Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-16-2003, 11:25 PM   #1
Member
 
flyin89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 178

Classifieds Rating: (7)
Ok lets talk 12 sec. cars.

How are you guys getting in the 12's. I've built quite a few cars and heres a pretty good guide to what it has taken to get bottom to mid 12's in the quarter. Lets hear about some other budget combos.

Engine;
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
350 .030
345Np pistons (don't get the hyper because they sit further in the hole and you lose compression)
274 extreme comp cam
ht817 lifters
Cloyes true roller chain
regular cast rings (seal quicker)
Vortec heads stock except the guide boss milled and 550 lift single springs(although 500 lift are all you really need) installed
Performer RPM Vortec intake
750 4779 Holley (ouch that hurts the budget)

BTW remember these heads are fast burn type and really don't like a lot of timing 32 degrees should be tops total timing.

Trans: (Old school)

350TH B&M shift kit and 3000 converter The Jegs $189 one has been doing just fine!(plus its made by B&M)

Rear:
3:73 Posi (would prefer a Powertraxx everytime but use what you can find as long is its not a gov-loc)

Exhaust:
Headman shorties with a 2 1/2 Y-pipe and a 3 inch cutout for the track. Running a dynamax exhaust keeps it quiet (read no tickets)
and the cutout still isn't that loud at the track compared to most others.

Slicks:
Borrow them or whatever don't even think of street slicks. Why pay 139 a tire and drive it on the street for 3 months and have a bald non-handling tire. When you can buy one set of slicks that will last you for a few years.(Taken care of properly)

This is just a guide that I have used and has been very successful feel free to comment.
__________________
1989 Firebird Weld wheels,400SBC,AFR alum.heads,11.2@119mph!
flyin89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 12:59 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,287
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 408 LSX
Transmission: Turbo 400

Classifieds Rating: (2)
what do you mean about hyper pistons? I assume you speak of ET streets when you speak of "street slicks" I dont see why they would wear faster than regular slicks. And since they are DOT approved you have the option to drive on the street and be prepared at all times. Plus, some people swear that the ET streets hook better than the slicks. Who wants to get caught with non sticky tires or with the nitrous bottle closed?

Also, could you go into detail on your car that ran 11.2.
__________________
1991 Firebird
F1R Procharged 408 LSX
2010 LSX True Street 10.0 Winner
9.6@145mph on 93


Last edited by GofasterFirebird; 04-17-2003 at 01:03 PM.
GofasterFirebird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 01:05 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
HiTech5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: ILL
Posts: 833
Car: 1986 Pontiac TA
Engine: 406
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Check out my sig. 11.60@118 mph!

www.geocities.com/dzperf
__________________
D&Z Performance
"Putting Power to the Pavement"
HiTech5 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 01:16 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 4,942
Car: Girls
Engine: Indian
Transmission: Change

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by GofasterFirebird
what do you mean about hyper pistons?
He means hypereutectic. They're Speed Pro's hyper pistons. I have them. Plus I have the moly-graphite coated skirts.

He's right. The compression height it a little shorter. The cast version advertises 9.5 comp ration with 64cc heads, but the hypers are 9.25 comp ratio with 64 cc heads.

Although it is only .25 of a point, it can make the difference between 299 HP and 300 HP.

I'm not sure why they did that, but I don't make the pistons so.....

Last edited by AJ_92RS; 04-17-2003 at 01:45 PM.
AJ_92RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 01:31 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,287
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 408 LSX
Transmission: Turbo 400

Classifieds Rating: (2)
He just made a generalization that all hypers reduce compression. That is all I was asking.
GofasterFirebird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 01:50 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 4,942
Car: Girls
Engine: Indian
Transmission: Change

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by GofasterFirebird
He just made a generalization that all hypers reduce compression.
A part number is a generalization?

Quote:
That is all I was asking.
And I answered your question.

He was referring to Speed Pro pistons. I don't know if other manufactures do the same though.

So for sake of argument, and for the general public...... Hypereutectic pistons don't cause a loss in compression because of what they're made from. Speed Pro's do because what I said ealier.

