Another pumped up 60*
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
Another pumped up 60*
Just found this searching around- Don't know if its for sale or what the deal is with this link.
http://community-2.webtv.net/cumonba...pecifications/
http://community-2.webtv.net/cumonba...pecifications/
#2
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
Anyone have a link or any info on Potter heads? Where to buy, specs, etc,.... Or even an address or ph#?
This deffinately are the answer to our problem with these 60*V6 motors. Those haeds have a much higher and better intake port angle for much better flow. I can make my own intake manifold to work with them.
This deffinately are the answer to our problem with these 60*V6 motors. Those haeds have a much higher and better intake port angle for much better flow. I can make my own intake manifold to work with them.
#4
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
Ladies and gentlemen, thats a 163ci (or 2.5L) 60*V6 that is pumping out 349 hp naturally asperated! Thes friggin motors can rock if given the right head flow.
http://community-2.webtv.net/cumonba...bys/index.html
http://community-2.webtv.net/cumonba...bys/index.html
#7
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
If they can get 350hp out of a 2.5L with those heads, we should easily get 300 "streetable" hp out of a 3.4 4th gen motor using the DIS ignition. It appears the injectors mount into the head intake ports, so fabbing an intake tube manifold that would fit under the hood would still be possible. The trouble might be mounting the serpentine bracketry to the heads for the belt assesories.
Trending Topics
#9
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
my dad and i were just looking at this... there are plaques in the background for racing championships in midgets...i bet this motor was built for a midget race car. my dad said that last time he was watching a midget race on tv, they were talking about running v6s in those cars.
#10
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
Sweet motor. I brought a good set of 3.4 heads home today off a motor with a spun rod bearing I pulled. The cam was wiped and one pushrod was slightly bent, but the valves are good. Time to do some head work if they are "capable" of producing 1.5 Hp per cubic inch with stock valves, 1.1-1.3 would be just fine for me . All I need now is some good literature on working these heads. Once they're done, the old ones will come off, and valvetrain will be swapped along with some 1.6 rollers.
#11
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: High plains of NM
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 89 Firebird
Engine: L98
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.73
I say we search high and low for theses "potter racing heads".
For porting 3.4 heads look at the chevy power manual and the stickey at the top of the V6 fourm.
I have a few pics on my car domain site as you all ready know.
Some day I want to get a pair of shat heads and cut them up so I know how thick the runner walls are. Then I will know how to port them to the max.
For porting 3.4 heads look at the chevy power manual and the stickey at the top of the V6 fourm.
I have a few pics on my car domain site as you all ready know.
Some day I want to get a pair of shat heads and cut them up so I know how thick the runner walls are. Then I will know how to port them to the max.
#12
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
Originally posted by oil pan 4
I say we search high and low for theses "potter racing heads".
I say we search high and low for theses "potter racing heads".
Here's what I do have- A pesponse from Mr. Randy Wold who now owns the motor:
"Dean.......I bought this engine from a midget racer in Idaho and all I
know about it is waht I have here on these web pages:
http://community.webtv.net/cumonbaby/TwoCumonBabys
Engine description:
http://community.webtv.net/cumonbaby...Specifications
I thnk Stewart VanDyne could help you with these heads: 714 847-4417
This is the telephone number I have for him. he has done development on
the Potter Heads. I have not talked with him but he did the set for
Steve Spoor, who I purchased the engine from.
I'm having Andy Casale build me a gearbox for the boat now so as to keep
the torque higher as these little engines don't develope a lot and bog
down some in the corners on water. Also, I can swing a bigger
propeller. I am excited to get this al installed and on the water.
I hope this helps you. Also condsider the Bow Tie heads.....they are
good , too.
Best Wishes,
Randy Wold"
-------------------------
That gives us a little direction at least. Feel free anyone interested to check on these contacts, but please do let us know if you do and what is learned. Thanks, Dean
#13
Originally posted by vsixtoy
If they can get 350hp out of a 2.5L with those heads, we should easily get 300 "streetable" hp out of a 3.4 4th gen motor using the DIS ignition. It appears the injectors mount into the head intake ports, so fabbing an intake tube manifold that would fit under the hood would still be possible. The trouble might be mounting the serpentine bracketry to the heads for the belt assesories.
