Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

TPI Tuned Port Injection discussion and questions. LB9 and L98 tech, porting, tuning, and bolt-on aftermarket products.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-08-2007, 10:07 PM   #1
Member
 
WhiteIrocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 156
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Jeg's recommended cam for 305...opinions??

Salesman recommended comp cam #24908-430-8 and springs #982-16 for 305 TPI Auto with 2000 stall, headers, and 3.42 rear gear. Does this cam look good? He said that the cam will sound lopey but not too much chop. Power range looks ok, but I just want to get some opinions. Heres the link...

cam: http://store.summitracing.com/partde...8&autoview=sku

springs: http://store.summitracing.com/partde...art=cca-982-16
__________________
'87 White Iroc Z - Totalled for minor cosmetic damage, rebuilding in process.

'99 NBM Camaro SS- Borla Catback, Hurst shifter, SLP lid, Centerforce DFX, Driver mod.
WhiteIrocZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 11:35 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
tenpin842's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 752
Car: 1987 Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Richmond 3.73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to tenpin842
Re: Jeg's recommended cam for 305...opinions??

I think the cam looks pretty good.
Dont forget to change your valve seals while your in there.

I used the CRANE cam in my sig. And I like it a lot!
__________________

Last edited by tenpin842; 05-09-2007 at 01:38 PM.
tenpin842 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 12:18 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
92GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bakersfield CA
Posts: 3,305
Car: Trans Am GTA
Engine: LB9 - 305TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (9)
Re: Jeg's recommended cam for 305...opinions??

Wait a sec, that cam has a .525" lift. I was going to install a ZZ4 cam which has a .510" lift and was told that the factory LB9 heads are only good for .500" lift and that MAYBE the ZZ4 cam would work. How is this .525" lift cam going to work?
__________________
www.TheFoat.com/92GTA 1992 Trans Am GTA SLP: GMPP optioned "SLP Performance Parts Package" GTA, 220K Miles, Dark Jade Gray Metallic, LB9, 4L60, T-Tops, and Gray Leather. Documentation includes Window Sticker, Factory Invoice, Etc.
92GTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 12:24 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Northern California, Redding
Posts: 842
Car: Red 1987 IROC Convertible
Engine: 305 LB9 TPI
Transmission: T5 5-Speed
Axle/Gears: 9-Bolt 3.45

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Jeg's recommended cam for 305...opinions??

A 305 TPI engine won't like that cam at all. There's too much duration, and not enough LSA. Also, a split pattern cam would be a better choice.

Time to re-think your cam choice!
mnorton is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 01:16 PM   #5
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NYTHIRDGEN
Posts: 1,088
Car: 1989 T/A
Engine: PROCHARGED LB9
Transmission: FB BUILT 700r4 2200 stall
Axle/Gears: 10 BOLT EATON 3:73 POSI

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Jeg's recommended cam for 305...opinions??

so does anybody know of a good cam for a lb9?, i will hopefully soon be adding a procharger. should i leave the peanut in there? or upgrade first?
8T9 BANDIT is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 08:16 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Roy,UT USA
Posts: 3,056

Classifieds Rating: (30)
Send a message via ICQ to Pat Hall
Re: Jeg's recommended cam for 305...opinions??

You might want to consider Comp cam# 08-501-8. That one should work with your stock computer, and make great power in a 305. You'll need to upgrade to the matching valve springs, but that'd be it.
__________________
89RS w/350 TPI; 69RS/SS w/450 HP 350/Muncie 4-Speed "Too weird to live, too rare to die."
Pat Hall is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2007, 12:02 AM   #7
Member
 
WhiteIrocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 156
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Jeg's recommended cam for 305...opinions??

