TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

descreened MAF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-31-2006, 01:32 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
89BlueRSCamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: East El Paso, TX
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 350-5.7L
Transmission: 700R
descreened MAF

I basically ripped off the screen on my MAF....did not damaged anything else in the process..just wanted to know if i did good or bad....and how this will affect anything if anything....i did these cuz i heard it is good for better airflow...i also will not be doing anything as far as reprograming...my car is basically stock...soooo.....how bad did i screw up???
Old 07-31-2006, 01:54 PM
  #2  
Senior Member

 
Tremo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Jose, CA, USA
Posts: 814
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 88 IROC-Z - original owner!
Engine: LB9 with K&Ns, MSD, Foil, Taylor
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt, 3.45 posi
Welll....... seems like the MAF is a pretty fragile item. And very expensive. Some guys have de-screened their MAF with no problems. Other guys destroyed theirs in the process. It's a real toss up as to if it's worth the risk. Unless you're making a LOT of horsepower, like over 400, I'd say leave the screens and don't risk MAF damage. If you insist on de-screening, I'd only remove the screen on the outlet side.

Hey, I admit it, I'm chicken to try to de-screen mine. Besides, I don't think it would make any difference on an LB9 with stock innards.
Old 07-31-2006, 01:57 PM
  #3  
Member

 
Z28cross-fire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '94 Z28
Engine: LT1 350
Transmission: 4L60E/A4
Your engine will most likely be fine, but do not do anything else to it. Like said, the MAF sensors are sensitive, and can be ruined quickly.
Old 07-31-2006, 06:03 PM
  #4  
Member
 
CC89Formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Amarillo TX
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 89 Formula
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
i did it, no problems for about a year, then the MAF went bad. now i have one with the computer chip inside and only the outlet side is descreened.
Old 07-31-2006, 07:49 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
LAFireboyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,674
Likes: 0
Received 242 Likes on 182 Posts
Car: 1987 Formula (original owner)
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt/3.45
Originally Posted by Tremo
I don't think it would make any difference on an LB9 with stock innards.
I 'felt' a noticeable difference in throttle response the first time I took-off. I have no dyno proof that it made any difference, though. But if the Camaro intake alone makes a 5-10 hp difference over the Firebird intake, then I'd think letting in 100-150 cfm more air would definitely show a difference.

Safe? Yeah, no worries. You might read a lot of technical reasons why not to do it, but because so many people have done it and had no problems, it kind of makes those reasons seem more 'theoretical.'

I've read about so many more people who have had no problems than people who had problems, that it makes me wonder if the reason people had problems was because they damaged their MAF during the process, or that maybe their MAF was about to fail anyway. It just doesn't seem like failure occurred simply because the screens were out.

But one thing I didn't do was remove the fins inside. I'd have surely messed-up my MAF if I'd tried to do that!
Old 07-31-2006, 08:38 PM
  #6  
Senior Member

iTrader: (1)
 
86TA355SR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: IN
Posts: 545
Received 22 Likes on 10 Posts
Car: 88, 89 & 91 GTA
Engine: 355 Super Ram/350
Transmission: TH-375/700R4
Axle/Gears: Currie Ford 9"/3.70
I removed the screens and the fins. No problems in 8 years.

Takes a lot of time to be careful of not destroying anything.

Guess I got lucky!
Old 07-31-2006, 11:13 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
89BlueRSCamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: East El Paso, TX
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 350-5.7L
Transmission: 700R
well i removed mine and drove the car a little but could not really say if i did damaged the MAF since i still have to fix the fans on the car...also i dont have a LB9...well no longer have the RS...i have a 89 IROC-Z....so i will have to wait till the weekend when i fix the fans and install some injectors since i have a damaged ones to see if the MAF is bad....i was not too careful when i descreened mine..kinda just ripped the screenes with some needle nose plyers and knife....i know i did not damaged the middle part and the wires are still there..the "hot" wires i guess....anyways...thanx for the input...also the car will stay basically stock..no major upgrades...the usual...manifold to back exhaust...better intake and MSD setup...other than that...maybe later a better cam...but nothing else....just wanted to get a better response on the car...
Old 07-31-2006, 11:48 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (3)
 
LAFireboyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 2,674
Likes: 0
Received 242 Likes on 182 Posts
Car: 1987 Formula (original owner)
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt/3.45
Sounds like the test drive went well, so I doubt you hurt your MAF. You'll be fine.

