Firebird vs. Camaro, would you switch, and if so why?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Alabama
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Firebird vs. Camaro, would you switch, and if so why?
If you have just one or the other, would you want to switch? Are there any technical differences that are that significant? In some old magazine reviews I've read, the guys said they liked the Firebird suspension better, but the Camaro was a tad faster due to its lighter weight.
One other thing I thought about was hood clearance. It seems the Camaro guys have an easier time fitting taller intakes (Performer RPM) under the hood of their cars, and the Camaro also probably breathes better through the front grill.
I'm partial to the Firebird's styling, but thirdgens are getting pretty scarce in this area, so I may not have the luxury of choice before much longer!
One other thing I thought about was hood clearance. It seems the Camaro guys have an easier time fitting taller intakes (Performer RPM) under the hood of their cars, and the Camaro also probably breathes better through the front grill.
I'm partial to the Firebird's styling, but thirdgens are getting pretty scarce in this area, so I may not have the luxury of choice before much longer!
#3
Supreme Member
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Central NJ, USA
Posts: 13,414
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
Car: 1986 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 700R4
I think Firebirds have a slightly lower CD (coefficient of drag) than the Camaros do, because of the hood. The 82 Trans-Am was actually designed in a wind tunnel!
I always thought the Camaro looked more like a muscle car, but the Firebird looked more like a sports car.
But I dig the flip-up lights and interior of Firebirds... I'm definately a Firebird fan.
I always thought the Camaro looked more like a muscle car, but the Firebird looked more like a sports car.
But I dig the flip-up lights and interior of Firebirds... I'm definately a Firebird fan.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chico, CA
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Firebird, 92 RS
Engine: 2.8L MPFI, 355 TPI
Transmission: t-5, t-5
Axle/Gears: open 3.42, posi 3.42
firebirds are more aerodynamic, and aerodynamics play a bigger role in the long run than weight does. of course im not sure of the specifics abotu camaroes or the weight difference, but i think firebirds had a cd of .32 or so, in 82. and it probably got slightly smaller as the years went on.(i think in 82 the trans am was the most aerodynamic domestic car made up to that point, until the next 'vette generation came out)
regardless, firebirds just look so much more bitchin than camaros, and you dont see them as much. i might take an iroc-z's look over an early 80's sc, but other than that firebirds are immensly superior in the looks department. people at my school think my 'bird is a corvette. granted, they're dumbasses, but you'll never catch anyone thinking a camaro is a 'vette.
i wouldnt switch to a camaro if it had an ls2 in it.
now, i would get it, i just wouldnt give up my bird for it.
regardless, firebirds just look so much more bitchin than camaros, and you dont see them as much. i might take an iroc-z's look over an early 80's sc, but other than that firebirds are immensly superior in the looks department. people at my school think my 'bird is a corvette. granted, they're dumbasses, but you'll never catch anyone thinking a camaro is a 'vette.
i wouldnt switch to a camaro if it had an ls2 in it.
now, i would get it, i just wouldnt give up my bird for it.
#5
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Arcadia ,Ca
Posts: 2,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 82 firebird s/e 83 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L 305ci 4b carb.....CFI
Transmission: TH200C....700R4
Birds are the way to goBecause I think the flip up lights are cool and the firebird logo.Camaros are bad as* looking too but I like the birds look much more.The 82-84 birds have no problem breathing that came with the functional hood scoop,nose vents and maybe even the fender vents
Last edited by 82knightrider; 03-06-2005 at 07:57 PM.
#6
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bristol Va
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 Camaro RS...GONE 87 SC (84 Z/28 clone)
Engine: 305 TBI LO3....GONE....305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4 with shift kit
well...(although it looks like im the only one haha)...im gonna have to go with the Camaro...i actually passed up an 82 firebird so i could get the camaro im driving now....i like both body styles...but i lean towards the camaro...just looks cleaner to me
Trending Topics
#8
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Tigard, Oregon
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '86 Berlinetta
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700R4
time to face the facts Stekman... you'd take any car that was broke just because you love to fix 'em
I'd choose Camaro w/ T-Tops...
or Firebird w/ drop top.
Camaro would be my 1st choice though.
I'd choose Camaro w/ T-Tops...
or Firebird w/ drop top.
Camaro would be my 1st choice though.
#9
Supreme Member
iTrader: (13)
camaro every time. i have no use for firebirds. the flip up lights are one of the things i don't like the most. that and the goofy instrument panel. i don't like how the nose comes to a point. my first car was a camaro, and this car is a camaro. i think that it will stay that way too. way more muscle car-ish, and i like them better than sports cars.
#10
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
I've got a bird, but I was looking for a Camaro. I think the IROCs and later Z28s just look pissed off if you look at them. Much more aggressive in my opinion. I also like the fact that they are a tad lighter on the front end, but then again, the birds are a bit more aerodynamic as well.
There's pluses and minuses to both of them. Honestly, I'm not sure which I'd take if I had the choice between two otherwise identical ones for the same price. It'd be a hard decision, especially if both were black.
There's pluses and minuses to both of them. Honestly, I'm not sure which I'd take if I had the choice between two otherwise identical ones for the same price. It'd be a hard decision, especially if both were black.
#11
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Waterloo, Iowa
Posts: 4,671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 firebird with 98 firebird interi
Engine: pump gas 427sbc Dart Lil M 13.5:1
Transmission: Oldani TH400 w/ BTE 9" convertor
Axle/Gears: 31 spline Moser/full spool/4.11Rich
I dont really care which, I got this car for a song and it just happened to be a firebird. But EVERYWHERE you look, camaro, camaro, camaro. When we were at a stop on the power tour there were 3rd gen camaros coming out my ears...I counted 3 firebirds.
I like things outta the norm, or non-sheep like- so I have to pick the birds based on camaro saturation everywhere I look.
I like things outta the norm, or non-sheep like- so I have to pick the birds based on camaro saturation everywhere I look.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Smithfield, NC
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1987 Camaro SC
Engine: 2.8L MPFI (rebuilt)
Transmission: 700R4 swapped to T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 open
I want my '88 Bird back! I'd still have it if it hadn't gotten stolen. The Camaro I have now was a really good deal, since the engine wasn't running. It's ok but I'd still rather have my Bird.
#15
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Pueblo Co
Posts: 3,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: No more birdy
I could never decide I like both. I like the Camaro front clip yet the Firebird rear clip is better looking. The only solution is to have one of each
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Alberta
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Red Rooster
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: M5
I have owned a Firebird, a Trans Am and a Camaro (except Berlineta)and my choice would be a Camaro....I can't explain why I just love Camaros..
#19
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chatfield, MN
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 Chevrolet Camaro IROC
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: Automatic
I've had a 87 Formula, and now Have a 83 TA (wifes car) and my baby a 85 IROC. I really love my IROC's stance and its aggressive look. Everyone has there own opinions as long as its a 3rd gen ya cant go wrong.
#20
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,989
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx
Engine: Turbo KA24DE
Transmission: 5 spd
Axle/Gears: 4.08 VLSD
I like my Trans Am, but I WISH there were a better way to get cold air to my engine. I also really like the look of the 91-92 hi-rise spoiler that came on Camaros. But I have 2 birds already. Maybe next one will be a Camaro, I dont really care.
#21
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 Firebird,
Engine: lq4
Transmission: gto t56 (mn12)
cam vs fire
Firebirds all the way. Its all a matter of style and preference. Would you like the power of an all out american muscle car like the firebird, or would you go for the less aggressive foreign sounding camaro .
I do however like the look of the stingray stinger hood on the camaro and the 92 high rise spoiler. Yea i guess camaros rock too.
I own all Firebirds now so I guess im still biased.
I do however like the look of the stingray stinger hood on the camaro and the 92 high rise spoiler. Yea i guess camaros rock too.
I own all Firebirds now so I guess im still biased.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992 Trans Am
History / Originality
27
05-10-2023 07:19 PM
92camaroJoe
Tech / General Engine
6
08-13-2015 06:07 AM