Transmissions and Drivetrain Need help with your trans? Problems with your axle?

T56 flywheels for older 2 piece rear seals

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-2011, 12:31 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
88 TA GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: MSD Dist., Crane Hi 6 ignition
Engine: 350 - 50 over, S/R Torquer Heads
Transmission: T56 - Originally a 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt posi with 370
T56 flywheels for older 2 piece rear seals

Hi For those that have an older block and installed a 6 speed tranny I was Wondering your thoughts on which works the best.

There are 3 companies that I know of that make a flywheel to bolt the 93-97 LT1 T56 6 speed tranny to an 85 an older block w/ the 2 piece rear main seal.

Centerforce Steel flywheel 700107 $425

Ram aluminium 2555 $408

McLeod 64033-00-07 $ not sure this is the correct #.

I would think go aluminium, but not sure...

Thanks in advance!
Old 04-05-2011, 12:28 AM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
black1990RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: kingman, AZ
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 camaro RS
Engine: forged 383,8.7;1 200hp nitrous
Transmission: t56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: quick perfomance 9 inch with 4.11s
Re: T56 flywheels for older 2 piece rear seals

what are your plans for the car? daily driver or strip only?
if you want it streetable i liked the centerforce because its weight keeps momentum up. the aluminum will allow you to pull RPM much faster but is to to good for the street
Old 04-05-2011, 07:05 AM
  #3  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (1)
 
sofakingdom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26,125
Received 1,691 Likes on 1,285 Posts
Car: Yes
Engine: Usually
Transmission: Sometimes
Axle/Gears: Behind me somewhere
Re: T56 flywheels for older 2 piece rear seals

I have the CF.

It's HELLA heavy. It makes the engine NOTICEABLY more sluggish revving than the stock 305 one I had on it before. That might be OK in some situations but I don't think it's necessary in mine.

If I had it to do over, I might use an aluminum one.

If you have even worse (lower number) gears than my already pitiful weenie stock ones (3.73) as I suspect you do with that 9-bolt, you will probably want the heavy one because the engine RPM will be held so low all the time. OTOH if you have gears that are a better match to the T-56 to begin with such as 4.10, the aluminum will probably be better.
Old 04-05-2011, 01:47 PM
  #4  
Member
Thread Starter
 
88 TA GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: MSD Dist., Crane Hi 6 ignition
Engine: 350 - 50 over, S/R Torquer Heads
Transmission: T56 - Originally a 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt posi with 370
Re: T56 flywheels for older 2 piece rear seals

Thanks, appreciate the feedback.

I plan for a daily driver.

I have come across another made by Spec and its much cheaper
Steel: SC66S = $279 (NY Performance Shop) $359 on their site
Aluminum: SC66A $ $359.00 on their site
The cool thing about this is that is has a weight that you can add depending on how the motor is balanced.

From what I was told (same as above), its better to go with steel for a daily driver as the alum. doesn't hold the momentum/power of the motor due to less mass.

I'm not sure what gear ratio I have, it did rev high on the highway w/ the 700R4 - 70MPH =2750RPM
Old 04-05-2011, 08:19 PM
  #5  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (167)
 
John in RI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: RI
Posts: 5,043
Received 354 Likes on 269 Posts
Car: 1984 Camaro Berlinetta
Engine: LT1
Transmission: T56 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 4.11 LS1 Rear End
Re: T56 flywheels for older 2 piece rear seals

I've only used the Centerforce - and have no complaints.

P.S. with a 350, auto, and BW rear doing 70 reading 27xx RPMS....... You've got a 2.77 gear ratio.

Old 04-06-2011, 10:50 PM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
88 TA GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: MSD Dist., Crane Hi 6 ignition
Engine: 350 - 50 over, S/R Torquer Heads
Transmission: T56 - Originally a 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt posi with 370
Re: T56 flywheels for older 2 piece rear seals

Thanks! I think I have some pics of the gear codes, when I changed the axle bearing...just have to find them.
Old 04-07-2011, 10:10 AM
  #7  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (10)
 
NufNuffZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: NC
Posts: 1,901
Received 43 Likes on 30 Posts
Car: 1987 Iroc
Engine: 357 Single plane and a Ysi vortech
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.50 9"
Re: T56 flywheels for older 2 piece rear seals

Im in this delimma right now. My build got switched up to now include a T56 that I couldn't pass up. Includes a VERY good Spec 3 clutch(know this as my friend and I put it in for the guy), but no flywheel.

700rwhp TPI car with a Vortech SC..... centerforce one?

