Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > V6
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?

V6 Discussion and questions about the base carbureted or MPFI V6's and the rare SFI Turbo V6.

Welcome to ThirdGen.org!
Welcome to ThirdGen.org.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join the ThirdGen.org community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-24-2009, 07:31 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 62
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 5305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Pros and Cons of the V6?

Hey guys,

This is my first post here on the board and I wanted to ask about the V6 engine for an 88 camaro. I'm 17 and am looking at getting my first car, and I found an 88 Camaro V6 RS (Body/front bumper looks like a berlinetta) on craigslist selling for $1,000.

My friend who claims to know a lot about American muscle was telling me to stay away from the V6 model, saying that these models at stock are underpowered and tend to have a lot of mechanical problems.

I figured I'd get your opinions about it. I've always like the third gen camaros, but frankly I don't know a lot about the pros and cons of the different engine sizes.

The seller doesn't specifiy what the engine size is, but I've read a lot about 88's having a 2.8L. Was this the only size for a V6?

*As a side note he mentioned that i'd have to replace the clutch soon. How much is it usually to replace the clutch?

As a 17 year old I honestly don't mind how much HP my car has. As long as it drives and gets the job done. I also read that they typically get good MPG.

What are some of the cons and pros of getting an 88 V6 Camaro?

Thanks,
Evan (Sorry if my questions seem nooby )

Last edited by eban808; 06-24-2009 at 07:41 AM.
eban808 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 08:27 AM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mason OH
Posts: 249
Car: 95 Firebird
Engine: Lt1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.23

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

Pros: easier to work on

CONS: you always get comments about having a v6, and its not that fast

in reality the 2.8 does pretty good, a power house? not by a long shot. but really, its a camaro! i loved mine, in town it drove like a small block, sounded like a small block, just didnt have the power of a good running small block. just remember that the 305's didnt have sh*t for power either in todays standards.

youre not going to win any races, and there are no easy cheap ways to make it fast. but its a cool car. 2.8s are not bad motors imo. some get great gas mileage and some get bad. just search and youll find that out.

clutches are not cheap unless you do it yourself. buy the car and love it.

( look in the spare tire well and check for rust, also the floor boards. the car may look alright from the top, but it might also be rotten under it. )

Good luck.
sloick is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 08:33 AM   #3
Junior Member
 
sienaz 86 2.8's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Hampton, CT
Posts: 45
Car: 86 firebird

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

my first car was an 86 v6 firebird and like you said stock it gets the job done. being only a 6 its lighter and i believe handles better then the v8 (better than the 2 ive driven anyway) but you most likely crave more horse power down the road and will have to decide between the handling of a v6 or the power of the v8. remember the v6 parts are harder to find and often more costly. the 2.8 is the only v6 that came in the third gens untill 90 or 91 IIRC i have not run into to many mechanical problems but then again i have litteraly completly taken out every thing apart in the car aside from the engine and tranny(wanted to change my whitecar with gray interrior to black on black ) i cant sspeak for the automatics but my 5 speed is a blast to drive just keep in mind its a v6 not the 500hp v8 that i drive mine like..... but if you do get it welcome to the thirdgen world
sienaz 86 2.8 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 10:13 AM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 27
Car: 1989 Firebird
Engine: 2.8 V6
Transmission: 5 Speed

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

My 2.8 is a blast to drive. Like others said, if you want power, or maybe want to add power later, unless you want to throw in a turbo of supercharger, I would go with a V8. If you want a fun car that, imo, is a very strong engine, that gets decent gas mileage, and is easy to work on, I would go with the V6. It is probably cheaper up front than a V8 as well.

Throw a nice cat-back on it and it puts out a nice exhaust tone. Not V8 quality, but the casual ear can't tell the difference.
spimonkey34 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 10:15 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
pontiacguy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pulaski, TN
Posts: 472

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

The V6 engines that are Multi-Point Fuel Injected do not suffer from the problems that happened to some of the earlier carbureted 2.8 V6 engines. The earlier engines were weaker in a few areas, and all of that was corrected when the changed the induction systems. They changed the motor to a 3.1 liter in 1990 by adding a longer stroke crank and different pistons to the 2.8 liter.