How's that?? :lala:
AJ_92RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 02:07 PM   #7
Member
 
flyin89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 178

Classifieds Rating: (7)
Quote:
Originally posted by GofasterFirebird
what do you mean about hyper pistons? I assume you speak of ET streets when you speak of "street slicks" I dont see why they would wear faster than regular slicks. And since they are DOT approved you have the option to drive on the street and be prepared at all times. Plus, some people swear that the ET streets hook better than the slicks. Who wants to get caught with non sticky tires or with the nitrous bottle closed?

Also, could you go into detail on your car that ran 11.2.
The 345NP is also made in a hyper design.
I won't use them because:
1) They are made harder but that also makes them brittle so if you do push it to hard they scatter.(All my 400's use forged pistons because of the Rod/stroke angle). With the 350 and a6000RPM cieling this has not been a prob. but...
2)The piston sits at least .020 in the hole if you believe this is only
.25 drop in compression you are dreaming.

The car running 11.2 at 119 has a 400SBC,5.7 rods.forged pistons,Afr 210 heads,850 DP,Runs on pump gas,it also has a powertraxx locker and a super street fighter converter in a TH350. It would be EASY to put it in the bottom tens Maybe high nines with N20. I don't see justification in running a street slick on a car that is driven regularly driven. I mean driving Radials like 295/50/15's on the street and 28-10.5's at the strip. If a person were to want to run(which just doesn't happen much) I would simply make a time to be at the track and run for whatever they have in mind.
flyin89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 02:11 PM   #8
Member
 
flyin89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 178

Classifieds Rating: (7)
Quote:
Originally posted by HiTech5
Check out my sig. 11.60@118 mph!

www.geocities.com/dzperf
Do you bottle that? It does look like a great sleeper.
flyin89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 02:14 PM   #9
Member
 
flyin89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 178

Classifieds Rating: (7)
Quote:
Originally posted by AJ_92RS
A part number is a generalization?



And I answered your question.

He was referring to Speed Pro pistons. I don't know if other manufactures do the same though.

So for sake of argument, and for the general public...... Hypereutectic pistons don't cause a loss in compression because of what they're made from. Speed Pro's do because what I said ealier.

How's that?? :lala:
You are correct AJ. Also the Jegs catalog lists the compression ratios as H345 9.35 with 64cc heads and 345np as 10.2 with 64 cc heads. .020 down adds a lot of chamber. You could be losing 20 hp.
__________________
1989 Firebird Weld wheels,400SBC,AFR alum.heads,11.2@119mph!

Last edited by flyin89; 04-17-2003 at 02:45 PM.
flyin89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 03:09 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 4,942
Car: Girls
Engine: Indian
Transmission: Change

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by flyin89
You are correct AJ. Also the Jegs catalog lists the compression ratios as H345 9.35 with 64cc heads and 345np as 10.2 with 64 cc heads. .020 down adds a lot of chamber. You could be losing 20 hp.
I'm assuming that's because there are 4 valve reliefs.

I have H345CNP30 flat tops and ya know what..... I just did the math and from what I can tell, the total is 9.27" ......

Here's my math so hopefully someone can verify it.

stroke = 3.48
divided by 2 = 1.74
add 5.7" rod length = 7.44
the pistons have a comp. height of 1.83"
add that to the 7.44 = 9.27

Is this right?

You've got me wondering now. I'm probably doing something wrong. I guess I'll have to actually get them pressed on and installed to measure how far they're in the hole.
AJ_92RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 03:29 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 4,942
Car: Girls
Engine: Indian
Transmission: Change

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Nevermind..... :sillylol:

I just went and actually measured the compression height (I don't know what the 1.83" is...) and it's 1.564"

That puts me at 9.004"

I can breath now.
AJ_92RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 04:08 PM   #12
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 157
Car: 1989 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec 350
Transmission: Built 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by flyin89
The 345NP is also made in a hyper design.
I won't use them because:
1) They are made harder but that also makes them brittle so if you do push it to hard they scatter.
2)The piston sits at least .020 in the hole if you believe this is only
.25 drop in compression you are dreaming.
1) Hypereutectic pistons are not stronger than forged pistons. They are stronger than cast because of a higher silicon content. That is what makes them more brittle. I run hypereutectic pistons in my 383 and have had none of my pistons "scatter."

2) I think we could use the manufacturer's compression rating on this one. Personally, I don't trust what people say when they refer to cylinders as "holes."
fast89RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 09:10 PM   #13
Member
 
flyin89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 178

Classifieds Rating: (7)
Quote:
Originally posted by fast89RS
1) Hypereutectic pistons are not stronger than forged pistons. They are stronger than cast because of a higher silicon content. That is what makes them more brittle. I run hypereutectic pistons in my 383 and have had none of my pistons "scatter."

