Auto Detailing and Appearance Share tips and tricks on how to make your Third Gen shine! Get opinions on products or how something tasteful looks on your Chevrolet Camaro or Pontiac Firebird.

Ferrari Hatched Camaro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 9, 2003 | 09:49 AM
  #1  
billsfirebird's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,907
Likes: 0
From: In the state of bliss
Car: 1984 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 2.5L Iron Duke 4 cylinder
Transmission: 5 speed manual
Ferrari Hatched Camaro

Whats your opinion on this hatch....I don't think it looks that great....not a big fan of the square effect you get looking straight at the back.

Interesting though...


http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...&category=6161
Reply
Old May 9, 2003 | 11:29 AM
  #2  
FyreLance's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,445
Likes: 1
From: Huber Heights, OH
Car: 00 TA, 91 Formula, 89 RS
Engine: LS1 / 305 / 2.8, respectively
Transmission: T-56 / auto / auto
Hm... it's kinda neat... but eh. :: shrug ::

Probably would look better with the little 3 pc. spoiler rather than that one.
Reply
Old May 9, 2003 | 11:56 AM
  #3  
TransAm12sec's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,076
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Car: 1982 Trans Am
Engine: LG4
Transmission: 200C
Axle/Gears: 3:73
I prefer the stock rear glass. Although I think it does look better the the notchback.
Reply
Old May 9, 2003 | 12:19 PM
  #4  
easySPEEDcamaro's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Car: 1992 Camaro Z28 Anniversary Edition
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: Borg Warner 5-Speed
i think that looks great!!! get more info!
Reply
Old May 9, 2003 | 01:24 PM
  #5  
devianb's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,029
Likes: 6
From: Illinois
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Personally, I love Targas, but not on all cars. I don't think thirdgens can pull off the targa look that well because of size of the sailpanel. I love the targa look on the K1 Evoluzione because they added a side window to the pillars which I think makes the hatch look a lot better.
Reply
Old May 9, 2003 | 01:39 PM
  #6  
91z4me's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
From: louisville, ky usa
That ain't no Z.
Reply
Old May 9, 2003 | 01:49 PM
  #7  
iroc22's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,415
Likes: 2
From: Surrey, BC
Theres one of those running around here. It doesn't look that bad. But I prefer the stock look myself.
Reply
Old May 9, 2003 | 06:24 PM
  #8  
zer0321's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 578
Likes: 1
That ain't no Z.
Yeah it is, check the vin#.
It came with the LB9 engine, which was only available on the Z28 at the time that care was made...
Reply
Old May 10, 2003 | 10:54 PM
  #9  
91z4me's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
From: louisville, ky usa
Originally posted by zer0321
Yeah it is, check the vin#.
It came with the LB9 engine, which was only available on the Z28 at the time that care was made...
While from the vin it is a LB9 engine, that does not mean it was a Z remember the B4C's? Also notice the hood. NOT stock. That looks like an 84Z hood. And since the rear picture is so poor I can't see a definate Z28 on the lower pass side of the bumper. Also I know there is not a Tuned Port Injection on the driver side of the rear bumper. This car could very well have been a Z but to me now it ain't. Anyone who messes up a car this much takes away all the value. I would be pretty sure the SPID list isn't in the driver's side rear compartment either. That is probably long gone. To me it ain't a Z.

BTW notice my sig which I didn't include the first time.
Reply
Old May 10, 2003 | 11:24 PM
  #10  
[VU]Juan's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
Car: 84 TransAM
Engine: Chevy 355
Transmission: TH350
looks allright, stock looks a lot cleaner, though.
Reply
Old May 10, 2003 | 11:30 PM
  #11  
BTS88IROC's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 957
Likes: 0
From: Mesa, AZ
Originally posted by 91z4me
While from the vin it is a LB9 engine, that does not mean it was a Z remember the B4C's? Also notice the hood. NOT stock. That looks like an 84Z hood. And since the rear picture is so poor I can't see a definate Z28 on the lower pass side of the bumper. Also I know there is not a Tuned Port Injection on the driver side of the rear bumper. This car could very well have been a Z but to me now it ain't. Anyone who messes up a car this much takes away all the value. I would be pretty sure the SPID list isn't in the driver's side rear compartment either. That is probably long gone. To me it ain't a Z.

Just because it has a different hood and doesn't have a sticker on the rear bumper makes it not a z-28??

I guess since my car doesn't have the sticker on the back bumper and not the original hood its not an Iroc.
Oh well.
Reply
Old May 10, 2003 | 11:45 PM
  #12  
mw66nova's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
and i highly doubt that it is a B4C.
Reply
Old May 11, 2003 | 01:33 AM
  #13  
robertg's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,878
Likes: 0
From: northeast ohio
Car: 2000 astro
Engine: 4.3
Transmission: A4
Axle/Gears: 7.5 with 3.42 gears
i wonder what a factory or repro notch would look like with a 91-92 z spoiler......
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Vintageracer
Camaros for Sale
12
Jan 10, 2020 05:33 PM
madsv1000
Interior Parts for Sale
1
Aug 20, 2015 06:45 AM
Randomtask2
Body
7
Aug 13, 2015 01:57 AM
3rdgenparts
Exterior Parts for Sale
0
Aug 8, 2015 11:48 AM
z28addict8490
Interior
6
Aug 7, 2015 08:48 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:58 AM.