Why isn't this intake listed as Vortec alternative?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 3
From: Peoria, IL USA
Car: 91 GTA
Engine: 377ci
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: QP Ford 9" 3.70s
Re: Why isn't this intake listed as Vortec alternative?
I just have the silicone coupling sitting on the fender. I was going to fab a bracket right away but it sits in there tight as it is now.
Once I got the AE ironed out she really belts out the revs when you step on it. At low idel I had to add 135% pump shot. Kinda cool.
No way I was going to do a normal air cleaner. Stock Fbody hoods and engine compartments get hot and the drop base would of killed the airflow this engine needs. Only thing I may change is the K&N. It looked much bigger in the add. It is on the end of 3.5" tubing.
Once I got the AE ironed out she really belts out the revs when you step on it. At low idel I had to add 135% pump shot. Kinda cool.
No way I was going to do a normal air cleaner. Stock Fbody hoods and engine compartments get hot and the drop base would of killed the airflow this engine needs. Only thing I may change is the K&N. It looked much bigger in the add. It is on the end of 3.5" tubing.
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,298
Likes: 2
From: Norfolk VA
Car: 85 Camaro IROC
Engine: 5.7 TPI
Transmission: 700-R4
Axle/Gears: open rear, 3.42 gears
Re: Why isn't this intake listed as Vortec alternative?
i guess i was picturing something like a 90* elbow or whatever.
i dont know...
thats pretty cool about the 135% pump shot. lots of air never hurt anything
i dont know...
thats pretty cool about the 135% pump shot. lots of air never hurt anything
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 660
Likes: 1
From: Corning NY
Car: 86' IROC
Engine: 388
Transmission: Built 700r4
Axle/Gears: 3.08 non-posi
Re: Why isn't this intake listed as Vortec alternative?
Going to dyno it? I would be interested in the numbers it makes.
Re: Why isn't this intake listed as Vortec alternative?
This morning I was seeing air at air cleaner at 70F and coolant was 185F so the "not so" cold" cold air apparently works. This AM in WI was 40dF.
My round 14 inch AC got so hot you could fry eggs on it. At that time I had no IAT. I do now.
My round 14 inch AC got so hot you could fry eggs on it. At that time I had no IAT. I do now.
Last edited by Ronny; Mar 30, 2010 at 10:24 AM.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 3
From: Peoria, IL USA
Car: 91 GTA
Engine: 377ci
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: QP Ford 9" 3.70s
Re: Why isn't this intake listed as Vortec alternative?
I am confused. Do you have a cold air intake?? I could definetly use some ideas. THis is the best I cam up with on short notice. I was ready to drive my car after 5 years of sitting.
Re: Why isn't this intake listed as Vortec alternative?
Me? See post 50 for pics. Best I could do with little room.... Other option is use TPIS cold air for TPI but that would require I hack up fan shroud I was told. I am TBI. 1984 Vette.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 3
From: Peoria, IL USA
Car: 91 GTA
Engine: 377ci
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: QP Ford 9" 3.70s
Re: Why isn't this intake listed as Vortec alternative?
Well here is the finished product from the first stop on Power Tour 2010. I understand the pictures are late. Kinda forgot about the post. Came acrossed it as I was doing some research on a 9" swap as the intake ran well enough to toast the 7.5" stock rear. THis summer I should be running a Ford 9 with a 3.70 gear ratio. That should liven things up. The axle is going to kill my funds for boost. Oh well maybe next year. Something always seems to come up. At this rate this forged SBC will run until the end of time.

Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,516
Likes: 5
From: San Antonio TX
Car: 1990 G92 IROC Z Miniram
Engine: 388cu 6.4 Liters
Transmission: G-Force T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73 Gears
Re: Why isn't this intake listed as Vortec alternative?
Not bad at all. One thing you ned to do is keep tire dressing on the tires. They look bad especially with custom wheels.
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 3
From: Peoria, IL USA
Car: 91 GTA
Engine: 377ci
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: QP Ford 9" 3.70s
Re: Why isn't this intake listed as Vortec alternative?
The first stop in Newton was after a torrential down pour. They had you check in in a grass field that had been rain on all night. I was not going to waste my weeks worth of cleaning supplies on the tires. I hit the car wash the next day.

Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,364
Likes: 51
From: Enschede, Netherlands
Car: 82 TA 87 IZ L98 88 IZ LB9 88 IZ L98
Engine: 5.7TBI 5,7TPI 5.0TPI, 5,7TPI
Transmission: T5, 700R4, T5, 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.08, 3.27, 3.45, 3.27
Re: Why isn't this intake listed as Vortec alternative?
Didn't read all the posts so this may have been mentioned before but the copper coating is to "marinize" the intake so the alu doesn't corrode. So, it's a marine application piece.
It's a nice piece for sure, I like seeing uncommon intakes (I have a couple rare/unusual pieces myself)
It's a nice piece for sure, I like seeing uncommon intakes (I have a couple rare/unusual pieces myself)
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: mattoon illinois
Car: 92camaro,86 camaro
Engine: 355
Transmission: 700r4
Re: Why isn't this intake listed as Vortec alternative?
so i went over this 2 or 3 times and did not see if any one found where to buy this. or is it one of those that you cant buy any more?
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,813
Likes: 110
From: Central NJ
Car: 86 Trans Am
Engine: 408 stroker sbc
Transmission: TKO600
Axle/Gears: Moser full floater m9, 3:70 trutrac
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 3
From: Peoria, IL USA
Car: 91 GTA
Engine: 377ci
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: QP Ford 9" 3.70s
Re: Why isn't this intake listed as Vortec alternative?
Didn't read all the posts so this may have been mentioned before but the copper coating is to "marinize" the intake so the alu doesn't corrode. So, it's a marine application piece.
It's a nice piece for sure, I like seeing uncommon intakes (I have a couple rare/unusual pieces myself)
It's a nice piece for sure, I like seeing uncommon intakes (I have a couple rare/unusual pieces myself)
I saw a real SLP Firehawk on PT with a T-Ram. It was awsome. I stood there for hours probably made the guy nervouse.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,002
Likes: 64
From: Wittman,Az
Car: 86 IROC-Z, '71 RS
Engine: 305 TPI/ 350
Transmission: 700R4/TH350
Re: Why isn't this intake listed as Vortec alternative?
Any more PT pics? Love the unique intake! It's nice knowing you have something that almost no one else has!
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 3
From: Peoria, IL USA
Car: 91 GTA
Engine: 377ci
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: QP Ford 9" 3.70s
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,002
Likes: 64
From: Wittman,Az
Car: 86 IROC-Z, '71 RS
Engine: 305 TPI/ 350
Transmission: 700R4/TH350
Re: Why isn't this intake listed as Vortec alternative?
Awesome! I'm building my '85 T/A with the power tour and silver state classic in mind.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992 Trans Am
History / Originality
27
May 10, 2023 07:19 PM
Fast355
DFI and ECM
14
Dec 2, 2016 06:33 PM
ambainb
Camaros for Sale
11
Apr 25, 2016 09:21 PM










