Suspension and Chassis Questions about your suspension? Need chassis advice?

Stupid mistake with steering linkages

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-30-2021, 10:30 AM
  #1  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
gta_knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI w/ extras !
Transmission: 700R4
Stupid mistake with steering linkages

Hi all

Me and my dad put together the new centre link, tie rod ends etc yesterday. Got it all bolted up no problem.....then when I was looking at it I thought hang on. That doesn't look right.

I think we just blew through it too quick and the centre link is facing the wrong way so the inner tie rods are on the outside now instead of at the back!

I've immediately took the nuts off the tie rod ends, idler arm and pitman arm to drop it all down and simply turn it around but can I hell get anything to separate now. I'm guessing all the new tapers are really in there already!

I've pulled the wheels lock to lock and everything is fine and moves nicely so my question is can I just leave it as it is? Or will the shop that needs to do the alignment get really weird numbers on their laser machine???

It will bug me though.... I might have to buy a ball joint separator kit to try and pop them free properly instead of whacking them with a metal bar and hammer.


Old 08-30-2021, 05:08 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sofakingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,115
Received 1,688 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

Get a nut the same size as the one that holds them together. Put it on the threads until the end of the stud almost comes through; maybe one thread from emerging. Then you can use your BFH safely. Do that at the Pitman arm and the outer rod ends; unbolt the idler arm from the chassis; then once it's all laying on the ground, it'll be MUCH easier and safer to finish disassembling, with less risk of damaging anything.

It won't affect "alignment", as such; but it WILL give you weird "bump steer" effects. I sure wouldn't leave it like that. The location of the rod end ball is supposed to be exactly in line with a line through the control arm bolts, and it won't be with the ball that far out in front. That line will miss the ball pivot by most of an inch with it like that.

I see a Nylock on that one rod end. That'd be a death trap: I wouldn't even get in that car, let alone ride in it, and sure as hell wouldn't drive it, with those. Should be a castle nut with a cotter pin.
The following users liked this post:
T.L. (08-30-2021)
Old 08-30-2021, 05:37 PM
  #3  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
gta_knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI w/ extras !
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

Originally Posted by sofakingdom
Get a nut the same size as the one that holds them together. Put it on the threads until the end of the stud almost comes through; maybe one thread from emerging. Then you can use your BFH safely. Do that at the Pitman arm and the outer rod ends; unbolt the idler arm from the chassis; then once it's all laying on the ground, it'll be MUCH easier and safer to finish disassembling, with less risk of damaging anything.

It won't affect "alignment", as such; but it WILL give you weird "bump steer" effects. I sure wouldn't leave it like that. The location of the rod end ball is supposed to be exactly in line with a line through the control arm bolts, and it won't be with the ball that far out in front. That line will miss the ball pivot by most of an inch with it like that.

I see a Nylock on that one rod end. That'd be a death trap: I wouldn't even get in that car, let alone ride in it, and sure as hell wouldn't drive it, with those. Should be a castle nut with a cotter pin.
Yeah I've already decided I'm taking it all off and swapping it around so it's right. Got a proper ball joint splitter on the way so I can hopefully just pop them free without risking damage

As for the tie rod ends I was surprised these came with a nylon locking nut and not the usual castle nut. Even though the other parts from the same supplier have Castle nuts and cotter pins?
Old 08-30-2021, 05:37 PM
  #4  
Supreme Member
 
LiquidBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,911
Received 176 Likes on 135 Posts
Car: 90 Formula / T-tops
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: MD8
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

Originally Posted by sofakingdom
I see a Nylock on that one rod end. That'd be a death trap: I wouldn't even get in that car, let alone ride in it, and sure as hell wouldn't drive it, with those. Should be a castle nut with a cotter pin.
good catch and interesting point. now you make me want to go look and see what I did with my BMW. Thinking they are nylock type nuts holding on some of the control arms. thanks for the warning!

EDIT: Also, I don't think Factory used cotter pins on steering components.

Last edited by LiquidBlue; 08-30-2021 at 05:41 PM.
Old 08-30-2021, 06:43 PM
  #5  
Supporter/Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,243
Likes: 0
Received 391 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

Originally Posted by LiquidBlue
good catch and interesting point. now you make me want to go look and see what I did with my BMW. Thinking they are nylock type nuts holding on some of the control arms. thanks for the warning!

EDIT: Also, I don't think Factory used cotter pins on steering components.
They most certainly did. Thats the only way to prevent the nut from spinning off. No replacement tie rod or front suspension piece for these cars will come with a nylon lock.
Old 08-30-2021, 06:47 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
OrangeBird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,699
Received 668 Likes on 477 Posts
Car: 1989 Firebird
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

Originally Posted by LiquidBlue
...... I don't think Factory used cotter pins on steering components.
LiquidBlue, your mistaken, I can assure you that that the factory did, in fact, use cotter pins on the tie rods & such.......

