Moving the front mount directly to the crossmember means the lifting force is direct. Anytime you can eliminate unneeded movement, it's easier to transfer power to where it's needed.
Uncontrolled movement from rubber mounts is wasted energy. Polyurethane bushings are better than the factory rubber but are still not the best. Using a shackle or rod end style front mount on the torque arm is considered a solid mount. It's designed to still allow forward and backward movement as the diff rotates through it's arc but the up and down movement of the front mount is solid. This means all the upward forces from a hard launch are directly applied to lifting the body and not compressing a rubber mounts.
The adjustability of an aftermarket torque arm also allows you to fine tune the suspension by changing the pinion angle. A real high end torque arm may even allow you to raise or lower the IC by changing the height of the front mount like ladder bars do.
You'll lose a bit of length by having the arm attached to the crossmember instead of the tranny but the advantages make up for it. Length is where the instant center is located. Ladder bars put the IC around 3' in front of the axle. LCA such as the Traction Action which eliminate the torque arm by using short brackets to the diff put the IC less than 2' in front of the diff. A torque arm puts the IC about 5' in front of the diff.
My car uses a 4-link so I have many different positions as to where to put the IC. For a high HP car, long and low works best. My IC is roughly 5' out so that puts it roughly where a torque arm mount would be however my IC height is only a couple of inches off the ground and I can even adjust it to be below the ground. Something that a torque arm or ladder bars can't do.
Simply moving the torque arm off the tranny and onto the crossmember should drop the IC down to a better height. It may not be much but even 1" in height can be a big change in how the suspension reacts.
Using an aftermarket torque arm has a few advantages. First of all, it's stronger than a factory arm so it won't flex and it's adjustable. Moving the front mount directly to the crossmember means the lifting force is direct. Anytime you can eliminate unneeded movement, it's easier to transfer power to where it's needed.
Uncontrolled movement from rubber mounts is wasted energy. Polyurethane bushings are better than the factory rubber but are still not the best. Using a shackle or rod end style front mount on the torque arm is considered a solid mount. It's designed to still allow forward and backward movement as the diff rotates through it's arc but the up and down movement of the front mount is solid. This means all the upward forces from a hard launch are directly applied to lifting the body and not compressing a rubber mounts.
The adjustability of an aftermarket torque arm also allows you to fine tune the suspension by changing the pinion angle. A real high end torque arm may even allow you to raise or lower the IC by changing the height of the front mount like ladder bars do.
You'll lose a bit of length by having the arm attached to the crossmember instead of the tranny but the advantages make up for it. Length is where the instant center is located. Ladder bars put the IC around 3' in front of the axle. LCA such as the Traction Action which eliminate the torque arm by using short brackets to the diff put the IC less than 2' in front of the diff. A torque arm puts the IC about 5' in front of the diff.
My car uses a 4-link so I have many different positions as to where to put the IC. For a high HP car, long and low works best. My IC is roughly 5' out so that puts it roughly where a torque arm mount would be however my IC height is only a couple of inches off the ground and I can even adjust it to be below the ground. Something that a torque arm or ladder bars can't do.
Simply moving the torque arm off the tranny and onto the crossmember should drop the IC down to a better height. It may not be much but even 1" in height can be a big change in how the suspension reacts.
#5
Supreme Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North East GA
Posts: 2,221
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes
on
40 Posts
Car: 1989 Firebird
Engine: 5.7 LS1
Transmission: T56
Re: torque arm trans mount vs body mount
Is there any advantage in road driving beyond launches. I know it helps on adjusting angles when you lower the car so it gets the geometry into shape.
I would think under hard cornering it would transfer a twisting action up the torque arm and if it is mounted to the tranny would be transfered up to the bell housing and to the engine to the K-member area, but mounted to the cross member would transfer the twist or torque at the cross member and the transfer would be to the floor pan and sub frame at its weakest location.
Maybe the torque arm isn't as tightly mounted as I am thinking and just acts to prevent rotation of the axel.
This is good info, I need to learn more of the rear suspension of the car, I am pretty well versed in the front.
I would think under hard cornering it would transfer a twisting action up the torque arm and if it is mounted to the tranny would be transfered up to the bell housing and to the engine to the K-member area, but mounted to the cross member would transfer the twist or torque at the cross member and the transfer would be to the floor pan and sub frame at its weakest location.
Maybe the torque arm isn't as tightly mounted as I am thinking and just acts to prevent rotation of the axel.
This is good info, I need to learn more of the rear suspension of the car, I am pretty well versed in the front.
#6
Re: torque arm trans mount vs body mount
Hello
I noticed that you are inquiring about a tunnel or a transmission mounted! If you are going to be using the vehicle for street use and a weekend cruiser and is close to 450 hp. I would suggest going with a 2205 with a torque arm relocation. And if you are going to be racing it and you are not worried about road noise and vibrations and want faster weight transfer. I would recommend going with a tunnel mounted torque arm. Below is a link to show you what all UMI Performance has to offer.
http://www.umiperformance.com/produc...ategory_id=114
http://www.umiperformance.com/produc...ategory_id=171
If you have any other questions feel free to ask and I will be more than glad to help!
