Auto Detailing and Appearance Share tips and tricks on how to make your Third Gen shine! Get opinions on products or how something tasteful looks on your Chevrolet Camaro or Pontiac Firebird.

1999 Camaro SS owner thinking of buying a 3rd Gen

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 01:05 PM
  #1  
1999-SS-Vert's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Riley, KS
Car: 1999 Camaro SS Convertible
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T-56
1999 Camaro SS owner thinking of buying a 3rd Gen

Hey guys
I've always loved the look of the 3rd Gen Camaro, especially the 91-92 Z28's and the 87-90 IROC-Z's. I ended up buying a 1999 SS Convertible 6 Speed. I love the car and am thinking of starting a small Camaro collection.
My first thought was of a 1969 SS 396 Camaro, but those are crazy expensive. My next favorite is the 3rd Gen.

I'm getting ready to go back to Iraq soon (U.S. Army), but when I come home I'd like to buy one (Mush to the wife's dismay). I'm an avid manual trans fan also. I don't want the car to do a power build or for speed. I've got the LS1 for that. I want a nice, low mile, original Camaro Z-28 or IROC. I'm not going to get another convertible, one is enough.

What is the best year to get and what should I look out for? My next door neighbor has a 92 Camaro RS 25th Anniversary edition. He's had lots of electrical problems (VATTS), and it's pretty weak with the TBI 305. At a minimum I want a TPI 305. So what do you guys think?
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 01:10 PM
  #2  
z28kindaguy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Car: 2004 Pontiac GTO
Engine: LS1
Transmission: M12
If you plan on keeping the car stock but want decent speed, I would settle for nothing less than a L98 (350 TPI) or at the very least the LB9 (305 TPI).

I would suggest a 91 - 92 z28. IMO they look the best.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 01:13 PM
  #3  
blyth18md's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,408
Likes: 2
From: Western Maryland
Car: 82z28
Engine: 406
Transmission: th350
Axle/Gears: 3.23
...or a b4c 1le car...

sweeet!
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 01:23 PM
  #4  
nick418's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
1991-1992 Z28 l98
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 01:35 PM
  #5  
MetalliCamaroRS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,030
Likes: 1
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: 700R4 3500 stall, TransGo shift kit
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11:1
Well if you want a manual, you're not gonna get a 350 unless someone did a swap. I'd look for a 91-92 Z with an LB9 and 5-speed.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 02:14 PM
  #6  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
yeah, do a 89 to 92 Iroc or Z28 L98. should do the trick. all you need to have alittle kick in the pants with one of those is make sure it has the 3.27 rear (9-bolt in the 89-90 i think) or at least 3.23 or up in the 91-92 10-bolt rears and add a 2800 stall converter and shift kit. makes an enjoyable car.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 02:16 PM
  #7  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
a lower mileage unit in great shape is fairly cheap at 4-6 grand.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 02:55 PM
  #8  
megaracerx's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
why not buy a Bird?? a nice Trans Am or GTA is just as nice as an IROC or Z-28
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 02:59 PM
  #9  
Aredross's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery Alabama were not *******s
Car: 1990 RS coupe
Engine: TBI 305.
Transmission: 700R4
Arent the 90-92 TPI's faster than the others?
Just thinking out loud
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 03:01 PM
  #10  
Quick6's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Car: 1991 Camaro Z28
Engine: L98 5.7 V8 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
A 91-92 Z28 350 TPI hard top!
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 03:11 PM
  #11  
MetalliCamaroRS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,030
Likes: 1
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: 700R4 3500 stall, TransGo shift kit
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11:1
Originally posted by Aredross
Arent the 90-92 TPI's faster than the others?
Just thinking out loud
I believe the speed density setups are rated at like 10 HP more than the MAF ones
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 03:45 PM
  #12  
Z28ricer's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
90-92 G92 305 tpi, good luck finding one, best bet will be a 91, dont think 90 iroc production was very high on em, 92 seems to be slim to none, figures seem to point at numbers most likely lower than 100, and not possible above 600, i have one of them, you've got 599 possible to search out.



