Auto Detailing and Appearance Share tips and tricks on how to make your Third Gen shine! Get opinions on products or how something tasteful looks on your Chevrolet Camaro or Pontiac Firebird.

least liked thirdgen??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 02:47 PM
  #51  
icebird_1981's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,661
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
well maby not the best ever but the second best i would say 2002 trans am firehawk is the best every. but that just me
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 03:38 PM
  #52  
Midnight Sun's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 541
Likes: 2
From: Mill Creek, Washington
Car: 1983 Trans Am
Engine: N/A
Transmission: N/A
Originally posted by Sitting Bull
Ladies and Gentlemen,

We suffer from an embarassment of riches with our thirdgen Camaros and Firebirds.

Gfx or not, spoilers or not, I've seen examples of every year and model that knock my socks off. These are just the best looking cars GM has ever produced

I think it is funny the way third gens are often the most neglected of any car, dented and scratched with bad paint and knocking engines. But on the other end of the spectrum, when someone fixes them up, they are proabably some of the nicest cars I have ever seen.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2003 | 06:06 PM
  #53  
meridius's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,012
Likes: 0
From: Allensville, PA
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 5.7 TPI (Now HSR)
Transmission: 700R4 by Probuilt
Axle/Gears: 3:27 9 Bolt Posi W/ Discs
I have an 84 and like some parts about it and I also like other parts of other cars as well, like the looks of the late model ones are raelly nice as well
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2003 | 01:07 AM
  #54  
tpiroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Car: GM & Jaguar
Engine: Various
Transmission: Various
Axle/Gears: Various
Riggs, is that your ride? If so, let's see some more pic of that bad mo! The orange is a little electric but the whole package is HOT if you ask me! I dig... I dig very much. Oh yeah, the Berlinetta was a monster TURD, it looked terrible, and the features were... odd?
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2003 | 06:50 AM
  #55  
90RS305's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
From: Tempe, Arizona
Car: 96 Silverado/99 Suburban
Engine: 700 cubic inches of 'Muican Awesome
Transmission: 4L80/4L60
Axle/Gears: Chunky/Clunky
Yeah, the 3rdgens did get a lot of disrespect!! I couldn't believe what a friend of mine told me! She was at a bacheloret (however thats spelled) party and the stripper they had showed up she said was fugly beyond recognition and they were cracking jokes about him. One of the jokes she remembered was one of them saying "yeah, I bet he pulled up in a 90' Camaro too.." which I took to heart, cuz thats what I own! (funny, the 90' Camaro's were the rarest year for Camaro, too!) She had no idea what year my car was...go figure...

But, in my opinion, 3rdgen was just not the generation for Firebirds. Granted I have seen some of the most stunning 3rdgen Firebirds, but if your gonna get one go with a late 4th gen or ANY 2nd gen, those are my fav. Now on the note of the Camaro...3rdgen was time to shine! Yeah, berlinetta was a slap in the face, but other than that they are things of beauty! I am defenetly partial to late models, though. 87 and up. Love 90's (of course), love 91-92's. It may be just me, but when you get in front of the car and look at it on an angle, your knees just start to get weak. Anywho, there's my 2 cents....
Attached Thumbnails least liked thirdgen??-1990-camaro-rs.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2003 | 09:58 AM
  #56  
Sickness91Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 6
From: Chesterfield, Indiana
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
It may be just me, but when you get in front of the car and look at it on an angle, your knees just start to get weak. Anywho, there's my 2 cents....


I agree 100%.....I especially get that feeling when looknig at the 91 and 91 Z28's..... Around here.....91 and 92's are very rare....I see 85-90 Irocs/Z28's/RS's & 82/84 Z28's all the time....I like them..but..the looks of them get old around here VERY quick..... the 91 and 92 Z28's just stand out...the highrise spoiler..the ground effects....and the power blisters..... JMO
Attached Thumbnails least liked thirdgen??-show.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2003 | 10:12 AM
  #57  
Jon92TA's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 783
Likes: 1
From: OC, CA
Car: 92 Trans Am - Sold
Berlinetta's had to be the low point, but I love the look of the IROC Camaro's, which is what I was looking for when I bought my T/A. I couldn't find an IROC in decent shape for a daily driver so I thought I'd check out this 92 T/A just to compare.

