LS1 or 400 small block?
#201
Supreme Member
iTrader: (15)
Re: LS1 or 400 small block?
so what all would I need to actually make the swap because im not really familiar with these motors at all and only have 2 builds under my belt a buddy of mine suggested the ls but its seems ill be outa budget by the time I get a intake carb motor heads and cam how much would the swap be realistically for a mild build
#202
Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Lansing Michigan
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 Camaro Z28 IROC
Engine: 5.0L TPI H.O. 215HP STOCK
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: GU6=3.42
Re: LS1 or 400 small block?
Howdy all, so has anyone ever done an LS swap WITHOUT problems???? I would love the technology, but not at the cost of constant problems. Also do I need to take some tech classes to learn about LS technology, as it seams everyone needs to get professional help with tuning once the swap is done. I don't mind sending the ECM but don't know anything about tweaking with a laptop, With an old school SBC there is no guesswork.
#203
Senior Member
Re: LS1 or 400 small block?
400 SBC vs LS1?
My vette has a custom built Dart 400 SBC with the 4.125 bore. Its an excellent engine. The Demon carb sucks. Fuel injected would be much better than carb for my ideal of fun and on equal terms of enjoyment to a fuel injected LS1. The Dart 400 gets 14.5 mpg normal driving and 16.8 mpg highway not too bad for a 400 with a carb. The carb frequently needs tweaking depending on the weather. I've learned to hate carbs other with a passion
My T/A's heads & cam LS1 is way more fun above 4000rpm than the vettes Dart 400. 27.5 mpg highway. No carb to mess with. Much better overall in my opinion.
I wish I had put a fuel injected big cube 427 LS in the vette instead of the Dart 400 with a carb. Getting weight out of the car helps the fun to drive factor in my opinion and seals the deal for the LS.
Based on my experience owning a 72 vette with a carb for like 30+ Years. Engine best engine the newer model LSx like the LS7 or LS3 or similar, next injected SBC, carb last choice.
My vette has a custom built Dart 400 SBC with the 4.125 bore. Its an excellent engine. The Demon carb sucks. Fuel injected would be much better than carb for my ideal of fun and on equal terms of enjoyment to a fuel injected LS1. The Dart 400 gets 14.5 mpg normal driving and 16.8 mpg highway not too bad for a 400 with a carb. The carb frequently needs tweaking depending on the weather. I've learned to hate carbs other with a passion
My T/A's heads & cam LS1 is way more fun above 4000rpm than the vettes Dart 400. 27.5 mpg highway. No carb to mess with. Much better overall in my opinion.
I wish I had put a fuel injected big cube 427 LS in the vette instead of the Dart 400 with a carb. Getting weight out of the car helps the fun to drive factor in my opinion and seals the deal for the LS.
Based on my experience owning a 72 vette with a carb for like 30+ Years. Engine best engine the newer model LSx like the LS7 or LS3 or similar, next injected SBC, carb last choice.
Last edited by Arctic White 91 RS; 03-06-2016 at 01:34 PM.
#205
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,733
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: LS1 or 400 small block?
On my race cars/daily drivers all EFI
-- Joe
#206
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
Re: LS1 or 400 small block?
Howdy all, so has anyone ever done an LS swap WITHOUT problems???? I would love the technology, but not at the cost of constant problems. Also do I need to take some tech classes to learn about LS technology, as it seams everyone needs to get professional help with tuning once the swap is done. I don't mind sending the ECM but don't know anything about tweaking with a laptop, With an old school SBC there is no guesswork.
Has anyone ever put a set of headers on a stock thirdgen without problems?
Has anyone ever converted a EFI thirdgen to carb without problems?
Has anyone ever put a 5.7 TBI/TPI engine into a 5.0 TBI/TPI thirdgen without problems?
Has anyone ever converted a V6 thirdgen to V8 without problems?
Has anyone ever made 400 hp in front of a stock T5 and 7.5" 10 bolt without problems?