Thanks
Brad
I noticed that you are inquiring about a tunnel or a transmission mounted! If you are going to be using the vehicle for street use and a weekend cruiser and is close to 450 hp. I would suggest going with a 2205 with a torque arm relocation. And if you are going to be racing it and you are not worried about road noise and vibrations and want faster weight transfer. I would recommend going with a tunnel mounted torque arm. Below is a link to show you what all UMI Performance has to offer.
http://www.umiperformance.com/produc...ategory_id=114
http://www.umiperformance.com/produc...ategory_id=171
If you have any other questions feel free to ask and I will be more than glad to help!
Thanks
Brad
#7
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,491
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 89' IROC-Z
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10-Bolt/2.73
Re: torque arm trans mount vs body mount
UMI, thought about going to a rod end on the x-member mount side of the torque arm? I didn't see this offered.
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 90 IROC 5.7 hardtop
Engine: L98
Transmission: T5 swap
Axle/Gears: Yup -- they still work
Re: torque arm trans mount vs body mount
Hello
I noticed that you are inquiring about a tunnel or a transmission mounted! If you are going to be using the vehicle for street use and a weekend cruiser and is close to 450 hp. I would suggest going with a 2205 with a torque arm relocation. And if you are going to be racing it and you are not worried about road noise and vibrations and want faster weight transfer. I would recommend going with a tunnel mounted torque arm. Below is a link to show you what all UMI Performance has to offer.
http://www.umiperformance.com/produc...ategory_id=114
http://www.umiperformance.com/produc...ategory_id=171
If you have any other questions feel free to ask and I will be more than glad to help!
Thanks
Brad
I noticed that you are inquiring about a tunnel or a transmission mounted! If you are going to be using the vehicle for street use and a weekend cruiser and is close to 450 hp. I would suggest going with a 2205 with a torque arm relocation. And if you are going to be racing it and you are not worried about road noise and vibrations and want faster weight transfer. I would recommend going with a tunnel mounted torque arm. Below is a link to show you what all UMI Performance has to offer.
http://www.umiperformance.com/produc...ategory_id=114
http://www.umiperformance.com/produc...ategory_id=171
If you have any other questions feel free to ask and I will be more than glad to help!
Thanks
Brad
would you expect any sotp experience from putting a tq arm brace into a street/strip sometimes take it to the track weekend cruiser?
thx
#9
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: new richmond wisconsin
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 5 cars
Re: torque arm trans mount vs body mount
Hello
I noticed that you are inquiring about a tunnel or a transmission mounted! If you are going to be using the vehicle for street use and a weekend cruiser and is close to 450 hp. I would suggest going with a 2205 with a torque arm relocation. And if you are going to be racing it and you are not worried about road noise and vibrations and want faster weight transfer. I would recommend going with a tunnel mounted torque arm. Below is a link to show you what all UMI Performance has to offer.
http://www.umiperformance.com/produc...ategory_id=114
http://www.umiperformance.com/produc...ategory_id=171
If you have any other questions feel free to ask and I will be more than glad to help!
Thanks
Brad
I noticed that you are inquiring about a tunnel or a transmission mounted! If you are going to be using the vehicle for street use and a weekend cruiser and is close to 450 hp. I would suggest going with a 2205 with a torque arm relocation. And if you are going to be racing it and you are not worried about road noise and vibrations and want faster weight transfer. I would recommend going with a tunnel mounted torque arm. Below is a link to show you what all UMI Performance has to offer.
http://www.umiperformance.com/produc...ategory_id=114
http://www.umiperformance.com/produc...ategory_id=171
If you have any other questions feel free to ask and I will be more than glad to help!
Thanks
Brad
i just ordered the 2216
what are people doing with the ic adjustable mounts for the track????
top or bottom???
#10
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Newington, CT
Posts: 1,021
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 5.7 RamJet
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Dana44 4.10
Re: torque arm trans mount vs body mount
Those are NOT tunnel mount torque arms. Those are cross member mount torque arms. Tunnel mounts have a plate that bolts to the underside of the transmission tunnel.. which is where the name comes from. The torque arm is then attached to that. The Jegster torque arm is an example of this.
#11
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: wv
Posts: 489
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 rs
Engine: 355 stealth ram, dart heads, S480
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: torque arm trans mount vs body mount
heres a few options from bmr fabrications, i've had good luck with all the stuff i've gotten from them. http://www.bmrfabrication.com/F3-sus....htm#torquearm
#12
Re: torque arm trans mount vs body mount
Those are NOT tunnel mount torque arms. Those are cross member mount torque arms. Tunnel mounts have a plate that bolts to the underside of the transmission tunnel.. which is where the name comes from. The torque arm is then attached to that. The Jegster torque arm is an example of this.
http://umiperformance.com/products.php?category_id=114
If you have any other questions feel free to ask and I will be more than glad to help!
Thanks
Brad
#13
Re: torque arm trans mount vs body mount
Here are a couple of pics of what happens to the tailshaft if you leave the torque arm attached to it. It can happen to a stock hp car or a high hp car.
SCAMARO 355, thanks for the recommendations.
SCAMARO 355, thanks for the recommendations.
#14
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: wv
Posts: 489
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 rs
Engine: 355 stealth ram, dart heads, S480
Transmission: 4L80E
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: torque arm trans mount vs body mount
No prob on the recomendation...i dont mind putting my name out there on a quality product..the torque arm setup is the last thing i need to put on the rear suspension to have everything BMR
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Terrell351
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
06-13-2021 01:13 PM
colton_carlson
Firebirds for Sale
7
03-08-2019 12:21 PM
adjust, aftermarket, arm, arms, body, camaro, chassis, ic, iroc, mount, mounts, polyurethane, rubber, suspension, torque