Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-16-2002, 10:37 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: northeast ohio
Posts: 1,878
Car: 2000 astro, 1984 camaro z28
Engine: 4.3, 305
Transmission: A4, A4
Axle/Gears: 7.5's with 3.42 and 3.23 gears

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via ICQ to robertg Send a message via AIM to robertg Send a message via Yahoo to robertg
How does offset grinding increase the stroke of a crankshaft?

I'm flipping through the new Hot Rod, and it speaks about offset grinding the crankshaft in order to gain an increase of stroke. I've also heard of 5.0 mustang guys doing this to stroke up to 347 from 302.


How exactly does it increase the stroke? The article spoke about how it changes the centerline, but I'm not totally familiar with the concept.

Anyone have some thoughts about this?
__________________
occasionally you may choose to throw your hands in the air and wave them like you just don't care.
robertg is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2002, 11:40 PM   #2
Moderator
 
Vader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 17,679

Classifieds Rating: (0)
If the crankshaft throws are ground to a smaller diameter, and almost all the material is taken off one side, the center of the journal is moved outward. A smaller con rod or thicker (spacer) bearing shell set is then used to compensate for the smaller diameter of the journals.

To change the stroke of a 302 to create a 347, the rod journals (and thus the crank) would be severly weakened from the smaller diameters. The more acceptable method is to use an aftermarket crank, but Ford guys often don't do the most acceptable thing.

__________________
Later,
Vader
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, and not one step simpler."
Vader is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2002, 11:44 PM   #3
Moderator
 
AlkyIROC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: 51°N 114°W, 3500'
Posts: 13,970
Car: 87 IROC L98
Engine: 582 Alcohol BBC
Transmission: Powerglide
Axle/Gears: Ford 9"/31 spline spool/4.86

Classifieds Rating: (0)
It's a common thing to do on an Olds engine also. You can offset grind the crank and use longer buick rods that have a smaller journal. The buick wrist pin holes need to be enlarged for the Olds wrist pins but it can be done.

You can easily take a 455 Olds to 496.
__________________
Hardtail Racing
All engine, no power adders! Bests: 9.029@150.45 (at altitude)
Theoretical sea level performance 8.623@157.05
AlkyIROC is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2002, 03:11 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Sitting Bull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Republic of Western Canada
Posts: 3,235
Car: 1986 Sport Coupé
Engine: 305-4v
Transmission: 700R4 and TransGo2

Classifieds Rating: (0)
And those 347 Ford engines can really respond

Car Craft has a nice write up in its current issue on one.

(I must be getting old ... the "death to Ford" chants are ringing with fainter clarity these days. I just like a good running machine anymore. Though there is still nothing like the interchangeability of small block Chevy parts
Sitting Bull is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2002, 11:12 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: northeast ohio
Posts: 1,878
Car: 2000 astro, 1984 camaro z28
Engine: 4.3, 305
Transmission: A4, A4
Axle/Gears: 7.5's with 3.42 and 3.23 gears

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via ICQ to robertg Send a message via AIM to robertg Send a message via Yahoo to robertg
Vader, when you say the crankshaft throws are ground to a smaller diameter, are you referring to the rod journals? That's my sticking point.

I'm still kinda baffled about this.
robertg is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2002, 11:43 PM   #6
FJK
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Illinois
Posts: 244

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Yes, the rod journal is ground smaller, but not concentric to its original centerline. To help visualize this, & I hope I can explain it in words rather than a diagram, do this. Draw a circle with a horizontal line through its diameter. This is your main journal with an imaginary center line. Now draw another circle and horizontal line directly above it. This is your rod journal. The distance between the 2 horizontal lines is your crank throw distance. Two times the crank throw distance is the stroke of the crankshaft.
Now, in your top circle that represents the rod journal, draw a smaller circle inside your original circle so that the tops of both circles coincide at the 12 o'clock position. Now draw a horizontal line through the smaller circle at its diameter. See what happens now? The distance between the main centerline & the centerline of the smaller circle is greater than the distance between the main center line & the original rod journal centerline. Thus, the crank throw increased & the stroke increased. If this is too "wordy" to understand, maybe Vader can explain it more clearly, assuming he had his coffee before reading this.
FJK is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2002, 10:26 AM   #7
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: WI,USA
Posts: 3,378
Car: 89 FORMULA 350
Engine: ls1
Transmission: t56
Axle/Gears: S60/ 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (6)
look at this funny drawing it is suppoused to show how the rod jornal is ground away to bring the rod center out more.

well it wont let me!

Last edited by 88 350 tpi formula; 07-21-2002 at 10:30 AM.
88 350 tpi formula is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2002, 11:23 AM   #8
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: W.P.B. FL. U.S.A.
Posts: 225

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by Sitting Bull
And those 347 Ford engines can really respond

Car Craft has a nice write up in its current issue on one.

(I must be getting old ... the "death to Ford" chants are ringing with fainter clarity these days. I just like a good running machine anymore. Though there is still nothing like the interchangeability of small block Chevy parts
Offset grinding was used back when cheap aftermarket cranks weren't available,don't bother. As for the Ford 302-347,I get irritated when I read all the hype as if it were some mystical all powerful enity. The only reason it ever gain any respect is when it was installed in a very light body,I would run a similar prep 302 sbc against it anyday. Do I hear an amend?
E-Z Rollin is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2002, 11:23 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
2000, 2001, 302, 347, 455, buick, crank, crankshaft, difference, grind, grinding, ground, hot, offset, pin, rod, set, shaft, shafts, stroke
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details