The thing is, that the only part you have to replace on a thirdgen to make it a solid performer is the "everything".
Sure, you can start with a solid 5.7L car, swap out the intake, cam, converter, exhaust, and have a solid performer. But without problems? Every major thirdgen project has problems. If it didn't, it would be a 5.0L mustang. We learn so much while working on these problems. If we didn't, we would be Ford guys.
How do I know this? Well I have never owned an 86 or 88 thirdgen, only those years. But I have the rest of the years. But I have built over a dozen 5.0L Mustang drag cars. I have only built on 4 thirdgens where we replaced the "everything".
Babbys first LS recipe:
- Find a 2WD 5.3L truck/van engine, trans, wiring harness, ECM, sensors swap the tail housing to a late 4th gen (6 bolts, 5 minutes)
- Go to the one place that makes brackets cheaply for the swap I know of http://www.kwikperf.com
- Buy engine swap motor mounts
- Send the harness to a rebuilder that removes all the extra wiring or do it yourself using youtube
- use the stock fuel system plumbed for early engines and plumb in GM part # 10299146 or AC Delco # GF822 for late returnees style
- Get one of the various laptop/programmers to turn off all the extra stuff in the computer
- get the right exhaust manifolds and have it put onto your exhaust
- without adding any performance parts, make more power than any thirdgen short of a few SLP fire hawks ever came with ~300hp.
Optionally: add a smallish turbo or small amount of nitrous to start making insane/race car levels of power
Also seconding that there is no reason to EFI things that are running fine with a carb already.
#207
Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Lansing Michigan
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 Camaro Z28 IROC
Engine: 5.0L TPI H.O. 215HP STOCK
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: GU6=3.42
Re: LS1 or 400 small block?
I understand that most swaps have challenges, but challenges should not take more than a weekend to figure out. I have swapped a few motors in Cutlass bodies, and never ran into any of the problems listed with an LS swap. Once the Oldsmobiles were up and running they stayed that way. I seem to come across post after post after post about LS swaps that have random ghost problems and the it takes several teams of engineers to figure out that one of the parameters are off in the computer and the guy is without a car for an entire summer.
I think if I go to an LS it will be in a 2000 or newer Firebird, you can't go wrong with factory for reliability. Power is nice, but I have found once you deviate from factory you loose reliability. I just don't know if I have what it takes to tackle these issues, who knows what the future will bring though...
I think if I go to an LS it will be in a 2000 or newer Firebird, you can't go wrong with factory for reliability. Power is nice, but I have found once you deviate from factory you loose reliability. I just don't know if I have what it takes to tackle these issues, who knows what the future will bring though...
#208
TGO Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: SALEM, NH
Posts: 11,733
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes
on
75 Posts
Car: '88 Formula, '94 Corvette, '95 Bird
Engine: LC9, 355" LT1, LT1
Transmission: T5, Zf6, 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.42, Dana44 3.45, 3.23
Re: LS1 or 400 small block?
I understand that most swaps have challenges, but challenges should not take more than a weekend to figure out. I have swapped a few motors in Cutlass bodies, and never ran into any of the problems listed with an LS swap. Once the Oldsmobiles were up and running they stayed that way. I seem to come across post after post after post about LS swaps that have random ghost problems and the it takes several teams of engineers
As far as the electronics go, if you can't tune an LS motor using the newer tuning software then this hobby isn't for you. The old days of using a hex editor, burning proms, swapping chips, using crappy ALDL software that crashed regularly - THAT was difficult. The obd2 stuff is not.
LSx swaps are easy. You wanna see a challenge, look at some of the turbo builds that have been popping up on the power adder forum the last two years. Tell one of those guys an LSx swap is hard, and you'll lose your man card for life.
-- Joe
#209
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
Re: LS1 or 400 small block?
I mean, it was a problem back in 2000-2003 when people were breaking new ground.
Today, the swap is down to a step by step science, and almost pedestrian in simplicity.