I have a 1992 3.1 liter firebird with an automatic, and I have loved owning it. Sure, there are times I wish that I had more power, but for the most part I have been satisfied with it. It now has 210K miles on it, and a recently blown head gasket is the only mechanical problem I have ever had with the drivetrain in the car. It is my daily driver now, since it can still get decent gas mileage. When the car was newer, I could get 30 MPG on the interstate with it. Last long trip I took in it was about 2 years ago, and I still got over 29 MPG!

If you like the car and don't care about racing or hot-rodding then the V6 will be fine. Get it checked out and make sure it is in good shape and runs good before you buy it. It might also be a lot cheaper to insure than a V8 car. It depends on your insurance company. To the insurance company, a 17 year old in a V8 camaro is an accident waiting to happen!
__________________
F-bodies I own:
1992 Firebird 3.1 V6 (Used to have 75 HP nitrous shot)
1984 15th anniversary Trans Am (2 cars, future project to take both cars and make one good one)
1969 Firebird 400 4 speed. Actually has a 455 in it. Almost done with the complete restoration.
pontiacguy1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 03:51 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 62
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 5305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

Thanks for the help guys!
Glad to hear that despite being a smaller engine, it's still a reliable one. As much as I love cars with a V8 engine, in reality its not practical for me. I'd be paying way too much for gas, lol. I live in Hawaii and I'll be doing mostly in town driving because my area doesn't have any major highways or freeways.

Another question, were the 88's all MPFI or were there still carb versions around?

The only thing now scaring me is the price of replacing the clutch, lol.

The car looks amazing in the pics, she's all black and I believe the rims are black too.
Will definatley take it in to a mechanic before buying though
eban808 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 04:55 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
I H8 WWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,142
Car: 89 IROC-Z
Engine: LO3
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 10 Bolt / 2.73

Classifieds Rating: (5)
Send a message via Skype™ to I H8 WWD
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

This is not a bash, just what I should have done when I got mine at 18yo back in 06.

Find one that does not need work or needs very little or easy things like hoses and battery, your 17 and a clutch job (unless you know how to do it) will cost you a pretty penny to have done (by teen wallet status). Keep looking out there, a kid near me just bought one for $1500, put new pads and rotors on and drives the hell out of it. Passed emissions and he is happy out driving, while Im still fixing mine...haha, but maybe thats what you want. Just a suggestion to look at a few and maybe even drive a few to see how you like them before deciding. As I bought the first one I saw and knew about, and now slightly regret it, but the guy did let me pay payments on it while it sat at MY house...so it wasn't a big loss (I was paying $150 a week to the guy for the car).
__________________
-Wrong Wheel Drive-
The improper displacement of power to the front wheels.


"I'm not an Addict,
I'm just an OD'er"
I H8 WWD is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 04:55 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
pontiacguy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pulaski, TN
Posts: 472

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

THE MPFI system was put into the cars starting, I believe, in 1986. From that point forward, all of the V6 cars had fuel injection. You could get a carb'd 305 V8 in some cars as late as 1987. After 1987, it was all fuel injection all across the board.

Replacing the clutch shouldn't cost more than a few hundred dollars. The clutch components won't cost more than $150 or so from a parts house, and the labor to put it in shouldn't cost more than about $250 or $300. You should be looking at around $500 to have it done, assuming that's all that's wrong.
__________________
F-bodies I own:
1992 Firebird 3.1 V6 (Used to have 75 HP nitrous shot)
1984 15th anniversary Trans Am (2 cars, future project to take both cars and make one good one)
1969 Firebird 400 4 speed. Actually has a 455 in it. Almost done with the complete restoration.
pontiacguy1 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 05:23 PM   #9
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 62
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 5305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

Thanks for the suggestions. I totally agree about getting a car that won't need work. I'm getting a summer job to help pay for everything. I wish I could make weekly payments like that, it would be sooo much better :P Haha.

