Acura RSX-Mustang GT-mustang Mach 1
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Milton FL near Pensacola FL
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 Z-28 2003 chevy Silverado Z71
Engine: was 305 LG4 now 355 HO
Transmission: TH700r4
Axle/Gears: posi 373
Acura RSX-Mustang GT-mustang Mach 1
Ok guys I have 2 guys and one girl at work that want to race me just wanting some opinions on how it well go first one I think I’ll have with no problems it’s a 2005 Acura RSX spec A with just a 3 inch exhaust. The other one I think well be a little closer but I think I’ll have him it’s a 1994 – 1995 5.0 Mustang GT vert all stock. Last one I think will be really close it’s a 1969 mustang Mach 1 428 cobra jet all stock but after market exhaust and he had the engine rebuilt like 2 years ago.
#2
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 Monte Carlo ss
Engine: ZZ4 1.5 rollers 650DP
Transmission: Probuilt 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 8.5 GN 3.42
I think the acura might be faster than the mustang.As for the 428 I am not sure but how much hp do you think you have.
#3
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Milton FL near Pensacola FL
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 Z-28 2003 chevy Silverado Z71
Engine: was 305 LG4 now 355 HO
Transmission: TH700r4
Axle/Gears: posi 373
well not sure but I would gusstamate 300 - 330 ish
#4
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Weedsport, NY
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: Bolt-on/cam 305
Transmission: 700R4 w/ 2500stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt Posi
The Acura and vert stang should be easy kills, the 428 will be interesting, big motor, but lazy and heavy. Get video, even the easy kill are still fun to watch.
#5
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2003 Evolution VIII
Engine: 2.0 I4
Is the RSX a Type S? If not, don't even waste your gas. If so, they trap around 95mph in the quarter. If you can beat that, you have him licked.
#7
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Weedsport, NY
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: Bolt-on/cam 305
Transmission: 700R4 w/ 2500stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt Posi
I don't see a well driven 355 Z28 with good boltons and a cam struggling with the average driven bolt on RSX-S. Its not a good launching car, so the holeshot is given, and I think you've safely got him (her) out-motored. Their topend is pretty good, but my SVT Contour pulls them, so I'm sure your Z would.
Trending Topics
#8
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2003 Evolution VIII
Engine: 2.0 I4
I don't see a well driven 355 Z28 with good boltons and a cam struggling with the average driven bolt on RSX-S. Its not a good launching car, so the holeshot is given, and I think you've safely got him (her) out-motored. Their topend is pretty good, but my SVT Contour pulls them, so I'm sure your Z would.
#9
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Weedsport, NY
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: Bolt-on/cam 305
Transmission: 700R4 w/ 2500stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt Posi
Maybe we have a different idea of bolt ons? My friends RSX-S with Intake, race header (w/ cat delete), exhaust, and reflash went 13.7@103 on street tires. At our local track, the only SVT Contours I've ever seen go mid 15s.
The only RSX's I've come against in the SVT were stock as far as I know, the one I raced a bunch of times I'd holeshot every time, and stay infront of, pulling slowly, though at least 100mph. Perhaps driver is coming into effect there. They do, however, respond very well to bolt-ons, the tune is supposed to do a LOT for that motor. The one you described above would be a nice battle indeed.
BTW, you're pretty right on with the SVT Contour times, stock they're good for about 15.4 at 90mph. 14's are pretty easy with a few bolt ons.
#10
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 2003 Evolution VIII
Engine: 2.0 I4
Yeah, that K20 is insane with bolt on mods, but the flash does most of it. The reflash allows the car to spin to a raised rev limiter -still making power safely- until it cuts off at 9100rpm with 100% stock internals. I don't think my friend's exhaust is 3", though. I think its more like 2.5" or less. Without the reflash or at least an intake, all bets are off. The intake alone makes 15whp on that engine.
#11
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Carolina!
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 406 sbc with Trick Flow heads, Hook
Transmission: Pro built 700R4
Axle/Gears: waiting on a new rear!!!!
The RSX and that GT!
Your focus doesn't need to be on them at all!
That Mach 1 is what you need to worry about!
Your focus doesn't need to be on them at all!
That Mach 1 is what you need to worry about!
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: CHICAGO
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 FORMULA 350
Engine: 5.7 L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 BOLT/ 3.27 GEARS
Well whatever the spec is..... Its gonna be "A spec" of worthless rice in the rear view mirror after his car gets owned.
#15
Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Weedsport, NY
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1986 Camaro SC
Engine: Bolt-on/cam 305
Transmission: 700R4 w/ 2500stall
Axle/Gears: 3.73 10bolt Posi
I like where your head's at.
The A-Spec is like kairles said, just rims and aero stuff. It yea, its sounds very Grand Turismo. But I like Grand Turismo, not as much as Forza, but it is fun.