Edited to add; while the factory did use cotter pins, what they didn't install was grease fittings on the various steering parts, or the driveshaft U joints.

Last edited by OrangeBird; 08-30-2021 at 06:52 PM.
Old 08-30-2021, 07:47 PM
  #7  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
Abubaca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: JAMESTOWN, NC
Posts: 8,367
Received 348 Likes on 275 Posts
Car: 1988 Iroc
Engine: L98 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Hawks 8.8 - 3.73
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

No replacement tie rod or front suspension piece for these cars will come with a nylon lock.
I recently puchased some Pro-Forged, AND Moog tie rods. They BOTH came with assorted cotter pin/castle nuts and lock nuts. Almost as if it was up to you to choose. NO WAY I'd EVER use nylocks. Holy cow that sounds sketchy!!!!
Old 08-30-2021, 07:47 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member
 
LiquidBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,911
Received 176 Likes on 135 Posts
Car: 90 Formula / T-tops
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: MD8
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

I'm still running factory tie-rods and center link, idler, pitman. no cotter pins. thought it was odd, then I saw this ultra low mile camaro pop up on BoT. it was 1400 miles. Noticed the exact same think, even same nuts on the center link. They are very distinct.




https://bringatrailer.com/listing/19...-28-iroc-z-26/
Old 08-30-2021, 09:34 PM
  #9  
COTM Editor

iTrader: (22)
 
QwkTrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,929
Likes: 0
Received 1,860 Likes on 1,274 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

Originally Posted by gta_knight
Yeah I've already decided I'm taking it all off and swapping it around so it's right. Got a proper ball joint splitter on the way so I can hopefully just pop them free without risking damage
I use a tool called a pitman arm puller. It'll pop those joints out with no damage. Available off the shelf at any Autozone. Works like a champ.

Use a castle nut with cotter pin, torque to 35 lb-ft.
Old 08-30-2021, 10:08 PM
  #10  
COTM Editor

iTrader: (22)
 
QwkTrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,929
Likes: 0
Received 1,860 Likes on 1,274 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

Originally Posted by LiquidBlue
I'm still running factory tie-rods and center link, idler, pitman. no cotter pins. thought it was odd, then I saw this ultra low mile camaro pop up on BoT. it was 1400 miles.
The nuts in that picture have cotter holes in them.
Also guess how much the factory worker cared that day.
The following users liked this post:
T.L. (08-30-2021)
Old 08-31-2021, 06:51 AM
  #11  
Supporter/Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,243
Likes: 0
Received 391 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

Originally Posted by Abubaca
I recently puchased some Pro-Forged, AND Moog tie rods. They BOTH came with assorted cotter pin/castle nuts and lock nuts. Almost as if it was up to you to choose. NO WAY I'd EVER use nylocks. Holy cow that sounds sketchy!!!!

Wait, the kit came with both castle nuts and nylon locks? They must have really good lawyers.

I am very sensitive about this subject because I had a cotter pin fail (old pin sheared off and nut backed off) and I lost steering on the highway. I was in a 1961 Corvair Wagon. I hit the fence pretty hard but survived (homemade seat belt mounts for the win), no thanks to Nader. Anyone who is not running cotter pins needs to give their guardian angel a break and put some in.
The following users liked this post:
LiquidBlue (08-31-2021)
Old 08-31-2021, 08:07 AM
  #12  
Supreme Member
 
LiquidBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,911
Received 176 Likes on 135 Posts
Car: 90 Formula / T-tops
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: MD8
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

Originally Posted by QwkTrip
The nuts in that picture have cotter holes in them.
Also guess how much the factory worker cared that day.
I don't think they are cotter pin holes. They are some odd pattern in the bolt. I'll get a close up photos when I'm down there next time. Both of my BMW's are not using cotter pins either, they are using Nylock. If you've ever worked on a modern BMW and follow their Technical Information Service manual (TIS), they are extremely precise in their procedures - down to which nuts or bolts need replaced, position of car when torquing, torque increments, stuff like that. I'm sure if they wanted a cotter pin in there, it would be in the TIS. Nothing like an old school 3rd Gen Factory Manual. To clarify - I'm not saying 3rd Gens ever used Nylock, but modern day BMW do. All I'm saying (or actualy wondering) is they didnt put cotter pins in. And thanks again for the warning guys, will quit testing my guardian Angel go get those cotter pins installed! Actually going over to get Liquidblue aligned this morning.

