Removal of "X" Braces in front of radiator
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI USA
Car: '89 Camaro Convertible
Engine: LB9 Heads/LT1 Cam Holley 670 Carb
Transmission: T5 Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Removal of "X" Braces in front of radiator
I recently did an in car cam swap and removed the two little braces that form an x and hold the air duct in place in front of the radiator.
My question is do you think that those two little rods provide any structural support or are they just meant to hold the air duct in place. I'm trying to decide whether or not to replace them. I don't plan on putting the air duct back in place. So if they don't strengthen the front end I'll just leave them off as well. Any opinions will be appreciated.
My question is do you think that those two little rods provide any structural support or are they just meant to hold the air duct in place. I'm trying to decide whether or not to replace them. I don't plan on putting the air duct back in place. So if they don't strengthen the front end I'll just leave them off as well. Any opinions will be appreciated.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI USA
Car: '89 Camaro Convertible
Engine: LB9 Heads/LT1 Cam Holley 670 Carb
Transmission: T5 Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.73
Thanks. That's what I was thinking. Anyone else care to offer an opinion?
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Maryland *Again*
Car: 86 Trans Am WS6
Engine: 350 TPI
Transmission: 700R4
Hmmm not sure their only reason is to hold the duct in place. My TA has them as well but doesn't have a duct there to hold so it must be some type of structural support. If it's not in your way I say put them back on, the engineers who designed this car felt they were neccessary.
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,627
Likes: 5
From: Houston Area
Car: Faster
Engine: Than
Transmission: You!
I removed my X - brace and have been driving it like that for a couple of years now. It had to be removed along with the baffle to install the ram-air boxes.
The brace is only there for minimal structural support to MAYBE save the radiator upon a light front end impact (minor wreck).
The brace is only there for minimal structural support to MAYBE save the radiator upon a light front end impact (minor wreck).
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI USA
Car: '89 Camaro Convertible
Engine: LB9 Heads/LT1 Cam Holley 670 Carb
Transmission: T5 Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.73
I've been driving it and I can't tell any difference. Since they are only held in place by one small screw on each end I would think that any structural "loading" would have sheared through such a small screw so I really don't think that there is a lot of force being applied.
However, since it is a convertible I want all of the rigidity I can get so I may just put them back in.
Anyone else have an opinion?
However, since it is a convertible I want all of the rigidity I can get so I may just put them back in.
Anyone else have an opinion?
Moderator




Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 14,293
Likes: 195
From: Doghouse ······································ Car: 1989 Formula 350 Vert Engine: 350 L98 Transmission: 700R4 Axle/Gears: B&W 3.27
Car: 87 Formula T-Top, 87 Formula HT
Engine: 5.1L TPI, 5.0L TPI
Transmission: 700R4, M5
Axle/Gears: Sag 3.73, B&W 3.45
I think a #8 Screw can withstand up to about 500-600 LBS Sheer...
John
John
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
From: Madison, WI USA
Car: '89 Camaro Convertible
Engine: LB9 Heads/LT1 Cam Holley 670 Carb
Transmission: T5 Manual
Axle/Gears: 3.73
I don't know if it's all in my head or not but the car seems less rigid. I'm going to put them back in.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1992 Trans Am
History / Originality
27
May 10, 2023 07:19 PM
ambainb
Camaros for Sale
11
Apr 25, 2016 09:21 PM