Wait a minute, the specs the guy told me over the phone were not the same as what the web site says. He stated that it was a .500 lift, 270 duration, 215 Duration at 050 lift, 1800-5000 Rpm, and he gave me part number 24908-430-8. That is definitely not the same cam, and that is correct that the LB9 heads can only take .500 lift. What do you think this would sound like, that is basically what I am going for with the cam swap. I definitely don't want to kill my bottom end torque, but I need a little lope to get me through till my new motor is done. What would the 08-501-8 sound like in a 305??? Thanks for the help fellas...

By the way, I am doing valve stem seals also. Replacing them with the umbrella type that will never leak for another 100,000 miles.

I was also thinking about roller rockers also, what would be the kind I need? I am going to have to buy them for the new motor anyway, so it wouldn't be wasted money. Valve cover issues???

Last edited by WhiteIrocZ; 05-10-2007 at 12:07 AM.
WhiteIrocZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2007, 12:45 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
LB9GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 836
Car: '91 GTA
Engine: 400sbc
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: ford 9" with 3.75

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Jeg's recommended cam for 305...opinions??

I used the comp cam xr258hr10.
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...8&autoview=sku
I used 1.6 roller rockers so that is 0.512/0.519
Worked good
__________________
'91 GTA - 400sbc,AFR195elim,280 xfi cam,1 5/8 shorty headers and single 4", LT1 intake, 3200 stall, 3.75 gears with a ford 9" and Zex dry nitrous.

*old 383 combo*11.00@125 - 1.55 60ft, 145hp n2o
LB9GTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2007, 03:23 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Roy,UT USA
Posts: 3,056

Classifieds Rating: (30)
Send a message via ICQ to Pat Hall
Re: Jeg's recommended cam for 305...opinions??

The 501 cam is actually pretty mellow in a 350, so in a 305, it'll definitely have a decent lope to it, and according to Comp cams, it's supposed to work with the stock computer, intake, etc. The duration is short enough to where it shouldn't give your computer fits. Plus the 112 LSA is ecm friendly too. As far as roller rockers go, originally, the only ones I found that fit centerbolt heads with no modifications at all are the Crane Gold series, narrow body, self-aligning aluminum ones. Problem is, they're about $325 for a set. Then I found this website. Go to www.cnc-motorsports.com. They have the aluminum, narrow body, self-aligning rockers for $158.95 in 1.5 or 1.6 ratio. They also have the stainless steel, self-aligning roller rockers for $168.95. These aren't listed as being narrow body, but it's a piece of cake to modify your centerbolt covers for them. All you have to do is cut out a little bit of the inner bracing, and some minor trimming of the oil baffle where your cap screws in. I'd highly recommend getting the stainless steel ones. Aluminum fatigues after a while. If you're putting them on a daily driver, the stainless ones will never fatigue or wear out. I got the stainless ones for mine, and when I saw firsthand how easy it is to modify the valve covers, I don't understand why there's such a fuss about absolutely having to use the narrow body ones. As a matter of fact, if you get the taller, aftermarket cast aluminum centerbolt covers, they clear the standard width rockers with no mods at all. I have a set of these, and they plopped right on. Plus they look so much nicer than the stock ones! The aluminum rockers are old-hat these days. Stainless steel ones are where it's at now.
__________________
89RS w/350 TPI; 69RS/SS w/450 HP 350/Muncie 4-Speed "Too weird to live, too rare to die."
Pat Hall is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2007, 12:53 PM   #10
Member
 
WhiteIrocZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 156
Car: 87 Iroc Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Jeg's recommended cam for 305...opinions??