If they can get 350hp out of a 2.5L with those heads, we should easily get 300 "streetable" hp out of a 3.4 4th gen motor using the DIS ignition. It appears the injectors mount into the head intake ports, so fabbing an intake tube manifold that would fit under the hood would still be possible. The trouble might be mounting the serpentine bracketry to the heads for the belt assesories.
#14
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
Originally posted by 614Streets
That motor is out of a midget and was purchased by the current owner from Steve Spoor. The current owner is putting it in a boat.
That motor is out of a midget and was purchased by the current owner from Steve Spoor. The current owner is putting it in a boat.
#15
Originally posted by vsixtoy
I have already posted these facts above. Do you happen to know the owner or Steve Spoor personally? I am well aware who Steve Spoor is, I don't know him personally though.
I have already posted these facts above. Do you happen to know the owner or Steve Spoor personally? I am well aware who Steve Spoor is, I don't know him personally though.
#17
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NWOhioToledoArea
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
This thread must give everyone a chuckle if you think about it.
Beside the usually V8 bashers saying not to build a 6.
Often people even here say not to build a 2.8 but go 3.4
but all the real power is in the 2.5?????
Were going backwards in performance. Sweeeeeeeeet.
I dare someone to ask about building a 350hp 2.5 in the tech section.
Beside the usually V8 bashers saying not to build a 6.
Often people even here say not to build a 2.8 but go 3.4
but all the real power is in the 2.5?????
Were going backwards in performance. Sweeeeeeeeet.
I dare someone to ask about building a 350hp 2.5 in the tech section.
#18
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NWOhioToledoArea
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Seriously though.
I wonder how fuel management is handled with individual intakes???
velocity stacks are the way to go. So simple in design and they work.
I wonder how fuel management is handled with individual intakes???
velocity stacks are the way to go. So simple in design and they work.
#19
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 firebird
Engine: Pos 2.8 pulled and replaced with a 350 tpi motor converted to carb.
Transmission: 700r4, vette servo,shift kit, hayden 15"x8" trans cooler.
Sure anyone can make alot of power with any engine with enough $ but is it realistic? Hell no.
#20
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by br()bert
Sure anyone can make alot of power with any engine with enough $ but is it realistic? Hell no.
Sure anyone can make alot of power with any engine with enough $ but is it realistic? Hell no.
#21
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NWOhioToledoArea
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Don't waste your breath AM91, brofart doesn't like like anything about the V6 but putting it down. His only reason to be in the forum is to put people and their ideas down.
He has that common SBC disease that rots peoples brains.
Though by now the disease in him is starving.
He has that common SBC disease that rots peoples brains.
Though by now the disease in him is starving.
#22
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 firebird
Engine: Pos 2.8 pulled and replaced with a 350 tpi motor converted to carb.
Transmission: 700r4, vette servo,shift kit, hayden 15"x8" trans cooler.
Am91,I wasnt bashing, and the motor being a v6 has nothing to do with it. NO tipical do it your selfer is going to have access or the $ to build this engine. Sure its intresting to see a 60* made so powerful, but in the regular everyday do it yourselfers world its not realistic.
Even though ( im sure we all can agree on this) i wish it was.
And as far as sbc's or v8's go , I never brought any of that up. I mearly was discussing the topic at hand. If one cant restrain ones self one should possibly try another web site to spend their time on. Imho Nickjr.com should suite one well.
Even though ( im sure we all can agree on this) i wish it was.
And as far as sbc's or v8's go , I never brought any of that up. I mearly was discussing the topic at hand. If one cant restrain ones self one should possibly try another web site to spend their time on. Imho Nickjr.com should suite one well.
Last edited by br()bert; 09-04-2004 at 12:20 AM.
#23
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
ANYHOW...I've got a few idea's in the works. Is it feasible for a guy like me? ABSOLUTELY, all I really lack is a few grand to get it put together. Main cost for me would be pistons, connecting rods (too lazy to modify from SBC rods), machine work and some butterfly's to make the throttle assembly from. Ireally like the velocity stack idea, and aside from having 3 Webers sitting on top of my engine, I'm going to have to figure out how to manage fuel delivery. Sure, it'll probably never leave paper, but a man can dream can't he? I do have a certain goal though, I plan on hitting 14's on motor alone, not too hard I'd imagine. I plan to take many people's money at the local "spot", they can see the "2.8" under the hood that has some hedders and dumps, then they can keep thinking it's at best a high 16 second car. Then I'm going to fly by their butts and enjoy having the money to build my next Big block car
#24
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NWOhioToledoArea
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
So we need to find a way to make this mod doable for $4000 or less to make it cheaper then buying a 300hp GM crate.
