Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

firebird vs mustang

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-2005, 02:12 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
shaun777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Glaslyn, SK
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Firebird formula
Engine: 350 5.7L
Transmission: 700R4
firebird vs mustang

k simple one, my V8 5.7L slightly modded firebird formula vs. my freinds stock 1994 mustang 3.8L V6 who would win??? 1/4 mile
Old 04-12-2005, 05:06 PM
  #2  
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
urbanhunter44's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brighton, CO
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
Do you even have to ask?

The mustang has something like 140 HP lol.
Old 04-12-2005, 05:28 PM
  #3  
Member

 
Coult_91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Valparaiso, IN
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91firebird, 2000 camaro
Engine: 305 tbi,K&N, edelbrock intake & 3.8
Transmission: 700R4
you now hold the title for the dumbest question ever!! you will stomp him by lengths!!
Old 04-12-2005, 06:13 PM
  #4  
Supporter/Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,247
Likes: 0
Received 391 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
You will obliterate him.
Old 04-12-2005, 07:47 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
shaun777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Glaslyn, SK
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Firebird formula
Engine: 350 5.7L
Transmission: 700R4
haha yea ok ok i admit stupid question but ok another one....i dinno what it is but everyone around likes to be exactly the same and they all like that boring ugly car called a mustang so whatta ya think bout a 96 mustang GT, gonna be a lil more of a challange?
Old 04-12-2005, 08:48 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
that will be a fun run, hope you know how to drive
Old 04-12-2005, 09:00 PM
  #7  
Supporter/Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,247
Likes: 0
Received 391 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by shaun777
so whatta ya think bout a 96 mustang GT, gonna be a lil more of a challange?
Nope. You will beat that to. Not all mustang slook bad. They are just like 3rd gens. When their good their GOOD and when they're bad they're BAD.
Old 04-12-2005, 09:50 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
yeah why did those cars get slower, the 89 stang is faster
Old 04-12-2005, 11:22 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
nidyanazo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Laguna Beach, Ca
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Gutted 92' RS TRACK ONLY / '86 Mustang gt 'vert / 1982 Yamiaha xs400 Cafe Racer
Engine: L03; TBI is IT! / 5.0HO (306) SFI / 400cc air cooled twin
Transmission: 700-r4 / WCT5/ 6-speed close ratio
I dont know about you putting the stomp down on the 96gt. they are 2v mod motors with 260hp. Might not go the way you think.
Old 04-12-2005, 11:50 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
84L69TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 1,940
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 4 Mopars total
Engine: Pentastar power
Transmission: T/F and New Process
Axle/Gears: Three 8 3/4's & one 9 1/4
A 96 mustang...even with a 5-speed, is a complete dog in stock form.
Old 04-12-2005, 11:53 PM
  #11  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (13)
 
mw66nova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Harford County, MD
Posts: 13,572
Received 26 Likes on 21 Posts
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
yeah, they're like mid 15 second cars.
Old 04-13-2005, 12:16 AM
  #12  
Member

 
Coult_91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Valparaiso, IN
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91firebird, 2000 camaro
Engine: 305 tbi,K&N, edelbrock intake & 3.8
Transmission: 700R4
Those arent much faster than 305 tbi... I' ve even seen a few stock vs stock and the tbi was faster...
Old 04-13-2005, 06:01 AM
  #13  
Supporter/Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,247
Likes: 0
Received 391 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Originally posted by nidyanazo
I dont know about you putting the stomp down on the 96gt. they are 2v mod motors with 260hp. Might not go the way you think.
The 98+ cars were but the 94 thru 97 were LO3 slow. They were an overrated 220hp.
Old 04-13-2005, 08:22 AM
  #14  
Moderator

 
3.8TransAM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Schererville , IN
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 91 GTA, 91 Formula, 89 TTA
Engine: all 225+ RWHP
Transmission: all OD
Axle/Gears: Always the good ones
The 94-98(was 98 the redesign or was it 99?, is it 94-97?) were horrendously slow lol. As in laughable slow from the factory.

I had a friend was a box stock 91 GTA and my other friend funning his mouth about killing him in his 97 convertaslow stang w/ a 5 spd.

End result 2 times GTA 14.6 at 96 and a 15.6 for the stan at like 88-89mph lol

Was sad, we still tease him to this day.

If your car runs remotely right, u will stomp.

later
Jeremy
Old 04-13-2005, 10:25 AM
  #15  
Supreme Member

 
Jgolden314's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Milan, MI
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: A4
the 99 cars got the PI intake and all that good ****, and redesigned body.
Old 04-13-2005, 12:20 PM
  #16  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
shaun777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Glaslyn, SK
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Firebird formula
Engine: 350 5.7L
Transmission: 700R4
originally posted by Mcdamit

yeah why did those cars get slower, the 89 stang is faster


i dinno i'll let ya know how things go with that i still think i can beat em perty good, but we'll see, i'm not gonna wager to much money on it either ......but yea good call what is goin on with mustangs like i love the older mustangs like the early shelby's and the 67-80 mustangs i mean they were a strong competitior in the muscle car catagory and also had a lot of power........what happened to those cars?? ,now look at what there coming out with in the past like 10-12 years its sad rilly if anyone wants to talk about selling out to the whole fast and furious **** burner thing going on i think these guyz would be perty high up there, this year they are trying to bring the old style back now but still i dinno i don't think it'll ever be as good as the early mustangs

