TPI on my 350
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: 40 miles N of Detroit
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 1969 Camaro SS
Engine: 355, roller, Profilers, FIRST tpi
Transmission: 200r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
TPI on my 350
I had a tpi unit along time ago and got rid of it. Now I've got the bug to be a bit different than all the other bellybutton 69 Camaros out there with a carb and a 14 inch air cleaner.
My engine is a 350 bored .030 over. Flat top pistons, four eyebrow reliefs, not sure if block was decked. Should be 9.75:1. 041 heads pocket ported. 1 5/8 dia full length headers. Cam is a Comp Extreme Energy 262. 218 & 224 @ .050 with .470 lift. First generation Edelbrock Performer manifold with 2200-2300 stall. 3.42 gears in a corp ten bolt rear.
I can get a nice TPI unit out of a 85 Vetter for $100. Car has always been set up for the street, would love around 425-450 tq at the flywheel. Can this be done with above TPI? What would need to be done to unit? Thanks for your replies.
My engine is a 350 bored .030 over. Flat top pistons, four eyebrow reliefs, not sure if block was decked. Should be 9.75:1. 041 heads pocket ported. 1 5/8 dia full length headers. Cam is a Comp Extreme Energy 262. 218 & 224 @ .050 with .470 lift. First generation Edelbrock Performer manifold with 2200-2300 stall. 3.42 gears in a corp ten bolt rear.
I can get a nice TPI unit out of a 85 Vetter for $100. Car has always been set up for the street, would love around 425-450 tq at the flywheel. Can this be done with above TPI? What would need to be done to unit? Thanks for your replies.
#2
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 3,371
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91' Firebird SOLD
Engine: 350 TPI +bolt-ons
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: TPI on my 350
I had a tpi unit along time ago and got rid of it. Now I've got the bug to be a bit different than all the other bellybutton 69 Camaros out there with a carb and a 14 inch air cleaner.
My engine is a 350 bored .030 over. Flat top pistons, four eyebrow reliefs, not sure if block was decked. Should be 9.75:1. 041 heads pocket ported. 1 5/8 dia full length headers. Cam is a Comp Extreme Energy 262. 218 & 224 @ .050 with .470 lift. First generation Edelbrock Performer manifold with 2200-2300 stall. 3.42 gears in a corp ten bolt rear.
I can get a nice TPI unit out of a 85 Vetter for $100. Car has always been set up for the street, would love around 425-450 tq at the flywheel. Can this be done with above TPI? What would need to be done to unit? Thanks for your replies.
My engine is a 350 bored .030 over. Flat top pistons, four eyebrow reliefs, not sure if block was decked. Should be 9.75:1. 041 heads pocket ported. 1 5/8 dia full length headers. Cam is a Comp Extreme Energy 262. 218 & 224 @ .050 with .470 lift. First generation Edelbrock Performer manifold with 2200-2300 stall. 3.42 gears in a corp ten bolt rear.
I can get a nice TPI unit out of a 85 Vetter for $100. Car has always been set up for the street, would love around 425-450 tq at the flywheel. Can this be done with above TPI? What would need to be done to unit? Thanks for your replies.
#6
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Re: TPI on my 350
I'd caution you about using the computer & harness from the 85 Vette. That particular year is a one-year specific computer that is very primitive and there aren't many people that tune them. The 85 Vette also ran a different fuel pressure (35lbs vs. 43 for everything else), and had the external MAF burnoff relay module.
If you're planning to run an aftermarket harness & ECU, then the 85 parts will be fine, but if you want a plug & play option, look for a TPI setup from an 86-92.
If you're planning to run an aftermarket harness & ECU, then the 85 parts will be fine, but if you want a plug & play option, look for a TPI setup from an 86-92.
#7
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: 40 miles N of Detroit
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 1969 Camaro SS
Engine: 355, roller, Profilers, FIRST tpi
Transmission: 200r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: TPI on my 350
I'd caution you about using the computer & harness from the 85 Vette. That particular year is a one-year specific computer that is very primitive and there aren't many people that tune them. The 85 Vette also ran a different fuel pressure (35lbs vs. 43 for everything else), and had the external MAF burnoff relay module.
If you're planning to run an aftermarket harness & ECU, then the 85 parts will be fine, but if you want a plug & play option, look for a TPI setup from an 86-92.
If you're planning to run an aftermarket harness & ECU, then the 85 parts will be fine, but if you want a plug & play option, look for a TPI setup from an 86-92.
Trending Topics
#8
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: 40 miles N of Detroit
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 1969 Camaro SS
Engine: 355, roller, Profilers, FIRST tpi
Transmission: 200r4
Axle/Gears: 3.42
Re: TPI on my 350
Yes, from my reading on here that is exactly what I'll do. IF I do this. There are so many conflicting stories out there on what kind of power to expect. Yes, I understand torque is king on the street. My engine probably puts out over 400 ft lbs at the crank now, but at 5300 rpm. Could I expect the same, more, or less if I use that Vette tpi? I am thinking the TPI with my current setup would have a flat torque curve over 400 ft lbs from 1500 RPM to 5000 RPM. Am I off base in this thinking? Will ported and siamesed stock base, ported and siamesed runners , and ported plenum be up to the task?
#9
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 3,371
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91' Firebird SOLD
Engine: 350 TPI +bolt-ons
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: TPI on my 350
Yes, from my reading on here that is exactly what I'll do. IF I do this. There are so many conflicting stories out there on what kind of power to expect. Yes, I understand torque is king on the street. My engine probably puts out over 400 ft lbs at the crank now, but at 5300 rpm. Could I expect the same, more, or less if I use that Vette tpi? I am thinking the TPI with my current setup would have a flat torque curve over 400 ft lbs from 1500 RPM to 5000 RPM. Am I off base in this thinking? Will ported and siamesed stock base, ported and siamesed runners , and ported plenum be up to the task?
#10
#13
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 3,371
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91' Firebird SOLD
Engine: 350 TPI +bolt-ons
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: TPI on my 350
Have you ever thought about a holley stealth ram intake manifold? They only run about $300 for the manifold.
#17
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Delaware
Posts: 3,371
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91' Firebird SOLD
Engine: 350 TPI +bolt-ons
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Re: TPI on my 350
My advice to you is to ditch the TPI manifold altogether. If I had a thirdgen again, that's what I would do. Get a Holley Stealth ram if you want to stick with Fuel injection. You want good advice? You just go it. Thank you
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sanjay
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
1
08-12-2015 03:41 PM