Someone has to build one first to stop the nay sayers.
I'll help anyway I can.
Someone has to build one first to stop the nay sayers.
I'll help anyway I can.
#25
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
It's because you've failed to learn your own lesson, br()bert. You've been established as a basher. When you post comments like that, you're going to get responses like this, and eventually we'll start taking action against you for instigating such things.
And Gumby, don't do that again. Instead of helping fix the problem, you *are becoming* the problem. You're on probation... act like it means something or it's getting stepped up.
I highly suggest you put each other on ignore and avoid mentioning each other's name in posts again until you manage to come to some kind of peaceful understanding OUTSIDE of TGO.
And Gumby, don't do that again. Instead of helping fix the problem, you *are becoming* the problem. You're on probation... act like it means something or it's getting stepped up.
I highly suggest you put each other on ignore and avoid mentioning each other's name in posts again until you manage to come to some kind of peaceful understanding OUTSIDE of TGO.
#26
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NWOhioToledoArea
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
Feel free to delete or edit any of my post Tech. I am not allowed.
But as it stands the probation is super BS.
I am on it for pointing out people being an A$$.
[I never starts it or anything. Though I do respond to it when it super lame or pointed towards me or my post.]
which is maybe also acting like an a$$ but only / maybe 5% of all my post are like that and the other 95% are helpful n nice.
But those who act like an a$$ 100% of the time and free to run around this board???
But as it stands the probation is super BS.
I am on it for pointing out people being an A$$.
[I never starts it or anything. Though I do respond to it when it super lame or pointed towards me or my post.]
which is maybe also acting like an a$$ but only / maybe 5% of all my post are like that and the other 95% are helpful n nice.
But those who act like an a$$ 100% of the time and free to run around this board???
#27
Supreme Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 85 firebird
Engine: Pos 2.8 pulled and replaced with a 350 tpi motor converted to carb.
Transmission: 700r4, vette servo,shift kit, hayden 15"x8" trans cooler.
Originally posted by TechSmurf
It's because you've failed to learn your own lesson, br()bert. You've been established as a basher. When you post comments like that, you're going to get responses like this, and eventually we'll start taking action against you for instigating such things.
It's because you've failed to learn your own lesson, br()bert. You've been established as a basher. When you post comments like that, you're going to get responses like this, and eventually we'll start taking action against you for instigating such things.
I didnt make any comment negative towards the engine being a v6 at all. One should read before they reply. It would be cool to see someone make this themselves but is it doable for only 4k?
Last edited by br()bert; 09-04-2004 at 03:27 PM.
#28
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 86 Berlinetta 84 MonteCL
Engine: 3.4 MPFI 3.8 229
Transmission: 700r4 T350
THAT particular one isn't doable for 4 grand, but a reall badarse 3.4 is! Use 10.5:1 frged aluminum pistons, supersix makes some lighter con rods (also forged), you'll need to take the heads and have some machine work done, there is a LOT of area to work with on the chambers. The only reason the compression is higher in these 3.4's is because they use the same chambers for the 2.8's BORE! You can unshroud the area around the valves or even add bigger valves (not too big though maybe 1.8I 1.5E). Get you a nice mid upper rpm grind with about .5 lift or so. ALuminum roller rockers from cranegold, get some high tensile pushrods made. Port matche the lower intake manifold, then the middle and add VsixToy's upper plenum and throttle body, VIOLA! I dunno about 300 to the wheels, but with the right head work, you could see close to 250. 250 Hp in a light car and you'll be pretty quick. Add nitrous and you're running 12's. hopefully.... You could probably doo all of this for about 3000-3500 bux depending on how much work you do yourself. You'll wanna lose the A/C and add a vac pump there, don't think the brakes will be too relibale otherwise
#30
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Posts: 2,375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '99 Trans Am, '86 Camaro
Engine: LS1, Scrap
Transmission: T56, T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 Stock ZT, 3.42 Open
Originally posted by br()bert
I didnt make any comment negative towards the engine being a v6 at all. One should read before they reply.
