Body General body information and techniques for restoration, repairs, and modifications.

The Weight Reduction Thread!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 23, 2005 | 06:16 PM
  #101  
B4Ctom1's Avatar
TGO Supporter
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
http://www.outlawperformance.com/ima...stuff/progress

take a look so far:

Reply
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 06:02 PM
  #102  
FerrMaro's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Canyon Country, CA
Hmmm...what about light weight carpeting? Has this already been covered? And where would someone go abot finding this?
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 07:38 PM
  #103  
mw66nova's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
yep, already been covered, ACC makes an aftermarket carpet and it only weighs like 10lbs or so and the factory stuff weighs probably in the neighborhood of 50 or more.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 07:44 PM
  #104  
B4Ctom1's Avatar
TGO Supporter
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
wow nice to know!
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2005 | 11:27 AM
  #105  
devianb's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,029
Likes: 6
From: Illinois
Car: 1988 Trans Am
Engine: 305 TPI
Ah, that is some good info, My primary concern is removing weight on moving parts, drivetrain, suspension, and wheels.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2005 | 01:21 PM
  #106  
cocacolakidd's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: RogueValley, Oregon
Car: 84Z & Porsche
Engine: 427sbc - 471 - 850 Demon Claw
Transmission: Bowtie stage II TH700R4 - 10" 3000
Axle/Gears: 9 Bolt w/ 3:45's
The Weight Reduction

Moving the battery to the trunk well area is a good weight transfer solution. True the heavy 4ga. cables are weighty, but they are half in front and half in back. This somewhat cancelles the weight transfer. By moving the battery to the rear well area it's 20 odd lbs. off the front, and 20lbs added to the rear area. This is a little adder for traction, and weight transfer.

Cocacolakidd -
Reply
Old May 12, 2005 | 02:24 PM
  #107  
FullSendRacing's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 294
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Car: '85 Trans Am FAILBIRD
Engine: 350
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4th gen torsen 3.42
I'm curious what the difference between stock formula hood and fiberglass. according to NfS, his IROC hood weighed 67.5. I think the formula hood is probably lighter, but can't be too much lighter. VFN fiberglass claims their fiber bolt-on is 18lb, and the bolt-on is 12lb. That's a pretty huge difference.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2005 | 12:52 AM
  #108  
NEEDforSPEED's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,036
Likes: 1
hey anyone got some shorty headers laying around they can weigh for me? j/w the diffrents
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2005 | 08:34 AM
  #109  
mw66nova's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
no, but i did weigh the aluminum vs. iron drums, WOW! 5lbs. lighter EACH! 10lbs. less rotating mass!
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2005 | 01:34 PM
  #110  
F-Bobby's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 253
Likes: 2
From: NH
Car: 1989 Formula 350
Engine: Stealth Rammed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 bolt
my 87 formula, with GTA wheels, 245 50 16 tires, no ac compressor or condenser (the rest of it was still there) no smog, headers, custom exhaust, No emmissions equipment at all, no other weight reduction and me in it (220) weighed in at 3440, and i also had some junk in the car, so it easily could have been 3400 had i cleaned it out.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2005 | 03:06 PM
  #111  
Spdfrk1990's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
So about 3200 with no driver not bad.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 05:41 PM
  #112  
F-Bobby's Avatar
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 253
Likes: 2
From: NH
Car: 1989 Formula 350
Engine: Stealth Rammed 350
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 3.45 9 bolt
Originally posted by Spdfrk1990
So about 3200 with no driver not bad.
yeah and that was with MINOR weight reduction. I also have Power locks and windows. The only things i took out were the air pump and the ac compressor and condenser. Oh and i got a mini starter, so that prolly shaved a few pounds off.
Reply
Old Jun 13, 2005 | 08:41 PM
  #113  
mw66nova's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
full power doors only weigh about 3lbs. more than non-powered doors, so.......
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2005 | 03:19 AM
  #114  
f355bird's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 0
From: allen,tx
Car: 1985 Iroc-Z
Engine: 305
Transmission: t-5
My formula is 3,100 with a 1/2 tank of gas. Thats without me. Plan to have it below 3,000 this summer.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2005 | 03:37 PM
  #115  
Spdfrk1990's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,972
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati
Alot of people think these cars are real heavy but there are some sport compact cars pushin 3,000 lbs. The cobalt SS is 2,991lbs and the srt4 neon is up there also.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 02:08 PM
  #116  
Gladstoneiroc's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 1
From: Gladstone, Missouri
Car: 91 Camaro RS
Engine: 5.0L TBI (ebl inside)
Transmission: T-5
Axle/Gears: 3.42 lsd 10 bolt
Lets get all the weights for rotors. I have some new PBR rotors and some iron drums I can weigh later. My reasoning is "if its lighter, I won't break as much of it."