I never really liked the look of the 91-92 nose and thought it was there to help transition the look to the 4th gens. But the T/A was really clean and ran good and I couldn't pass it up. Now that I've owned it for a couple years the 91-92 style nose looks normal to me now and the old traditional front looks cut-off flat, weird.

I'd still like to have an IROC some day. I don't really care for the look of the 91-92 Z28's with the high wing and blister hood, Chevy shoulda quit while they were ahead stuck to the IROC. Too bad IROC switched to Dodge, but good to see that they did wake up and came back to F-bodys even if it's the T/A's, so thats cool.

Last edited by Jon92TA; Apr 17, 2003 at 10:18 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2003 | 09:39 PM
  #58  
riggs58's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
No, that orange camaro is not mine, wish it was though. That's the best looking Iroc I have ever seen. The car was on ebay a while back. Here are some more pictures.
Attached Thumbnails least liked thirdgen??-orangecamaro.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2003 | 09:40 PM
  #59  
riggs58's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
another
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2003 | 09:46 PM
  #60  
riggs58's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Nevermind, the pic is too big
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2003 | 10:07 PM
  #61  
tpiroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Car: GM & Jaguar
Engine: Various
Transmission: Various
Axle/Gears: Various
Thanks for the second pic, feel free to email any other pics you have of the car if you could, it's inspiring; I really like it.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2003 | 10:28 PM
  #62  
riggs58's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Here you go Tpiroc! Hurry, get all the pictures you can before ebay takes them out of their database.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...&category=6161
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2003 | 10:28 PM
  #63  
CETATornado's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI
BTW, in case anyone was wondering, that color is classic Hugger Orange...

I personally like the 85-90 Firebirds more, and the 91-92 Camaros...
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2003 | 10:32 PM
  #64  
tpiroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Car: GM & Jaguar
Engine: Various
Transmission: Various
Axle/Gears: Various
Originally posted by riggs58
Here you go Tpiroc! Hurry, get all the pictures you can before ebay takes them out of their database.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...&category=6161
Awesome... wonder what the reserve was Zero bids... poor guy. Oh well, he'll just have to relist it @ $6000 again with no reserve
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2003 | 10:35 PM
  #65  
riggs58's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Here is a 91-92 Z that the color I think could be called Hugger Orange, or close to it. I like the Iroc better though.
Attached Thumbnails least liked thirdgen??-acfc4odth.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 07:34 AM
  #66  
philoldsmobile's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 1
From: Milton Keynes, England
Car: 2009 Volvo V50 R Design
Engine: 2.0 turbo diesel
Transmission: 6 speed auto
Axle/Gears: yes, both
I'm pretty happy with my 86 sport coupe (V8) :-)





.



I agree with the general feeling here, any of the years / models can look good, with the right treatment.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 11:38 AM
  #67  
83TransAm's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Car: 1983 Trans Am
Engine: 355 SBC
Transmission: 700R-4
I LOVE the 85-90 style Trans Am's, especially the GTA style noses and wings. Although, I have an 83, I am trying to retrofit a wing and such on there. I will post pics later.

