Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Tech / General Engine Is your car making a strange sound or won't start? Thinking of adding power with a new combination? Need other technical information or engine specific advice? Don't see another board for your problem? Post it here!

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-17-2006, 08:32 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 441
Car: 85' TA
Engine: 355 Carbed
Transmission: Built 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Modifying Valves for Performance...

What can be done to a set of valves, like the ones pictured below, to increase air flow?

As i understand, most gains in airflow can be achaieved in the pocket and valve. Air can flow through the runner very freely as stock casting, the way the air has to move around the valve is where flow is created.

My vortec heads are already bowl ported, gasket matched, and runners enlarged. So my next step of attack is valve modifacation. I know i can buy valves already modified, but i have so many old valves its not even funny, so i can modify them to practice, and order a set of valves to completely modify.


12SecondTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2006, 09:27 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,760
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
you can have the valves and seats cut with 3/5 angles,
you can have the valves back cut
you can round off the top and under side edge

It's your lucky day, I recently scanned a section of David Vizards "how to modify SBC cylinder heads", the section about home modifying valves for performance. Here ya go

link
Sonix is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2006, 09:29 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,760
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
The only thing to remember, is the valves seat area is the part that has to touch the valve seat on the head, so it must be the same angle, with no nicks, in order for it to seal ok. Aside from that area, the rest can be smoothed, ground and modified to suit. I think i'll chuck an old 1.84" valve up in a drill press and whip out the needle files and give these a shot...
Sonix is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 09:38 AM   #4
Moderator
 
Vader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 17,679

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Radius the margin at the faces of the intake valves (The far right example):



Among the short trackers around here (required to run factory castings and 2-barrels), the concensus is that this change alone is worth 5HP. I'm not sure how many CFM that may be, but the dyno doesn't lie.
Vader is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 10:07 AM   #5
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,445
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere

Classifieds Rating: (1)


The "back cut", where you either radius or at least reduce the discontinuity between the untouched portion of the back of the head and the ground face, makes a similar difference.

You'll likely find that a file is near about useless for that.

I like to use a diamond bit in a die grinder, with the valve spinning of course.
__________________
Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.
— William of Ockham, from Quaestiones et decisiones in quattuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi

Roughly paraphrased into modern English, and applied to figuring out what's wrong with your car:

The simplest explanation that fits all the facts is probably the right one.
sofakingdom is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 10:34 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 9,551
Car: 91 Camaro Vert
Engine: 02 LS1, HX40
Transmission: 2002 LS1 M6

Classifieds Rating: (0)
i know this isnt the low buck approach, but ive seen great gains in otherwise stock heads by just swapping in a good set of performance aftermarket valves... the tiny changes between them and the stockers makes a huge diff in airflow..
MrDude_1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 02:55 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,760
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Vader, you are talking about the red arrow area here? I think vizard said something about a certain way to do that, or else it will cause reversion or something....? Or to chamfer it, but not radius it...?


Sofa, you are talking about the blue arrow? What about a sanding drum in a die grinder? Probably would work the same...
Attached Images
File Type: gif valves.gif (5.3 KB, 298 views)
Sonix is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 03:01 PM   #8
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 10,445
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Yeah, I'm talking about both places; the red arrow, and the blue arrow. The red one is the margin, the blue is the "back cut".

A sanding drum is too coarse. It would be too hard to control. Also not really smooth enough; that is, instead of a nice smooth outer surface, it's lumpy, so it tends to leave divots and peaks instead of a fine smooth surface.