A month ago a guy had an 89 350 V8 Camaro he was willing to sell me four $1,000 because he was moving. The day I go to look at it, he sells it. Seeing another Camaro here on Maui for sale at that price is great, as there arent too many around where I live.

We have a few family friend mechanics who I'll most likely go to if I replace the clutch. Pontiacguy, thanks for the price quote. I was worried because my dad told me he paid around $700 to replace the clutch on his Toyota 4runner.

I won't be racing it, so I feel relieved knowing that the V6 is still a reliable engine. The guy looks like he takes good care of his, he said he replaced the pads, rotors, wires and cap. He also has new armrests and brake calipers to throw in
eban808 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2009, 11:24 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 916
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 3.1L +bolt ons
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser forged, 3.73, SLP posi

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

As others have said, the engine is solid. 175k+ miles here. No issues.

The more problems are likely to be rust (especially near an ocean!) and a high mileage body (read: flexing and creaking). The rust issue is expensive. Pass if you find anything major. The tired body can be fixed with subframe connectors (~$100), which should be done even if the car is in great condition. It will help with the creaks and rattles, but then its up to you to re-tighten everything down.
Even if you buy a v6, a LOT of parts will interchange such as suspension, interior, brakes, body, etc. So if you enjoy modifying your car, you will still find plenty of ways to go broke customizing a v6 fbody.

Just realize the car is older, and is probably going to perform like it.
__________________

Any idiot can make a fast v8. It takes a real idiot to make a fast v6.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Project 3.4 Camaro View Post
The only thing it will make go fast is your $.
jensen73110 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2009, 12:27 AM   #11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

This is a great read. My 15 yo daughter has been saving for her first car and we just picked up a 1991 T-top RS with the v6 automatic. I wanted her to have a great-looking car we could modify without the worries of too much HP and temptation. Now it's sitting in the garage ready for a complete makeover. I'm curious what kind of MPG most of you are getting in city driving?
rhsooner71 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2009, 07:23 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
mtwlkn122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Batavia Area, NY
Posts: 467
Car: 91 Firebird, 06 Dodge Ram 1500 SLT
Engine: 3.1L, 4.7L
Transmission: 700r4, 45RFE
Axle/Gears: 3.23 open, 3.55?

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhsooner71 View Post
This is a great read. My 15 yo daughter has been saving for her first car and we just picked up a 1991 T-top RS with the v6 automatic. I wanted her to have a great-looking car we could modify without the worries of too much HP and temptation. Now it's sitting in the garage ready for a complete makeover. I'm curious what kind of MPG most of you are getting in city driving?
Great find for your daughter!....I make 20mpg in city driving. I drive my car everyday and love it. Im 19 so this is my first third gen. Ive ran into some problems but nothing i couldnt handle or afford yet. Today i just picked it up from my mechanic...he put in a new oil pan and pump and also fixed a trans leak for $150...i supplied the pan gasket and oil pump...he did the trans for free while he was there without me asking....Mazurs in Batavia, New York(great guys...they always take car of me) Sure sometimes i wish it was a v8. But recently i took it to a cruise and alot of people commented me on the car. I spoke to an older gentlemen that enlightened my horizons some.

He said "im glad to see shes still a six"...i said "whys that"....he says "come here boy follow me..."...he took me to about 20 different cars and said "what do you see"....i said "crate motors...350's and big blocks, all with chrome dress up kits"....he said "take what you see here and learn from it"...then he walked away. ....well ive been looking at swaping to a 350 for some time....now ive decided i dont want to be like EVERY SINGLE PERSON OUT THERE. Now ive changed my mind and will now just get the most i can from my six and love it the whole way through....at some point i plan to do a turbo set up just so i can have that little "boost" when i want it.