Steve
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 11:47 AM
  #68  
CustomX's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,192
Likes: 2
From: Oklahoma city
Car: 90 irocz
Engine: 350tip
Transmission: 700r4
91-92 rs. just a hodge podge of parts fromt he 16 inch wheels on some to the iroc spoiler to........etc etc etc. Idunno they dotn look that bad, butfor soem reason im just not popping a boner when i see them.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 12:16 PM
  #69  
IROCThe5.7L's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 70
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 427 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt / 3.73 TrueTrac
Originally posted by philoldsmobile
I'm pretty happy with my 86 sport coupe (V8) :-)


Why is there IROC stickers on it?
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 12:46 PM
  #70  
tpiroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Car: GM & Jaguar
Engine: Various
Transmission: Various
Axle/Gears: Various
Originally posted by CustomX
91-92 rs. just a hodge podge of parts fromt he 16 inch wheels on some to the iroc spoiler to........etc etc etc.
I used to admire the little "scoops" in the GFX on the 91-92 models, and wanted to convert just the front piece, but after seeing it done, I'm not too impressed. I dunno, I'm having the front end re-painted in the summer and might still try to find one locally if the price is right, what do you guys think (I know this is off topic but it's not quite worthy of its own thread...)?
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 03:13 PM
  #71  
philoldsmobile's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 1
From: Milton Keynes, England
Car: 2009 Volvo V50 R Design
Engine: 2.0 turbo diesel
Transmission: 6 speed auto
Axle/Gears: yes, both
Originally posted by IROCThe5.7L
Why is there IROC stickers on it?
Coz they were free, plus i think they break up the white nicely.

and no, i dont ever calim it to be an IROC
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 03:16 PM
  #72  
tpiroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Car: GM & Jaguar
Engine: Various
Transmission: Various
Axle/Gears: Various
Originally posted by philoldsmobile
Coz they were free, plus i think they break up the white nicely.

and no, i dont ever calim it to be an IROC
Technically speaking you have by placing the stickers there (Just givin' ya a hard time).
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 07:29 PM
  #73  
chevkid's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: West Haven,UT
Car: 87 SC
Engine: 350
Transmission: t5
82-84 Birds look awsome. I do like 85-89 thirdgens the best. Ya all need to stop raggin on Sport Coupes
This is one of my favorite thirdgens


Last edited by chevkid; Apr 18, 2003 at 07:31 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 07:35 PM
  #74  
tpiroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Car: GM & Jaguar
Engine: Various
Transmission: Various
Axle/Gears: Various
Who's raggin' on Sport Coupes?
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2003 | 10:01 PM
  #75  
90RS305's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
From: Tempe, Arizona
Car: 96 Silverado/99 Suburban
Engine: 700 cubic inches of 'Muican Awesome
Transmission: 4L80/4L60
Axle/Gears: Chunky/Clunky
Originally posted by chevkid
82-84 Birds look awsome. I do like 85-89 thirdgens the best. Ya all need to stop raggin on Sport Coupes
This is one of my favorite thirdgens
Those don't look quite stock...is that a firebird wing? And what did you do to the roof?
Reply
Old Apr 19, 2003 | 12:43 AM
  #76  
Agent13's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,301
Likes: 13
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1983 Daytona Trans Am
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
.

Last edited by Agent13; Sep 5, 2005 at 12:10 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 12:31 AM
  #77  
KagA152's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 1
From: Roscoe, IL
Car: 1991 Trans Am
Engine: LQ4
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.70
How can you say no to this? And for those of you who can, you are obviously morons, j/k.
Attached Thumbnails least liked thirdgen??-01.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 05:07 AM
  #78  
90RS305's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
From: Tempe, Arizona
Car: 96 Silverado/99 Suburban
Engine: 700 cubic inches of 'Muican Awesome
Transmission: 4L80/4L60
Axle/Gears: Chunky/Clunky
My biggest thing about the 91-92 Firebirds as most everyone has been saying is the nose on the thing. The gfx, as the picture above depics wonderfully for me, (nothing personal, that is a sweet car man) is that they don't come all the way to the front. If they did, those cars would be like twice as sweet! When they changed the way the nose looked they shouldn't have made that sacrafice....anyone agree? (or at least get what I'm saying?)

