Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Transmissions and Drivetrain
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Transmissions and Drivetrain Need help with your trans? Problems with your axle?

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-11-2006, 06:09 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
JAYDUBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: DC_MD_VA Area
Posts: 670
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: L03 305 V-8 (for now ;) )
Transmission: T-5 5 speed
Axle/Gears: stock... whatever that means :)

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to JAYDUBB Send a message via MSN to JAYDUBB Send a message via Yahoo to JAYDUBB
Strange S60

Anyone heard of or seen this? Its a Dana 60 rear for 82-02 F body cars...

http://www.strangeengineering.net/ne...earendAD1.html

Hmmm...
__________________

- Daily Driver: 2002 Nissan Maxima SE 6-speed
- Injured Reserve: 1998 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP (4T65E=JUNK!!!)
- Project Car: 1991 Chevrolet Camaro RS 305 5 Speed
- Truck: 1995 Chevy K1500 305 5-speed MANUAL 4WD! NO PUSH-BUTTON CRAP! LOL!
JAYDUBB is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2006, 06:41 PM   #2
Supreme Member
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 10,296
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, 700r4
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, open 3:23

Classifieds Rating: (9)
standard 35 spline axles?!!! damn that thing must be heavy as hell and made to take a beating! looks neat

and its very similiarly priced to the 12 bolt and 9" ford rear that are available
//<86TA>\\ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 03:04 PM   #3
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 4,367
Car: projects.......

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Shagwell
Dana 60's have been run for years. Thing is they are very heavy, and the internals are also very heavy therefore take more power to pull. Why carry the extra weight and loose hp turning extra weight when a 9" can be built to handle over 2500hp?
Shagwell is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 04:56 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
JAYDUBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: DC_MD_VA Area
Posts: 670
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: L03 305 V-8 (for now ;) )
Transmission: T-5 5 speed
Axle/Gears: stock... whatever that means :)

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to JAYDUBB Send a message via MSN to JAYDUBB Send a message via Yahoo to JAYDUBB
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shagwell View Post
Dana 60's have been run for years. Thing is they are very heavy, and the internals are also very heavy therefore take more power to pull. Why carry the extra weight and loose hp turning extra weight when a 9" can be built to handle over 2500hp?
I spoke to someone at Strange and they claim that it is STRONGER than the 9 inch. And it takes less HP to turn.

Im not an engineer or anything but it sounds good to me!
JAYDUBB is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2006, 07:24 PM   #5
Supreme Member
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 10,296
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, 700r4
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, open 3:23

Classifieds Rating: (9)
for the same price its probably stronger that the 9", and may be easyer to turn, but its still a bit heavyer
//<86TA>\\ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2006, 04:00 PM   #6
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 4,367
Car: projects.......

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Shagwell
I fully agree that it's stonger than a 9", but since you can build a 9" to take WAY more power than you'll ever be putting into a factory chassis, why carry the extra weight? They are much heavier. - Unless Strange has done some decent voodoo with their aftermarket internals (possible, from such a company), typical 9" stuff eats less hp.

- FYI we've got a dana 60 under my old man's blower car - It's there for two reasons; came with the car when we got it, and you don't have to worry about it, even @ 9600 r's behind the blower motor....
__________________
Jp Shawgo - Close E'nuff Racing

1986 camaro - 10.5 outlaw/Outlaw 632
1989 GTA vert
www.sandeperformance.com
www.transmission-specialties.com
Shagwell is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2006, 09:18 AM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4
Car: 1982 Trans Am, 2002 Formula Firehawk, 2000 Camaro SS Convert., 2002 Formula

Classifieds Rating: (0)
I just bought and installed an s-60 in my 02 formula. It went in extremely easy and strange thought this design out well. I also did get a best on motor with this rear 1.5 sixty foot 11.6 @ 114 mph. I think its the best for the price and you have a lot to grow into. I saw no loss in track numbers.

