Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Transmissions and Drivetrain
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

Transmissions and Drivetrain Need help with your trans? Problems with your axle?

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-23-2007, 01:49 AM   #1
Member
 
darkride86T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Carolina(but you'll never take the DC out of me!!!)
Posts: 186
Car: '95 Z28 and '95 Tahoe
Engine: LT1 350/LO5 350
Transmission: 4L60E/4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73posi/3.42posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Powertrax No-Slip vs. Eaton or Auburn Posi

I'm trying to decide which unit to buy. I currently have a 10 bolt with
2.73 gears and open differential. I'm keeping my 2.73's because I am not really concerned about being quicker in the 1/4 mile as I am about MPG's
and top end(my goal: to see if I can make that 140 mph speedo go into
the world without #'s with my boat anchor 305,lol). They are all relatively in the same price range, about $450.00. I am considering Powertrax because I don't have to mess with my ring and pinion set-up and my axle/carrier/pinion bearings are all relatively new. Does anyone have any suggestions,info, or
pros & cons about either one of these units? If I can save up the money
and the wife let's me(lol), I would consider the Zexel-Torsen unit from a
4th gen and swap in 28 spl. axles from an 89-92 3rd gen. I here those units
are pretty good. If anyone's got any input about the Zexels, you know like
if you can get a 2 series carrier, that would be most appreciated.
darkride86T/A is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2007, 10:41 AM   #2
Supreme Member
 
//<86TA>\\'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 10,299
Car: 86 Trans Am, 92 Firebird
Engine: 408 sbc, 3.1L of raw power
Transmission: TKO600, 700r4
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 3:70 trutac, open 3:23

Classifieds Rating: (9)
Re: Powertrax No-Slip vs. Eaton or Auburn Posi

the power trax is more of a pain than its worth, and is not a very "comfortable" thing to drive with. I speak from experience.

go with a posi, it may require a little more setup work, but you will be much happier in the end.

the zexel would be a good deal if you can get one
//<86TA>\\ is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2007, 01:05 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
EvilCartman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Northern CA.
Posts: 5,322
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH400 4,000 stall
Axle/Gears: Currie 9", 4.56 gears

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Re: Powertrax No-Slip vs. Eaton or Auburn Posi

Seconded on going with a posi. It's a bit more predictable than the powertrax unit in corners. The powertrax will make the front of the car jump if you get on and off the gas while the posi is nice and smooth all the time.
__________________
Best times to date, motor pass: 11.81 @ 114.55 1.63 60' 10/18/08
nitrous pass: 10.49 @ 126 mph 1.42 60' 10/18/08
350, AFR 195 heads, Eagle H-beam 6" rods, Victor Jr,
750 Race Demon, ProMagnum RR's, Hooker LT, TH400, Spohn T/A and C/M
EvilCartman is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2007, 04:41 PM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NewBrunswick,Canada
Posts: 100
Car: 85 Z28
Engine: 383
Transmission: TH350
Axle/Gears: 3:73

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Powertrax No-Slip vs. Eaton or Auburn Posi



Even with the weaker "Street" springs in the locker it is still not operate very smoothly and is quite noisy.
JohnZ28 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2007, 05:17 PM   #5
Jay
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Andover, CT
Posts: 1,003
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 5.7 RamJet
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Dana44 4.10

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Powertrax No-Slip vs. Eaton or Auburn Posi

why? you say you aren't concerned with fast 1/4 mile times so why bother with a posi? The only usefull thing it adds is traction from a stop which you don't seem to want.
Jay is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 02:40 AM   #6
Member
 
darkride86T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: North Carolina(but you'll never take the DC out of me!!!)
Posts: 186
Car: '95 Z28 and '95 Tahoe
Engine: LT1 350/LO5 350
Transmission: 4L60E/4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73posi/3.42posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Powertrax No-Slip vs. Eaton or Auburn Posi

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay View Post
why? you say you aren't concerned with fast 1/4 mile times so why bother with a posi? The only usefull thing it adds is traction from a stop which you don't seem to want.
First of all, I never said that I didn't want better or added traction from a stop. I'm also tired of the one wheel burn-outs. And this car's soul purpose now is to be a "fun" daily driver/toy/cruiser. Second, my 2.73's give me the mpg's I want, plus I don't race this car. Third and most important,
IT'S MY FREAKIN CAR, AND I WANT TO PUT A POSI REAR IN IT!!!!!!!!!!! Who are you to make it seem like I'd be wasting my time doing this by asking me why? That's like me asking you why did you go through the trouble of putting a Dana 44 and T-56 in your IROC. It's really none of my business why. I think it's cool that your 19 year old IROC is still on the road, it's probably in way better shape than my poor battered T/A. I posted this
thread to find out pros,cons, and info on the above mentioned posi units, and to get suggestions on which one to buy. I don't mean to be an a**hole Jay, but I'm looking for information to help me make my 3rd gen more enjoyable to me and all you've done is answer a question with a question. Now if you have any info or comments on the above mentioned units, then I will more than welcome your input and suggestions. If not, than I humbly
ask you to unsubscribe to this thread and move on to threads that are of better interest to you. Thank you.

Last edited by darkride86T/A; 09-24-2007 at 02:45 AM.
darkride86T/A is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 02:40 AM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > Transmissions and Drivetrain

Tags
9, auburn, aurburn, cons, differential, eaton, fbody, posi, power, powertrax, problems, pros, slip, trax, versus, vs
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details