Brand new rear PBR rotor weighs 12.5 lbs (+- .5 lbs)

Last edited by Gladstoneiroc; Jun 23, 2005 at 02:11 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 10:44 PM
  #117  
transam84's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
I just recently swapped out my inner front steel bumper for an aluminum bumper in my Trans Am. with both front bumpers on the ground and with the impact absorbers still attached to both, the aluminum bumper weighed exactly 14 lbs less than the steel one !!! I thought at first these aluminum bumpers only came on 4 cylinders cars BUT I found 3 at the junkyard so now all 3 of my cars have an luminum bumper and I have one I could sell maybe but for now I am keeping it. I found all the aluminum bumpers in 82-84 cars and nothing newer. bring a magnet to the junkyard to look for some.
easiest way to get these aluminum bumpers off is to remove the 4 bolts that hold onto each headlight assy and get those out of the way, then you can very easily remove the bolts connecting the front bumper cover to the fenders and then presto there is the inner front bumper. it is hel on by 8 15 mm nuts (4 each end), I think it was 15 mm.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 11:03 PM
  #118  
mw66nova's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
those don't fit camaros by chance do they?
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 02:09 AM
  #119  
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,023
Likes: 90
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
The aluminum bumpers were on all sorts of versions of the early firebirds. My ’83 TA had one on it. I believe that the camaros only got them with the 4 cylinder engine, but I could be wrong there also. The camaro aluminum bumper support is slightly different then the firebird one
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 12:18 PM
  #120  
CamaroCain's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 158
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
Car: 88 Camaro
Did they also come with rear aluminum supports as well???
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 01:20 PM
  #121  
DanTheMan_smlk's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 84
Likes: 1
is there such a thing as "plastic" or lighter weight t-tops? If they exist, how much do they weigh?
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 01:28 PM
  #122  
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,023
Likes: 90
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
the support brackets were aluminum.

GM did make lexan t-tops but they were prone to cracking and were recalled, so they are difficult to find nice ones.
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2005 | 08:56 PM
  #123  
transam84's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
the Firebird aluminum bumper will def not fit the Camaros, sorry guys. 83 crossfire is correct on the lexan t-tops, but be preparred to spend big bucks if you find a decent pair. today I just got a manual sterring gearbox from the junkyard out of an S10 pickup and it is supposed to be a direct bolt in. the 3rd gen power steering gear box weighs 29 lbs with the pitman arm attached and the manual gear box off the S10 with the S10 pitman arm attached weighs 23 lbs so if you wanted to reduce weight and don't mind man steering then this is a GREAT way to loose some lbs in a hurry, 6 lbs diff from the 2 gear boxes plus all the weight you would loose pitching the power steering pump and all the parts attached to it and not to mention one less thing for the motor to turn which would give you a couple more ponies, not like you would feel it though.
Reply
Old Jun 25, 2005 | 09:28 PM
  #124  
transam84's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
well I was checking out things on Ebay and so I looked at aluminum water pumps. I saw one and asked the seller how much it weighs with no packing and he said 4 lbs and thats for a long water pump. after that I went to my garage and weighed an extra water pump I had on the shelf.this water pump is cast iron and the stock replacement you would get at any autoparts store. this water pump weighs 15 lbs!!! so going to an aluminum water pump will give a guy another 11 lbs reduction in front end weight.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2005 | 02:43 PM
  #125  
mw66nova's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
Originally posted by transam84
not to mention one less thing for the motor to turn which would give you a couple more ponies, not like you would feel it though.
you probably won't feel it, but i dropped from a 13.98 to a 13.88 and gained 1 mph JUST by taking the ps pump belt off. that's without the weight reduction.