Strange Engineering
Strange S60 Dana Rear End
F-Body Dana Rear End Features:

25lbs heavier than a 12 bolt, 10lbs heavier than a 9"
Standard True-Track Diff w/Power-Lock
35 Spline Posi
All new casting using 3.0" OD Tubing, 1/4" Thick
Large ring gear than 12 bolt (by 0.875) and 9" (by 0.75)
Standard Dana Gear can handle 1200RWHP
Many Gear Options
LT1 build in mounts - LS1 requires backing plates to be sent in!
Driveshaft will need to be shortened 1.625" (don't do this a strange chromemoly isn't that expensive)

12 bolt 8% power loss
ford 9 has 10% power loss
s-60 has 5% power loss
1982KITT is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2006, 02:10 AM   #8
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 111
Car: 1989 Pontiac trans-am
Engine: building a 400
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (1)
anyone know what brakes to use with the s60 on a 89 year car. Strange says they come with 93-97 or 98-02 mounts witch its better? can these brakes be used without the ABS? anyone use Bear brakes on this rearend?
89pontiac400 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2007, 08:33 AM   #9
Junior Member
 
Aerosmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 44
Car: 1982 Camaro, 1985 Z28
Engine: 383, 305
Transmission: TH350, T-5

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Hey 1982kitt, how long did it take to get the rearend? As soon as my tax refund gets here about the first week of Feb I'm ordering mine. Also what was shippnig charges like? Lastly, what did you go with for the diff, I'm leaning towards upgrading to a locker.
Aerosmith is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2007, 01:41 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Buckhannon, WV
Posts: 2,661
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears

Classifieds Rating: (0)
The reason the dana axle takes less power to turn is the pinion offset. The ford 9" has a high offset, meaning that the pinion hits the ring gear at high angle. The result is the pinion teath tend to drag across the face of the ring gear teeth. It makes for more strength but takes more power to turn. The dana gets it's strength from sheer size, so there is no need for the high pinion offset.
BMmonteSS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2007, 02:05 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Kars, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 616

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Strange S60

I hate to bring this back from the dead, I just want to find some clear info.
So which rear is the best exactly??? You have a few to choose from I suppose. I'dd love to see a list of order (best-worst) done in peoples opinions. I also know price comes into play in most people's budgets. But for now, just the best in quality and performance.
Kinda like
1 S60
2 Moser
3 Strange 12
4
5
6 Aussie 9 blot
7 10 bolt


Something like that. Again, opinions. And stock choices at the lower end of the list is good to know. If it becomes a good source of info, prices, reasons, etc, maybe make it a "sticky" so people can reference it. Is it a sticky already? I don't even know.

Anyway, thanks for the info guys. Cheers
Buddy is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2007, 10:19 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Buckhannon, WV
Posts: 2,661
Car: 84' Monte
Engine: 350
Transmission: 700-r4
Axle/Gears: ferd 9" posi 3.50 gears

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Strange S60

Basically when it comes to strength once you get something aftermarket the strength level is so high it really isn't a factor. Some people want to have an all chevy car and go with the 12 bolt, some once the ability to easily swap gears and go with a 9", then some people want a more efficent rear end and go with the S-60.

The ford 9" is going to be the cheapest way to get a stron axle in your vehicle and the fact that it doesn't have c-clips is an added bonus. You can put together a junk yard center section for cheap and just buy a premade housing ready to bolt in. Then you can upgrade the center section as funds allow. There are also a wide range of differentials available for the 9", there is also a lot of used nascar parts floating around.
BMmonteSS is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 05:53 PM   #13
Supreme Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 4,367
Car: projects.......

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Send a message via AIM to Shagwell
Re: Strange S60

too many variables to choose a best - worst scale. As monte said, once you go aftermarket, you're basically going to be plenty strong. One of the biggest things is whether or not you're looking for bolt-in. If you have some decent fabricating skills there are several rears that can be had/built for a reasonable $ and are very strong. The Ford 8.8 fall into this category.
Shagwell is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2007, 05:53 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Transmissions and Drivetrain

Tags
60, 9, axle, backing, body, camaro, engineering, gen, hub, lock, locker, original, plate, power, s60, strange, trans
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details