Oh yeah, my car has 2.73 gears and 27" tall tires on 19" wheels. I'll never get to use 6th until I change gears!
Old 04-08-2011, 03:01 AM
  #8  
Junior Member
 
black1990RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: kingman, AZ
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 camaro RS
Engine: forged 383,8.7;1 200hp nitrous
Transmission: t56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: quick perfomance 9 inch with 4.11s
Re: T56 flywheels for older 2 piece rear seals

yeah you are definitely going to want those gears changed. gas mileage will go up but you will have a large power decrease. i actually have a couple of the centerforce flywheels left over . mine is the 9 bolt with 3.45 and it is a pig
Old 04-08-2011, 01:27 PM
  #9  
Member
Thread Starter
 
88 TA GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: MSD Dist., Crane Hi 6 ignition
Engine: 350 - 50 over, S/R Torquer Heads
Transmission: T56 - Originally a 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt posi with 370
Re: T56 flywheels for older 2 piece rear seals

Originally Posted by black1990RS
yeah you are definitely going to want those gears changed. gas mileage will go up but you will have a large power decrease. i actually have a couple of the centerforce flywheels left over . mine is the 9 bolt with 3.45 and it is a pig
Have you used any of the clutches above? What do you think works best?

Thanks!
Old 04-08-2011, 02:29 PM
  #10  
Member
 
Jaxom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 'Bama
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: StealthRam 355
Transmission: 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9-bolt
Re: T56 flywheels for older 2 piece rear seals

I've been running the Centerforce flywheel and Spec clutches for 8 years. I started out with a stage 3, but decided to drop to a stage 2 when I pulled the powertrain to swap it into another car. The stage 3 was just a little too much for me in a street car and had some mild chatter at low speeds, more so when backing. I have NO complaints with the stage 2 in a 375ish HP street car. The flywheel is indeed VERY heavy and no-load revving is a little more sluggish than I'd like, but I don't run around kicking the throttle all the time anyway.

Also FWIW I run a 3.70 9-bolt in the rear and turn around 1800rpm in 6th at 80mph. The majority of 9-bolt rears were equipped with 2.77 gears, and if that's what you have they'll make you miserable. I had a peg-leg 2.73 10-bolt behind my T56 for the first six months or so and it was truly a dog. 6th gear was essentially unusable.

Last edited by Jaxom; 04-08-2011 at 02:33 PM.
Old 04-08-2011, 04:52 PM
  #11  
jmd
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
jmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Aridzona
Posts: 6,288
Received 42 Likes on 41 Posts
Car: `86 SS / `87 SS
Engine: L69 w/ TPI on top / 305 4bbl
Transmission: `95 T56 \ `88 200-4R
Re: T56 flywheels for older 2 piece rear seals

Originally Posted by John in RI
I've only used the Centerforce - and have no complaints.

P.S. with a 350, auto, and BW rear doing 70 reading 27xx RPMS....... You've got a 2.77 gear ratio.

that's for ~26" tires and a 1:1 gear (third in a 700-R4, fourth in a T5,) not overdrive.
Old 04-10-2011, 02:45 AM
  #12  
Junior Member
 
black1990RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: kingman, AZ
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: 1990 camaro RS
Engine: forged 383,8.7;1 200hp nitrous
Transmission: t56 6 speed
Axle/Gears: quick perfomance 9 inch with 4.11s
Re: T56 flywheels for older 2 piece rear seals

im running a stock clutch now which i could truly do without i am looking into a ram clutch ive heard some good about them for there price just need to come into some more cash. im also working on swapping a forth gen 10 bolt posi with 4.10 here in the very near future
Old 04-11-2011, 02:33 PM
  #13  
Member
Thread Starter
 
88 TA GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: MSD Dist., Crane Hi 6 ignition
Engine: 350 - 50 over, S/R Torquer Heads
Transmission: T56 - Originally a 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt posi with 370
Re: T56 flywheels for older 2 piece rear seals

Originally Posted by jmd
that's for ~26" tires and a 1:1 gear (third in a 700-R4, fourth in a T5,) not overdrive.
I'm talking in overdrive with stock tires 245/50/16's, I always thought it rev'd high for a 350, thought maybe 373's or 411's...
Old 04-11-2011, 02:36 PM
  #14  
Member
Thread Starter
 
88 TA GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: MSD Dist., Crane Hi 6 ignition
Engine: 350 - 50 over, S/R Torquer Heads
Transmission: T56 - Originally a 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt posi with 370
Re: T56 flywheels for older 2 piece rear seals

Originally Posted by Jaxom
I've been running the Centerforce flywheel and Spec clutches for 8 years. I started out with a stage 3, but decided to drop to a stage 2 when I pulled the powertrain to swap it into another car. The stage 3 was just a little too much for me in a street car and had some mild chatter at low speeds, more so when backing. I have NO complaints with the stage 2 in a 375ish HP street car. The flywheel is indeed VERY heavy and no-load revving is a little more sluggish than I'd like, but I don't run around kicking the throttle all the time anyway.