As for my LB9 reference, I assumed Tremo was making reference to his own car, an LB9. And since mine is also an LB9, I thought I'd mention it. I had seen that your car was an L98, which will prolly be even happier than an LB9 with that extra air.
Old 08-01-2006, 10:48 AM
  #9  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
89BlueRSCamaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: East El Paso, TX
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 350-5.7L
Transmission: 700R
True...i was not reading his post correctly i guess it helps when you read their quick bio...also i dont know if anyone has tried it...but what about gutting the intake...Y shaped thing....i read some users here cut the bottom part of it to help the car breathe better....any input on this idea....good/bad
Old 08-03-2006, 10:57 AM
  #10  
Supreme Member
 
formul8!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: www.thirdgentech.com
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2004 GTO
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T-56
Originally Posted by 86TA355SR
I removed the screens and the fins. No problems in 8 years.

Takes a lot of time to be careful of not destroying anything.

Guess I got lucky!
Same here. As long as you run a good air filter with a tight seal so it does not let any dirt though, you should have no problems. Also, the MAF must not be able to move around much either. Excessive Shaking is another way to rip the wire or damage teh electronics.
Old 08-03-2006, 02:22 PM
  #11  
Senior Member

 
Tremo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Jose, CA, USA
Posts: 814
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 88 IROC-Z - original owner!
Engine: LB9 with K&Ns, MSD, Foil, Taylor
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt, 3.45 posi
One final word of caution. If your de-screened MAF ever fails and you have to go to a parts store to buy a replacement, look out. They want your old MAF as the core for rebuilding, or they charge you extra (the core charge). Some won't accept a MAF that has been de-screened, or has had the fins ground away. If that happens, you toss the failed MAF and eat a $100 core charge.

Is there a way to remove the screens without any damage, so they could be superglued back into place if the MAF has to be returned as a core?
Old 08-03-2006, 02:51 PM
  #12  
Member
 
87IROCZ350TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Car: 87 IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: BW 7.75" 3.27
Originally Posted by 89BlueRSCamaro
True...i was not reading his post correctly i guess it helps when you read their quick bio...also i dont know if anyone has tried it...but what about gutting the intake...Y shaped thing....i read some users here cut the bottom part of it to help the car breathe better....any input on this idea....good/bad
Check the tech articles if you haven't already. there is a how-to on gutting the y-intake. I removed my outlet screen about five years ago and the MAF is still fine. I didn't notice much except for a small increase in throttle response. Screen removal probably works well in conjunction with other "ten-minute mods."
Old 08-03-2006, 03:17 PM
  #13  
Member
 
WhiteKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 88 GTA
Engine: 305
Transmission: Manual
MAFs have $100 core charge on them?
Thats ridiculous.

Last edited by WhiteKnight; 08-03-2006 at 03:21 PM.
Old 08-03-2006, 05:25 PM
  #14  
Supreme Member
 
formul8!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: www.thirdgentech.com
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 2004 GTO
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T-56
I have never heard of a core charge on a MAF. Once you take one apart, they do not go back together.
Old 08-03-2006, 05:45 PM
  #15  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (8)
 
whitedevilTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern CT
Posts: 2,412
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Car: 1986 Trans am
Engine: 5.3 LM7
Transmission: T56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: Dana 44 w/ 3.55's
I had to buy a new MAF for my car, and on the Bosch one which I got, there was no core I believe, but they listed another brand that did have a core. I also think it was around 100$.
Old 08-04-2006, 12:48 AM
  #16  
Senior Member

 
Tremo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Jose, CA, USA
Posts: 814
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Car: 88 IROC-Z - original owner!
Engine: LB9 with K&Ns, MSD, Foil, Taylor
Transmission: WC T-5
Axle/Gears: BW 9-bolt, 3.45 posi
Yes, MAFs have a core charge. The amount depends on which new MAF you buy. One I was reading said they would not accept a core MAF that had been altered or modified in any way. Core charges ranged from $60 or so to up about $100. Some very expensive brand new MAFs (not remans) had no core charge.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mark_ZZ3
TPI
15
05-24-2018 01:02 PM
BumpaD82
Tech / General Engine
37
02-26-2016 02:57 PM
racereese
Tech / General Engine
14
10-03-2015 03:46 PM
Ikes 91Z
LSX and LTX Parts
0
09-13-2015 09:03 AM



Quick Reply: descreened MAF



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:54 PM.