Hardtop was required on them which should help you on a search looking through cars, 90-92 305 and disc brake its likely a G92, was only avail hardtop only manual and had discs.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 05:14 PM
  #13  
Stevo's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,970
Likes: 1
From: Northern, VA
Car: Pair of 92 Z28s
worst problem is that they didnt offer the 5 spd with the 350...

thats the only problem on my car is its not manual but ill live with what i got cause i love the power it makes.

many people have droped the T-5 in the 350s and have had no problems...GM said it couldnt hold to the amount of torque the L98/350s made.

if u gotta have a manual definently go with a later iroc or 91-92 z28 LB9/5 spd. My plan sence i hate autos is to drop a T56 from a later model camaro next summer.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 05:45 PM
  #14  
Kandied91z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,039
Likes: 0
From: michigan
i love mine..
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 06:26 PM
  #15  
azvolfan's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,308
Likes: 0
From: Avondale, AZ
Car: currently thirdgenless!!!
The '91-'92 Z28 305 TPI 5sp with dual exhaust was rated at 230hp. I think that will fit the bill nicely. As far as finding one, that may be tough.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 06:54 PM
  #16  
IROCThe5.7L's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 70
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 427 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt / 3.73 TrueTrac
If you are going to start a "collection", i'd look for an IROC-Z. Just my opinion though.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 08:39 PM
  #17  
nick418's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
Originally posted by azvolfan
The '91-'92 Z28 305 TPI 5sp with dual exhaust was rated at 230hp. I think that will fit the bill nicely. As far as finding one, that may be tough.
not dual exhaust, DUAL CATS
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 08:41 PM
  #18  
megaracerx's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Originally posted by nick418
not dual exhaust, DUAL CATS
but YOU dont need to worry about them anymore, do ya?
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 08:43 PM
  #19  
nick418's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
Originally posted by megaracerx
but YOU dont need to worry about them anymore, do ya?
SHHHHHHH its suppose to be a secret between you and me
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 08:48 PM
  #20  
megaracerx's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Originally posted by nick418
SHHHHHHH its suppose to be a secret between you and me

my bad..
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 09:09 PM
  #21  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
SHHHHHHH its suppose to be a secret between you and me

WHOA, hold on. whats up nick??
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 09:14 PM
  #22  
megaracerx's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Orr89RocZ
WHOA, hold on. whats up nick??
Nothing. what would give you the idea that anything is "up" huh? huh?!?

Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 09:40 PM
  #23  
91Zman's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 0
From: Where the heck am I !..Oh yeah,in Lousy-ana.
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 4L60 automatic
I hear that the '91-92 Z28s are pretty sweet!
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 09:43 PM
  #24  
megaracerx's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,297
Likes: 0
Originally posted by 91Zman
I hear that the '91-92 Z28s are pretty sweet!

there not that great...


ok ok...i admit...there are...but until i own one...my LG4 conquers all!
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 09:49 PM
  #25  
91Zman's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 1,563
Likes: 0
From: Where the heck am I !..Oh yeah,in Lousy-ana.
Car: 1991 Z28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 4L60 automatic
Originally posted by megaracerx
there not that great...


ok ok...i admit...there are...but until i own one...my LG4 conquers all!
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 09:56 PM
  #26  
RU-QWIK's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,635
Likes: 1
From: Central Coast Calif.
Car: 91' Camaro
Engine: 383 ci
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 9 bolt / 3:70
A 5 speed car is going to be much harder to find than an automatic, but they are out there. Are you up to do a conversion? I have swapped out automatics in 2 thirdgens, it is a very easy job ! I did mine first with no problems, other than the trans. finally let go. I now have a 6 speed in it....also an easy conversion. If you are game for doing the swap, there is plenty of information on this site alone to guide you through it.

Good luck!

Jason Aschle
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2005 | 11:25 PM
  #27  
1999-SS-Vert's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Riley, KS
Car: 1999 Camaro SS Convertible
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T-56
Thanks for all the responses. A T-56 swap isn't out of the question, although I am leaning towards keeping the car basically stock/original. A guy I know in the Kansas f-body club has a black 1991 Z28 with a T-56, I'm not sure if is a 350 or 305, but is is a TPI engine.
Would you guys consider an IROC-Z (1987-1989) or a 91-92 Z28 more collectable? Like I said, this car will mostly be to look good, not go that fast. I'd have to sink a lot of money into the TPI engine to get it as fast as my 99 SS was stock. I'm not sure if these cars will ever be collectable, but I think they will in 5-10 years, especially the sought after models/option packages.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 12:01 AM
  #28  
Sickness91Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 6
From: Chesterfield, Indiana
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
Would you guys consider an IROC-Z (1987-1989) or a 91-92 Z28 more collectable?
For me, it's hard to answer that question. Around here, I see WAY more IROCs than I do 91-92 Z28's. I've had a hand full of people ask me "where did you get that spoiler, what kind of body kit is that, where are your IROC decals"...all kinds of crazy questions because there are no 91-92 Z28's in my area. I had to travel to another state to pick my 91 Z28 up...and it wasn't in very good condition either. Just depends how popular they are in your area I suppose
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 12:04 AM
  #29  
MetalliCamaroRS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,030
Likes: 1
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: 700R4 3500 stall, TransGo shift kit
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11:1
You can find production numbers here

A 1LE wouldn't be a bad investment for ya
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 05:57 AM
  #30  
nick418's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
id say that the 91-92 Z28 is gonna be more collectible. 1. I OWN one 2. They made Less 1991-92 Z28s then they made IROCS
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 07:27 AM
  #31  
Greg99LS1's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, TX USA
Car: 2012 Corvette Grand Sport 'vert
Engine: LS3
Transmission: 6L80
Axle/Gears: 2:73
A '90 IROC is pretty rare, since the 1990 MY was a very short one, especially if you can find a G92 car...