I've done margins before in a pinch with 400 grit sandpaper, lubed with ATF, just holding it on the valve margin with my finger, and that didn't work too bad; kind of burnt my finger a little bit though, and went through a bunch of sandpaper, by the time I finished a whole set of valves.
__________________
Numquam ponenda est pluralitas sine necessitate.
— William of Ockham, from Quaestiones et decisiones in quattuor libros Sententiarum Petri Lombardi

Roughly paraphrased into modern English, and applied to figuring out what's wrong with your car:

The simplest explanation that fits all the facts is probably the right one.
sofakingdom is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2006, 03:04 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,760
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
hmm, good to know, thanks! I'll look into a diamond bit for my dremel or die grinder.
Sonix is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2006, 04:02 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,760
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
I finally got around to starting this myself yesterday. I've got 8 1.84 valves, 8 1.94 valves (which I want to use), and 16 1.5 valves, that I hope to get 8 useable ones out of.
I'll snap a few pics to show what i've done, and maybe get some feedback
Sonix is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2006, 01:34 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,760
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
I got the valves from the 993 heads I practiced porting on. The valves are "scalloped" on the underside, and are in decently good shape. The ones off my 416 heads, are flat bottomed, and have ROUGH valve sealing surfaces:

1.50 exhaust

here's what I mean, scalloped:
pic
what's the deal on that? good thing, bad thing?

scalloped and flat valves


exhaust valve think the valve seat is bad enough on the exhausts to have to toss them out? I would think so...

intake

back of intake

I did this according to vizards write up in
link and what i've heard on these boards. Apparently a radius on the front margin, is good for the exhaust valve in particular. Radiusing, or chamfering, the back ridge, is also a good idea, and knocking down the green arrowed spot in that one pic of mine, was also mentioned.

I used 50/80/120/180/220/320/600 grit sandpaper, and a maroon scotch brite pad. I finished it with autosol metal polish, on a piece of paper towel. I used a file to knock off the sharp edges, and chamfer it a bit, then the paper to smooth things out, and finally polish. I can post a "before" pic if desired. I've finished a handful of valves so far. I think i'll grind the chamber side of the valve to be perfectly smooth, and polish that to a chrome style of finish.
Any thoughts? This look good so far?

sofa, I would think with only 400 grit, this would take FOREVER to remove enough material from the back edge to call it radiused. I think my smooth single cut file did a good job.

Last edited by Sonix; 02-16-2006 at 01:36 AM.
Sonix is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2006, 03:08 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,760
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
ahem, ok sofa, I think I understand you now.

I used a file on the intake valve, radiused the back of the valve seat into the back of the valve. (a back cut).

then did a chamfer on the front face.
According to vizard, you want to radius the exhaust front edge, but chamfer the intake, as it prevents cammy-ness (mildy i'd guess).

HOWEVER! The exhaust valve is much harder then the intake, and after trying to use the file on an exhaust valve, I realized I had flattened the teeth on my file.... hmm.
A word to the wise, beware of destroying your files.
Sonix is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2006, 03:16 PM   #13
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 441
Car: 85' TA
Engine: 355 Carbed
Transmission: Built 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
i ended up getting the guy at the machine shop todo it for me. I tipped him $100 to make my vortec's flow as well as possible.

He started off with a 5 angle valve job, and cut the seat real far down, so the valve gets a larger opening at less lift, hard to expalin if you dont know. He unshrouded the chamber very well, and i mean excellently. Gasket matched to felpro, forgot the number but it was large. Enlarged the runners a bunch. he said almost definately i would end up with another 30cfm at the least. although they were not flow tested.

Also when since he cut the valve so far down he was able to take quite some material off the surface to make up for the deshrouding and more. Said i might have lost 1cc when all was done.

you'd never believe what i paid for all this tho, wasn't that much. $400 including the cash i tipped the guy to port. so i got the deal of the century.
12SecondTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2006, 03:18 PM   #14
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 441
Car: 85' TA
Engine: 355 Carbed
Transmission: Built 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by Sonix
ahem, ok sofa, I think I understand you now.

I used a file on the intake valve, radiused the back of the valve seat into the back of the valve. (a back cut).

then did a chamfer on the front face.
According to vizard, you want to radius the exhaust front edge, but chamfer the intake, as it prevents cammy-ness (mildy i'd guess).

