Anyone think about putting the vette tail lights on?
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 1
From: Manassas, VA
Car: 89 Formula Firebird
Engine: 305 - Demon 525
Transmission: 700R4
Anyone think about putting the vette tail lights on?
Well on a third gen it might look better.
LOL!!!!wtf.......
<img src=http://images.cardomain.com/installs/190000-190999/190305_29_full.jpg>
LOL!!!!wtf.......
<img src=http://images.cardomain.com/installs/190000-190999/190305_29_full.jpg>
Trending Topics
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 13,622
Likes: 5
From: Orland Park, IL
Car: 1984 Z28
Engine: SLOW carbed ls
Transmission: TH400 with brake, 8" PTC converter
Axle/Gears: moser 9" 4.11
man,
i love it when kids drink out of the toilet...especially when they push the dog out of the way
i love it when kids drink out of the toilet...especially when they push the dog out of the way
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Florida
Car: 87' Firebird
Engine: 2.8L
Transmission: Standard
another one
i have another but i just went to get it off a cd and the cd drive just disappeared! ARGH i tell ya comptuers cant live with em cant live with out em
i have another but i just went to get it off a cd and the cd drive just disappeared! ARGH i tell ya comptuers cant live with em cant live with out em
Last edited by TFM4th; Oct 20, 2002 at 09:12 PM.
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 9
From: Readsboro, VT
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
Originally posted by TFM4th
another one
i have another but i just went to get it off a cd and the cd drive just disappeared! ARGH i tell ya comptuers cant live with em cant live with out em
another one
i have another but i just went to get it off a cd and the cd drive just disappeared! ARGH i tell ya comptuers cant live with em cant live with out em
Supposidly that car had a stout 350 in it. When it drove by me, it sounded like every other 2.8 thirdgen I've heard.
Supreme Member
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
From: Elizabeth, Colorado
Car: '94 Corvette
Engine: LT1
Transmission: 4L60E
I have to tell you that I never liked the C5's Fat *** on a C5!!!
yuk...I'll keep my C4...
BTW: I like my 3rd gen Tran Am rear end. I wouldn't change a thing.
Ron
yuk...I'll keep my C4...
BTW: I like my 3rd gen Tran Am rear end. I wouldn't change a thing.
Ron
Last edited by ronterry; Oct 21, 2002 at 07:18 AM.
TGO Supporter
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 13,579
Likes: 9
From: Readsboro, VT
Car: 85 IROC-Z / 88 GTA
Engine: 403 LSx (Pending) / 355 Tuned Port
Transmission: T56 Magnum (Pending) / T5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 / ?
I just realized that Wraith's car doesn't have back-up lights.
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Florida
Car: 87' Firebird
Engine: 2.8L
Transmission: Standard
Originally posted by redbird_400
I would stick with my lights. I just cant get over how Phat they look at night.
I would stick with my lights. I just cant get over how Phat they look at night.
i used to have the first set of lights, but i took those out and put in the TA lights (diffrently than all the other TA's) and i was forced to take the neon plate frame off.. too many tickets
Last edited by TFM4th; Oct 21, 2002 at 01:11 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 0
From: "No one cares if you're in before the lock!" - Best quote ever.
That rear looks better on the Accord then on that Camaro...matches the lines of the car better. I imagine some people dislike it so much due to the principle alone...? *braces for it*
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 3,534
Likes: 0
From: Mililani, HI USofA Search Posts: 2848.............. Whore Posts: 47.................. Magical Whore Posts: 1
Car: 91 Camaro 77K
Engine: 3.1 Vslick
Originally posted by Azure
That rear looks better on the Accord then on that Camaro...matches the lines of the car better. I imagine some people dislike it so much due to the principle alone...? *braces for it*
That rear looks better on the Accord then on that Camaro...matches the lines of the car better. I imagine some people dislike it so much due to the principle alone...? *braces for it*
Supreme Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,076
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Car: 1982 Trans Am
Engine: LG4
Transmission: 200C
Axle/Gears: 3:73
I've seen a full size truck with the lateset vette taillights in Wisconsin. I was in a bus going to a cross country meet.
Supreme Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 0
From: "No one cares if you're in before the lock!" - Best quote ever.
Yuo have got to be sh*tting me....
I dunno.. It looks crooked to me, as if the right side were shorter than the left. Also the paint on the vette part seems to be less shiny than the rest of the car. And the third thing that looks weird is the bottom left hand corner, it just looks smudged to fit.
I wont believe it till I see a second pic.
I wont believe it till I see a second pic.
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 414
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
The Accord, while I certainly don't like it, looks like it was done professionaly. The Camaros look like they were some GTS tailight covers with vette cutouts...probably costing oh, I'd say $50 bucks.
Don't get me wrong, I don't like the Accord either.
Don't get me wrong, I don't like the Accord either.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post








