Can I beat a Mustang?
#151
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 97 Z28
Engine: LT1
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Re: Can I beat a Mustang?
13.5 is about the best I've seen out of a stock LT1 fbody, it was '97 SS. I have heard of some 93's being freakishly fast for some reason.
Kind of a shame the LS1's overshadow LT1 so much since it doesn't take much to get them to run well. My 97 put out 297 rwhp and 321 rwtq with Cai, LT's, ory, cutout, 1.6 RR's, and a basic tune through an auto with a 3400 stall converter. I thought that was pretty good for having 100k+ on the odo
Kind of a shame the LS1's overshadow LT1 so much since it doesn't take much to get them to run well. My 97 put out 297 rwhp and 321 rwtq with Cai, LT's, ory, cutout, 1.6 RR's, and a basic tune through an auto with a 3400 stall converter. I thought that was pretty good for having 100k+ on the odo
#152
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: toledo
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 Z28
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: Can I beat a Mustang?
13.5 is about the best I've seen out of a stock LT1 fbody, it was '97 SS. I have heard of some 93's being freakishly fast for some reason.
Kind of a shame the LS1's overshadow LT1 so much since it doesn't take much to get them to run well. My 97 put out 297 rwhp and 321 rwtq with Cai, LT's, ory, cutout, 1.6 RR's, and a basic tune through an auto with a 3400 stall converter. I thought that was pretty good for having 100k+ on the odo
Kind of a shame the LS1's overshadow LT1 so much since it doesn't take much to get them to run well. My 97 put out 297 rwhp and 321 rwtq with Cai, LT's, ory, cutout, 1.6 RR's, and a basic tune through an auto with a 3400 stall converter. I thought that was pretty good for having 100k+ on the odo
some things brought up when looking at lt1 f-bodys
93 batch firing/only year for speed density
94 had case hardened pushrods(idk why lol)
95 had goofy obd2 connector but still has obd1 computer(no chip)
96 intro to obd2 computer and dual cat
97 minor tweaks to computer
#153
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
Re: Can I beat a Mustang?
actually, alot of people seem to think the 93's were a bit stronger than other years of the LT1 fbodies. dont know why. come to think of it, the fastest bone stock LT1 fbody was a 93' that ran a 13.4
#154
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Diamondhead, MS
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 89 20th Ann. TA
Engine: Turbo 3.8 V6
Transmission: 200 4R
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: Can I beat a Mustang?
----------
93 was a poop year f-body wise when speaking for the lt1. Between using batch firing and Speed Density the cars were turds.
some things brought up when looking at lt1 f-bodys
93 batch firing/only year for speed density
94 had case hardened pushrods(idk why lol)
95 had goofy obd2 connector but still has obd1 computer(no chip)
96 intro to obd2 computer and dual cat
97 minor tweaks to computer
some things brought up when looking at lt1 f-bodys
93 batch firing/only year for speed density
94 had case hardened pushrods(idk why lol)
95 had goofy obd2 connector but still has obd1 computer(no chip)
96 intro to obd2 computer and dual cat
97 minor tweaks to computer
Last edited by TTA 1387; 01-20-2009 at 05:58 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
#155
Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 91 GTA
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:73
Re: Can I beat a Mustang?
You just might win! then you will have to put up with reasons why he lost. lol.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Thirdgen89GTA
NW Indiana and South Chicago Suburb
8
09-12-2015 08:39 PM