Sorry about the story....but i think its nice to see that people actually love there six as much as i do. Sure its not the fastest car on the block but it **** sure turns alot of heads and gets alot of complements at shows and cruises....mind you my car is not a show car...has problems...and is stock appearing under the hood except for the intake. I just have come to realize that its not all about doing what everyone else says you should do. Sad to say its taken me 19 yrs to learn that but gotta start somewhere

Last edited by mtwlkn122; 06-25-2009 at 07:27 PM.
mtwlkn122 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2009, 09:59 PM   #13
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 62
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 5305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

Thanks a bunch guys,

mtwlkn122 - thats a great story. The frien I mentioned earlier told me that the V6 models had transmissions problems, blaming it on "poor steel" used to produce it. Have you or anyone else had a lot of transmission problems?

I really want to get this car now. I'm a bit short of the thousand and im trying to convince my parents to pick up the slack. I applied for summer jobs but I won't make the money in time to get it. Wish me luck though!
eban808 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2009, 10:43 PM   #14
Member
 
Killert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Norristown PA
Posts: 409
Car: 88 Firebird.
Engine: 3.4L
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt, 3.27:1 Diskbrakes

Classifieds Rating: (7)
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

I got mine for 500$ and only put 350$ into it (doing work myself with my pops) to get it inspected and reliable. It was sitting for a while too but my 2.8 was great, it had 163K when I got it and i put 1k on it (beating it the whole way) and it finally spun a bearing. The car handles pretty good for still have the original springs and shocks.

I say get a V6, then if you feel its too slow buy a 3.4L out of a 4thgen and do the swap. its so much better, 200lbs of torque is a true change. Its way more fun to drive. I put one in my bird after the 2.8 quit. I love the car now. I also put a 9 bolt posi with rear disks. I have enough torque now to chirp the tires alittle pulling out if I give it some gas (I have an auto)

Its also still cheap to run and its cheap to insure

Good luck

I'm also now in the process of painting (well prepping for paint) one panel at a time.

Last edited by Killert; 06-25-2009 at 10:48 PM.
Killert is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 01:05 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 916
Car: 1991 Firebird
Engine: 3.1L +bolt ons
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser forged, 3.73, SLP posi

Classifieds Rating: (3)
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

Quote:
Originally Posted by eban808 View Post
Thanks a bunch guys,

mtwlkn122 - thats a great story. The frien I mentioned earlier told me that the V6 models had transmissions problems, blaming it on "poor steel" used to produce it. Have you or anyone else had a lot of transmission problems?

700r4 is a tank for the v6. Unbreakable unless you do something stupid. Mine went 160,000 miles on the original fluid. It was rebuild for performance, not because it needed it.

T5 is a little different. It will break under stock v8 torque. With a 6, and someone that knows how to shift, it should be fine for years.

Stop listening to your friend about thirdgens.
jensen73110 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 02:06 AM   #16
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 62
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 5305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

Haha, thanks for the reassurance. This has been a great help for me and I appreciate everyones input. Hopefully I'll get it! It's always been my dream to get a camaro and this may be the one. Thanks!
eban808 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 04:20 PM   #17
Member
 
8urv8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cleveland,Ga.
Posts: 123
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L V6 w/.425" cam (Int. & Exh.)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Stock

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

I traded my '95 mitsubishi Eclipse GST for my '92 RS w/ the 3.1L v6. Just shortly after that, i installed the Crane PowerMax cam (.425" lift on Int. & Exh., 272 deg. dur.), Moroso high flow oil pump, TCI 2800 stall torque converter, FlowMaster DeltaForce race muffler, Magnafuel FPR, Aeromotive fuel pump and I ported the intake manifold. All that gave me an excllent increase in horespower and throtle response. I also have alot more done to the rest of the car. Right now i'm just having issues with the ignition timing. when I got the car, I put about $750 into it to get it running right. But, this has been the the most reliable car I have had. and it's also the most fun. It's awesome when you roll up to a stoplight and a punk in a Honda or something thinks he can whip you, then all that changes when that light turns green. lol.
8urv8 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 05:30 PM   #18
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 26

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pontiacguy1 View Post
To the insurance company, a 17 year old in a V8 camaro is an accident waiting to happen!
I resent that! The insurance companies are crazy nowadays, huh?
WhtIroc is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2009, 07:08 PM   #19
Junior Member
 
BladeQuarter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas, Georgia
Posts: 79
Car: 1989 Chevy Camaro RS
Engine: Proud V6 Owner
Transmission: 5 Speed
Axle/Gears: unk.

