Ferrari Hatched Camaro

Subscribe
May 9, 2003 | 09:49 AM
  #1  
Whats your opinion on this hatch....I don't think it looks that great....not a big fan of the square effect you get looking straight at the back.

Interesting though...


http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...&category=6161
Reply 0
May 9, 2003 | 11:29 AM
  #2  
Hm... it's kinda neat... but eh. :: shrug ::

Probably would look better with the little 3 pc. spoiler rather than that one.
Reply 0
May 9, 2003 | 11:56 AM
  #3  
I prefer the stock rear glass. Although I think it does look better the the notchback.
Reply 0
May 9, 2003 | 12:19 PM
  #4  
i think that looks great!!! get more info!
Reply 0
May 9, 2003 | 01:24 PM
  #5  
Personally, I love Targas, but not on all cars. I don't think thirdgens can pull off the targa look that well because of size of the sailpanel. I love the targa look on the K1 Evoluzione because they added a side window to the pillars which I think makes the hatch look a lot better.
Reply 0
May 9, 2003 | 01:39 PM
  #6  
That ain't no Z.
Reply 0
May 9, 2003 | 01:49 PM
  #7  
Theres one of those running around here. It doesn't look that bad. But I prefer the stock look myself.
Reply 0
May 9, 2003 | 06:24 PM
  #8  
Quote:
That ain't no Z.
Yeah it is, check the vin#.
It came with the LB9 engine, which was only available on the Z28 at the time that care was made...
Reply 0
May 10, 2003 | 10:54 PM
  #9  
Quote:
Originally posted by zer0321
Yeah it is, check the vin#.
It came with the LB9 engine, which was only available on the Z28 at the time that care was made...
While from the vin it is a LB9 engine, that does not mean it was a Z remember the B4C's? Also notice the hood. NOT stock. That looks like an 84Z hood. And since the rear picture is so poor I can't see a definate Z28 on the lower pass side of the bumper. Also I know there is not a Tuned Port Injection on the driver side of the rear bumper. This car could very well have been a Z but to me now it ain't. Anyone who messes up a car this much takes away all the value. I would be pretty sure the SPID list isn't in the driver's side rear compartment either. That is probably long gone. To me it ain't a Z.

BTW notice my sig which I didn't include the first time.
Reply 0
May 10, 2003 | 11:24 PM
  #10  
looks allright, stock looks a lot cleaner, though.
Reply 0
May 10, 2003 | 11:30 PM
  #11  
Quote:
Originally posted by 91z4me
While from the vin it is a LB9 engine, that does not mean it was a Z remember the B4C's? Also notice the hood. NOT stock. That looks like an 84Z hood. And since the rear picture is so poor I can't see a definate Z28 on the lower pass side of the bumper. Also I know there is not a Tuned Port Injection on the driver side of the rear bumper. This car could very well have been a Z but to me now it ain't. Anyone who messes up a car this much takes away all the value. I would be pretty sure the SPID list isn't in the driver's side rear compartment either. That is probably long gone. To me it ain't a Z.

Just because it has a different hood and doesn't have a sticker on the rear bumper makes it not a z-28??

I guess since my car doesn't have the sticker on the back bumper and not the original hood its not an Iroc.
Oh well.
Reply 0
May 10, 2003 | 11:45 PM
  #12  
and i highly doubt that it is a B4C.
Reply 0
May 11, 2003 | 01:33 AM
  #13  
i wonder what a factory or repro notch would look like with a 91-92 z spoiler......
Reply 0
Subscribe