Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Spring compressor not needed??? This can't be right!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-28-2010, 01:26 PM
  #1  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
86TpiTransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Springfield, MO, USA
Posts: 1,536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans Am, 1991 Firebird
Engine: 355 TPI, 3.1L V6
Transmission: 700R4 in both
Spring compressor not needed??? This can't be right!

Today I called the auto parts store to get a price on front struts for my 1991 Firebird and when she looked them up in the Monroe book at the bottom a footnote states "A spring compressor is not needed for this car". I asked her if she's sure it was referring to a 1991 Firebird and she said yes. Also, this is not a quick strut application which I know doesn't need a spring compressor, this was just for the struts alone.

I'm very confused by this. Did they do something different to the 1991 Firebirds that I'm not aware of that makes it so you don't need a spring compressor? My friend had an '89 Formula and he had to use a spring compressor on his. Is the Monroe book wrong?
Old 04-28-2010, 02:43 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
86TpiTransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Springfield, MO, USA
Posts: 1,536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans Am, 1991 Firebird
Engine: 355 TPI, 3.1L V6
Transmission: 700R4 in both
Re: Spring compressor not needed??? This can't be right!

UPDATE: I called a buddy of mine at a shop and he said that the computer lists separate labor time for the struts and springs which makes him believe the struts and springs are in different places on my '91. I'm really confused now and I'm going to have to pull the tire off and check this out with my own eyes.
Old 04-28-2010, 02:59 PM
  #3  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
Norwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Munford, TN
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 z
Engine: Chevy 383
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt 3.73
Re: Spring compressor not needed??? This can't be right!

Ever look under your car? THe spring is between the lower a-arm and the pocket on your k-member. Your strut attaches to the spindle up to the strut bearing in the tower. It's a modified strut with no spring.
Old 04-28-2010, 03:00 PM
  #4  
Member

iTrader: (7)
 
chevysquid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Coupeville, Washington
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 IROC T-TOP
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-R4
Re: Spring compressor not needed??? This can't be right!

Struts are a bolt on deal. Don't need to touch the spring at all.
Old 04-28-2010, 03:29 PM
  #5  
Moderator

iTrader: (5)
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 19,282
Received 93 Likes on 68 Posts
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: Spring compressor not needed??? This can't be right!

Originally Posted by chevysquid
Struts are a bolt on deal. Don't need to touch the spring at all.


JamesC
Old 04-28-2010, 03:51 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
DJP87Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,771
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 1987 Black IROC-Z (SOLD)
Re: Spring compressor not needed??? This can't be right!

Also it is a known fact that all 3rd gen cars have sagging springs.







Old 04-29-2010, 08:04 AM
  #7  
Supreme Member

Thread Starter
 
86TpiTransAm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Springfield, MO, USA
Posts: 1,536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans Am, 1991 Firebird
Engine: 355 TPI, 3.1L V6
Transmission: 700R4 in both
Re: Spring compressor not needed??? This can't be right!

Originally Posted by DJP87Z28
Also it is a known fact that all 3rd gen cars have sagging springs.
And now I may have a broken spring. For some reason I thought the strut went through the spring like on other cars. I guess that explains why there's no quick strut for my car.
Old 04-29-2010, 08:15 AM
  #8  
Moderator

iTrader: (5)
 
JamesC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 19,282
Received 93 Likes on 68 Posts
Car: Met. Silver 85 IROC/Sold
Engine: 350 HO Deluxe (350ci/330hp)
Transmission: T-5 (Non-WC)
Axle/Gears: Limited Slip 3.23's
Re: Spring compressor not needed??? This can't be right!

Originally Posted by 86TpiTransAm
And now I may have a broken spring.
Springs do break, but it's not all that common. Take a peek.

JamesC
Old 04-29-2010, 09:51 AM
  #9  
Supreme Member

 
AM91Camaro_RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Spring compressor not needed??? This can't be right!

FYI, seperate spring and strut is called a "conventional" setup. Strut through spring is called "coilover".
Old 04-29-2010, 07:36 PM
  #10  
Moderator

 
AlkyIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 17,120
Likes: 0
Received 123 Likes on 104 Posts
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 588 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86
Re: Spring compressor not needed??? This can't be right!

Originally Posted by 86TpiTransAm
And now I may have a broken spring. For some reason I thought the strut went through the spring like on other cars. I guess that explains why there's no quick strut for my car.
That's a Macpherson strut. As mentioned above, the spring and strut are completely separate.

Doing the strut is relatively easy. Jack up the car and put jack stands under the framework behind the front wheels. Put the jack under the control arm and jack it up just enough to compress the spring. Take off the tire. Unbolt and remove the strut. Reverse the procedure to reinstall.

The weight of the car is held up by the spring between the a-arm and the upper spring pocket under the frame rail. Technically you don't even need to use a jackstand under the body. It's just there as a safety item. Jacking the car up under the a-arm takes to load off the ball joint which makes removing the strut easier. The upper mount of the strut doesn't hold any weight of the car. It just keeps the strut in the correct position for wheel alignment.

When converting to a coil over system, you do put all the front weight of the car on the strut. This means the strut towers "should" be reinforced to handle the increased load.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
IROCZ1989
North East Region
7
01-24-2016 03:55 PM
TheExaminer
Suspension and Chassis
21
08-25-2015 07:34 PM
kitt23
Exterior Parts Wanted
2
08-15-2015 12:37 PM
86camaroman201
Fabrication
0
08-11-2015 10:39 PM
GEmrsn
Interior Parts Wanted
3
08-08-2015 03:15 PM



Quick Reply: Spring compressor not needed??? This can't be right!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:44 PM.