got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 09 Cobalt SS Sedan. 92 Z28 vert
Engine: 2.0T EFR6758; 5.0TT T3/T4 8psi
Transmission: F40; 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.76 LSD; 3.23 posi
got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
the reason I took out the 2.8 in the first place was because the rear main seal was leaking so bad it ran out of oil on my brother and spun the #1 rod bearing. I rebuild the motor and made a few modifications.
I started the new motor for the first time today and it seemed to run ok but the rear main seal is leaking worse than ever now!
The previous owner was my grandmother, and my grandfather and uncle have worked on this car in the past. they told my brother that the rear main seal leaked a little (1qt per tank of gas) ok a lot!
Is there a part that a previous "mechanic" may have removed from the rear main seal area that is causing it to leak this bad? How does the rear main seal stay in the block? I just put it on the crank and tightened the main cap down on it, but what is to stop it from falling right out of the back? the flexplate is too far from the block to do that task, and I don;t see any holes where anything could be bolted or screwed in to keep the rear main seal in place.
I started the new motor for the first time today and it seemed to run ok but the rear main seal is leaking worse than ever now!
The previous owner was my grandmother, and my grandfather and uncle have worked on this car in the past. they told my brother that the rear main seal leaked a little (1qt per tank of gas) ok a lot!
Is there a part that a previous "mechanic" may have removed from the rear main seal area that is causing it to leak this bad? How does the rear main seal stay in the block? I just put it on the crank and tightened the main cap down on it, but what is to stop it from falling right out of the back? the flexplate is too far from the block to do that task, and I don;t see any holes where anything could be bolted or screwed in to keep the rear main seal in place.
#2
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,405
Likes: 0
Received 216 Likes
on
202 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
It is as you mention, just pressed into place. The spring end goes toward the inside of the block, with the dust lip toward the back, or outside of the block.
The two other common areas for leaking is the cam rear cover and the distributor O-ring.
RBob.
The two other common areas for leaking is the cam rear cover and the distributor O-ring.
RBob.
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 09 Cobalt SS Sedan. 92 Z28 vert
Engine: 2.0T EFR6758; 5.0TT T3/T4 8psi
Transmission: F40; 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.76 LSD; 3.23 posi
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
yeah I'm pretty sure its the rear main seal and it popped out of the block and leaning on the flywheel. I put "the right stuff" gasket sealer on every thing but the RMS, so I'd bet thats the problem.
Thanks though
Thanks though
#4
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
You can replace the rear main with the motor in the car, if so suspected. Take the oil pan off and use a small punch to push the upper half of the seal out....
Wait a minute, a 1988 rear main should be one piece, why would you need to use the cap to seat it?
Wait a minute, a 1988 rear main should be one piece, why would you need to use the cap to seat it?
#5
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Chasing Electrons
Posts: 18,405
Likes: 0
Received 216 Likes
on
202 Posts
Car: check
Engine: check
Transmission: check
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
RBob.
#6
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 09 Cobalt SS Sedan. 92 Z28 vert
Engine: 2.0T EFR6758; 5.0TT T3/T4 8psi
Transmission: F40; 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.76 LSD; 3.23 posi
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
I don't think I'll have to do much prying to get it out, so that will save me from messing up the crank... maybe I got some assembly lube on it?
My plan is to take the RMS out, clean everything, reinstall, and secure it by putting some permatex high-temp metal epoxy on the back of the block to ensure that it cannot back out anymore.
I guess I'll have to move the tranny back a few inches to get the flexplate off? Wouldn't it be sweet if all I had to do was unbolt the torque converter and push it into the tranny?
My plan is to take the RMS out, clean everything, reinstall, and secure it by putting some permatex high-temp metal epoxy on the back of the block to ensure that it cannot back out anymore.
I guess I'll have to move the tranny back a few inches to get the flexplate off? Wouldn't it be sweet if all I had to do was unbolt the torque converter and push it into the tranny?
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 RS
Engine: 3.1L + .060" overbore
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.11, Auburn LSD
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
Are you putting it in backwards? You said you want to glue it to the block, not possible if its in the right way. When its on right, it should be flat with the block. Cupped end should be towards the engine. You should not be able to see the spring. The oil pressure goes into the seal, pushing the springed lip into the crank and seals it. More pressure, more sealing. I would not use glue. IMO. Just tap it in all the way.
Trending Topics
#8
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 09 Cobalt SS Sedan. 92 Z28 vert
Engine: 2.0T EFR6758; 5.0TT T3/T4 8psi
Transmission: F40; 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.76 LSD; 3.23 posi
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
I have the RMS installed in the correct direction. I pulled the flywheel cover today. I looked up at the RMS with a flashlight and it was not pushed out of the block as I suspected, and for the most part, was dry of oil. I'm leaning toward the "rear engine cover" as the problem. At least I hope that is the problem because I wouldn't know what else to do about the RMS. The only way to find out is to pull the tranny back and get in there. I do know that the oil is definitely coming out somewhere inside the bell housing.
