I see they advertise this for $24.95..up to 7hp gain...1 to 2 additional degrees of spark advance...hmmmmmmm. Or did I basically do the same thing by relocating my MAT to the air intake housing? (I used a V6 housing that already had the hole in it.)


------------------
85 IROC,5.0 TPI,T-Tops,fully loaded,black with red Lear-Siegler "Camaro" interior,Decal Delete,91 Bose stereo,Stage 2 Fastchip,AFPR,TB Airfoil,K&Ns,March pulleys,Alum. Driveshaft,92 police version 700r4

"The Devil drives a Camaro"

 

I've never seen it, but if it makes the sensor read cooler then it would be adding more fuel too. That might not be so good.

 

This 'modification' (cough cough) would be terrible ... especially on cold days. Definitely not worth the money.

Tim

------------------
TRAXION's 1990 IROC-Z
Best Time = 12.244 @ 112.51mph (1.778 60' / 7.819@88.32mph in the 1/8)
All Natural. No Force. No Drugs. Stock Bottom End. Stock Body Panels.
Gunning for NA 11's with bigger cam, bigger stall, and bigger exhaust.
-=ICON Motorsports=-
Moderator: PROM board at thirdgen.org

 

i used a v6 snorkle and put a mat sensor in there and used that one, in summer it was nice peppy engine decent mileage

in winter it was burning verry rich so i use the mat in the plenum.

i asume that slp thing will do the same

-Stell

------------------
1988 IROC-Z 305TPI MINT!!
Mods= Accell SuperCoil, MSD 6A, Ported Plenum, No MAF Screans, K & N, SLP AirFoil,180 Thermostat+ Temp Switch, Relocated MAT, Cold Air. ,MSD Ignition wires and a few other misc goodies

1988 Pontiac Trans Am. 305 TPI Beyond MINT Condition. Dynomax Catback