#16
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Milton FL near Pensacola FL
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 Z-28 2003 chevy Silverado Z71
Engine: was 305 LG4 now 355 HO
Transmission: TH700r4
Axle/Gears: posi 373
We are racing today after work let you guys know how it goes my oil sending unit went out but I got it fixed for tonight.
#18
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Brighton, CO
Posts: 4,345
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: '72 Chevy Nova
Engine: Solid roller 355
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 8.5" 10-bolt 3.73 Posi
i dont think you'll have any problems with the RSX-S. What's your exact setup? I've seen dog h/c/i 350s that couldn't hit a 13.5, and I've seen smoggable h/c/i 350s that hit 11.9s in a stock weight car..
#21
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tomah, WI
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 305 CFI
Transmission: Auto
Axle/Gears: Stock
The RSX might actually give you a run. That is, if the guy can drive at all. Chances are he can't.
You should blow the doors off the newer GT Vert. They run top 14, low 15 at BEST. 5.0 was good in the fox, but the SN95 got HEAVY.
That Cobra Jet is gonna be the one to watch for. They may be old and big, but that is a LOT of power. I'm interested in seeing the results, but my money is on the CJ.
You should blow the doors off the newer GT Vert. They run top 14, low 15 at BEST. 5.0 was good in the fox, but the SN95 got HEAVY.
That Cobra Jet is gonna be the one to watch for. They may be old and big, but that is a LOT of power. I'm interested in seeing the results, but my money is on the CJ.
#22
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ganiesville GA
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1992 z28/1992 RS heritage edition
Engine: 350 tpi, 305 tbi
Transmission: 700R4,T5
Axle/Gears: G92
here is a idea of how fast a 69mach 1 is i have a 92 z28 with a 96 vortec 350 my neibor has the mach 1 he beat me in a quarter by about 1 1/2 cars
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 Mustang Coupe/89 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0 carb'd/305
Transmission: T5/T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 and stock TrakLok/stock GM
The RSX might actually give you a run. That is, if the guy can drive at all. Chances are he can't.
You should blow the doors off the newer GT Vert. They run top 14, low 15 at BEST. 5.0 was good in the fox, but the SN95 got HEAVY.
That Cobra Jet is gonna be the one to watch for. They may be old and big, but that is a LOT of power. I'm interested in seeing the results, but my money is on the CJ.
You should blow the doors off the newer GT Vert. They run top 14, low 15 at BEST. 5.0 was good in the fox, but the SN95 got HEAVY.
That Cobra Jet is gonna be the one to watch for. They may be old and big, but that is a LOT of power. I'm interested in seeing the results, but my money is on the CJ.
New Edge's auto 'verts are turds. high 14's are the norm.
New Edge hardtop, stickshift GT's are low low 14's at the norm.
Now if its a S197 (05+) GT, the automatic 'vert is still a high 13's car....
#24
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Milton FL near Pensacola FL
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1985 Z-28 2003 chevy Silverado Z71
Engine: was 305 LG4 now 355 HO
Transmission: TH700r4
Axle/Gears: posi 373
Well we raced
Acura Type S – Jumped him about a car ½ off the line by the end I was 3 cars on him I let up before the end easy kill.
Mustang 5.0 1995 – About the same as the Acura jumped him car and ½ kept strong all the way had him I think about 3 ½ car’s
1969 Mach 1 428 – He went HARD off the line sounded like a train had me just a little more then a car and ½ finish almost neck and neck but he had me by a bumper fun race I like the close one’s he saids it all stock but exhaust I call BS.
Acura Type S – Jumped him about a car ½ off the line by the end I was 3 cars on him I let up before the end easy kill.
Mustang 5.0 1995 – About the same as the Acura jumped him car and ½ kept strong all the way had him I think about 3 ½ car’s
1969 Mach 1 428 – He went HARD off the line sounded like a train had me just a little more then a car and ½ finish almost neck and neck but he had me by a bumper fun race I like the close one’s he saids it all stock but exhaust I call BS.
#26
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 Monte Carlo ss
Engine: ZZ4 1.5 rollers 650DP
Transmission: Probuilt 700-R4
Axle/Gears: 8.5 GN 3.42
Look at it this way.The car had 78 more cubes.You did great.I think those old mach 1 cars ran at least low 13s.12s should be no problem even with 40 years of advancement.Imagine if it had a modern valvetrain and heads. He would have smoked you bad.
#27
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1986 Pontiac Firebird S/E
Engine: 305 carb'd V8
Transmission: 4-speed auto
Axle/Gears: Stock
I have to add, there is no shame in losing to a classic automobile with a big block either! Good kills by the way, especially the r!cer.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The Dirty Bird!
Pacific Northwest Region
10
12-01-2001 02:12 PM