Ohh yeah, could defenetly go without the spoke rims too...
Attached Thumbnails least liked thirdgen??-1990-camaro-rs.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 05:54 AM
  #79  
z_power's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Poland
Car: '89 GTA
Engine: a bunch of pieces
Transmission: still there - very stockish TH700
chevkid: have you got any more pics of this splitted sunroof? I haven't seen anything of this kind before...
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 01:32 PM
  #80  
KagA152's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,704
Likes: 1
From: Roscoe, IL
Car: 1991 Trans Am
Engine: LQ4
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.70
Originally posted by 90RS305
My biggest thing about the 91-92 Firebirds as most everyone has been saying is the nose on the thing. The gfx, as the picture above depics wonderfully for me, (nothing personal, that is a sweet car man) is that they don't come all the way to the front. If they did, those cars would be like twice as sweet! When they changed the way the nose looked they shouldn't have made that sacrafice....anyone agree? (or at least get what I'm saying?)

Ohh yeah, could defenetly go without the spoke rims too...
firehawk wheels will come with time, but im poor right now

compared to the formula, the ground effects continue forward, but not all the way around the nose. any artist want to depict what it might look like if they did go all the way around?

Larry Dunlap's car:
Attached Thumbnails least liked thirdgen??-91-formula.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 04:18 PM
  #81  
GNR4EVR's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Memphis, TN
I'm with Kag on this one....say no to this?!
Attached Thumbnails least liked thirdgen??-gta1.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 04:19 PM
  #82  
GNR4EVR's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Memphis, TN
Attached Thumbnails least liked thirdgen??-gta2.jpg  
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 04:57 PM
  #83  
TransAm12sec's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,076
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Car: 1982 Trans Am
Engine: LG4
Transmission: 200C
Axle/Gears: 3:73
Is the part on the door apart of the gfx? or is it apart of the body?
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 07:54 PM
  #84  
GNR4EVR's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Memphis, TN
it's part of the door.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2003 | 08:26 PM
  #85  
chevkid's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: West Haven,UT
Car: 87 SC
Engine: 350
Transmission: t5
Originally posted by z_power
chevkid: have you got any more pics of this splitted sunroof? I haven't seen anything of this kind before...
heres some more pics. this used to be my moms car.

Reply
Old Apr 21, 2003 | 02:53 AM
  #86  
90RS305's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
From: Tempe, Arizona
Car: 96 Silverado/99 Suburban
Engine: 700 cubic inches of 'Muican Awesome
Transmission: 4L80/4L60
Axle/Gears: Chunky/Clunky
Hey chevkid, my post got cut off on the last page but I was asking about your wing and that roof also. Is that a firebird wing? And where did you (or your mom?!) get that top from?
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2003 | 05:16 AM
  #87  
sst's Avatar
sst
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
I know this is a dumb question but what ia gfx?
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2003 | 05:18 AM
  #88  
90RS305's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,070
Likes: 0
From: Tempe, Arizona
Car: 96 Silverado/99 Suburban
Engine: 700 cubic inches of 'Muican Awesome
Transmission: 4L80/4L60
Axle/Gears: Chunky/Clunky
Ground Effects....aka the bodykits that go around the bottom of our third generation Camaros and Firebirds...
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2003 | 02:54 PM
  #89  
chevkid's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: West Haven,UT
Car: 87 SC
Engine: 350
Transmission: t5
Originally posted by 90RS305
Hey chevkid, my post got cut off on the last page but I was asking about your wing and that roof also. Is that a firebird wing? And where did you (or your mom?!) get that top from?
your right, it's a Firebird wing. My cousin did everything you see to the car. He had someone just cut two holes in the roof and put in the sunroof, but it had to be inspected and pass some saftey thing too.

Last edited by chevkid; Apr 21, 2003 at 02:56 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frozer!!!
Camaros for Sale
35
Jan 19, 2024 04:55 PM
Terrell351
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
5
Jun 13, 2021 01:13 PM
Exxon Limited
Camaros Wanted
22
Dec 21, 2015 10:36 PM
fastrs1891
South Central Region
2
Oct 20, 2015 09:24 AM
Exxon Limited
Camaros for Sale
2
Aug 9, 2015 08:13 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:52 PM.