Last edited by shaun777; 04-13-2005 at 12:24 PM.
Old 04-13-2005, 12:30 PM
  #17  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (13)
 
mw66nova's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Harford County, MD
Posts: 13,572
Received 26 Likes on 21 Posts
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
they were only a strong competitor in the muscle car era in looks. have you ever seen a 77-78 mustang? they're pretty ugly. the mustang II (as the were called) were a joke.

in the muscle car era, mopar OWNED the streets. unless you had a bb chevelle with mods out your ears, the mopar guys whomped everyone that touched them.
Old 04-13-2005, 12:33 PM
  #18  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
shaun777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Glaslyn, SK
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Firebird formula
Engine: 350 5.7L
Transmission: 700R4
true true but back then they at least had sum power to back up the talk now adays like the past 10 years they've jus gone downhill, i think anyways
Old 04-13-2005, 12:42 PM
  #19  
Supreme Member
 
25thmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
The spelling on here hurts my eyes...

In the thirdgen eras, the Mustangs were really good, and held their own fine. Then 1994-1998 was a joke for them, as far as performance goes. The only notable cars were the Cobras, which could run with the LT1s. Even with the change in 1999, they were slower than comparable year Fbodies, unless again talking Cobra, or Mach 1. This is why I own a thirdgen Mustang...
Old 04-13-2005, 02:19 PM
  #20  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
2QUIK4U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI L98
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" with 4.11
A friend of mine has a 96 GT with a paxton supercharger and a borla exhaust. He still can't break into the 13's..... It sounds sweet, but only a low 14 second car. He has stuck almost 4 grand in mods into it.. Sucker!
Ford got their act together with the last couple years of the cobra's.... HP TV was dyno'n one the other day and it had 363 rwhp stock!!! They put a smaller pulley on the blower and reprogrammed the computer and rwhp was at 420!!!!
That did impress me. It don't take much to get them into 11's.
I had my hands full racing a slightly moded 2003 Mach 1 last year..
I barely beat him (no spray) and it was only cuz i had the hole shot. He was pulling me in the rest of the way. I love 4.10 gears
Old 04-13-2005, 07:25 PM
  #21  
Supreme Member

 
Jgolden314's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Milan, MI
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1999 Z28
Engine: LS1
Transmission: A4
Originally posted by 25thmustang
This is why I own a thirdgen Mustang...
And a mighty fine one at that!
Old 04-13-2005, 07:40 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
rocluvr0013's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chico/Antioch California
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 1989 iroc Z Hardtop
Engine: 350 tpi
Transmission: 700r4
Mustangs...

MY 350 tpi put the hurt on a slightly modded 98 cobra dohc (b4 they were supercharged) no problem and i was overheating at the time. He had a manual and i was still able to pull on him above 90 mph... (i have ram air i assume that helped) and i of course stomped him on the line so you should have no problem unless he has major mods or your not running well ...
Old 04-13-2005, 07:48 PM
  #23  
Supporter/Moderator

iTrader: (7)
 
ShiftyCapone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,247
Likes: 0
Received 391 Likes on 298 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Re: Mustangs...

Originally posted by rocluvr0013
MY 350 tpi put the hurt on a slightly modded 98 cobra dohc (b4 they were supercharged) no problem and i was overheating at the time. He had a manual and i was still able to pull on him above 90 mph... (i have ram air i assume that helped) and i of course stomped him on the line so you should have no problem unless he has major mods or your not running well ...
You got lucky or raced a car with a bad driver. The 96 thru present cobras could hang if not beat LT1 cars. I would stay on the cautious side of any cobra.
Old 04-13-2005, 08:03 PM
  #24  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
shaun777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Glaslyn, SK
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1987 Firebird formula
Engine: 350 5.7L
Transmission: 700R4
yea ditto here, wouldn't touch a cobra, but no its stock to and myns runnin as good as it kin be, so might as well try it
Old 04-13-2005, 09:39 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
Mcdamit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 878
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89' Iroc-Z G92
Engine: TPI 305 G92
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: Limited 9 bolt, 3.45
now a simple question would the 5spd lb9 or the L98 beat on a later model cobra.....

And kid if you can drive, it will be close race, beat on him
Old 04-13-2005, 10:17 PM
  #26  
Member

 
Coult_91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Valparaiso, IN
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91firebird, 2000 camaro
Engine: 305 tbi,K&N, edelbrock intake & 3.8
Transmission: 700R4
lb9 stock for stock never.....No l98 5speed stock only autos...but, maybe with some modes..
Old 04-14-2005, 04:10 AM
  #27  
Member

iTrader: (1)
 
2QUIK4U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 5.7 TPI L98
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 9" with 4.11
i raced a 99 cobra back when my car was in the low 14's We only got to race 2 times in a measured 1/4 mile on a sweet, flat, local county road. The first race i pulled the hole-shot because he got excited and spun for the first 30' (i measured his tracks the next day) I had him by 3 cars at the 330' mark, but everytime he shifted he would pull on me. I won by 1 and 1/2 cars....
The next race i had a 1/2 car lead from the 60' mark and he won by 1 and 1/2 car lengths. I would say a slightly modded cobra before supercharging can go high 13's with a good driver..
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PATRIOTIC1911
Northern Great Plains and Rocky Mountain
5
10-07-2022 10:38 PM
RedLeader289
History / Originality
18
01-22-2016 03:05 PM
IROCZDAVE (88-L98)
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
0
09-02-2015 08:43 AM
Cacike
Transmissions and Drivetrain
4
08-27-2015 05:10 PM



Quick Reply: firebird vs mustang



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 PM.