Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

2005 Lancer vs 1991 RS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-11-2008, 12:12 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
xsupermann69x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Chevy Camaro RS
Engine: V6 3.1L
Transmission: automatic
2005 Lancer vs 1991 RS

Alright so my buddy just got a 2005 lancer oz rally sedan. and hes like dude my lancer could kick ur ***. and i dont see how its a 2.4 and it has 120 hp. correct me if im wrong yea its a lot lighter but i have a 3.1 and im at what 185 hp? who would win. and what would be the best way to start to give me the better chance dig 20mph roll or what?
let me know guys. im tired of hearing tons of **** at lunch everyday.
----------
its stock and an automatic. mine is also stock and and auto.

Last edited by xsupermann69x; 02-11-2008 at 12:13 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 02-11-2008, 12:23 PM
  #2  
Senior Member

 
90CamaroTBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Waldorf, MD
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 91 Formula, 89 IROC
Engine: LB9, LB9
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
Axle/Gears: Posi 2.73, Posi 2.73
Re: 2005 Lancer vs 1991 RS

You have 140hp I think he can edge you out, best best is probably to race from a stop.
Old 02-11-2008, 12:25 PM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
xsupermann69x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Chevy Camaro RS
Engine: V6 3.1L
Transmission: automatic
Re: 2005 Lancer vs 1991 RS

any cheap add ons that would take running up to advanced auto that i could add to beat him? gonna see if he will throw down money. he is really cocky
Old 02-11-2008, 01:13 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
i_love_thirdgen's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Beer City,Wisconsin
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 92 camaro,99 s10
Re: 2005 Lancer vs 1991 RS

CAI, Throttle Body Bypass, weight reduction
----------
Also PM sent

Last edited by i_love_thirdgen; 02-11-2008 at 01:14 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 02-13-2008, 11:47 AM
  #5  
Member
 
Mr.K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Riverside CA,
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1982' camaro Z/28
Engine: lt-1 out of a 95' impala ss
Transmission: viper spec t-56
Axle/Gears: Ford 9in 3.90 gears
Re: 2005 Lancer vs 1991 RS

strip the hell out of your car lol, gut the cat or cut it off. good luck tell us how it ends up.
Old 02-13-2008, 12:00 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
avro206's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89 Formula
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: 2005 Lancer vs 1991 RS

his car is 2.0 BTW--I think you'll win
Old 02-13-2008, 12:50 PM
  #7  
Member
Thread Starter
 
xsupermann69x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Chevy Camaro RS
Engine: V6 3.1L
Transmission: automatic
Re: 2005 Lancer vs 1991 RS

well i had asked him and there is actually 2 size engines and he said his is the 2.4. but i gotta get my car running 100% it takes a bit for mine to warm up. so idk. im def going from a dig. i think ill have him till 3rd gear. so prob have him till 45ish but idk ill let everyone know. it will probly go down this weekend. keep posting stuff to help me out tho. def wanna know because even if i loose i wont give up i wanna beat him he does talk a lot of crap.
Old 02-13-2008, 01:15 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

 
avro206's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 89 Formula
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.27
Re: 2005 Lancer vs 1991 RS

He is dumb....OZ has a 2.0L (no upgrade engine) Ralliart has a 2.4L 162hp. Doesn't even know whats in his car!!
Old 02-13-2008, 08:43 PM
  #9  
Member
Thread Starter
 
xsupermann69x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Chevy Camaro RS
Engine: V6 3.1L
Transmission: automatic
Re: 2005 Lancer vs 1991 RS

Originally Posted by 871LEIroc
He is dumb....OZ has a 2.0L (no upgrade engine) Ralliart has a 2.4L 162hp. Doesn't even know whats in his car!!
haha i wouldnt doubt it with this kid but i was just going with the worst. so with this said sense he has a 2.0 could i beat him? how if so how bad?
Old 02-14-2008, 10:25 AM
  #10  
Member
 
Mr.K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Riverside CA,
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1982' camaro Z/28
Engine: lt-1 out of a 95' impala ss
Transmission: viper spec t-56
Axle/Gears: Ford 9in 3.90 gears
Re: 2005 Lancer vs 1991 RS

borrow a nitrous kit from someone lol.
Old 02-14-2008, 07:14 PM
  #11  
Member
Thread Starter
 
xsupermann69x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Chevy Camaro RS
Engine: V6 3.1L
Transmission: automatic
Re: 2005 Lancer vs 1991 RS

