Transmissions and Drivetrain Need help with your trans? Problems with your axle?

Why did this happen?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2007, 02:23 AM
  #1  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
86_Dan_Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: So Cal / El Mirage, AZ
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Why did this happen?

This was a Bowtie Overdrives 2400 stall converter. It was working fine in till this. It chewed up the pump and left me stranded.
Attached Thumbnails Why did this happen?-p1010029.jpg  

Last edited by 86_Dan_Z28; 03-10-2007 at 03:05 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Old 03-10-2007, 03:22 AM
  #2  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
86_Dan_Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: So Cal / El Mirage, AZ
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
.
Attached Thumbnails Why did this happen?-thetc1.jpg  
Old 03-17-2007, 08:05 PM
  #3  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
86_Dan_Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: So Cal / El Mirage, AZ
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
.

.
Attached Thumbnails Why did this happen?-broketc.jpg  
Old 03-17-2007, 08:06 PM
  #4  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
86_Dan_Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: So Cal / El Mirage, AZ
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
.

Destroyed the pump.
Attached Thumbnails Why did this happen?-pumpgone.jpg  
Old 03-17-2007, 09:20 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,037
Received 394 Likes on 336 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Either the converter ballooned OR the crankshaft somehow walked toward the transmission under load (thrust bearing clearance wrong)

Perhaps the better answer is the pump itself failed and chewed up the converter.

My stock 200K mile 700r4 in my 87 GMC Jimmy did that recently and it only had a 3.1 sitting in front of it.
Old 03-17-2007, 09:22 PM
  #6  
Supreme Member

 
Randy82WS7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: 62656
Posts: 4,812
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1991 S10 pickup 2700lbs
Engine: 4.3L Z TBI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08 7.625"
holy damn, thats crap! :O


how does a converter ballooon?

what does that mean exaclty- what exactly happens when one balloons?>

thans
Old 03-17-2007, 09:26 PM
  #7  
Moderator

 
Apeiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Mercedes Norte, Heredia, Costa Rica
Posts: 20,981
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Car: 1984 Z28 Hardtop
Engine: 383 Carb
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 3.54 Dana 44
Pressure inside the converter causes the case to distort and expand, called "ballooning". This causes Bad Things to happen. Anti-ballooning plates are steel plates welded to the case to reinforce it.
Old 03-17-2007, 09:29 PM
  #8  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,037
Received 394 Likes on 336 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally Posted by Randy82WS7
holy damn, thats crap! :O


how does a converter ballooon?

what does that mean exaclty- what exactly happens when one balloons?>

thans
The converter is under its highest stress when it is fully loaded up at full stall with the tires stopped. At this point it is very possible for the converter to be under so much pressure that the converter actually grows, hence ballooning or blowing up like a balloon due to the stress. It is actually more common than the aftermarket converter manufacturers would want you to believe. I am fairly sure that converter ballooning is actually what broke the crankshaft in one of my 350s. I had a cheapy re-stalled 2,400 rpm converter in my 700r4 and the crankshaft snapped near the rear most rod bearing journal, less than 1,500 miles after installing the converter.
Old 03-17-2007, 10:15 PM
  #9  
Member

Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
86_Dan_Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: So Cal / El Mirage, AZ
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 86 Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23
Originally Posted by Fast355

Perhaps the better answer is the pump itself failed and chewed up the converter.
This was a 13 vane pump. I think I heard before that they are not very good.
Old 03-18-2007, 12:32 AM
  #10  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,037
Received 394 Likes on 336 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally Posted by 86_Dan_Z28
This was a 13 vane pump. I think I heard before that they are not very good.
FWIW, all the performance trans guys scream for the 13 vane pump, but I still have the stock 1983 7-vane pump in my transmission. The extra vanes in the 13 vane pump actually take up space that could be occupied by transmission fluid to increase the volume of the pump. The additional cuts in the pumps rotor also weaken it more than a 7 or 10 vane pump. The aftermarket guys usually claim the fluid flows more consistantly with the 13 vane, which it does to a very minor extent. All the 13 vane pump really does is cut-down on the buzzing the pressure regulator made on the earlier model 700r4s.
Old 03-18-2007, 02:51 AM
  #11  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (31)
 