My personal preference would be an 85-90 IROC....they look much cleaner (smoother) than the 91-92 Z28s.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 10:06 AM
  #32  
f355bird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 0
From: allen,tx
Car: 1985 Iroc-Z
Engine: 305
Transmission: t-5
I would also agree the iroc is by far the best looker for camaro's. If i bought another thirdgen it would be an iroc without a doubt.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 12:59 PM
  #33  
CaysE's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,680
Likes: 7
From: Dirty Jersey
If you want a collection, find a 1LE, no doubt about it.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 02:01 PM
  #34  
Z28ricer's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,149
Likes: 3
From: Tampa, FL, USA
Car: 93 240SX
Engine: LQ9
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.54 R200 IRS
1LE is rare yup

90- 62
91- 478
92- 705

But like i said, seems nobody around here even realizes how few G92 5 liter 92s were made, take a look at production numbers for 90-92 cars and the rules they were built by, a 350 car was supposed to automatically have G92, a little research and you'll find out how little were made

I've quite possibly got the only black / red striped G92 5 liter heritage

Last edited by Z28ricer; Jan 8, 2005 at 02:04 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 03:29 PM
  #35  
IROCThe5.7L's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 70
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 427 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt / 3.73 TrueTrac
Originally posted by f355bird
I would also agree the iroc is by far the best looker for camaro's. If i bought another thirdgen it would be an iroc without a doubt.
:werd:

I do not want to start a pissing match or anything between Iroc’s and 91-92 Z’s. But I believe the Iroc’s are the most sought after thirdgens.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 03:34 PM
  #36  
Sickness91Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 6
From: Chesterfield, Indiana
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
Originally posted by IROCThe5.7L
:werd:

I do not want to start a pissing match or anything between Iroc’s and 91-92 Z’s. But I believe the Iroc’s are the most sought after thirdgens.
Without a doubt, your right, but alot of people just want the "IROC" name. You could take a..lets say a 1987 Z28, put an IROC-Z Decal on the door and people with not much knowledge about 3rd gens will think it's an IROC....not knowing about the different options the IROC has over the base Z28. To the public that don't know much about the 82-92 Camaros...they will just about call every base Camaro, RS, IROC, Z28...whatever an IROC because of what type of car it is Which is cool....I just hate it when people tell me "to bad it's not an IROC"

Last edited by Sickness91Z28; Jan 8, 2005 at 03:38 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 03:36 PM
  #37  
Sickness91Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 6
From: Chesterfield, Indiana
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
350 car was supposed to automatically have G92, a little research and you'll find out how little were made
BTW, there were only 175 1991 Z28 1LE's equipped with the 5.7 TPI/G92
And a friend of mine has one...and recently totalled it
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 04:15 PM
  #38  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
i wish mine was a G92. its an 89 with the 9 bolt and 2.77 gears. the G92 had dual cats and 3.27's i believe for the 5.7 liter cars.

i thought all G92's were 1LE's????
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 04:16 PM
  #39  
nick418's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
Originally posted by Orr89RocZ
i wish mine was a G92. its an 89 with the 9 bolt and 2.77 gears. the G92 had dual cats and 3.27's i believe for the 5.7 liter cars.

i thought all G92's were 1LE's????
nope... My G92 isnt 1LE
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 04:46 PM
  #40  
IROCThe5.7L's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,225
Likes: 70
From: Buffalo, NY
Car: 1988 IROC-Z
Engine: 427 SBC
Transmission: ProBuilt 700R4
Axle/Gears: Moser 12 Bolt / 3.73 TrueTrac
Originally posted by 84customZ28
Without a doubt, your right, but alot of people just want the "IROC" name. You could take a..lets say a 1987 Z28, put an IROC-Z Decal on the door and people with not much knowledge about 3rd gens will think it's an IROC....not knowing about the different options the IROC has over the base Z28. To the public that don't know much about the 82-92 Camaros...they will just about call every base Camaro, RS, IROC, Z28...whatever an IROC because of what type of car it is Which is cool....I just hate it when people tell me "to bad it's not an IROC"

I hear ya.