I didnt make any comment negative towards the engine being a v6 at all. One should read before they reply.
And now, Gumby, here's a quick example of why you're still in the red....
Originally posted by Gumby
But as it stands the probation is super BS.
But as it stands the probation is super BS.
I am on it for pointing out people being an A$$.
Rules violation: Public criticism of other members.
[I never starts it or anything. Though I do respond to it when it super lame or pointed towards me or my post.]
which is maybe also acting like an a$$ but only / maybe 5% of all my post are like that and the other 95% are helpful n nice.
Over 95% of AGood2.8's posts were helpful and nice, and some of the best and most reliable technical content on TGO. All it takes is one royal screwup to put you in the spotlight. We expect our members to follow the rules 24/7. Just because an earthquake struck last night doesn't mean looting is legal for upstanding citizens this morning. You still go to jail.
But those who act like an a$$ 100% of the time and free to run around this board???
Rules violation: Public criticism of other members.
6 technical rules violations and a 'the rules shouldn't apply to me'.... and we're supposed to think you're rehabilitated?
This matter, however, is now in off-topic territory. Subsequent replies will be deleted. If you have further concerns, PM me.
Let's get back to the real topic... that obnoxious midget motor
#31
Originally posted by AM91Camaro_RS
anyways...anybody find anything on those heads yet??
anyways...anybody find anything on those heads yet??
#32
Supreme Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: NWOhioToledoArea
Posts: 8,113
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 86-FireBird
Engine: -MPFI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3:42
I guess $4000 is a tad low. You really only get [ far as summit website goes] 310hp V8 for $5-6000
Course the weight savings make the 6 a tad better. Id only say $4000 for a well connected person who has Friends who do machine work or have their own shop. Also counting on a person getting lucking with having some of the parts needed plus picking up the other needed ones cheap.
I am sure those heads are $2-2500 easy. Most good aluminum heads run on that range.
Forget the full 350hp. Even 300hp would be more then enough to make a fresh Gm crate owner weep. strip the car down to 2500lbs and run a 6 speed with 3:55 gears.
Course the weight savings make the 6 a tad better. Id only say $4000 for a well connected person who has Friends who do machine work or have their own shop. Also counting on a person getting lucking with having some of the parts needed plus picking up the other needed ones cheap.
I am sure those heads are $2-2500 easy. Most good aluminum heads run on that range.
Forget the full 350hp. Even 300hp would be more then enough to make a fresh Gm crate owner weep. strip the car down to 2500lbs and run a 6 speed with 3:55 gears.
#34
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by 85berlinetta2.8
is there a 6 speed that will mate to a 60* v6?
is there a 6 speed that will mate to a 60* v6?
#35
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: parishville NY upstate
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 86 IROC-Z
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.42s/posi/disc
yeah if u can mate a v6 t5 to a v8 then there should be a tranny out there that will mate to the v6 some how.
#36
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
Its simple.
1) A Richmond six-speed (I can take a picture of one if you'd like next time I'm at the family garage. My brother has one sitting down there waiting to go into his '64 Vette roadster.) They aren't cheap.
2) a standard V8 bellhousing and clutch assembly (Not a 3rd gen T5 bellhousing, they sit the tranny cockeyed)
3) V6 to V8 adapter plate
If any of you think you can just throw rear end gears of your choice and a 6-speed, you have some things to learn still about powerbands being mated with gear ratios. You put a 6-speed behind a fairly stock 60*V6 and you'll NEED more like a 4.11 rearend. 3.55's are like droping your current tranny to about 2.73's. It all depends on what ratio gear package you have inside the 6-speed.
The "imfamous" Dean.
1) A Richmond six-speed (I can take a picture of one if you'd like next time I'm at the family garage. My brother has one sitting down there waiting to go into his '64 Vette roadster.) They aren't cheap.