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

Quote:
Originally Posted by WhtIroc View Post
I resent that! The insurance companies are crazy nowadays, huh?
no, they are doing what they need to do to protect themselves. I am tired of seeing todays youth wrapped aaround tree's becouse they have a lead foot and an empty head. Personally my kids won't get thier hands on anything over a 4 banger with no mods until they move outa my house.
BladeQuarter is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2009, 07:46 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
K-slice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Traverse City, MI
Posts: 701
Car: 91' Firebird
Engine: 3.1 LH0 V6
Transmission: Auto 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 limited slip

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Send a message via Yahoo to K-slice
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BladeQuarter View Post
no, they are doing what they need to do to protect themselves. I am tired of seeing todays youth wrapped aaround tree's becouse they have a lead foot and an empty head. Personally my kids won't get thier hands on anything over a 4 banger with no mods until they move outa my house.
You can get goin alot faster in a modern Honda, Focus, Cobalt, than you can a 3rd gen v6 f-body..
K-slice is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2009, 07:13 AM   #21
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 62
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 5305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

I may be 17 but believe I tend to drive a lot safer than most of the people on the highway. You should see how a lot of the tourist drivers and dudes in civics drive here in Hawaii.

As far as speed goes, I don't care if the V6 can drag or not. As long as the car drives its fine. I just wanted to ask how reliable the engine was.
eban808 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2009, 05:54 PM   #22
Member
 
8urv8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cleveland,Ga.
Posts: 123
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: 3.1L V6 w/.425" cam (Int. & Exh.)
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Stock

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

if it's the 3.1, then it's gonna be good to u it u take care of it. I haven't had any experience with the 2.8, so i can't tell u anything on it...
8urv8 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2009, 06:51 PM   #23
Member
 
sam24th's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 209
Car: 85 firebird
Engine: 3.4L V6
Transmission: auto

Classifieds Rating: (1)
Send a message via AIM to sam24th
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

I have an 85 firebird I bought for 1,300 and it runs like a champ, just the idle is a lil high, but I havent had any other problems. I average about 19-20 mpg mostly city driving. Only thing Ive changed since buying it was a shiftercable, and sparkplugs besides the regular maintnence stuff. Im willing to say its more reliable than the crapcivic I had before the bird which broke down 3 times before I sold it. Also my GF enjoys the T-tops more.
sam24th is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2009, 06:22 PM   #24
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 62
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 5305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

UPDATE:

So I saw the car and aside for some body damage everything looks good. He replaced spark plugs, rotors, brake pads, and the distributor cap. All I need is for the car to be registered, inspected by a mechanic, and take her for a spin and I'm sold.

But I am stumped. He claims its an 88 camaro RS. I just read on another site that there were no RS models in 88. On the passenger door there is an RS logo. And for some reason the car has a berlinetta front end. The bumper with the open vents. Did the RS models come with this alternative bumper? Or was it limited to the berlinetta? If im not mistaken the berlinetta was made up until 1986.