2) I think we could use the manufacturer's compression rating on this one. Personally, I don't trust what people say when they refer to cylinders as "holes."
Personally I don't care who you trust! You want me to show you some pieces of the guys engines that have come apart?(its not pretty the pin has been the only thing remaining on a couple I've saw and that made a nice hole in the side of the block so everything is practically trash)

I build engines for customers and have been building them pratically all my life. Forged pistons are not "stronger" they are softer and more forgiving take a hammer hit a forged piston it won't break it will bend and fold. Hit the hyper and pick up your chips. There are a lot of things that can make a piston scatter detonation,valvetrain,etc... I'd rather know I have a buffer zone


If you were to build motors and were constantly involved with machinists you would call a cylinder hole a "hole". But you obviously don't so... Have a nice day.
__________________
1989 Firebird Weld wheels,400SBC,AFR alum.heads,11.2@119mph!

Last edited by flyin89; 04-17-2003 at 10:08 PM.
flyin89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 09:17 PM   #14
Member
 
flyin89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 178

Classifieds Rating: (7)
Quote:
Originally posted by AJ_92RS
Nevermind..... :sillylol:

I just went and actually measured the compression height (I don't know what the 1.83" is...) and it's 1.564"

That puts me at 9.004"

I can breath now.
The hyper pistons have held up fine in most 350's I've seen in 400's the stroke + the short rod makes the piston rock more. that is what usually breaks them. You should mock assemble it (your 350) and then just have it milled zero deck if you really want to gain that compression back. Sorry to give you bad news but better to know now than later.
flyin89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2003, 10:29 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 4,942
Car: Girls
Engine: Indian
Transmission: Change

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by flyin89
The hyper pistons have held up fine in most 350's I've seen in 400's the stroke + the short rod makes the piston rock more. that is what usually breaks them. You should mock assemble it (your 350) and then just have it milled zero deck if you really want to gain that compression back. Sorry to give you bad news but better to know now than later.
Bad news??? Who said it was bad news??? Not me...

From what I've calculated using online compression calculators, with a .025" deck height, that puts me right at 9.5:1 comp. Why is that bad? That's what I'm shooting for.

I guess what's bad news to you isn't to me...
AJ_92RS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2003, 03:13 PM   #16
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: illinois
Posts: 203
Car: 92 camaro
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: probuilt 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 383LT1intake
hey flyin are you still running the 10 bolt rear? if so what have you done to it to make it hold up? i ran 12.4 last yr and was waiting for mine to go ill be in 11's this year thanks
383LT1intake is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2003, 05:07 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
HiTech5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: ILL
Posts: 833
Car: 1986 Pontiac TA
Engine: 406
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.70

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Flyin - All Natural, no spray!
I like to keep the outside looking pretty much stock minus decals. I've owned it since new and it only has 36,000 miles on it.

www.geocities.com/dzperf
__________________
D&Z Performance
"Putting Power to the Pavement"
HiTech5 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2003, 09:11 PM   #18
Member
 
flyin89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 178

Classifieds Rating: (7)
Quote:
Originally posted by 383LT1intake
hey flyin are you still running the 10 bolt rear? if so what have you done to it to make it hold up? i ran 12.4 last yr and was waiting for mine to go ill be in 11's this year thanks

No joke I still have the 7 5/8 (71/2) Rear Powertraxx locker and 28 spline axles no probs yet.(knock on wood)
__________________
1989 Firebird Weld wheels,400SBC,AFR alum.heads,11.2@119mph!
flyin89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2003, 09:13 PM   #19
Member
 
flyin89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 178

Classifieds Rating: (7)
Quote:
Originally posted by HiTech5
Flyin - All Natural, no spray!
I like to keep the outside looking pretty much stock minus decals. I've owned it since new and it only has 36,000 miles on it.

www.geocities.com/dzperf

Totally awesome I really like your car!
__________________
1989 Firebird Weld wheels,400SBC,AFR alum.heads,11.2@119mph!
flyin89 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2003, 09:13 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
12sec, 345np, 383, 50, build, cars, cc, compression, made, pistons, pro, ratio, speed, stock, street
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details