How does the xr258hr10 sound and perform??? Any sound clips?? Like I said I want a little lope to it more than all out performance because this is just my every day driver, I want it to sound fast but still get 24 mpg on the highway... . So if it has a smooth idle, its out of the question.
WhiteIrocZ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2007, 01:18 PM   #11
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: northern jerz
Posts: 2,864
Car: heavily modded formula
Engine: 521cuin big block ford!
Transmission: bullet proof ford C-6
Axle/Gears: ford 8.8, 3.55 gears

Classifieds Rating: (4)
Re: Jeg's recommended cam for 305...opinions??

yea hmm im likeing this thread, im gona chime in so if u could help me too i'd appreciate it. im sick of my 350tpi and i want more HP so idk how u guys delt with the 305's power but looks like u guys built them up nice. my sig has the mods ive done, and i think i wanna get rid of the TPI and go with the HSR, but the cam dies out at 4800...correct? and the HSR wont make power till then, eventually puting ina 383 so i want it to convert over, ive been looking at cams and i might just wanna throw somethinging in there for more HP till the 383 becomes a reality. gona use stock L98 heads, HSR, and either gona put on the 1.6 aluminum narrow body self alligning roller rockers i have now or just throw in a cam with more duration...wats ur ideas, i believe stock L98 heads max lift is around .480...so i was thinking of a GM hot cam since its only 200$, compcams and crane roller cams are 275$ and up ahhhhhh! max lift with the hotcam with 1.5s is .492/.492 with a duration of 218/228 at .050, lobe at 112.

so ur opinon of the HSR/hotcam or the HSR/1.6rr? and HP estimates...

also gona need to upgrade the springs in this bad boy they got 130,000 on them, so if u could also point out a good set of springs that arent crazy $$ that will allow the lift, like Beehives etc id really appreciate it.
----------
hmm guess it didnt show my sig...basically full true dual exhaust with Xpipe, portet plenum/matched to SLP runners, stock base, 50psi fuel pressure, motorvation TB spacer, airfoil, ram air, pullies, motorvation strip chip, complete suspension etc, WS6, worked 700r4, stock 3.23 9 bolt posi etc

Last edited by customblackbird; 05-10-2007 at 01:21 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
customblackbird is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2007, 01:56 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
LB9GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 836
Car: '91 GTA
Engine: 400sbc
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: ford 9" with 3.75

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Jeg's recommended cam for 305...opinions??

Quote:
So if it has a smooth idle, its out of the question.
I had to up the idle speed for it to idle better. It was running rich at idle, too. It was not smooth.
Sorry, I blew the engine last fall so no clips.
LB9GTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2007, 02:49 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 722

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Jeg's recommended cam for 305...opinions??

Quote:
Originally Posted by LB9GTA View Post
I used the comp cam xr258hr10.
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...8&autoview=sku
I used 1.6 roller rockers so that is 0.512/0.519
Worked good
That looks like a decent cam, I'm using the Summit K1102 in mine (when I get it in) and it's a 204/214. Since I've got an 86 I'm pretty much stuck with a flat tappet cam. With the LTR type intake I'd definitely be keeping towards the conservative side on the cam, unless you're getting some runners or have some runners too. If you've got some siamesed SLPs it becomes a different ball game. I'd be thinking about 215 degrees would be as high as I'd wanna go in a street motor, and even then only with some chip work.
Drac0nic is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2007, 06:05 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
PneumaticTire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 439
Car: 1986 Camaro Z28
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: Who orders an auto in a Camaro??
Axle/Gears: Economy gears..once again, WHY?!?

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to PneumaticTire Send a message via Yahoo to PneumaticTire
Re: Jeg's recommended cam for 305...opinions??

Quote:
Originally Posted by LB9GTA View Post
I used the comp cam xr258hr10.
http://store.summitracing.com/partde...8&autoview=sku
I used 1.6 roller rockers so that is 0.512/0.519
Worked good

how did you getit to be computer controlled compatible?
PneumaticTire is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2007, 11:14 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
LB9GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Posts: 836
Car: '91 GTA
Engine: 400sbc
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: ford 9" with 3.75

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Jeg's recommended cam for 305...opinions??

I turned the idle up, that's it.
I bought a chip burner but never got around to burning a chip for my car.

