Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-10-2003, 10:52 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Grayslake, IL and Champaign, IL
Posts: 1,209

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Performer RPM Air Gap vs. Victor Jr. Intakes

My new setup will have AFR 195cc heads milled to 64cc chambers and a Comp XR282HR cam (230/236 @ .050, .510/.520 lift). My question is, should I go with the Edelbrock dual plane Performer RPM air gap manifold, or the Edelbrock single plane Victor Jr. manifold? I understand that the RPM range on the Performer is 1500-6500, and the Victor Jr. is 3500-8000, but which one will turn out better times at the track? On desktop dyno, the single plane gives me more power from 3500 on up than the dual plane does. I will probably be shifting at around 6500 RPM on my 700R4. My goal is low 12s, possibly 11s. I have the traction covered, and I will be getting a new rear end soon. Any help/suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
CamaroX84 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2003, 12:05 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moscow, ID I need my own machine shop
Posts: 3,852
Car: 82 Z28
Engine: Al LT1 headed LG4 305
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi with spacer

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I hear the Air-gap is the best all-around intake out there.
__________________
LT1 headed LG4 305 beast! Comp Solid lifter XS-262-10S, 1.6 Roller Rockers, 10.2:1, Holley 4160 600cfm, modded Weiand 7502 intake to fit LT1 heads____ Custom cylinder head cooling. Weiand 8208 Short Water Pump____TH-350 3 series 3.73 with 2 series posi and spacer____ Hedman Hedders 1 5/8 headers and Y-pipe 3in Exhaust, Dynomax 3" Bullet muffler ____Moroso Ultra 40 Wires ACCEL HEI Super Coil ____Competition Engineering 3120 Bolt-on SFC's____Homemade: Wonderbar, solid tie rod sleeves, Aluminum LCA and Panhard Rod with spherical rod ends, alternator and PS bracket, Strut tower brace, and Decoupling torque arm with telescoping link.
3000lbs

"The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than their democratic State itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism - ownership of government by an individual, by a group or by any controlling private power."
-FDR

"If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator."

-- President George W. Bush
During a photo-op with Congressional leaders on 12/18/2000.
ME Leigh is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2003, 06:22 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Chander, Arizona USA
Posts: 1,338
Car: 2006 Silverado 1500
Engine: 5.3L
Transmission: 4L60E

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to zippy
i'd say go with the victor jr.
__________________
2006 Silverado 1500 RCSB 2wd 5.3L 345RWHP/341RWTQ. Comp Cam 222º/224º .566/.568 112LSA, 2600 stall, 3.73 gear (stock), Detroit Locker, 160º thermostat, Corsa Sport cat back, Outlaw cold air intake, Pacesetter long tubes.

13.59@100.34 2.04 60' In full street trim with no weight reduction and on the 20's.
zippy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2003, 10:23 PM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: kalamazoo, Mi, USA
Posts: 281

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Hot Rod magazine called the performer RPM intake the best intake out there. Unless you are thinking of spinning your motor to 8000, and having a stall converter at 3500 get the performer RPM, it gives you a much more streetable air flow.
__________________
87 LS T-Tops 5-speed. Pioneer Mosfet Deck 2 10 JL W3's. Cerwin Vega 4X6's and 6X9's and a PPI660 watt 6 channel amp in a custom box. Koni Sway Bars and shocks/struts. Z-28 15's and compt T/A tires. Soon to have some serious go fast goodies.( 12bolt Richmond 390 gear and eaton posi, weld subframes and traction bars)
xxwarrior36xx is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2003, 12:45 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Chander, Arizona USA
Posts: 1,338
Car: 2006 Silverado 1500
Engine: 5.3L
Transmission: 4L60E

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to zippy
it is correct, the performer rpm is possibly the best street intake out there, but many test's have shown the victor jr. to have within 1 to 2 % difference in peak torque and around a 3 to 5 % gain in hp. this is something you have to see dyno numbers on rather than reading the sales add's, individual tests (non comparison), or just rpm range. they do make a few different victor jr.'s and quite often the torque can be made up with a carb spacer. as for the stall, i'd assume if he's planning to run them time's he's not running the saturday night special converter. it's your call, i'd just say check around at some dyno numbers of both. you'll find the victor jr. isn't as bad at low rpm as some might think.
__________________
2006 Silverado 1500 RCSB 2wd 5.3L 345RWHP/341RWTQ. Comp Cam 222º/224º .566/.568 112LSA, 2600 stall, 3.73 gear (stock), Detroit Locker, 160º thermostat, Corsa Sport cat back, Outlaw cold air intake, Pacesetter long tubes.

13.59@100.34 2.04 60' In full street trim with no weight reduction and on the 20's.
zippy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2003, 05:48 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
jbenge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Danville, IN
Posts: 924
Car: 84 Camaro Sport Coupe
Engine: 408LSX
Transmission: TH-350
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 bolt, 4.30 gears

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I switched from a Victor jr to an RPM airgap intake and took about .2 sec off my 1/4 mile time with my combo. I could feel a difference in low and mid range torque with the RPM airgap. But I'm using a milder cam, hydraulic roller 222/230 @.05. I'd say go with the RPM Airgap unless you are planning on revving over 6500 rpm's and are running a low gear.
__________________
1984 Camaro F41(street driven on pump gas)
408LS, 11.5:1, TFS heads, Super Vic, T&D rockers, callies rotating assy., Moser 12 bolt, 4.30 gears, TH-400,
1991 Z28 5.7L, future LS swap!
jbenge is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2011, 12:27 PM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 8

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Performer RPM Air Gap vs. Victor Jr. Intakes

How does Vic jr. Apply to a 409 sbc yes rev to 7 gran
abad409sbc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 04:30 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 764
Car: 87 Z28
Engine: AFR 383 CID
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4:11

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Performer RPM Air Gap vs. Victor Jr. Intakes

8 yr old thread back to life
LS4GXP is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2011, 04:30 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
355, air, airgap, flow, gap, intake, intakes, jr, performer, rpm, versus, vic, victor, vs, weiand
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details