I like the 91-92's alot myself My buddy has a 92 B4C
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2005 | 09:42 PM
  #41  
camaroguy21's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Car: 1992 Camaro 5.7L Z28
Engine: L98, G92 option
Transmission: Pro-Built 700R4
Get a 1990 Iroc Z with the 350 TPI. Not only was this the last year of the Iroc, but the 350's were also still available with T-Tops. Then put on the 91-92 ground effects and 5in. spoiler and call it a day...
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2005 | 10:29 AM
  #42  
Sickness91Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 6
From: Chesterfield, Indiana
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
Get a 1990 Iroc Z with the 350 TPI. Not only was this the last year of the Iroc, but the 350's were also still available with T-Tops.
For The Camaros, 1989 was the last year that the 350 was available with t-tops..not 1990.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2005 | 06:09 PM
  #43  
91RSHawaii's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu Hawaii
Car: 1999 30th Anniversary Pontiac T/A
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T-56
Axle/Gears: 3.42
157,000 IROCS vs. 17,000 91-92 Z28s... go figure get a 25th ann one, that should be a collectible later, but its true that an IROC might be more valued than an 91 z28 later on... the fact remains however that there are not many 91-92 z28s at all in existence today... if they only made 17,000 of em.... a good chunk must be totalled or totally wrecked.. in a decade or two, we all might end up owning a piece of history much in the same way those 69 camaros are... plus, if they reintroduce the camaro into production, it can only make our cars more and more popular.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2005 | 08:16 PM
  #44  
ScottyRS's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,678
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Car: 1992 Camaro RS
Engine: L03
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: Stock
Get a '92 25th anniversary heritage Z-28. It's a bitchin car and a nice investment.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2005 | 09:04 PM
  #45  
Stevo's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,970
Likes: 1
From: Northern, VA
Car: Pair of 92 Z28s
Originally posted by ScottyRS
Get a '92 25th anniversary heritage Z-28. It's a bitchin car and a nice investment.
i agree
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 10:14 PM
  #46  
f1ls1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 561
Likes: 3
From: Lake Elsinore,CA
Car: 1999 F-1 Camaro Conv 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: LS1/L98
Transmission: A4/A4
Axle/Gears: 3.23/3.27
Originally posted by 1999-SS-Vert
Thanks for all the responses. A T-56 swap isn't out of the question, although I am leaning towards keeping the car basically stock/original. A guy I know in the Kansas f-body club has a black 1991 Z28 with a T-56, I'm not sure if is a 350 or 305, but is is a TPI engine.
Would you guys consider an IROC-Z (1987-1989) or a 91-92 Z28 more collectable? Like I said, this car will mostly be to look good, not go that fast. I'd have to sink a lot of money into the TPI engine to get it as fast as my 99 SS was stock. I'm not sure if these cars will ever be collectable, but I think they will in 5-10 years, especially the sought after models/option packages.
87-90 Iroc will hold it's value better than the 91-92 Z28's.
How is old Fort Riley? I was stationed there 1983-85.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2005 | 09:05 AM
  #47  
1999-SS-Vert's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Ft. Riley, KS
Car: 1999 Camaro SS Convertible
Engine: LS1
Transmission: T-56
Fort Riley was established in 1853. I've been here since July 2002, but I've only actually been physically here about 1/2 the time due field exercises and a deployment. It's actually alot nicer than I expected. It is a pretty area. After living in CA most of my life, I'm not wild about the Kansas climate and bugs.

As for the cars, I guess time will tell. It will probably be another 10-15 years before the cars are collectable, like the 1st and 2nd gens.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2005 | 09:17 AM
  #48  
f1ls1's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 561
Likes: 3
From: Lake Elsinore,CA
Car: 1999 F-1 Camaro Conv 1990 Iroc-Z
Engine: LS1/L98
Transmission: A4/A4
Axle/Gears: 3.23/3.27
Actually they are starting to appreciate now. The third gen is the new collector car. So now is the time to decide if you really want one while you can still get OEM parts from GM.

What part of CA are you from? Yea, That Kansas climate sure does suck! -20 in the winter to +115 in the summer. Sure glad I'm not there anymore.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2005 | 11:07 AM
  #49  
lxcamaroxl's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
From: Acushnet,Ma
Car: 92 Camaro (R)eally(S)tock
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: Auto 700r4
Im about to buy an 86 IROC. What other specail options did it include?
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2005 | 12:30 PM
  #50  
Abubaca's Avatar
Moderator
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 8,494
Likes: 413
From: Sophia, NC
Car: 2016 Camaro SS + 1986 Z28
There wasn't a whole lot of "extras" in '86.

...not that it's a bad thing though!
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:08 PM.