I was just going to use the epoxy to make a "retainer" off the back of the block to keep the RMS from backing out in the future. I don't intend to get any epoxy on the crank itself, and very little if any on the RMS as well.
I was just going to use the epoxy to make a "retainer" off the back of the block to keep the RMS from backing out in the future. I don't intend to get any epoxy on the crank itself, and very little if any on the RMS as well.
#9
Supreme Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Hawaii
Posts: 2,292
Received 157 Likes
on
146 Posts
Car: 89' Firebird
Engine: 3.4L V-6
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: Whatever came stock!
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
"rear engine cover"
what is that???
Try considering the intake manifold seal at the back, the cam seal, and the distributor.
My 2.8 would leak liek CRAZY, enough to dry the engine if you didnt refill, and it all came from the distributor O-ring which was all hard and old. When I put the 3.4 in, I didnt seat the dizzy right so I coudl time it and it leaked liek CRAZY. My mechanic said that there is no way in hell the O-ring could leak so much cause its in there and blocking the oil from coming up, but it did. Snug the dizzy down and that stopped the oil leak liek that.
I think bwecause there is a oil passage right near the tp of the distributo opening so if the O-ring is bad it leaks liek crazy.
what is that???
Try considering the intake manifold seal at the back, the cam seal, and the distributor.
My 2.8 would leak liek CRAZY, enough to dry the engine if you didnt refill, and it all came from the distributor O-ring which was all hard and old. When I put the 3.4 in, I didnt seat the dizzy right so I coudl time it and it leaked liek CRAZY. My mechanic said that there is no way in hell the O-ring could leak so much cause its in there and blocking the oil from coming up, but it did. Snug the dizzy down and that stopped the oil leak liek that.
I think bwecause there is a oil passage right near the tp of the distributo opening so if the O-ring is bad it leaks liek crazy.
#10
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 09 Cobalt SS Sedan. 92 Z28 vert
Engine: 2.0T EFR6758; 5.0TT T3/T4 8psi
Transmission: F40; 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.76 LSD; 3.23 posi
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
I searched back there with a flashlight and a white lint-free cotton cloth (old tee-shirt)... its all clean and dry. the leak is from something in the bellhousing.
the rear engine cover is a plate that seals the rear-most cam journal on the back of the block... that would experience some oil pressure as well.
the rear engine cover is a plate that seals the rear-most cam journal on the back of the block... that would experience some oil pressure as well.
#11
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sayreville NJ
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
more then likley its the cam seal or on of the 2 oil galley plugs right aboce/nexto the cam seal.theres nothing else back there that could leak
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 RS
Engine: 3.1L + .060" overbore
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.11, Auburn LSD
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
If it was coming from the main seal you would see oil on the back of the flywheel like one of those spinny frisbee paint things.
#13
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 09 Cobalt SS Sedan. 92 Z28 vert
Engine: 2.0T EFR6758; 5.0TT T3/T4 8psi
Transmission: F40; 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.76 LSD; 3.23 posi
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
It was the "rear engine cover." The cork gasket blew out, and was spraying oil all over the place. I'm going to eliminate the cork gasket and use "The Right Stuff Gasket Maker" which is the best stuff since sliced bread and JB weld.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bellingham, WA
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1989 RS
Engine: 3.1L + .060" overbore
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 4.11, Auburn LSD
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
Good deal! I've taken more than a couple 2.8's apart and found that gasket britle, but never broken. Glad it was something simple, now fix it!
#15
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 09 Cobalt SS Sedan. 92 Z28 vert
Engine: 2.0T EFR6758; 5.0TT T3/T4 8psi
Transmission: F40; 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.76 LSD; 3.23 posi
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
Done. no more leaks anywhere that I can find. The next step is tuning and fabricating a tie bar to keep the throttle body coupler from blowing off!
this thing is really slow for a turbo 3.1L. We're only talking about 5-6 psi, but its a dog. I'm confident that the tune is so far off that it will pick up at least 30hp with a good dyno tune with a wideband sensor. When the motor gets broken in a little better, we'll crank the boost. I'd like to see a reliable 12-14psi.
this thing is really slow for a turbo 3.1L. We're only talking about 5-6 psi, but its a dog. I'm confident that the tune is so far off that it will pick up at least 30hp with a good dyno tune with a wideband sensor. When the motor gets broken in a little better, we'll crank the boost. I'd like to see a reliable 12-14psi.