i bought a man box from an s10 off of ebay a couple nights ago. can't wait till it gets here so i can weight it etc.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2005 | 04:14 PM
  #126  
transam84's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
MW66NOVA.... I have a project car without a motor so I mocked up the man gearbox I just bought on friday at the junkyard and there are 2 little mods you have to do to make it work. if your standing at your drivers side fender and looking down at the gear box you will have 2 mounting hole on top of the gearbox, the one closer to the firewall needs a slight mod. you will need to pull out the ole angle grinder and grind a slot in the webbing to accomidate the bracket that the swaybar is bolted to, bad description of the brkt but you will know what I meen after you get your old gearbox out. one other very little mod was I had to use a hammer (I know this sounds bad) and dent the frame just slightly enough to make the gear box sit flat to the frame. if I knew how to post a pic here I would do it. if you would like to see a pic of the 2 mods I had to make send me an email to southpaw1969@hotmail.com and I can send you a pic that way. and if you know how to post the pics and you would want to then go right on ahead.
I can't wait to do this swap b/c I want to really be able to see how much weight I am cutting off the front of the car from this swap.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2005 | 09:36 AM
  #127  
FullSendRacing's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 294
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Car: '85 Trans Am FAILBIRD
Engine: 350
Transmission: T56
Axle/Gears: 4th gen torsen 3.42
recaro speed vs. stock seats

Just got recaros last night. they are the speed seats set up for a 4-pt. My stock 84TA vinyl seats weighs 25 without the brackets, and the recaro seats weigh 29 lb each.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2005 | 11:19 AM
  #128  
jimp2001's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY Area
Car: Red on Red 89 RS
Engine: LO3 305 TBI
Transmission: TH-700R4
Axle/Gears: 10-bolt / 2.73
my camaro weighs in at 2650 with 1-2 gals of gas in it... bone stock 3.1L V6 and no AC from the factory
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2005 | 11:36 AM
  #129  
mw66nova's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
Originally posted by jimp2001
my camaro weighs in at 2650 with 1-2 gals of gas in it... bone stock 3.1L V6 and no AC from the factory
no way bro. check your scales. they are wrong.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2005 | 11:37 AM
  #130  
mw66nova's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 13,576
Likes: 30
From: Harford County, MD
Car: camaro sportcoupe
Engine: 7.0L
Transmission: G-Force GF5R
Axle/Gears: Moser 9"
Originally posted by transam84
MW66NOVA.... I have a project car without a motor so I mocked up the man gearbox I just bought on friday at the junkyard and there are 2 little mods you have to do to make it work. if your standing at your drivers side fender and looking down at the gear box you will have 2 mounting hole on top of the gearbox, the one closer to the firewall needs a slight mod. you will need to pull out the ole angle grinder and grind a slot in the webbing to accomidate the bracket that the swaybar is bolted to, bad description of the brkt but you will know what I meen after you get your old gearbox out. one other very little mod was I had to use a hammer (I know this sounds bad) and dent the frame just slightly enough to make the gear box sit flat to the frame. if I knew how to post a pic here I would do it. if you would like to see a pic of the 2 mods I had to make send me an email to southpaw1969@hotmail.com and I can send you a pic that way. and if you know how to post the pics and you would want to then go right on ahead.
I can't wait to do this swap b/c I want to really be able to see how much weight I am cutting off the front of the car from this swap.