Also FWIW I run a 3.70 9-bolt in the rear and turn around 1800rpm in 6th at 80mph. The majority of 9-bolt rears were equipped with 2.77 gears, and if that's what you have they'll make you miserable. I had a peg-leg 2.73 10-bolt behind my T56 for the first six months or so and it was truly a dog. 6th gear was essentially unusable.
Thanks - i'm going to have to find those pics I took a few years back to confirm...
Old 04-12-2011, 07:27 PM
  #15  
Member
iTrader: (1)
 
BlueChevyZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '84 Z 28
Engine: has 8 cylinders
Transmission: has a stick coming out of it
Axle/Gears: a grenade, makes wheels turn
Re: T56 flywheels for older 2 piece rear seals

if you plan any track time its best to use the steel flywheel, if its all street driven then the aluminum will be ok..
Old 04-13-2011, 12:41 AM
  #16  
Member
Thread Starter
 
88 TA GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: MSD Dist., Crane Hi 6 ignition
Engine: 350 - 50 over, S/R Torquer Heads
Transmission: T56 - Originally a 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt posi with 370
Re: T56 flywheels for older 2 piece rear seals

Originally Posted by BlueChevyZ
if you plan any track time its best to use the steel flywheel, if its all street driven then the aluminum will be ok..
Thanks Going to call Ram tomorrow as they say there aluminium is "streetable"
Old 04-13-2011, 07:43 AM
  #17  
Supreme Member

iTrader: (4)
 
InfernalVortex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Macon, GA
Posts: 6,485
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: Vortec headed 355, xe262
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 9-bolt 3.70
Re: T56 flywheels for older 2 piece rear seals

Originally Posted by BlueChevyZ
if you plan any track time its best to use the steel flywheel, if its all street driven then the aluminum will be ok..
Then how come factory LT1 flywheels are steel?

Ive always heard the exact opposite.

I have a steel flywheel in mine (Mine is a 1 pc RMS engine though. so its not applicable to the thread)
Old 04-13-2011, 06:41 PM
  #18  
Member
 
Jaxom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 'Bama
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: '89 IROC-Z
Engine: StealthRam 355
Transmission: 6-speed
Axle/Gears: 3.70 9-bolt
Re: T56 flywheels for older 2 piece rear seals

The concept is still applicable...only the part numbers are different.

In my experience, aluminum flywheels are best suited to autocross and rally racing where there are a lot of sudden gear/rpm changes and the engine needs to be able to rev up and down quickly to accommodate that. For drag racing or a street car, there's no real need for a lightweight flywheel, and using one could make it more difficult to get a good idle quality out of the engine.
Old 04-13-2011, 07:53 PM
  #19  
Member
Thread Starter
 
88 TA GTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Car: MSD Dist., Crane Hi 6 ignition
Engine: 350 - 50 over, S/R Torquer Heads
Transmission: T56 - Originally a 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt posi with 370
Re: T56 flywheels for older 2 piece rear seals

Originally Posted by Jaxom
The concept is still applicable...only the part numbers are different.

In my experience, aluminum flywheels are best suited to autocross and rally racing where there are a lot of sudden gear/rpm changes and the engine needs to be able to rev up and down quickly to accommodate that. For drag racing or a street car, there's no real need for a lightweight flywheel, and using one could make it more difficult to get a good idle quality out of the engine.
Thanks - I was thinking for the weight - the Centerforce is 34 LBS. The lighter the easier for the motor to spin, but the less mass is the issue....

Anyway Ram said they have sold many for street apps and they haven't had one come back, zero issues....

Think I'm going w/ the Spec steel FW.....
Old 10-08-2011, 10:12 PM
  #20  
Junior Member
 
stark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: T56 flywheels for older 2 piece rear seals

Originally Posted by 88 TA GTA
Thanks, appreciate the feedback.

I plan for a daily driver.

I have come across another made by Spec and its much cheaper
Steel: SC66S = $279 (NY Performance Shop) $359 on their site
Aluminum: SC66A $ $359.00 on their site
The cool thing about this is that is has a weight that you can add depending on how the motor is balanced.

From what I was told (same as above), its better to go with steel for a daily driver as the alum. doesn't hold the momentum/power of the motor due to less mass.

I'm not sure what gear ratio I have, it did rev high on the highway w/ the 700R4 - 70MPH =2750RPM
hey there, the cost of these 2 piece rms fly wheels for a t56 is killing me,any chance i can have the name and or number of that shop you found one at for 240?
Old 10-09-2011, 08:24 PM
  #21  
Junior Member
 
stark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: T56 flywheels for older 2 piece rear seals

any chance you have any of those center force flywheels left?
Old 10-11-2011, 08:36 PM
  #22  
Junior Member
 
stark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: T56 flywheels for older 2 piece rear seals

bump
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Exxon Limited
Camaros Wanted
22
12-21-2015 10:36 PM
BlackphantomZ28
LSX and LTX Parts
1
10-19-2015 06:25 PM
Reborn756
Tech / General Engine
142
09-04-2015 03:42 AM
BlackphantomZ28
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
4
08-31-2015 10:29 AM
Exxon Limited
Camaros for Sale
2
08-09-2015 08:13 PM



Quick Reply: T56 flywheels for older 2 piece rear seals



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:24 AM.