2) a standard V8 bellhousing and clutch assembly (Not a 3rd gen T5 bellhousing, they sit the tranny cockeyed)
3) V6 to V8 adapter plate
If any of you think you can just throw rear end gears of your choice and a 6-speed, you have some things to learn still about powerbands being mated with gear ratios. You put a 6-speed behind a fairly stock 60*V6 and you'll NEED more like a 4.11 rearend. 3.55's are like droping your current tranny to about 2.73's. It all depends on what ratio gear package you have inside the 6-speed.
The "imfamous" Dean.
Last edited by vsixtoy; 09-10-2004 at 12:50 PM.
#37
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: AR
Posts: 6,819
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Car: 1991 Camaro RS Vert
Engine: 350 S-TPI
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: GU5/G80/J65
I would think with the adapter, and v8 bell housing, it would push the tranny back futher too correct?
Meaning, new driveshaft, new cross-member, cut hole in floor more.
Meaning, new driveshaft, new cross-member, cut hole in floor more.
#39
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
Originally posted by devianb
I find it hard to understand how so little cubes can make that much power naturally aspirated. i wonder how much torque it developed?
I find it hard to understand how so little cubes can make that much power naturally aspirated. i wonder how much torque it developed?
#40
Supreme Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 91 Camaro
Engine: 3.1...not hardly stock
Transmission: 700r4....not stock either
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by Dale
I would think with the adapter, and v8 bell housing, it would push the tranny back futher too correct?
Meaning, new driveshaft, new cross-member, cut hole in floor more.
I would think with the adapter, and v8 bell housing, it would push the tranny back futher too correct?
Meaning, new driveshaft, new cross-member, cut hole in floor more.
#41
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 1,340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '87 Cam RS V6
Engine: Top Secret
Transmission: DYT700R4 custom inerts and conv.
Here's an example of what one of these 60*V6 motors can do with 6 speed behind it and 4.11 gears.
This is a fairly NON-exotic motor built for a fairly standard rpm range of 3600-5200 powerband. You just need about a 1600 rpm range to focus building the motor torque to. Just the thing required for these little engines. This equates to a fairly pumped up stock 3.4 Camaro engine putting out about 180hp and a peak toque @ around 3600-3800 rpms
The car would pull strongly all the way to 140mph-never getting out of the powerband ever.
1st- 32mph@5200
2nd- 32mph@3600/ 47mph@5200
3rd- 47mph@3600/ 67mph@4800
4th- 67mph@3600/ 87mph@4650
5th- 87mph@3700/ 108mph@4650
6th 108mph@3600 140mph@4650
4th to 5th only drops to 3700 rpm's because of the tranny internal gear ratio for 1.00 to .80
The car would run a low 15 sec 1/4 and yet still reach 140mph with a little V6
Edit- You'd also be able to cruise 70mph down the hwy in 5th @ 3000 rpms, or in 6th @ 2330 rpms. Great gas mileage also. Right now you guys with 5speeds are currently doing 70@2300 (same in top gear) but with 3.42's instead of 4.11's
This is a fairly NON-exotic motor built for a fairly standard rpm range of 3600-5200 powerband. You just need about a 1600 rpm range to focus building the motor torque to. Just the thing required for these little engines. This equates to a fairly pumped up stock 3.4 Camaro engine putting out about 180hp and a peak toque @ around 3600-3800 rpms
The car would pull strongly all the way to 140mph-never getting out of the powerband ever.
1st- 32mph@5200
2nd- 32mph@3600/ 47mph@5200
3rd- 47mph@3600/ 67mph@4800
4th- 67mph@3600/ 87mph@4650
5th- 87mph@3700/ 108mph@4650
6th 108mph@3600 140mph@4650
4th to 5th only drops to 3700 rpm's because of the tranny internal gear ratio for 1.00 to .80
The car would run a low 15 sec 1/4 and yet still reach 140mph with a little V6
Edit- You'd also be able to cruise 70mph down the hwy in 5th @ 3000 rpms, or in 6th @ 2330 rpms. Great gas mileage also. Right now you guys with 5speeds are currently doing 70@2300 (same in top gear) but with 3.42's instead of 4.11's
Last edited by vsixtoy; 09-10-2004 at 08:07 PM.
#42
Supreme Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: IROC Z
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: 700R4
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hotrodboba400
Firebirds for Sale
3
12-10-2019 07:07 PM