Auto Detailing and Appearance Share tips and tricks on how to make your Third Gen shine! Get opinions on products or how something tasteful looks on your Chevrolet Camaro or Pontiac Firebird.

FX Designs releases TA bodykit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 02:08 AM
  #1  
PontiacRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Car: 1987 Pontiac Trans Am GTA, 1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
Engine: Custom 350, 3.1 V6
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
FX Designs releases TA bodykit

I was browsing the FX designs website and I noticed that had added this bodykit. I like it even better than the one they make for the Camaros. I wonder if the sideskirts from the TA kit would fit a Camaro.





Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 02:31 AM
  #2  
EvilCartman's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 4
From: Northern CA.
Car: '82 Z28
Engine: 350
Transmission: TH400 4,000 stall
Axle/Gears: Currie 9", 4.56 gears
One word, UGLY.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 02:38 AM
  #3  
Thirdgen89GTA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
I suppose it solves the issue of the firebirds being a bottom breather. But it still doesn't work with the cars lines, and ultimately looks out of place.

Its awkward, and I don't really see how to fix it.

I say ney, don't like it.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 03:30 AM
  #4  
Incoming's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Seminole, Florida
Car: 1986 Firebird T/A Streetracer
Engine: V8 350TPI
Transmission: Modified 700R4
i like it looks bad ***
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 05:26 AM
  #5  
18inchboyds's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 3
From: Amsterdam , NY
Car: 1985 Trans Am
Engine: vee eight
Transmission: auto
Axle/Gears: 4.10 gears
those side skirts looks good .
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 08:16 AM
  #6  
'86Twins's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 1986 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: T-5 NWC
Call me *****, but I think it looks good too. Makes me really want to get my firebird back on the road!
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 08:43 AM
  #7  
tilstad's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Car: 87 Black Formula
Engine: Rollercammed Lg4
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10 Bolt Locker
I think it is hard to tell what it would look like when it's only primered. Perhaps it could be cool in it's own way.

But the thing that nags me about it, did you notice how incredibly low the front is? It's like almost scraping the ground, even though it seems to have stock ride height!!

I wouldn't lower a car with that kit...Now we only need a Baja-kit.

Last edited by tilstad; Jan 23, 2005 at 08:00 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 10:08 AM
  #8  
Orr89RocZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
the back end sorta makes it look like the 4th gen trans am, which i like.

the side skirts are cool, i like that

the front end is uhhhhh, jury is still out

i need more angles and painted to really decide
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 10:10 AM
  #9  
Camaroguy18's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 0
From: MN
Car: 1986 Camaro SC (Supercool)
Engine: one composed of various metals
It's different, so thats a plus....not really domestic looking though IMO someone should get it though
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 11:36 AM
  #10  
'86Twins's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 1986 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: T-5 NWC
Originally posted by Camaroguy18
It's different, so thats a plus....not really domestic looking though IMO someone should get it though
Send me the money and I'll gladly buy it!

Just kidding around with ya. But I do plan on buying it for my firebird when I get the cash.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 11:40 AM
  #11  
Dingley's Avatar
Senior Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, RI
Car: 1986 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: LG4 305
Transmission: T5
i think i can sum this up for everyone....

side skirts look REALLY GOOD.
front bumper cover looks awful.
rear bumper is okay, but there are better options.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 11:43 AM
  #12  
Incoming's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Seminole, Florida
Car: 1986 Firebird T/A Streetracer
Engine: V8 350TPI
Transmission: Modified 700R4
if all else u could order just the sideskirts and bumper... the only part i might not like about it is that it might not be long enough of a front it is hard to tell without some good shots...
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 11:44 AM
  #13  
Incoming's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Seminole, Florida
Car: 1986 Firebird T/A Streetracer
Engine: V8 350TPI
Transmission: Modified 700R4
im gonna order the bumper and the sideskirts.. those got damaged in the accident and its hard enough trying to find a decent bumper around here

also what does it mean by 2peice and 4 piece sideskirts or sideskirts and door panels what door panels are they talking about?

Last edited by Incoming; Jan 13, 2005 at 11:48 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 11:57 AM
  #14  
CaysE's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,680
Likes: 7
From: Dirty Jersey
Not bad except for the front bumper cover. But I do like the foglight mounts and the big center scoop. If it was a TTA (copy, hopefully, no need to go taking apart a perfectly good original), an intercooler would look great in there.

The door panels are what make the sideskirts look straight along the top. The sideskirts are actually U-shaped and wrap around the sides of the door panels.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 12:24 PM
  #15  
Stevo's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,970
Likes: 1
From: Northern, VA
Car: Pair of 92 Z28s
stuff like this just looks so outta place. These cars look great from the factory...but meh thats just my opinion
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 12:36 PM
  #16  
Agent13's Avatar
Moderator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,302
Likes: 13
From: Chicagoland
Car: 1983 Daytona Trans Am
Engine: LG4
Transmission: T5
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Looks like an old man who lost his teeth....
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 12:41 PM
  #17  
PontiacRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Car: 1987 Pontiac Trans Am GTA, 1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
Engine: Custom 350, 3.1 V6
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
If it was a TTA (copy, hopefully, no need to go taking apart a perfectly good original), an intercooler would look great in there.
That makes me drool thinking about how that would look.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 01:26 PM
  #18  
Kandied91z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,039
Likes: 0
From: michigan
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 02:08 PM
  #19  
FyreLance's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,445
Likes: 1
From: Huber Heights, OH
Car: 00 TA, 91 Formula, 89 RS
Engine: LS1 / 305 / 2.8, respectively
Transmission: T-56 / auto / auto
How nasty.

Especially the nose. Rear is... bearable... sideskirts are alright.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 02:29 PM
  #20  
Sonar_un's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Car: '86 T/A
Engine: 350/LT1 Intake
Transmission: 700R4 - Built
Axle/Gears: 4th gen 3.42
OMG HIDEOUS!

Our cars aren't 'tuner' cars and shouldn't be treated as such.

Side skirts are ok though.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 02:40 PM
  #21  
Daytona T/A's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Car: 1983 25th Anniversary Daytona 500 Pace Car Trans Am
Engine: 5.0L 305 Crossfire-Injected V8
Transmission: 4 spd. auto
I still have yet to see an aftermarket bodykit for thirdgens that I like
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 03:09 PM
  #22  
Formula 89 Bird's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: IL
Car: 89 Formy
Engine: 305--->TPI 350
Transmission: auto :(
I like it. Everything is smooth and not over done except for the rear, its kinda of busy. Other than that I'd buy it (anybody have a price) and if I saw it painted.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 03:14 PM
  #23  
KiLLJ0Y
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
i like the side and rear.. but i question the front.

before i call it ugly.. i would want to see a final product.. painted.. maybe in black or red..



any finished pics?
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 06:40 PM
  #24  
f355bird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 0
From: allen,tx
Car: 1985 Iroc-Z
Engine: 305
Transmission: t-5
I think it definately looks better than any other kit i have seen for 3rdgens. Looks pretty good over all but i wouldnt put it on my car.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 07:38 PM
  #25  
tornado's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: laveen,az
Car: 1987 Z/28
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
i like it, its diffrent, so do u guys think the side skirts would fit a camaro??
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 07:54 PM
  #26  
jgifford's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo, Tx
Car: 1986 Z28
Engine: 355TPI 380hp
Transmission: Rebuilt 700r w/ Transgo Shift Kit
Originally posted by Sonar_un
Our cars aren't 'tuner' cars and shouldn't be treated as such...
Define 'tuner' If you mean an automobile that's been modified with fiberglass body parts such as hoods (ahem), ...etc and/or performance upgrades, then what does that make us? I'm just messing with ya.

Actually, I like the rear, I really like the sideskirts, and in my mind, with the right paint, an intercooler, and some mesh to fill in where its teeth should be , it could have potential to look pretty cool. I've always liked totally different.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 09:09 PM
  #27  
Borsty's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
From: Eden, NY
Car: 89 Trans am
Engine: TBI 350 HO Vortec heads
Transmission: 700R4
ugly


the only good part is the side skirts, rest is ****ing horrid
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 09:32 PM
  #28  
PontiacRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Car: 1987 Pontiac Trans Am GTA, 1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
Engine: Custom 350, 3.1 V6
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
The price is $328 per part of the kit. I haven't found any pictures of it painted, but I doubt there are any since the kit just came out.
Reply
Old Jan 13, 2005 | 10:26 PM
  #29  
z28kindaguy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Car: 2004 Pontiac GTO
Engine: LS1
Transmission: M12
:no:
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 09:27 AM
  #30  
Dante93GTZ's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,873
Likes: 5
From: East Tennessee
Car: 1992 Z28 Heritage Edition
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23:1
Re: FX Designs releases TA bodykit

Originally posted by PontiacRacing
I was browsing the FX designs website and I noticed that had added this bodykit. I like it even better than the one they make for the Camaros. I wonder if the sideskirts from the TA kit would fit a Camaro.





As far as body kits go, I think it looks pretty good.

ONe thing I take into consideration as I look at this is what it could POTENTIALLY do for the 3rdgen. Kids that want a V8 but some customization potential can look at that kit and actually buy a 3rdgen, instead of a Honda.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 11:41 AM
  #31  
MetalliCamaroRS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,030
Likes: 1
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: 700R4 3500 stall, TransGo shift kit
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11:1
Re: Re: FX Designs releases TA bodykit

Originally posted by Dante93GTZ


ONe thing I take into consideration as I look at this is what it could POTENTIALLY do for the 3rdgen. Kids that want a V8 but some customization potential can look at that kit and actually buy a 3rdgen, instead of a Honda.
I don't see that as a good thing at all. Then we'll have a bunch of "Fast and Furious" third gens running around.

As for the body kit, I don't like it. The side skirts are alright, but the nose and rear bumper look out of place.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 11:45 AM
  #32  
PontiacRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Car: 1987 Pontiac Trans Am GTA, 1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
Engine: Custom 350, 3.1 V6
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
I don't see that as a good thing at all. Then we'll have a bunch of "Fast and Furious" third gens running around.
I see it as a good thing. Some of these people who would have never driven a V8 can see what the power of one can actually do. The more people who buy third gens and parts for them, the more aftermarket companies will make parts for us.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 01:25 PM
  #33  
Demon355's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 4
From: Toronto, Ont
Someone photochop those pics so that we can see the kit with paint. You can't really tell if it looks good unless it actually goes with the car. But from seeing it now...I think it looks like **** except for the side skirts. I'd take those.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 02:26 PM
  #34  
1983Fbody's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
From: Newberry, Mi
Car: transam, el camino
Engine: 415
Transmission: T56
eww, I mean.. I like different.. thats just sick.. in a bad way... gross

Last edited by 1983Fbody; Jan 14, 2005 at 02:28 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 02:40 PM
  #35  
MetalliCamaroRS's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,030
Likes: 1
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: 700R4 3500 stall, TransGo shift kit
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11:1
Originally posted by PontiacRacing
I see it as a good thing. Some of these people who would have never driven a V8 can see what the power of one can actually do. The more people who buy third gens and parts for them, the more aftermarket companies will make parts for us.
True, but I'd rather not see APC come out with parts for our cars. I think the import tuner brands would just make import tuner styled parts for our cars. I guess if thats what you want a muscle car to look and sound like, then thats fine. Just my opinion though
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 02:42 PM
  #36  
CrazyHawaiian's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 3
From: Changing Tires
Car: too many ...
I'll be honest, the only part I like is the sideskirts. I like the idea of an aftermarket kit, but so far I have not seen any of these kits that I like. The main reason I dont like the fronts of the FX design kits (for both Camaro and T/A) is because the bottom edges come back in toward the body instead of going straight down or out a little (like the stock front clip). I think this makes the front end look less aggressive. If the bottom corners were brought out a little more to make the entire front lip wider, then I think it would look 100 times better. The other thing I dont like are all the unnecessary vents. This gives the kit the illusion of being physically weak (well in my opinion anyway). I can understand vents in the front to mount turn signals or driving lights, even the area for a FMIC, but thats about it. And the rear bumper, that little bar that hangs between where the exhaust tips would sit, I dont see a reason for this vent. I think if it were solid then it would look physically stronger. I like the sideskirts alot.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 03:02 PM
  #37  
Goumba T's Avatar
Senior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
From: Howard Beach, NYC
Car: 1990 TA
Engine: LB9 305
Transmission: 4L60
Re: Re: Re: FX Designs releases TA bodykit

Originally posted by MetalliCamaroRS
I don't see that as a good thing at all. Then we'll have a bunch of "Fast and Furious" third gens running around.
The first thing I thought about when I saw it was that bright orange 'bird on eBay a while back that was "inspired" by F&F.

My vote: fugly.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 04:19 PM
  #38  
Squeeks83's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 973
Likes: 0
From: Avondale, AZ, used to be seattle, washington
Car: 1978 Chevrolet C10
Engine: 350
Transmission: Turbo 350
Originally posted by EvilCartman
One word, UGLY.
exactally
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 10:08 PM
  #39  
PontiacRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Car: 1987 Pontiac Trans Am GTA, 1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
Engine: Custom 350, 3.1 V6
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
True, but I'd rather not see APC come out with parts for our cars. I think the import tuner brands would just make import tuner styled parts for our cars. I guess if thats what you want a muscle car to look and sound like, then thats fine. Just my opinion though
I'd be happy if they made just tail lights. I hate how the stock tail lights look. But anyway, I'll be the first to admit that I love muscle cars. I love V8's and big *** cars, but I also like the GT Styling. I don't think the GT Styling looks as out of place on sports cars like Camaros and Firebirds as it does on economy cars like Civics.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 10:10 PM
  #40  
nick418's Avatar
TGO Supporter
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 91 Z28 & 21 Hellcat Challenger
Engine: L98, Hemi 6.2
one Word, UGLY
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 11:26 PM
  #41  
deadbird's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 6,775
Likes: 27
From: So.west IN
Car: 87 Formula/ 00 Xtreme
Engine: TPI 305/ v6
Transmission: struggling t-5/ 4l60E
Axle/Gears: 3.08/ 3.23
The bad thing of it is.. our cars are caught in a cross generation gap. The young crowd wants the: mass-media, mind-numbing, shoved-in-your-face-must have-it-because it's-trendy-it's-on-TV, it's the latest style so I'm in, crap.
The elder crowd wants.. custom but, subtle and still turns heads w/o having to have gaudy-_ss flash BS bolted on.

