Theoretical and Street Racing Use this board to ask questions about street racing, discuss your street races, and "who would win?" questions. Keep it safe.

quick question on TTA's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2002, 04:18 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
1992_25t_1letpi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Newfoundland, Canada
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
quick question on TTA's

why did they give it a TC V6? and the same thing for Grand Nationals...TC V6??? why not a TC V8. Is it because of reliability problems?
Old 02-24-2002, 06:36 PM
  #2  
Member
 
shrp1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Wichita Kansas
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well buick was into the whole v6 during thise days with the indy motor stuff. Plus I think it was also a way to show future technology and smaller motors potential?

Phil
Old 02-24-2002, 07:06 PM
  #3  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
yeah, Buick was into the whole V6 thing, can't blame them they did one hell of a job
Old 02-24-2002, 08:00 PM
  #4  
Member
Thread Starter
 
1992_25t_1letpi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Newfoundland, Canada
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i know that the V6's were very fast, but imagine how much faster an 8 could have been :hail: :rockon:
Old 02-24-2002, 08:07 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by 1992_25t_1letpi
i know that the V6's were very fast, but imagine how much faster an 8 could have been :hail: :rockon:
yeah but MUCH more expensive though....
Old 02-24-2002, 10:59 PM
  #6  
Administrator

iTrader: (1)
 
IROCZTWENTYGR8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: In a mint Third Gen!
Posts: 7,386
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: Red 87 IROC-Z28 T-Top
Engine: 5.7 Tuned Port Injection
Transmission: 700R4 Auto
Axle/Gears: BW 9-Bolt 3.27
It SHOULD have been a T/Ced L98.
Old 02-24-2002, 11:02 PM
  #7  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by IROCZTWENTYGR8
It SHOULD have been a T/Ced L98.
that would've been badasss, but again cost comes into play, plus the LC2(turbo 3.8) has been there done that, while a L98 with a hairdryer would take MUCH development, and would take a while to tune...
Old 02-24-2002, 11:12 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

 
tpivette89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Newark, DE
Posts: 1,960
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 2006 Corvette
Engine: LS2
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.42s
callaway did a twin turbo L98, but it was expensive, it required a total engine rebuild and a $25000 increase over the base corvette price
Old 02-24-2002, 11:20 PM
  #9  
Supreme Member

 
iroc22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Surrey, BC
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Yeah the L98 Turbo would have been a real gound stomper but the reason the 3.8 worked so well was because it was being developed since the late 70s ('78,'79) and it's development peaked '86 and '87 and those are the years that got the T/C 3.8 respect. Do you think the hot air carbed 3.8 turbo engines in say 1980 (Regals and Monte Carlos) get any respect from the V8s? Probably not. It took a long time to get that engine to where it was.
Old 02-25-2002, 03:17 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
CODY BEHNKE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: NEBRASKA
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And remember the vette was not to be beat by another GM car from the factory.
Old 02-26-2002, 11:42 AM
  #11  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
fly89gta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mays Landing NJ
Posts: 4,335
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Car: 2018 Camaro SS
Engine: LT1 w/Paxton 1500SL
Originally posted by CODY BEHNKE
And remember the vette was not to be beat by another GM car from the factory.
true, that's why the TTA was "rated" at 250HP We all know that's FAR from true
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
redmaroz
LTX and LSX
7
08-16-2015 11:40 PM
happyhapka
TPI
3
08-15-2015 04:42 PM
jahblah
Tech / General Engine
5
08-12-2015 05:54 PM



Quick Reply: quick question on TTA's



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 AM.