#16
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Glen Park, NY
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: TPIS II Supercharged w/Nitrous
Transmission: 700R4 Probuilt
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Richmond 12 Bolt
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
Found other 3.1 turbos with a similar problem.. They had way to much base pressure from boost... If you have too much of that then the pressure has to go somewhere. Actually had mine leaking out top of the oil dipstick tube for a short period of time until I found a Vacuum Line that was a positive pressure line instead of neg pressure.. Glad to hear that you found your problem.
#17
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 09 Cobalt SS Sedan. 92 Z28 vert
Engine: 2.0T EFR6758; 5.0TT T3/T4 8psi
Transmission: F40; 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.76 LSD; 3.23 posi
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
are you talking about blow-by? or did I neglect to do something with the vacuum lines? The only hose I changed was the breather hose that went from the pass side valve cover to the intake tube in front of the throttle body. I just have that vented to the atmosphere.
I tested the pcv valve and it totally seals shut when positive pressure is applied (1 psi or more). I think the IAC valve also ties in with the pcv valve on the back of the intake, but any boost in there just goes to the lower intake (not the crank case) right?
I tested the pcv valve and it totally seals shut when positive pressure is applied (1 psi or more). I think the IAC valve also ties in with the pcv valve on the back of the intake, but any boost in there just goes to the lower intake (not the crank case) right?
#18
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sayreville NJ
Posts: 2,472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
as far as that coupler blowing off mount the bov on the intercooler to tb side of the charge pipes closer to the tb the better.
also swaping from an reg hose clamp to a t=bolt clamp will help. the best thing to do is weld 4 lil **** on the edge of the tb lip.
btw that t4 50 trim wont really come alive till around 10 psi possibly a bit more.but it will still make more power then the t3 u had on there even at low boost
Last edited by daves12secV6; 07-28-2007 at 12:43 AM.
#20
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 09 Cobalt SS Sedan. 92 Z28 vert
Engine: 2.0T EFR6758; 5.0TT T3/T4 8psi
Transmission: F40; 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.76 LSD; 3.23 posi
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
I changed the compressor wheel and housing to a t04E 60 trim. I guess I need to make a way in the next month or so to get time on a dyno.
#21
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Glen Park, NY
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 1987 IROC-Z
Engine: TPIS II Supercharged w/Nitrous
Transmission: 700R4 Probuilt
Axle/Gears: 3:73 Richmond 12 Bolt
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
are you talking about blow-by? or did I neglect to do something with the vacuum lines? The only hose I changed was the breather hose that went from the pass side valve cover to the intake tube in front of the throttle body. I just have that vented to the atmosphere.
I tested the pcv valve and it totally seals shut when positive pressure is applied (1 psi or more). I think the IAC valve also ties in with the pcv valve on the back of the intake, but any boost in there just goes to the lower intake (not the crank case) right?
I tested the pcv valve and it totally seals shut when positive pressure is applied (1 psi or more). I think the IAC valve also ties in with the pcv valve on the back of the intake, but any boost in there just goes to the lower intake (not the crank case) right?
Initially we thought it was a PVC valve.. So we purchased a new one. Put it in the left valve cover and attached the line from the plenum assembly. Rev ed the engine and the problem was still there. So, I did a little experimenting. I removed the PVC and rev ed the engine and the problem stopped. I raised the RPM to around 5000 and there was no problems. I removed the PVC with engine running and checked for vacuum at that line where the PVC plugs into the plenum with had plenty.
As soon as I plugged the PVC back in and raised the rpm to around 1000+ the problem came back. Just out of dumb luck, I was looking at the left side of the engine and there was a line coming from the TB to the left valve cover to what appeared to be another PVC valve.. After taking it out of the left valve cover, It was just a plastic elbow. But, once that was taking out, The problem stopped again.
I checked for vacuum at that line. There was positive pressure, Not Negative pressure to help evacuate the pressure from the base.
I called a friend who is a tech from Garrett turbos. He simply explained it to me that once you use a turbo or S/C, all the air going into the engine is considered as positive pressure, as is all the air going through the throttle body, Your system no longer uses negative pressure from the engine to draw more air.
SOLUTION
We had to remove the line from the T/B and put a plug in the hole.
Problem solved.
#22
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 09 Cobalt SS Sedan. 92 Z28 vert
Engine: 2.0T EFR6758; 5.0TT T3/T4 8psi
Transmission: F40; 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.76 LSD; 3.23 posi
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
I'm pretty sure thats the same as what I did, but instead of plugging the hole I just replaced the entire intake pipe. I checked the dipstick and all seemed fine. no oil leak, firmly seated.
I guess the low 8.5:1 compression hurts it pretty bad untill I crank the boost. I drove my older brother's '06 Cobalt (140hp) and noticed that it is considerably faster than this 3.1 turbo.