I'm just glad the people that own true classic f-bodies (1stgen & 70-73 2nd gen) don't desire this crap. (or any other classic owners)

What does look like total s__t is the fact the front & rear bumper wrap up to the body line and the gfx ar still ride the stock lower line. Even if the sides look good.. it looks like a__ as a package.

Of course.. just my opinion amongst the many.

Last edited by deadbird; Jan 14, 2005 at 11:29 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2005 | 05:01 AM
  #42  
CrazyHawaiian's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 5,675
Likes: 3
From: Changing Tires
Car: too many ...
I dont think anyone with 1st or 2nd gens would ever run GFX since those cars didnt come with GFX, it would look way out of place. What I dont really understand is why its OK for the C4 vettes to have bodykits and stuff, but its a no-no for the 3rd gen f-body. I think its because there are no good quality kits out there for us. I dont really like the idea of a new front clip because its trendy. I do like the idea of the front lip sitting lower to the ground, I think it looks more aggressive. Probably because I like the GT style. I finally have the stance I want with my Z28, but I'm not happy with the way the front clip sits in relation to the ground. Too much gap for me, so its gonna change.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2005 | 09:38 AM
  #43  
LottaBallsCamaro's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 914
Likes: 0
From: Hampton Roads. VA
Yeah, I would definatly like to see a "modest" bodykit that just imporved the lines of the car instead of drastically changing them.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2005 | 08:54 PM
  #44  
GokuZ06Roc's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Albany NY
Car: 87' Iroc-Z
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
i like the sideskirts...front and rear bumper tho....i dunno
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 02:19 AM
  #45  
redraif's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 1
From: Moved... GA still, more garage space!
Car: 87 Red/Blk Bird loaded 3.4L & 700R4
Transmission: Th700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by 18inchboyds
those side skirts looks good .
Looks like the 91-92 Camaro
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 02:25 AM
  #46  
redraif's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 1
From: Moved... GA still, more garage space!
Car: 87 Red/Blk Bird loaded 3.4L & 700R4
Transmission: Th700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by CrazyHawaiian
I'll be honest, the only part I like is the sideskirts. I like the idea of an aftermarket kit, but so far I have not seen any of these kits that I like. The main reason I dont like the fronts of the FX design kits (for both Camaro and T/A) is because the bottom edges come back in toward the body instead of going straight down or out a little (like the stock front clip). I think this makes the front end look less aggressive. If the bottom corners were brought out a little more to make the entire front lip wider, then I think it would look 100 times better.
I would rather modify there Camaro rear one for a bird. This one seems too rounded! The center of the front is fine. esp if you were going to run an innercooler. But the darn front sides are throwing me. I don't like the curve in! Should be more angular & sweep out not in!

Its also a bad angle. I want to see it straight on Frt and back!

Last edited by redraif; Jan 23, 2005 at 02:27 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 09:30 AM
  #47  
War_Eagle's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: Titusville, Fl. USA
Not impressed with it. The front and rear completly take away from the car, and the side skirts don't blend in either. Oh well not for me...

Last edited by War_Eagle; Jan 29, 2007 at 08:54 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 10:36 AM
  #48  
speed88's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
From: St. John's, NL, Canada
Car: 1988 Trans Am GTA
Engine: 383
Transmission: 700R4
F'ing horrible!!! Absolutely disgusting!! :nono: :no:
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 11:27 AM
  #49  
iansane's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,109
Likes: 25
From: Tacoma, Wa
Car: '91 TA vert
Engine: turboLSx
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23




Also have camaro stuff on their site. Yikes.
Reply
Old Jan 23, 2005 | 12:23 PM
  #50  
iroc2nv's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,951
Likes: 1
From: pefferlaw ontario
Car: 1987 iroc-z custom
Engine: 355 tuned port
Transmission: 5spd baby, only way to go
Axle/Gears: 3.45
i have to disagree with almost everyone here.

i think the side skirts DO NOT go well with the kit.

the front and rear look good, while the sides look out of place

im glad that companies are finally starting to put products out for our cars and finally now i can maybe compete against some other cars that are "different" like mine

iroc2nv

i personally think that my front end looks better on my car then it does on that black car..plus i have the "seamless look" now too, which also helps

but thats just my opinion

iroc2nv
Attached Thumbnails FX Designs releases TA bodykit-iroc-front-shot.jpg  

Last edited by iroc2nv; Jan 23, 2005 at 12:29 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 AM.