got it on
12-07-2006, 03:48 PM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: warwick
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1983 & 1993 camaro z28
Engine: 5.0 carbed/ LT1 injected
Transmission: T5/auto
Axle/Gears: 373/posi
got it on
well on the way to work to day line up with a 06 stang GT Had to race hime
well took him 1,2,3 then fouth was a bad gear has any one ealse had a runnin with one and were you beat .Got a 350 and a five speed it was orig a l98 engine but swaped to carb ?????
well took him 1,2,3 then fouth was a bad gear has any one ealse had a runnin with one and were you beat .Got a 350 and a five speed it was orig a l98 engine but swaped to carb ????? 
12-08-2006, 01:00 PM
#7
Supreme Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1993 Ford Mustang
Engine: 5.0L
Transmission: T5
Trending Topics
12-08-2006, 06:51 PM
#8
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Carolina!
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 406 sbc with Trick Flow heads, Hook
Transmission: Pro built 700R4
Axle/Gears: waiting on a new rear!!!!
There is no way you can be 24yrs old! Your grammer is pathetic!
12-08-2006, 07:19 PM
#9
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: warwick
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1983 & 1993 camaro z28
Engine: 5.0 carbed/ LT1 injected
Transmission: T5/auto
Axle/Gears: 373/posi
swapped in the 5 speed my self and no did'nt take him .They have about 300hp sorry .
12-09-2006, 03:18 PM
#11
Supporter/Moderator
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 13,272
Likes: 0
Received 396 Likes
on
302 Posts
Car: '90 RS
Engine: 377 LSX
Transmission: Magnum T56
Easy on the cracks guys. The new stangs are quite potent and in the right hands can rip off a low 13 second pass. They are nothing to be taken lightly.
12-13-2006, 06:54 PM
#13
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: UofA(Tucson), AZ
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 92 Precision Red Firebird
Engine: v6->357 vortec xe262h rpm intake
Transmission: t5-> t56
Axle/Gears: 10bolt 3.42s
haha ohh how the mighty have fallen. i believe this is where you insert youre shoe in mouth
12-14-2006, 12:41 PM
#14
Supreme Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 5.7L EFI LTR setup
Transmission: T-5 World Class
they dyno'd a stock GT on Horsepower TV ...it only put 255 to the rear wheels. But yes that enough to take you ....maybe . They are a dam heavy car. heck I have video here of a GT500 ( 2006) only getting a 13.6
12-15-2006, 05:55 AM
#16
12-15-2006, 06:45 AM
#17
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Gilbert
Posts: 1,009
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1990 Iroc-Z
12-18-2006, 12:27 PM
#19
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 843/910
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 Iroc Z
Engine: 350TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Yea, I dont see the hype with the GT, tons of people were and still are comparing them to the late 4th gen LS1 cars...meanwhile they're far too underpowered and they weigh ~3500lbs.
12-22-2006, 06:40 PM
#20
Supreme Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 2,839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: Mustang
Engine: Bolt Ons
Transmission: Stock
Axle/Gears: 3.73
260-270 rwhp on average and mid 13s with decent driving... They are heavy but the weight is there for a reason. The cars feel better than ANY Mustang ever, and are very solid cars even compared to brand new, more expensive cars! You get what the weight gives!