I wont be able to go up to his place for another week but I wanted to ask about it here. Thanks!
eban808 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2009, 07:28 PM   #25
Jay
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Andover, CT
Posts: 1,003
Car: 88 IROC
Engine: 5.7 RamJet
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: Dana44 4.10

Classifieds Rating: (2)
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

I owned quite a few V6 thirdgens over the years, The automatics were dogs, the T5 model were more fun but reality was they were still slow. More than enough power for me then though.
As for better handling.. let's see they got smaller sway bars, softer springs and struts/shocks, and taller profile narrower tires. How that = better handling I don't know.
Gas mileage? Nothing great with the V6 cars I owned. My IROC was getting 20/24 before I did the T56 swap. Now I can manage 27 or so highway.
Duarability?? well I had 6 2.8L engine blow up on me. I'd say they were junk. My L98 went 250K miles before a head gasket let go.

If you have a V6 car and runs great and you love your car... great! I hope it last forever and you get miles of enjoyment out of it. Personal I hate the 2.8L
I recently bought an 87 RS thinking I could use it as my daily driver in nice weather. I made it about 2 weeks before I started looking for a TPI 350. The car is currently in my barn, engine and tranny coming out tomorrow. L98 from a 92 TA going back in.

As for the question on the 88 RS, no there were none in 88. If it's got a Berlinetta/Sport Coupe nose on it, then it's probably a replacement. Car may have been in a front end collision and they used the wrong nose. 87 was the first year for the RS in thirdgens, but it was a limited production model.
They didn't start as the base model until 89.
Jay is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2009, 07:44 PM   #26
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 62
Car: 1991 Camaro RS
Engine: 5305 TBI
Transmission: 700R4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

Thanks. So it must not be an 88 model.

The comment on the engine blowing really scares me. The friend I mentioned earlier used that as his reason for why he believes the 2.8 is junk. He went on about how the engines were built of a different composite and called it "cheap steel".

The cars got 116,000 miles on it, and he said its the only car thats never let him down. I really hope it lasts long because I've been selling off a lot of my stuff in order to buy my first car.

Thanks,
Evan
eban808 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 10:30 AM   #27
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 85
Car: 87 Camaro
Engine: 2.8l V6
Transmission: 700r4

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

113,000 strong, still starts up even though it hasn't moved out of my driveway in three months, sure the battery may have died but thats for me not driving it. The only thing it needs is a new exhaust manifold.

It's true the auto's are quite slow compared to the manuals which have a bit more pep to them.

Good luck with it!
musclecar201 is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 10:39 PM   #28
Senior Member
 
bl85c's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: right behind you
Posts: 2,281
Car: '85 maro
Engine: Hybrid 3.4
Transmission: TH700 R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73 posi

Classifieds Rating: (0)
Re: Pros and Cons of the V6?

Cons- The lower intake manifold, like all gm v-engines will leak. Low output from the factory. The iron heads suck and can't be ported much.

Pros- Decent parts availability. Large DIY performance community. Good weight bias & handling. Decent mileage. Popular ECM swaps available.
__________________
Increasingly I find the difference between a 'fact' and opinion is the number of people that believe it.

3.4 block converted to roller valvetrain with 220/225 cam on 115 lsa, early '769' heads with 3500 valves, LS6 springs & mild porting, worked over heddman headers, 3500 plenum with ported 3400 lower & 'short star' 65mm throttle. 210hp at 5800ft (that's 270hp at sealevel )
bl85c is offline vBGarage Page   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2009, 10:39 PM
ThirdGen
1992 Camaro




Paid Advertisement


Reply

Go Back   Third Generation F-Body Message Boards > Tech Boards > V6

Tags
1991, 31, 92, automatic, camaro, cons, engine, engines, gas, iroc, mileage, power, pro, pros, v6, v8, vs
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 


1982 Camaro '82 || 1983 Camaro '83 || 1984 Camaro '84 || 1985 Camaro '85 || 1986 Camaro '86 || 1987 Camaro '87 || 1988 Camaro '88 || 1989 Camaro '89 || 1990 Camaro '90 || 1991 Camaro '91 || 1992 Camaro '92


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright © 1997 - 2012 ThirdGen.org. All rights reserved. No part of this website may be reproduced without the expressed, documented, and written consent of ThirdGen.org's Administrators.

Emails & Contact Details