yeah, i'd like some pics, email me at matt@jamaministry.com
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2005 | 11:46 AM
  #131  
Lo-tec's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 2
From: Gambrills, Md
Car: clapped out 84Z
Engine: 355 efi roller
Transmission: tremec TKO
Originally posted by 83 Crossfire TA
The aluminum bumpers were on all sorts of versions of the early firebirds. My ’83 TA had one on it. I believe that the camaros only got them with the 4 cylinder engine, but I could be wrong there also.
Nope, my 84 Z has an aluminum one up front. Probably had one in the rear too until I replaced it after getting hit by some bonehead.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2005 | 09:06 PM
  #132  
transam84's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
well I had the parts for my man steering swap but today I actually did the swap. it really is not as bad as one might think. almost feels like you have power steering still, just a little bit stiffer. I can still make a 90 degree turn with one hand and I am no fitness gym guru type of person so really not that bad at all. BEST THING OF ALL, THE WEIGHT REDUCTION: I cut 23 lbs off of the front of my car with this swap. my new gear box weighs 23 lbs and the entire power steering setup (pump,belt,gearbox,lines, brkts and bolt) weighed 46 lbs. well I think the next thing on the list to drop weight is to swap out the cast iron water pump for an aluminum pump.
can anyone post some pics for me on this swap if I send them in an email, I am not sure how to reduce the size of the pics.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2005 | 01:13 PM
  #133  
B4Ctom1's Avatar
TGO Supporter
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
can anyone show me a pic of the part of the bumper which is aluminum, even if the pic is not of the actual aluminum part. I would prefer to know what I am looking for though.


Originally posted by transam84
well I had the parts for my man steering swap but today I actually did the swap. it really is not as bad as one might think. almost feels like you have power steering still, just a little bit stiffer. I can still make a 90 degree turn with one hand and I am no fitness gym guru type of person so really not that bad at all. BEST THING OF ALL, THE WEIGHT REDUCTION: I cut 23 lbs off of the front of my car with this swap. my new gear box weighs 23 lbs and the entire power steering setup (pump,belt,gearbox,lines, brkts and bolt) weighed 46 lbs. well I think the next thing on the list to drop weight is to swap out the cast iron water pump for an aluminum pump.
can anyone post some pics for me on this swap if I send them in an email, I am not sure how to reduce the size of the pics.
I will host them for you.
send them to my user name @gmail.com
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 01:09 AM
  #134  
Crall13's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 108
Likes: 1
From: St Louis area
Car: 92 Formula
Engine: 5.7 L
Is there such thing as a "good" light weight sub box. I've got two 12's and the box weighs at least 60lbs.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 01:49 AM
  #135  
NEEDforSPEED's Avatar
Thread Starter
Supreme Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,036
Likes: 1
fiber glass box man....
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2005 | 10:42 PM
  #136  
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,023
Likes: 90
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Originally posted by B4Ctom1
can anyone show me a pic of the part of the bumper which is aluminum, even if the pic is not of the actual aluminum part. I would prefer to know what I am looking for though.
This is the actual aluminum one off of my ’83 TA:


Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 03:05 AM
  #137  
xlwhellraiser's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,122
Likes: 1
From: colorado
Car: 1992 Trans/am convertible
Engine: 305 TPI
Transmission: 700r4
Axle/Gears: 2.73 drum WS6
What about honey combs??? I took mine off the bumper and it was pretty heavy. probably 10-20lbs if not more. It felt like one of my 25 pounders. I am starting to look into this thread and I am looking for weight reduction for a daily driver.
I am looking into replacing big pieces like hatch and I already have a fiberglass hood (I think). T-tops.