I guess the low 8.5:1 compression hurts it pretty bad untill I crank the boost. I drove my older brother's '06 Cobalt (140hp) and noticed that it is considerably faster than this 3.1 turbo.
#23
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 09 Cobalt SS Sedan. 92 Z28 vert
Engine: 2.0T EFR6758; 5.0TT T3/T4 8psi
Transmission: F40; 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.76 LSD; 3.23 posi
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
Finally got around to turning up the boost... its a noticable difference from 5psi to 7psi. thats how the car's been running for the past 5 months(7psi). The valve covers started leaking because I messed up the gasket installing them. While the mid and upper intakes were off to replace the gaskets, we installed some 37pph injectors, and I made the neccesary changes to the chip. We put 7 turns on the wastegate too. The power difference from 7psi to 15psi is very impressive. Even more impressive is that the stock MAF sensor seems to be reading that amount of airflow fairly accurately. Well into the 200g/s range. The stock tune is heavily modified at this point. I have a 165 ecm and V8 MAF tha I was going to put in place of the V6 stuff to handle the higher airflow, but that doesn;t seem neccesary just yet.
That all said... its still not very "fast"... maybe a high 14 1/4
That all said... its still not very "fast"... maybe a high 14 1/4
#24
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
High 14's on boosted iron heads is all anybody seems to get. From what I understand and read, professionally ported heads are still only going to get you in the low13's/high12's if lucky.
Boost is so much fun
Boost is so much fun
#25
Senior Member
iTrader: (24)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: washington state
Posts: 712
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Car: 1992 Firebird v6 1992 formula v8
Engine: 3.1, 350 TPI
Transmission: both 700 r4
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
Could possible be the rear cam seal. Or distributor o ring
#26
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: right behind you
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: '85 maro
Engine: In the works...
Transmission: TH700 R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
Why not swap it in anyway and use the $32B mask? That's a neat little trick you mentioned in my other thread to get the stock maf up to 197 g/sec. How good is the resolution?
#27
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 09 Cobalt SS Sedan. 92 Z28 vert
Engine: 2.0T EFR6758; 5.0TT T3/T4 8psi
Transmission: F40; 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.76 LSD; 3.23 posi
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
resolution... the off-idle tip-in has suffered a lot. My guess is that it's mostly due to the MAF sensor being so far upstream from the motor and low injector pulse widths, combined with a critical MAF signal. Small variations high or low can cause decent swings in the tune at idle, but seems fine everywhere else. the O2 sensor being pretty far from the motor doesn't help idle either. To take off fast just preload the motor a little with the brakes on.
The available $3A definition doesn't have any parameters for AE vs TPS... only load and CTS. I was told some time ago how to do a ROM dump to enable the programmer people to due a full ecm hack, but never really felt like figuring it out. it always seems easier to go $32b/$6E when ever I think about it.
The available $3A definition doesn't have any parameters for AE vs TPS... only load and CTS. I was told some time ago how to do a ROM dump to enable the programmer people to due a full ecm hack, but never really felt like figuring it out. it always seems easier to go $32b/$6E when ever I think about it.
#28
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Casselberry, FLA
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 88 V6 'bird/89TBI bird/85 T/A
Engine: 2.8/TBI/TPI
Transmission: V8 T-5/700R4 x2
Axle/Gears: 3.42 open/2.73 open/ 3.27 9 bolt
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
So, you are turbo-ing a third gen V6 with a stock ecm and maf? Did I read that right?
#29
Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Car: 09 Cobalt SS Sedan. 92 Z28 vert
Engine: 2.0T EFR6758; 5.0TT T3/T4 8psi
Transmission: F40; 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.76 LSD; 3.23 posi
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
the other thread is on the diy PROM board called "v6 owners check this out" (or some thing like that).
I am boosting an 88 v6 with stock 302 ecm and v6 MAF. The available parameters in the available definition ($3A) are far inferior to the $32B or $6E. However, if you plan on making enough power to make it worth the effort of fabrication and tuning... get something better. If I could start over, i'd swap a FWD top end and run some code $59 on 7730/7749 ecm.
I am boosting an 88 v6 with stock 302 ecm and v6 MAF. The available parameters in the available definition ($3A) are far inferior to the $32B or $6E. However, if you plan on making enough power to make it worth the effort of fabrication and tuning... get something better. If I could start over, i'd swap a FWD top end and run some code $59 on 7730/7749 ecm.
#30
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Casselberry, FLA
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Car: 88 V6 'bird/89TBI bird/85 T/A
Engine: 2.8/TBI/TPI
Transmission: V8 T-5/700R4 x2
Axle/Gears: 3.42 open/2.73 open/ 3.27 9 bolt
Re: got the turbo 3.1 running today, rear main seal still leaks
Thanks much.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post