Originally Posted by Mr.K
borrow a nitrous kit from someone lol.
haha that would be easy but no one that i know has one. but i would win then for sure. so whats everyones guesses then on who wins?
Old 02-14-2008, 07:30 PM
  #12  
Supreme Member

 
leeperryracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: cleanest '86 sport coupe around!!
Engine: 355ci twin 66mm turbos on e85
Transmission: built rmvb th400 w/ t-brake
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 2005 Lancer vs 1991 RS

both cars have to be able to get out of their own way first
Old 02-14-2008, 07:37 PM
  #13  
Member
Thread Starter
 
xsupermann69x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Chevy Camaro RS
Engine: V6 3.1L
Transmission: automatic
Re: 2005 Lancer vs 1991 RS

sorry that im only 18 and dont have tons and tons of money to spend on my car. i gotta go to college first then ill be droppin big bucks on my car or another 3rd gen.
Old 02-14-2008, 07:52 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member

 
leeperryracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: cleanest '86 sport coupe around!!
Engine: 355ci twin 66mm turbos on e85
Transmission: built rmvb th400 w/ t-brake
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Re: 2005 Lancer vs 1991 RS

make sure you pass 'em classes and get a "good" degree and you'll be able to build any motor/car your heart desires
Old 02-14-2008, 07:59 PM
  #15  
Member
Thread Starter
 
xsupermann69x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Chevy Camaro RS
Engine: V6 3.1L
Transmission: automatic
Re: 2005 Lancer vs 1991 RS

Originally Posted by leeperryracing
make sure you pass 'em classes and get a "good" degree and you'll be able to build any motor/car your heart desires
thats the plan. haha.
Old 02-15-2008, 05:42 PM
  #16  
Member
 
Mr.K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Riverside CA,
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1982' camaro Z/28
Engine: lt-1 out of a 95' impala ss
Transmission: viper spec t-56
Axle/Gears: Ford 9in 3.90 gears
Re: 2005 Lancer vs 1991 RS

its better to do that than to get stuck in a crappy job you hate. so when are you going to race?
Old 02-16-2008, 11:11 AM
  #17  
Member
Thread Starter
 
xsupermann69x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Chevy Camaro RS
Engine: V6 3.1L
Transmission: automatic
Re: 2005 Lancer vs 1991 RS

not to sure. probly next weekend. i just got me some new sparkplugs and wires because my car decieded to start missin on me. so hopfully that corrects the problem. by using premium gas would that help me at all?
Old 02-16-2008, 03:41 PM
  #18  
Member
 
84bandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 2005 Lancer vs 1991 RS

no, id run 87 octane, a low compression engine would make more power on a lower octane fuel because the burn would be more complete
so go with 87
Old 02-16-2008, 03:49 PM
  #19  
Member
Thread Starter
 
xsupermann69x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 Chevy Camaro RS
Engine: V6 3.1L
Transmission: automatic
Re: 2005 Lancer vs 1991 RS

Originally Posted by 84bandit
no, id run 87 octane, a low compression engine would make more power on a lower octane fuel because the burn would be more complete
so go with 87
alright will do.
Old 02-16-2008, 07:08 PM
  #20  
Member

 
KBcobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 92 Chevrolet Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L V6
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: 2005 Lancer vs 1991 RS

Should of got the 5 spd :P . 5 spd would help its lighter and if you can drive faster than your auto right now. I've raced a MK IV non Turbo Supra, kept up with him for a little bit and soon as i hit 60 i lost him. Both of us were 16s year olds. Now he turbo it and running at 18lbs of boost so now i'll never catch him lol
Old 02-22-2008, 01:20 PM
  #21  
Junior Member
 
lauerak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: 2005 Lancer vs 1991 RS

if you car is an auto magic put it into first gear and race him at a rollin 15 that puts u in ur power band and it puts him outa his thats about his shift point, i know that oz lancer like the back of my hand- my 87 sport coupe walks all over my buddys lancer
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Linson
Auto Detailing and Appearance
25
09-25-2021 07:55 PM
ZekeThorpe
Theoretical and Street Racing
35
10-07-2015 07:30 PM
mcfastestZ28
Interior
9
10-05-2015 07:12 AM
Jlanz55
TPI
2
09-29-2015 08:55 AM
dbrochard
Interior Parts Wanted
0
09-28-2015 07:40 PM



Quick Reply: 2005 Lancer vs 1991 RS



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 AM.