I am also looking into fabing up something for the hatch. The glass is just massive. Anyone have any more info into making your own glass out of lighter materials???
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 04:09 AM
  #138  
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,023
Likes: 90
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
that honeycomb stuff is relatively light compared to the rest of the stuff in the firebird nose.

I saved the aluminum assemblies (it’s not only the bumper but the brackets…) but I may in the future just ditch the whole thing and weld something up lightweight to hold the urethane up. My formula was in an accident that sheared the whole assembly off and bent up the front of the passenger side frame rail that made it impossible to put it all back, but instead I just made a very light wooden framework that got screwed inside the nose to support it. Something similar out of some light gauge steel tube would do the trick.

Another thought I’ve been having is that the popup headlights weigh something in the 30# range, making hard mounting some smaller lights and getting rid of the motors and brackets fairly attractive. I wish I knew what the law was about that around here…
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 07:55 AM
  #139  
Lo-tec's Avatar
TGO Supporter
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 2
From: Gambrills, Md
Car: clapped out 84Z
Engine: 355 efi roller
Transmission: tremec TKO
Originally posted by xlwhellraiser
Anyone have any more info into making your own glass out of lighter materials???
You can buy the rear hatch in lexan. I found a couple of linkings by doing a search on "lexan hatch"on the site. Check this car out:

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/403007/9

Last edited by Lo-tec; Jul 30, 2005 at 07:58 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 12:42 PM
  #140  
firebirdjosh's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 1
From: Worcester, MA
Car: 86 T/A
Engine: HSR 355
Transmission: 700R4
Axle/Gears: 2.77 posi
I took off my rear hatch and drove around and noticed alot of traction issues. 100+ pounds at the rear is a big deal.
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2005 | 12:51 PM
  #141  
B4Ctom1's Avatar
TGO Supporter
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
that is incredible. I dont mind so much because it is my intent to re-ballast the car farther back after it is completed for street and then a different weight for track.
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2005 | 08:14 PM
  #142  
Crall13's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 108
Likes: 1
From: St Louis area
Car: 92 Formula
Engine: 5.7 L
How much weight reduction needs to be done in order to make a difference. I'm thinking of Fiberglass hood, and possibly fenders. But if that alone won't make much difference I'll spend my cash on something else (but will eventually get a hood because I'm tired of stock)
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2005 | 09:16 PM
  #143  
NoItsNotForSale's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
From: Bonham TX
Car: 87 & 89 Iroc's
Engine: 5.0 - 5.7
Transmission: 700R's
Axle/Gears: 2.77 - 3.70
Originally posted by Crall13
How much weight reduction needs to be done in order to make a difference. I'm thinking of Fiberglass hood, and possibly fenders. But if that alone won't make much difference I'll spend my cash on something else (but will eventually get a hood because I'm tired of stock)
The factory fenders are almost as light as the fiberglass ones not really worth it.

I think this is right but removing 100lbs = .1 at the track.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 05:13 PM
  #144  
1989GTATransAm's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 6,859
Likes: 14
From: Cypress, California
Car: 1989 GTA
Engine: 369 TPI
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 3.70 Nine Bolt
JerryWho's car is down to around 2900 pounds. I think by the end of the year he will be down below 2800 pounds. This is a street legal car.

Maybe he will see this post and give the latest weight on his car.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 01:41 AM
  #145  
Conv389drv's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Somebody was asking about a formula to compare aluminum to steel regarding rotational weight. I did some number crunching with these:

Inertia of a uniform cylinder: I = (1/2)(mass)(cross sec. area)^2

I used that value for inertia in the formula for rotational kinetic energy

KE = (1/2)(Inertia)(radians/sec.)^2

For the rotational speed rad/sec (omega) I assumed 5000 rpm and changed it to radians/sec.

