FX Designs releases TA bodykit
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Car: 1987 Pontiac Trans Am GTA, 1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
Engine: Custom 350, 3.1 V6
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
FX Designs releases TA bodykit
I was browsing the FX designs website and I noticed that had added this bodykit. I like it even better than the one they make for the Camaros. I wonder if the sideskirts from the TA kit would fit a Camaro.


Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 5,906
Likes: 240
From: Chicagoland Suburbs
Car: 1989 Trans Am GTA
Engine: LT1, AFR 195cc, 231/239 LE cam.
Transmission: M28 T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10bolt waiting to explode.
I suppose it solves the issue of the firebirds being a bottom breather. But it still doesn't work with the cars lines, and ultimately looks out of place.
Its awkward, and I don't really see how to fix it.
I say ney, don't like it.
Its awkward, and I don't really see how to fix it.
I say ney, don't like it.
Senior Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Car: 87 Black Formula
Engine: Rollercammed Lg4
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.23 10 Bolt Locker
I think it is hard to tell what it would look like when it's only primered. Perhaps it could be cool in it's own way.
But the thing that nags me about it, did you notice how incredibly low the front is? It's like almost scraping the ground, even though it seems to have stock ride height!!
I wouldn't lower a car with that kit...Now we only need a Baja-kit.
But the thing that nags me about it, did you notice how incredibly low the front is? It's like almost scraping the ground, even though it seems to have stock ride height!!
I wouldn't lower a car with that kit...Now we only need a Baja-kit.
Last edited by tilstad; Jan 23, 2005 at 08:00 AM.
Trending Topics
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,895
Likes: 429
From: Pittsburgh PA
Car: 89 Iroc-z
Engine: 555 BBC Turbo
Transmission: TH400
Axle/Gears: MWC 9” 3.00
the back end sorta makes it look like the 4th gen trans am, which i like.
the side skirts are cool, i like that
the front end is uhhhhh, jury is still out
i need more angles and painted to really decide
the side skirts are cool, i like that
the front end is uhhhhh, jury is still out
i need more angles and painted to really decide
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Car: 1986 Pontiac Firebird
Engine: 305 LG4
Transmission: T-5 NWC
Originally posted by Camaroguy18
It's different, so thats a plus....not really domestic looking though IMO someone should get it though
It's different, so thats a plus....not really domestic looking though IMO someone should get it though
Just kidding around with ya. But I do plan on buying it for my firebird when I get the cash.
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, RI
Car: 1986 Pontiac Trans Am
Engine: LG4 305
Transmission: T5
i think i can sum this up for everyone....
side skirts look REALLY GOOD.
front bumper cover looks awful.
rear bumper is okay, but there are better options.
side skirts look REALLY GOOD.
front bumper cover looks awful.
rear bumper is okay, but there are better options.
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Seminole, Florida
Car: 1986 Firebird T/A Streetracer
Engine: V8 350TPI
Transmission: Modified 700R4
if all else u could order just the sideskirts and bumper...
the only part i might not like about it is that it might not be long enough of a front it is hard to tell without some good shots...
the only part i might not like about it is that it might not be long enough of a front it is hard to tell without some good shots... Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
From: Seminole, Florida
Car: 1986 Firebird T/A Streetracer
Engine: V8 350TPI
Transmission: Modified 700R4
im gonna order the bumper and the sideskirts.. those got damaged in the accident and its hard enough trying to find a decent bumper around here
also what does it mean by 2peice and 4 piece sideskirts or sideskirts and door panels what door panels are they talking about?
also what does it mean by 2peice and 4 piece sideskirts or sideskirts and door panels what door panels are they talking about?
Last edited by Incoming; Jan 13, 2005 at 11:48 AM.
Not bad except for the front bumper cover. But I do like the foglight mounts and the big center scoop. If it was a TTA (copy, hopefully, no need to go taking apart a perfectly good original), an intercooler would look great in there.
The door panels are what make the sideskirts look straight along the top. The sideskirts are actually U-shaped and wrap around the sides of the door panels.
The door panels are what make the sideskirts look straight along the top. The sideskirts are actually U-shaped and wrap around the sides of the door panels.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Car: 1987 Pontiac Trans Am GTA, 1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
Engine: Custom 350, 3.1 V6
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
If it was a TTA (copy, hopefully, no need to go taking apart a perfectly good original), an intercooler would look great in there.
Junior Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: IL
Car: 89 Formy
Engine: 305--->TPI 350
Transmission: auto :(
I like it. Everything is smooth and not over done except for the rear, its kinda of busy. Other than that I'd buy it (anybody have a price) and if I saw it painted.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 0
From: allen,tx
Car: 1985 Iroc-Z
Engine: 305
Transmission: t-5
I think it definately looks better than any other kit i have seen for 3rdgens. Looks pretty good over all but i wouldnt put it on my car.
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
From: Amarillo, Tx
Car: 1986 Z28
Engine: 355TPI 380hp
Transmission: Rebuilt 700r w/ Transgo Shift Kit
Originally posted by Sonar_un
Our cars aren't 'tuner' cars and shouldn't be treated as such...
Our cars aren't 'tuner' cars and shouldn't be treated as such...
I'm just messing with ya.Actually, I like the rear, I really like the sideskirts, and in my mind, with the right paint, an intercooler, and some mesh to fill in where its teeth should be
, it could have potential to look pretty cool. I've always liked totally different. Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Car: 1987 Pontiac Trans Am GTA, 1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
Engine: Custom 350, 3.1 V6
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
The price is $328 per part of the kit. I haven't found any pictures of it painted, but I doubt there are any since the kit just came out.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,873
Likes: 5
From: East Tennessee
Car: 1992 Z28 Heritage Edition
Engine: L98
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 3.23:1
Re: FX Designs releases TA bodykit
Originally posted by PontiacRacing
I was browsing the FX designs website and I noticed that had added this bodykit. I like it even better than the one they make for the Camaros. I wonder if the sideskirts from the TA kit would fit a Camaro.