#210
Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Lansing Michigan
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 Camaro Z28 IROC
Engine: 5.0L TPI H.O. 215HP STOCK
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: GU6=3.42
Re: LS1 or 400 small block?
Hey All,
I am sure those that have been exposed to the swap understand it better than I do, perhaps it is just the fear of the unknown I guess. Just like I had no issues with HEI on my other cars, my elders wanted nothing to do with it, so times change and I must change with them. My old professor once said.."If your not going forward...you will continue to go backwards"
Perhaps on a future project I will tackle the swap. I hope I have not offended anyone about this topic. Thanks for sharing everyone.
I am sure those that have been exposed to the swap understand it better than I do, perhaps it is just the fear of the unknown I guess. Just like I had no issues with HEI on my other cars, my elders wanted nothing to do with it, so times change and I must change with them. My old professor once said.."If your not going forward...you will continue to go backwards"
Perhaps on a future project I will tackle the swap. I hope I have not offended anyone about this topic. Thanks for sharing everyone.
#211
TGO Supporter
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
Re: LS1 or 400 small block?
Don't forget that the adversity encountered working on something brings knowledge. Our Great Grandfathers and Grandfathers knew this. Can you imagine what it took to make 300hp out of a Flathead Ford with nearly zero aftermarket? In one water cooled block that is roughly the equivalent of 8 Briggs and strattion motors running?
#212
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: huntsville, al
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 6.8 HSR N2O
Transmission: TKO 600
Axle/Gears: 9" Moser 3.50 True trac
Re: LS1 or 400 small block?
Ok just to chime in, I built a 414 SBC EFI for my 89. Like any other major change out yeah there have been a lot of things to work out. Some were mandatory but others were by preference. In the end I have a pretty good running ride.
Building a SBC from ground up vs LS isn't really that much difference in cost but the SBC combo to get to the LS performance level is not nearly as well manored and drivable. I have regretted not going with an LS but that's in the past. IF I were starting over from scratch I would go LS all the way.
If I add up everything for the engine, tranny, fuel system, ECM, exhaust etc I probably have around $15,000 in a Dart/AFR 414 with TKO trans. Could have done a great LS for just a little more.
If you are just going with a mild performance upgrade then it's not worth it but if you are looking for a powerful, streetable combo the LS probably can be beat in value. If you don't want the "headaches" then buy a new Camaro, it's all sorted out. As far as the old days, well they're the old days.
Building a SBC from ground up vs LS isn't really that much difference in cost but the SBC combo to get to the LS performance level is not nearly as well manored and drivable. I have regretted not going with an LS but that's in the past. IF I were starting over from scratch I would go LS all the way.
If I add up everything for the engine, tranny, fuel system, ECM, exhaust etc I probably have around $15,000 in a Dart/AFR 414 with TKO trans. Could have done a great LS for just a little more.
If you are just going with a mild performance upgrade then it's not worth it but if you are looking for a powerful, streetable combo the LS probably can be beat in value. If you don't want the "headaches" then buy a new Camaro, it's all sorted out. As far as the old days, well they're the old days.
#213
Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Lansing Michigan
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 Camaro Z28 IROC
Engine: 5.0L TPI H.O. 215HP STOCK
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: GU6=3.42
Re: LS1 or 400 small block?
Thanks for sharing your experience Antman... I'm not quite ready to drop 15K into a motor and drivetrain. So little by little upgrade options, unless I can talk the wife into a SIXGEN...
#216
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 571
Received 483 Likes
on
233 Posts
Car: 1989 Firebird GTA
Engine: Motown Aluminum 427
Transmission: TH400/GVO
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 IRS 3.75:1
Re: LS1 or 400 small block?
Who said arguing never solved any problems? Looks like it solved this one..... Ended the thread.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theshackle
Tech / General Engine
4
03-05-2017 06:37 PM
Mickeyruder
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
3
09-02-2015 02:45 PM
BlackphantomZ28
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
08-22-2015 01:00 PM