I advanced the timing and it ran well and still got about 26mpg(cdn gallon)
LB9GTA is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2007, 03:11 AM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Roy,UT USA
Posts: 3,056

Classifieds Rating: (30)
Send a message via ICQ to Pat Hall
Re: Jeg's recommended cam for 305...opinions??

On my last reply, I forgot to chime in on the valve seals you're going to use. Most recommend going to positive type valve seals on both the intake and exhaust valves. GM originally used umbrella type seals on the exhaust side, and those are the cause of 99% of our cars that notoriously puff a little smoke out when you first start them up. Do a search on here for "valve seals", and you'll notice how many guys here recommend using positive type seals, not umbrellas. I've never actually heard the 501 cam run in a 305, but I'd be willing to bet it would be pretty damn lopey in a 305. It's a pretty good sized cam for that size of motor. Blackbird, you'll be walking the line pretty close with the GM hot cam when it comes to lift @ .492 on stock heads. Most guys say you should be checking your retainer to guide clearance pretty carefully any time you start to exceed about .480 lift. Of course, you'll want to upgrade your springs and retainers anyways. I wouldn't trust the original springs/retainers at that amount of lift.
__________________
89RS w/350 TPI; 69RS/SS w/450 HP 350/Muncie 4-Speed "Too weird to live, too rare to die."
Pat Hall is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2009, 08:05 PM   #17
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 20
Car: 1985 Trans Am 305 TPI

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Jeg's recommended cam for 305...opinions??

seeing as how your all talking cam's im looking forward to getting Trick flow 56cc chamber aluminum heads 175cc intake, for my 305 TPI along with edelbrock high flow base and SLP runners with port matched plenum and custom cold intake and some hooker shorty's. with this stuff in, what do you guys recommend for a cam? I need a street/strip not to wild, but one that will make the heads worth it you know. also what rockers should i go with 1.5 or 1.6?? im pretty new but want to build a nice 305 atleast in the low 14's

and would i need to change injectors?

Thanks,
Jonathan
85birdy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2009, 09:09 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Lakewood, ca. USA
Posts: 2,421

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Jeg's recommended cam for 305...opinions??

Quote:
Originally Posted by 8T9 BANDIT View Post
so does anybody know of a good cam for a lb9?, i will hopefully soon be adding a procharger. should i leave the peanut in there? or upgrade first?
I don't know a lot about cams, but if it will work to maximize power in a naturally aspirated engine, you DO NOT want to use it with a blower! Hot cams for n/a engines are designed with a lot of overlap to work at higher rpms. When you install a blower with a cam with a lot of overlap, your boost will push your fuel and air into the exhaust headers before the exhaust valve closes on the intake stroke. For a blower motor you want max lift with as little overlap as you can get. I would not even ask about cams in the tpi board for a blower motor. Go to the power adder board and ask the guys that are already running blower motors to see what they are running.
Russ-So Cal is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2009, 09:44 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
Saculia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 675
Car: currently a 91 G92.
Engine: 305TPI
Transmission: Borg Warner WC 5 speed
Axle/Gears: 3.42

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Jeg's recommended cam for 305...opinions??

Are you planning to use the stock heads and TPI? If so, that cam is way too big for you. I have the comp cams 08-500-8 and like it a lot. Sounds way different than stock. I wouldn't call it lopy, but I would definitely call it choppy. This cam is slightly smaller than the 08-501-8, which is also a good choice, but may require more work to the heads, including screw in studs.
You want a cam that is going to give you a power band where the TPI can breathe. Also, no matter how computer friendly a cam is, you will need a computer tune in order to take full advantage of it. Computer friendly means that it will run, but it will be too rich in some spots and too lean in others. My car really woke up after the tune and has no problems running with stock LT1s.
When getting a cam it is better to err on the smaller side.
Saculia is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2009, 09:44 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > TPI

Tags
305, 350, 91, cam, cams, duration, good, hot, installing, motor, performance, recommended, stock, sumk1102, summit, tpi
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details