HOWEVER! The exhaust valve is much harder then the intake, and after trying to use the file on an exhaust valve, I realized I had flattened the teeth on my file.... hmm.
A word to the wise, beware of destroying your files.

well go figure, the intake air is normally like what, ummmm 1200+ degrees cooler then exhaust, it make heat up but then is quickly cooled by the incoming air. However the exhaust never gets that priviledge. The exhaust must be harder and able to withstand hotter temperatures all day long.

Last edited by 12SecondTA; 03-02-2006 at 05:43 PM.
12SecondTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2006, 05:42 PM   #15
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 441
Car: 85' TA
Engine: 355 Carbed
Transmission: Built 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
12SecondTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2006, 06:20 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,760
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Quote:
Originally posted by 12SecondTA
Deep, very informative.
Sonix is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2006, 01:45 AM   #17
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 441
Car: 85' TA
Engine: 355 Carbed
Transmission: Built 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by Sonix
Deep, very informative.
i had to delete my post, i hit quote instead of edit on my post and had to delete the outcome.
12SecondTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2006, 09:39 AM   #18
Junior Member
 
92HeritageT~Top's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tyler, TX
Posts: 65
Car: 92 Heritage T-Top
Engine: 350
Transmission: 5-Speed

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to 92HeritageT~Top
Sonix, what is that book you refered to, and linked to earlier? I might try to find me one, he seems to have some great info written up.
92HeritageT~Top is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2006, 10:14 AM   #19
Supreme Member
 
Gumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NWOhioToledoArea
Posts: 6,977
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by 12SecondTA
well go figure, the intake air is normally like what, ummmm 1200+ degrees cooler then exhaust, it make heat up but then is quickly cooled by the incoming air. However the exhaust never gets that priviledge. The exhaust must be harder and able to withstand hotter temperatures all day long.

Also why ya will burn up your ex valves with header leaks.
__________________
86 Pontiac Firebird [68 Firebird HoodScoops, Notchback, Rear Mounted Tach, Inverted Wing,
T/A HoodVents in SailPanel, Front & Rear STB, Boxed LCA/PanHard, Fulley Welded Interior, Alston SFC]
http://www.thirdgen.org/techboard/v6...-all-over.html
See link for newer pics and above mods.

Gumby is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2006, 10:45 AM   #20
Senior Member
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,760
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
How to build and modify small block chevy cylinder heads - a powerbook series book, by David Vizard. (maybe not word for word, but close.)

It's a little dated, most of the heads talked about in the book are old double hump, or 993 heads, written before vortec was invented I think. But, it's a really good book, showing how to port the bowl area, why to not waste your time doing certain things, etc...
Sonix is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2006, 02:39 PM   #21
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 441
Car: 85' TA
Engine: 355 Carbed
Transmission: Built 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally posted by Gumby
Also why ya will burn up your ex valves with header leaks.
you wont "burn your valves" as normally thought of the defintion of burn.

exhaust leaks cause your engine to run lean, and lean conditions make emense heat, so much heat it can warp a valve, or destroy a valve. that is what exhaust leaks do.
12SecondTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2010, 07:07 AM   #22
Member
 
87_LG4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 152
Car: '87 Camaro SC
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Modifying Valves for Performance...

Four year old thread coming back to life...

I've been searching high and low for all kinds of little things you can do to increase performance, and valve mods for the most part seems to be as simple as back cutting, 3-angel job and polish. But then I stumbled across this article which kind of peaked my curiosity. These so called Powre Ringz can supposedly increase both power and fuel economy by promoting increased vaporization, but does it seem at all plausible? What do you guys think? Anyone ever try such a thing, or maybe wanna try it out?
87_LG4 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2010, 12:41 PM   #23
Senior Member
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,760
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Modifying Valves for Performance...

Thanks 87_LG4 for letting me know all these links had died. Here, i'll upload all my pics now. Should be self explanatory which pic is which.

That article you linked to is basically what I did (except for the "powre ringz".) The power rings sound like an alright idea, give them a try eh?

The sandpaper, and dremel while spinning the valve in a drill press is what I had to do though. Keep in mind what I noted above, exhaust valves are SUPER hard...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1.94 intake scalloped.jpg (55.0 KB, 11 views)
File Type: jpg 150, 305 valve.jpg (52.9 KB, 11 views)
File Type: jpg 194 back view.jpg (70.5 KB, 9 views)
Sonix is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2010, 12:43 PM   #24
Senior Member
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,760
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Modifying Valves for Performance...

A few more;
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 194, side view.jpg (61.5 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg Picture1 007.jpg (542.2 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg 150 valves2.jpg (39.5 KB, 9 views)
Sonix is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2010, 12:45 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,760
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Modifying Valves for Performance...

Scans from the book;
Attached Images
File Type: jpg scan.jpg (365.3 KB, 6 views)
File Type: jpg Scan0001.jpg (421.1 KB, 4 views)
File Type: jpg Scan0002.jpg (318.9 KB, 3 views)
Sonix is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2010, 12:46 PM   #26
Senior Member
 
Sonix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 10,760
Car: 1982 Trans-Am
Engine: 355 w/ ported 416s
Transmission: T10, hurst shifter
Axle/Gears: 10 bolt, true-trac, 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Modifying Valves for Performance...

Last of the book scans
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Scan0003.jpg (324.4 KB, 5 views)
File Type: jpg Scan0004.jpg (303.6 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg Scan0005.jpg (290.3 KB, 1 views)
Sonix is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2010, 03:18 PM   #27
Member
 
87_LG4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 152
Car: '87 Camaro SC
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Modifying Valves for Performance...

Thank you Sonix. Those pictures are exactly what I've been looking for. Now to rig my drill in a vertical manner...

Thanks again
__________________
"Fuel burns fast on an empty tank"

F-Body Club of Norway FBCN
87_LG4 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2010, 07:51 PM   #28
Supreme Member
 
305sbc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Fairview Heights Illinois
Posts: 2,205
Car: 1986 & 89 Irocz
Engine: sbc's
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27:1 / 3.25:1

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Modifying Valves for Performance...

It'll go quick if you also use a die grinder with a sanding cartridge roll mounted, and then later a scotchbrite/sanding flapper wheel for finishing. You will then need to get the 45* retouched.

Here's some pictures of modified valves:
http://s165.photobucket.com/albums/u...dis/?start=500



305sbc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2010, 07:54 PM   #29
Supreme Member
 
305sbc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Fairview Heights Illinois
Posts: 2,205
Car: 1986 & 89 Irocz
Engine: sbc's
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27:1 / 3.25:1

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Modifying Valves for Performance...

Note: The valves in the photos I posted are LS1 valves and already have an efficient shape and a factory 30* back-cut on the intake valve.
SBC1 valves require more grinding to get a superior shape, but they come out almost as well as the LSX valves.
305sbc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2010, 08:40 PM   #30
Member
 
87_LG4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bergen, Norway
Posts: 152
Car: '87 Camaro SC
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Modifying Valves for Performance...

How does this one look? I'm pretty pleased with the result, but then again I'm no expert. What do you think?

Valve Back Cut 3.jpg
87_LG4 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2010, 11:10 AM   #31
Supreme Member
 
305sbc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Fairview Heights Illinois
Posts: 2,205
Car: 1986 & 89 Irocz
Engine: sbc's
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27:1 / 3.25:1

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Modifying Valves for Performance...

Here's some pics of radiused exhaust valves.
http://s702.photobucket.com/albums/w...used%20valves/
305sbc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 03-23-2010, 11:10 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Tech / General Engine

Tags
194, angel, cut, gains, increase, intake, modify, modifying, performance, powre, powreringz, rings, ringz, sanding, valve, valves
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details