84 TA VS 90's NON TURBO ECLIPSE

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

07-22-2003, 11:39 PM

Sir Speed A Lot

Member

Thread Starter

Join Date: Feb 2003

Location: Charlestown, NH

Posts: 155

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Car: 1984 Trans Am

Engine: 305 LG4 :(

Transmission: 700r4 :(

84 TA VS 90's NON TURBO ECLIPSE

HEy guys,

I have an 84 TA LG4 no mods with a tranny that slips with full throttle up until 40 MPH, then its fine... will i have any luck against a mid 90's non turbo eclipse with a header?

Thanks,

TOM

:lala:

Reply Like

07-23-2003, 12:07 AM

rx7speed

Supreme Member

Join Date: Aug 2001

Location: Caldwell,ID

Posts: 5,389

Likes: 0

Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Car: 2005 BMW 545i

Engine: 4.4L N62B44

Transmission: 6spd auto

Axle/Gears: Rotating

I raced one before on the freeway

should have been in 3rd for the speed I was going but instead had it in 4th
from 60-90 walked him everytime

those things are slower then a constapated turtle

Reply Like

07-23-2003, 04:31 PM

IROCaholic

Supreme Member

Join Date: Jun 2003

Location: Cypress,Tx

Posts: 1,521

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Car: 89 Camaro RS

Engine: 350 carbed now

Transmission: World Class T5

Axle/Gears: Peg Leg w/ 3.73's

I dont know , I went to school with a guy who had a 93 eclipse with a header and exhuast and he ran a 16.0 , I dont think a stock LG4 in perfect running condition runs that , and you said your tranny is slipping, so good luck.

Reply Like

07-23-2003, 07:43 PM

Dan88IrocZ

Senior Member

Join Date: Jan 2002

Location: Pittsfield, MA

Posts: 909

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

If my friends stock 2.8 Cavalier can take a modded non-turbo eclipse...I sure hope you can. From a light, even with a slipping tranny it should all be yours..