I was browsing the FX designs website and I noticed that had added this bodykit. I like it even better than the one they make for the Camaros. I wonder if the sideskirts from the TA kit would fit a Camaro.

ONe thing I take into consideration as I look at this is what it could POTENTIALLY do for the 3rdgen. Kids that want a V8 but some customization potential can look at that kit and actually buy a 3rdgen, instead of a Honda.
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,030
Likes: 1
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: 700R4 3500 stall, TransGo shift kit
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11:1
Re: Re: FX Designs releases TA bodykit
Originally posted by Dante93GTZ
ONe thing I take into consideration as I look at this is what it could POTENTIALLY do for the 3rdgen. Kids that want a V8 but some customization potential can look at that kit and actually buy a 3rdgen, instead of a Honda.
ONe thing I take into consideration as I look at this is what it could POTENTIALLY do for the 3rdgen. Kids that want a V8 but some customization potential can look at that kit and actually buy a 3rdgen, instead of a Honda.
As for the body kit, I don't like it. The side skirts are alright, but the nose and rear bumper look out of place.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Car: 1987 Pontiac Trans Am GTA, 1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
Engine: Custom 350, 3.1 V6
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
I don't see that as a good thing at all. Then we'll have a bunch of "Fast and Furious" third gens running around.
Someone photochop those pics so that we can see the kit with paint. You can't really tell if it looks good unless it actually goes with the car. But from seeing it now...I think it looks like **** except for the side skirts. I'd take those.
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,030
Likes: 1
Car: 1989 IROC-Z
Engine: 383 stroker
Transmission: 700R4 3500 stall, TransGo shift kit
Axle/Gears: Moser 9", 4.11:1
Originally posted by PontiacRacing
I see it as a good thing. Some of these people who would have never driven a V8 can see what the power of one can actually do. The more people who buy third gens and parts for them, the more aftermarket companies will make parts for us.
I see it as a good thing. Some of these people who would have never driven a V8 can see what the power of one can actually do. The more people who buy third gens and parts for them, the more aftermarket companies will make parts for us.
I'll be honest, the only part I like is the sideskirts. I like the idea of an aftermarket kit, but so far I have not seen any of these kits that I like. The main reason I dont like the fronts of the FX design kits (for both Camaro and T/A) is because the bottom edges come back in toward the body instead of going straight down or out a little (like the stock front clip). I think this makes the front end look less aggressive. If the bottom corners were brought out a little more to make the entire front lip wider, then I think it would look 100 times better. The other thing I dont like are all the unnecessary vents. This gives the kit the illusion of being physically weak (well in my opinion anyway). I can understand vents in the front to mount turn signals or driving lights, even the area for a FMIC, but thats about it. And the rear bumper, that little bar that hangs between where the exhaust tips would sit, I dont see a reason for this vent. I think if it were solid then it would look physically stronger. I like the sideskirts alot.
Senior Member

Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
From: Howard Beach, NYC
Car: 1990 TA
Engine: LB9 305
Transmission: 4L60
Re: Re: Re: FX Designs releases TA bodykit
Originally posted by MetalliCamaroRS
I don't see that as a good thing at all. Then we'll have a bunch of "Fast and Furious" third gens running around.
I don't see that as a good thing at all. Then we'll have a bunch of "Fast and Furious" third gens running around.
My vote: fugly.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Car: 1987 Pontiac Trans Am GTA, 1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
Engine: Custom 350, 3.1 V6
Transmission: 700R4, 700R4
True, but I'd rather not see APC come out with parts for our cars. I think the import tuner brands would just make import tuner styled parts for our cars. I guess if thats what you want a muscle car to look and sound like, then thats fine. Just my opinion though
TGO Supporter
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 6,775
Likes: 27
From: So.west IN
Car: 87 Formula/ 00 Xtreme
Engine: TPI 305/ v6
Transmission: struggling t-5/ 4l60E
Axle/Gears: 3.08/ 3.23
The bad thing of it is.. our cars are caught in a cross generation gap. The young crowd wants the: mass-media, mind-numbing, shoved-in-your-face-must have-it-because it's-trendy-it's-on-TV, it's the latest style so I'm in, crap.
The elder crowd wants.. custom but, subtle and still turns heads w/o having to have gaudy-_ss flash BS bolted on.
I'm just glad the people that own true classic f-bodies (1stgen & 70-73 2nd gen) don't desire this crap. (or any other classic owners)
What does look like total s__t is the fact the front & rear bumper wrap up to the body line and the gfx ar still ride the stock lower line. Even if the sides look good.. it looks like a__ as a package.
Of course.. just my opinion amongst the many.
The elder crowd wants.. custom but, subtle and still turns heads w/o having to have gaudy-_ss flash BS bolted on.
I'm just glad the people that own true classic f-bodies (1stgen & 70-73 2nd gen) don't desire this crap. (or any other classic owners)
What does look like total s__t is the fact the front & rear bumper wrap up to the body line and the gfx ar still ride the stock lower line. Even if the sides look good.. it looks like a__ as a package.
Of course.. just my opinion amongst the many.
Last edited by deadbird; Jan 14, 2005 at 11:29 PM.
I dont think anyone with 1st or 2nd gens would ever run GFX since those cars didnt come with GFX, it would look way out of place. What I dont really understand is why its OK for the C4 vettes to have bodykits and stuff, but its a no-no for the 3rd gen f-body. I think its because there are no good quality kits out there for us. I dont really like the idea of a new front clip because its trendy. I do like the idea of the front lip sitting lower to the ground, I think it looks more aggressive. Probably because I like the GT style. I finally have the stance I want with my Z28, but I'm not happy with the way the front clip sits in relation to the ground. Too much gap for me, so its gonna change.
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 1
From: Moved... GA still, more garage space!
Car: 87 Red/Blk Bird loaded 3.4L & 700R4
Transmission: Th700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by 18inchboyds
those side skirts looks good .
those side skirts looks good .
Supreme Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,266
Likes: 1
From: Moved... GA still, more garage space!
Car: 87 Red/Blk Bird loaded 3.4L & 700R4
Transmission: Th700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Originally posted by CrazyHawaiian
I'll be honest, the only part I like is the sideskirts. I like the idea of an aftermarket kit, but so far I have not seen any of these kits that I like. The main reason I dont like the fronts of the FX design kits (for both Camaro and T/A) is because the bottom edges come back in toward the body instead of going straight down or out a little (like the stock front clip). I think this makes the front end look less aggressive. If the bottom corners were brought out a little more to make the entire front lip wider, then I think it would look 100 times better.
I'll be honest, the only part I like is the sideskirts. I like the idea of an aftermarket kit, but so far I have not seen any of these kits that I like. The main reason I dont like the fronts of the FX design kits (for both Camaro and T/A) is because the bottom edges come back in toward the body instead of going straight down or out a little (like the stock front clip). I think this makes the front end look less aggressive. If the bottom corners were brought out a little more to make the entire front lip wider, then I think it would look 100 times better.
I would rather modify there Camaro rear one for a bird. This one seems too rounded! The center of the front is fine. esp if you were going to run an innercooler. But the darn front sides are throwing me. I don't like the curve in! Should be more angular & sweep out not in!Its also a bad angle. I want to see it straight on Frt and back!
Last edited by redraif; Jan 23, 2005 at 02:27 AM.
Not impressed with it. The front and rear completly take away from the car, and the side skirts don't blend in either. Oh well not for me...
Last edited by War_Eagle; Jan 29, 2007 at 08:54 PM.
Supreme Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,951
Likes: 1
From: pefferlaw ontario
Car: 1987 iroc-z custom
Engine: 355 tuned port
Transmission: 5spd baby, only way to go
Axle/Gears: 3.45
i have to disagree with almost everyone here.
i think the side skirts DO NOT go well with the kit.
the front and rear look good, while the sides look out of place
im glad that companies are finally starting to put products out for our cars and finally now i can maybe compete against some other cars that are "different" like mine
iroc2nv
i personally think that my front end looks better on my car then it does on that black car..plus i have the "seamless look" now too, which also helps
but thats just my opinion
iroc2nv
i think the side skirts DO NOT go well with the kit.
the front and rear look good, while the sides look out of place
im glad that companies are finally starting to put products out for our cars and finally now i can maybe compete against some other cars that are "different" like mine
iroc2nv
i personally think that my front end looks better on my car then it does on that black car..plus i have the "seamless look" now too, which also helps
but thats just my opinion
iroc2nv
Last edited by iroc2nv; Jan 23, 2005 at 12:29 PM.








Looks like an old man who lost his teeth....
:nono: :no:
