Auto Detailing and Appearance Share tips and tricks on how to make your Third Gen shine! Get opinions on products or how something tasteful looks on your Chevrolet Camaro or Pontiac Firebird.

18's to Big

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2007 | 11:37 PM
  #1  
kelham's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Car: 87 TA / 87 Firebird
Engine: 385 FastBurn / Performance 3.4L
Transmission: TKO600 / 700R4
Axle/Gears: Ford 9" / GM 10bolt
18's to Big

Im looking at buying the Torq Thrust II's before race season this year. Do you think they would be to big or would have clearence issues if I went with an 18x10 inch rim with 255/35R18's. Or should I go with a 17x9 rim for racing on, I just dont want the rims to take over the car. Anyone done the 18 inch rim thing, and regretted it let me know
Thanks
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 12:53 AM
  #2  
Gr89RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach CA
Car: '02 Z06
I've had mine for just over a month now..don't regret 'em one bit. I feel like their is perfect harmony between the car and the wheels..and clearance is not a problem so long as you choose backspacing and tire size wisely. With a 10" wide wheel I'd look into something wider like a 285/295". I'm running 18x9" in the rear with 285's and a 5.5" backspacing.
Attached Thumbnails 18's to Big-18jyd.jpg  
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 12:57 AM
  #3  
Black is Best's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: Dallas TX
Car: 89 Camaro RS
Engine: 305 TBI
Transmission: 700r4
I personally like 18's on thirdgens. Well most I have seen some that look horrible.

But w/ Torq Thrust I'd go w/ 17's IMO.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 07:04 AM
  #4  
1FastZ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 667
Likes: 2
From: Louisville Kentucky U.S.A.
Car: 86 Iroc Z
Engine: 406
Transmission: 350 Turbo
Axle/Gears: 373
I love my 18's......would never go back
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 07:23 AM
  #5  
GTAKnight's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Mankato, MN
Car: Trans Am GTA, 1989
Engine: L98
Transmission: 700R4
I am buying 18s for my 89 GTA within next week.
At the moment I decided for:

18 x 8,5 front, 6 mm negative offset with: with 245/40/18
18 x 9,5 rear, 6 mm positive offset with: 275/35/18

What do you say to the size, will they fit okey? Which offset would you recommend me? The rims should not overlap the fender (hopefully you know what I mean.

Thanks for any advice!
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 07:30 AM
  #6  
Radiorick's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: Hermitage, Pa
Car: '89 t-bird SC/87 Z-28 vert
Engine: 305
Transmission: auto
18"

Picked up my 18s last summer - finally bought tires for them this winter. 18s look great and everything I've seen and read there is no problems. I will put mine on this springs. I put a set of goodyear eagles on my eagle alloy 077 rims. SWEET Can't wait to show them off Rick
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 10:44 AM
  #7  
Sickness91Z28's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,226
Likes: 6
From: Chesterfield, Indiana
Car: 1991 Z28 Camaro
Engine: 5.7
Transmission: Jasper 700R4 Stage II
Axle/Gears: 3.23 For Now
I've got 17" TTII's on mine....I'm really wanting to get a set of 18's though. But I have yet to see a set of 18" TTII's on a third gen
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 11:40 AM
  #8  
Firebat's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,786
Likes: 3
18s weigh more than the same rim in 17" form. 18s get less traction than 17s. Tires for 18" cost more. 17s sounds like a better choice, for racing. 18s look about perfect though, depends on the rim.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 12:43 PM
  #9  
Brisk's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,623
Likes: 0
From: Beautiful BC
Car: '88 IROC-Z / '91 Z28 / '91 GTA
Engine: LT4 Hot Cam 305 / L98 355 / MR 383
Transmission: 5-spd / 700R4 / 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3:45 / 3:23 / 3:23
I agree with Gr89RS, with a 10" wide rim look for something wider like a 285 or 295. I've got a 10" wide rear rim with 275's on and the rubber is just a touch too narrow.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 01:16 PM
  #10  
BADNBLK's Avatar
COTM Editor
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,098
Likes: 13
From: WINDSOR, CO
Car: 91 Z28, 87 SC, 90 IROC, 92 RS
Engine: LS1, 305 TPI, L98, NADA
Transmission: T56, 700r4's, and NADA
Axle/Gears: 3.89, 3.42, 3.23, NADA
I've got 18's and would never go back to 17's. I ran two different sets of 17's before going this route, and the 18's complete the suspension. Firebat does make some good points, and I would seriously think about what type of racing you are doing. I run 18x10 in the rear with 285/35's, and will be stepping up to a 295/35 g-force drag radial this summer.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 05:07 PM
  #11  
Kandied91z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,039
Likes: 0
From: michigan
the 18" dr is great if you don't want to go down on rim size to race, fun on the street as well but it's a heavy wheel and tire combination even with lighter billet wheels.

if you race then stick with 17's or smaller. if you want to "play" 18's are fine. i like my 19's but tires are wayyyyy.... too expensive.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 06:08 PM
  #12  
Camaroguy18's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,139
Likes: 0
From: MN
Car: 1986 Camaro SC (Supercool)
Engine: one composed of various metals
I slapped my 18's on when I was doing a complete suspension overhaul so I cant comment on the difference of ride quality (my car rides rough as it is from all the tightening up) but you can't beat the look for the price. Like kandied was stating, just by going up an inch to 19's you already notice a huge price gap...17's and 18's are comparable, just depends on if you want performance or a little bit of show
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 06:11 PM
  #13  
xgtharo86x's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 692
Likes: 1
From: Oviedo,Florida
Car: 86' Trans am
Engine: 85 LG4-non cc carb(building a 350)
Transmission: Rebuilt 700R4,vette servo,2200stall
Axle/Gears: 2.73 Posi
i think 18's fill the wheel well perfectly
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2007 | 06:30 PM
  #14  
5678TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
From: Maui, Hawaii
Car: 1984 Trans Am
Engine: broken 385sbc
Transmission: G-Force rebuilt T-5
Axle/Gears: Currie 9" Ford 4.30:1
save the 255's for an 8" rim.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 10:40 AM
  #15  
Johns88sc's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
I think the 18" fit the car perfectly appearance wise.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 03:13 PM
  #16  
Kandied91z's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 13,039
Likes: 0
From: michigan
Originally Posted by Camaroguy18
I slapped my 18's on when I was doing a complete suspension overhaul so I cant comment on the difference of ride quality (my car rides rough as it is from all the tightening up) but you can't beat the look for the price. Like kandied was stating, just by going up an inch to 19's you already notice a huge price gap...17's and 18's are comparable, just depends on if you want performance or a little bit of show
the larger you go rim size and width your car suffers greatly in ride and wear/tear.

if you think your car rides rough with 16's or 17's don't even consider jumping up unless you've dumped alot of money into your suspension and even then you won't get a very comfortable ride but most of us deal with it. your front steering will see the most wear when you jump up in size as well so upgrade your bushings and check them out every year. your steering box should be gone through as well if you have a high mileage car or it won't last long.

all things to consider when going up such a size. you not only loose power on the street but your gas mileage drops also from the weight the larger and wider your rim. you can cut this down by running a skinnier tire up front and running the skinniest tire you feel you can live with in the rear.

has anyone found a torque multiplier versus different tire weights and statistics yet. i've tried to look to see how much horsepower and torque you actually loose when switching wheels but i have yet to find anything.

my car physically lost 23 horsepower to the wheels when i went from 16's to 19's on the dyno just to give you an idea. so if you don't have a built motor your really going to notice it in that 170 horsepower tbi or 230 horsepower tpi on the street.

just things to consider..
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 08:01 PM
  #17  
18inchboyds's Avatar
Supreme Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 3
From: Amsterdam , NY
Car: 1985 Trans Am
Engine: vee eight
Transmission: auto
Axle/Gears: 4.10 gears
i love how my 18s look but i dont like my ride with the sportlines and poly bushings . Its harsh . But it looks good and thats what i care about .
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2007 | 08:25 PM
  #18  
Gr89RS's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,912
Likes: 0
From: Redondo Beach CA
Car: '02 Z06
Originally Posted by Kandied91z
the larger you go rim size and width your car suffers greatly in ride and wear/tear.

if you think your car rides rough with 16's or 17's don't even consider jumping up unless you've dumped alot of money into your suspension and even then you won't get a very comfortable ride but most of us deal with it. your front steering will see the most wear when you jump up in size as well so upgrade your bushings and check them out every year. your steering box should be gone through as well if you have a high mileage car or it won't last long.

all things to consider when going up such a size. you not only loose power on the street but your gas mileage drops also from the weight the larger and wider your rim. you can cut this down by running a skinnier tire up front and running the skinniest tire you feel you can live with in the rear.

has anyone found a torque multiplier versus different tire weights and statistics yet. i've tried to look to see how much horsepower and torque you actually loose when switching wheels but i have yet to find anything.

my car physically lost 23 horsepower to the wheels when i went from 16's to 19's on the dyno just to give you an idea. so if you don't have a built motor your really going to notice it in that 170 horsepower tbi or 230 horsepower tpi on the street.

just things to consider..
this is true, but there are many variables to consider..cast wheels weigh much more than a billet aluminum wheel depending on the wheel you decide to go with (light weight wheels are pricey as the cheaper wheels are heavier).

I personally felt no noticeable difference when switching from the stock 16's to my boyds, it's all subjective though.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 09:16 PM
  #19  
The Project's Avatar
Supreme Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,041
Likes: 8
From: West of Toronto
Car: 89 IROC
Engine: 305 TPI / ZZ4 cam
Transmission: Stage 2 700R4, LS1 driveshaft
Axle/Gears: Strange 3.42 w/ Auburn
Also beware of the cost..........Up here in Canada going from 17" to 18" can cost an EXTRA $500 for rims and tires!!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cam-aro
Camaros Wanted
2
Nov 12, 2015 03:35 PM
BrianChevy
Wheels and Tires
5
Oct 13, 2015 12:33 PM
LT1Formula
Engine/Drivetrain/Suspension Parts for Sale
7
Oct 8, 2015 08:34 PM
3.8TransAM
NW Indiana and South Chicago Suburb
2
Oct 1, 2015 07:47 PM
dusterbd
TPI
0
Sep 29, 2015 08:40 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:18 AM.