Last edited by LiquidBlue; 08-31-2021 at 08:11 AM.
Old 08-31-2021, 08:25 AM
  #13  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (58)
 
Drew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Salina, KS
Posts: 20,309
Received 1,052 Likes on 748 Posts
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

Not holes. They're locking nuts. The nut is deformed by stamping or punching the nut to deform it, which makes it resist vibrating loose.

Nylon locking nuts are probably an acceptable substitute, but if you're more comfortable with castle nuts and cotter pins or whatever....
Old 08-31-2021, 08:34 AM
  #14  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
gta_knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI w/ extras !
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

It's weird because the inner tie rods that connect to the centre link have castle nuts and pins but the outer tie rods have the solid thread and locking nut?

The threaded part is that long I could put 2 locking nuts on it!
Old 08-31-2021, 08:38 AM
  #15  
Supreme Member
 
LiquidBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,911
Received 176 Likes on 135 Posts
Car: 90 Formula / T-tops
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: MD8
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

Originally Posted by Drew
Not holes. They're locking nuts. The nut is deformed by stamping or punching the nut to deform it, which makes it resist vibrating loose.

Nylon locking nuts are probably an acceptable substitute, but if you're more comfortable with castle nuts and cotter pins or whatever....
Yes, that is exactly what they look like, as if they have been stamped. BTW, did a quick search on this subject and the cotter pin -vs- nylock mystery is all over the internet!
Old 08-31-2021, 08:41 AM
  #16  
Supreme Member
 
LiquidBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,911
Received 176 Likes on 135 Posts
Car: 90 Formula / T-tops
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: MD8
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

Originally Posted by gta_knight
It's weird because the inner tie rods that connect to the centre link have castle nuts and pins but the outer tie rods have the solid thread and locking nut?

The threaded part is that long I could put 2 locking nuts on it!
Yes, it looks tight back there. If they are too long, I'd get the correct tie-rod end. Is it possible they gave you two outers? Be sure to measure them against old ones next time, sure you figured that out already

Originally Posted by gta_knight
but the outer tie rods have the solid thread and locking nut? !
That is what I see on the newer BMW's, not even a hole for a cotter pin if even you wanted to put one in.
Old 08-31-2021, 08:52 AM
  #17  
Senior Member

Thread Starter
 
gta_knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: England
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 1987 GTA
Engine: 350 TPI w/ extras !
Transmission: 700R4
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

Originally Posted by LiquidBlue
Yes, it looks tight back there. If they are too long, I'd get the correct tie-rod end. Is it possible they gave you two outers? Be sure to measure them against old ones next time, sure you figured that out already

That is what I see on the newer BMW's, not even a hole for a cotter pin if even you wanted to put one in.
It's not uncommon for manufacturers to alter parts for older cars I guess.

These were all ordered together from Rock Auto, all Mevotech brand. I would of rather went with ac delco but I couldn't get all the stuff shipped to the UK from from same place so the postage was insane. The mevotech stuff had a heart next to it so people obviously buy it
Old 08-31-2021, 09:01 AM
  #18  
COTM Editor

iTrader: (22)
 
QwkTrip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,929
Likes: 0
Received 1,860 Likes on 1,274 Posts
Car: '89 Firebird
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: T56
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

Originally Posted by Drew
Not holes. They're locking nuts. The nut is deformed by stamping or punching the nut to deform it, which makes it resist vibrating loose.
Metal top lock nut? Or some kind of staking process with one time use?
Old 08-31-2021, 12:27 PM
  #19  
Moderator

iTrader: (3)
 
Abubaca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: JAMESTOWN, NC
Posts: 8,367
Received 348 Likes on 275 Posts
Car: 1988 Iroc
Engine: L98 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Hawks 8.8 - 3.73
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

Wait, the kit came with both castle nuts and nylon locks? They must have really good lawyers.
I ended up NOT using the Moog tie-rods, and this thread reminds me that they need to be returned! I'll go look tonight. IIRC, they didn't have an even number of each, meaning it wasn't one or another. I just kinda assumed it was end of shift for some parts packer and that's what I got!!!
Old 08-31-2021, 12:52 PM
  #20  
Supreme Member
 
LiquidBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,911
Received 176 Likes on 135 Posts
Car: 90 Formula / T-tops
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: MD8
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

Here's a better pick of the weird bolt. the sides of the bolt are indented or stamped at each face of the head





Old 08-31-2021, 07:41 PM
  #21  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sofakingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,115
Received 1,688 Likes on 1,283 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

That doesn't look factory to me.

On our cars, AFAIK they were all cotter pins & castle nuts.

What I'd be worried about with a Nylock is, if for any reason whatsoever the wedge became sufficiently unwedged to allow it to turn, the first thing that would happen is, it would try to back the Nylock off. Can't imagine a Nylock holding up to that for very long. The kind of a locknut with the punched-in places would do better, but still, ...

It's YOUR EFFFFFING LIFE AND THE LIFE OF EVERY PASSENGER IN YOUR CAR AND THE LIFE OF EVERY INNOCENT BYSTANDER. Are you willing to risk THAT over that little 2¢ part? Not me.

There are risks worth taking. IMO a Nylock vs a cotter pin, in that application, is not one that's "worth it".
The following users liked this post:
Jaysz28 (09-01-2021)
Old 09-15-2021, 02:23 PM
  #22  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: DC Metro Area
Posts: 7,975
Received 83 Likes on 70 Posts
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

Those locking nuts on the center link are factory. All 3 of my thirdgens still have them and my '83 did also.

As far as nylocs go, well I don't know what BMW was thinking but I wouldn't trust them on my car. They're probably OK for one use under the car (assuming automotive grade, hardened nuts, NO WAY EVER hardware store grade nothing made of cheese), but once you back them off and put them back on that nyloc is doing next to nothing, and they don't work when they get warm either, the nylon gets soft or even melts- it probably wouldn't be a big issue on 3rd gens but on modern cars where those linkages tend to be in warmer, tighter packed places... and unless I have been the only one that has EVER touched the car I'd always be worried that someone re-used the nyloc nut.
The following users liked this post:
T.L. (09-15-2021)
Old 09-15-2021, 04:49 PM
  #23  
Supreme Member
 
LiquidBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,911
Received 176 Likes on 135 Posts
Car: 90 Formula / T-tops
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: MD8
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

As far as BMW using nylock, I'd have to go back and see exactly where they use them, I forget. The manual will call for a replacement on many bolts and nuts. You do what they say. don't ask questions. Nylock is used in some places, and "self locking" collar nuts are used in other places.

Here is few types
https://www.ecstuning.com/b-genuine-...t/33306787062/
https://www.bimmerworld.com/Suspensi...yABEgKjwPD_BwE

In any regard, I am not advocating their use for 3rd Gens! I was merely pointing out that they are getting used in modern cars. Oh, and yeah, when I had the car aligned by BMW, (who should know better) I brought them new nuts to install anyway!

And yes, I'm pretty damn sure those are factory nuts on the centerlink, as I've owned the car since 1992, and the center link has never been replaced. Nor the tie-rods for that matter. Or any of the steering gear. All factory.
Old 09-15-2021, 05:01 PM
  #24  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (8)
 
TTOP350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Il
Posts: 11,723
Received 773 Likes on 520 Posts
Car: 1989-92 FORMULA350 305 92 Hawkclone
Engine: 4++,350 & 305 CIs
Transmission: 700R4 4800 vig 18th700R4 t56 ZF6 T5
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9"ford alum chunk,dana44,9bolt
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

Originally Posted by LiquidBlue
Here's a better pick of the weird bolt. the sides of the bolt are indented or stamped at each face of the head



Yup, those are factory nuts. Most people don't even notice them.
The following users liked this post:
LiquidBlue (09-15-2021)
Old 09-16-2021, 03:07 PM
  #25  
Supreme Member
 
LiquidBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,911
Received 176 Likes on 135 Posts
Car: 90 Formula / T-tops
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: MD8
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

BTW - been over on another board discussing this with some guys. Interesting lock info starts on page 6, cotter pins included : https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/...9900009424.pdf
Old 11-28-2021, 01:47 AM
  #26  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (56)
 
articwhiteZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 3,765
Received 86 Likes on 81 Posts
Car: 92 Lingenfelter Z28 articwhite
Engine: Aluminum 615BBC
Transmission: Th400wbrake/curri entps9" locker
Axle/Gears: 4.11/4.30/4.56
Re: Stupid mistake with steering linkages

MY 1992 Z28 did not have cotter pins on the center link also..still have it also..no holes for them..
The following users liked this post:
LiquidBlue (11-28-2021)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
86iroc504
Suspension and Chassis
21
04-18-2020 08:21 PM
JonnyThrice
Suspension and Chassis
5
07-06-2017 01:52 PM
Blue91ZConv
Suspension and Chassis
15
10-05-2010 09:34 AM
Blackknight
Suspension and Chassis
21
07-21-2009 12:02 AM
stage20
Suspension and Chassis
7
02-22-2008 08:58 PM



Quick Reply: Stupid mistake with steering linkages



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:41 AM.