Pat Hall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Roy,UT USA
Posts: 3,347
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Yeah, I've also heard the 13 vane pump is overrated and unnecessary from quite a few tranny builders. Dana at Probuilt uses the 10 vane pump in pretty much all of his rebuilds, along with the hardened pump ring kit, and we all know how good his 700r4's are. I talked to him not long ago on the phone, and he was telling me that GM had pretty much resolved most of the design flaws in the 700r4's by 88 or 89. By then, they had upgraded to the 10 vane pump, added the auxiliary valve body, forward clutch accumulator, redesigned some of the valves, and got the shift points about right.
Old 03-19-2007, 12:09 AM
  #12  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,037
Received 394 Likes on 336 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally Posted by Pat Hall
Yeah, I've also heard the 13 vane pump is overrated and unnecessary from quite a few tranny builders. Dana at Probuilt uses the 10 vane pump in pretty much all of his rebuilds, along with the hardened pump ring kit, and we all know how good his 700r4's are. I talked to him not long ago on the phone, and he was telling me that GM had pretty much resolved most of the design flaws in the 700r4's by 88 or 89. By then, they had upgraded to the 10 vane pump, added the auxiliary valve body, forward clutch accumulator, redesigned some of the valves, and got the shift points about right.
In all honesty my 1983 G20 Van got the hell beat out of it from day one and still somehow the stock 700r4 managed to live on. It did not die until 285,000 miles and that was after beating on it for about 10K miles behind a 315 HP 350 TBI. When it died, most of the drivetrain inside of the 83 700r4 completely fragged. The pinon gears had pieces missing! The ring gear had chunks of metal lodged in it. The drive shell shattered. Basically the only good rebuildable pieces were the valvebody, case and pump.

I rebuilt a 1993 Camaro 4L60-NON E to replace the original 700r4. 3-4 WOT shifts into OD are fun, as are 5,500 rpm WOT shifts in every gear.

Last edited by Fast355; 03-19-2007 at 12:13 AM.
Old 03-19-2007, 01:20 AM
  #13  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (31)
 
Pat Hall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Roy,UT USA
Posts: 3,347
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
[QUOTE=Fast355;3269127]In all honesty my 1983 G20 Van got the hell beat out of it from day one and still somehow the stock 700r4 managed to live on. It did not die until 285,000 miles and that was after beating on it for about 10K miles behind a 315 HP 350 TBI.

I guess our TBI motors must be kinder to 700r4's because I've got 233,000 miles on my orginal trans behind my L03, and it still works great. I'm going to be putting a ZZ4 cammed TPI L98 in front of it in a couple of months here though, so I'm thinking the trans might buy the farm not long after I swap the motor. I'm going to put a 2600 stall converter, .500 boost valve, corvette servo, and a transgo kit in the trans at the same time I swap the motor, and I'm hoping that'll buy the trans a little more time. We'll see.
Old 03-19-2007, 02:37 AM
  #14  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (2)
 
Fast355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hurst, Texas
Posts: 10,037
Received 394 Likes on 336 Posts
Car: 1983 G20 Chevy
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 4L60
Axle/Gears: 14 bolt with 3.07 gears
Originally Posted by Pat Hall
Originally Posted by Fast355
In all honesty my 1983 G20 Van got the hell beat out of it from day one and still somehow the stock 700r4 managed to live on. It did not die until 285,000 miles and that was after beating on it for about 10K miles behind a 315 HP 350 TBI.
I guess our TBI motors must be kinder to 700r4's because I've got 233,000 miles on my orginal trans behind my L03, and it still works great. I'm going to be putting a ZZ4 cammed TPI L98 in front of it in a couple of months here though, so I'm thinking the trans might buy the farm not long after I swap the motor. I'm going to put a 2600 stall converter, .500 boost valve, corvette servo, and a transgo kit in the trans at the same time I swap the motor, and I'm hoping that'll buy the trans a little more time. We'll see.
Mine ran its first 210K behind a carbed 305 HO, then I swapped to TBI, keeping the stock 305 HO, ran it another 65K miles, built a 350, installed it, and the 700r4 lived for another 10K.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
InfernalVortex
Electronics
10
04-20-2021 11:31 AM
BrianChevy
Wheels and Tires
10
08-08-2019 02:16 PM
RedLeader289
Tech / General Engine
10
05-28-2019 01:47 PM
RS Reaper
Electronics
4
10-17-2018 07:52 PM
racereese
Tech / General Engine
14
10-03-2015 03:46 PM



Quick Reply: Why did this happen?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:14 AM.