I used a 3 inch diameter, and I assumed the driveshaft weights were 15 lbs for the steel, and 10 lbs for the aluminum. This was kind of arbitrarily chosen, and not too accurate anyway; a lot of the weight is in the u-joints, not the shaft itself. (this calculation doesn't include the U-joints)

I should mention that this is an EXTREMELY simplified calculation, strictly an A to B comparison, of a theoretical uniform object, but it is useful to help demonstrate the relative impact of the driveshaft weight.

Anyway, the energy required to get the steel shaft to 5000 rpm was 77.4 joules; the energy for the aluminum shaft was 51.5 joules. The aluminum shaft takes about 30 percent less energy to reach that speed.

If you assume this happens in 10 seconds, and convert joules/sec to watts, and watts to horsepower, you get about 0.00689 HP for the Al shaft, and 0.0104 HP for the steel shaft. The difference remains about 30 percent. This is the horsepower required for the shaft to reach 5000 rpm in ten seconds.

As you can see, it's not much, but this is assuming NO friction, and this also assumes a uniform cylinder, whereas the driveshaft has its mass at the outermost diameter. If I got really bored I guess I could calculate the driveshaft inertia from scratch, but not tonight!!


This would have been easier to show if I could have pasted MathCad stuff in here, but apparently it's not compatible.


Anyway, this was kind of fun to play with to see the differences between the two shafts from a dynamics point of view.

And by the way, to put the joules value in perspective, if you use
KE = 1/2(Mass)(velocity)^2 and assume your car is represented by a 3000 lb block on a frictionless surface, then to reach 60 mph requires 363,000 joules of energy!


As a disclaimer I should add that all this info assumes that I didn't make any typos and/or F- up the calculation!

Reply
Old Aug 14, 2005 | 10:31 PM
  #146  
B4Ctom1's Avatar
TGO Supporter
Veteran: Air Force
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 4,991
Likes: 1
From: Cheyenne, Wyoming
Car: 1992 B4C 1LE
Engine: Proaction 412, Accel singleplane
Transmission: built 700R4 w/custom converter
Axle/Gears: stock w/later 4th gen torsen pos
Originally posted by Crall13
How much weight reduction needs to be done in order to make a difference. I'm thinking of Fiberglass hood, and possibly fenders. But if that alone won't make much difference I'll spend my cash on something else (but will eventually get a hood because I'm tired of stock)
the hood alone is a huge reduction.
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2005 | 03:14 PM
  #147  
jrmaatta's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: Marengo, IL
Car: 2011 Ranger
Engine: 2.3L
Transmission: Stick - Shift like a man!
Originally posted by Crall13
How much weight reduction needs to be done in order to make a difference. I'm thinking of Fiberglass hood, and possibly fenders. But if that alone won't make much difference I'll spend my cash on something else (but will eventually get a hood because I'm tired of stock)
82-92 Firebird fiberglass parts

That site lists their front end (one piece fenders & bumper) at about 20-22 lbs depending on which one you get (stock or extended). It replaces the whole front end other than hood.



You can also get a 91-92 "Banshee" style front end from them as well. 23 lbs



And they have flat stock-style or Formula-style pin-on hoods rated at 12 lbs or bolt-on at 18 lbs. 4.5" Cowl Induction hood is 15pin or 22bolt-on. Doors are 10lbs each. They have a 4lb rear hatch (I'm thinking that does not include rear window). 2 piece dash is 4 lbs.

I'll definetly be hitting them up for stuff once I get a Firebird to start working on. Luckily I live like 20 minutes away from them too, so no S/H $$$ for me!! lol. As for the front end, in the pics it looks like they don't have headlights, so it'll be even easier for me to convert to non-pop-up headlights since I'll be using the first front end I posted, extended type.

Thank you everybody for gettin' MORE ideas churning in my head!! Even tho I don't currently have a Firebird to work on haha
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2005 | 10:55 PM
  #148  
83 Crossfire TA's Avatar
Supreme Member
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,023
Likes: 90
From: DC Metro Area
Car: 87TA 87Form 71Mach1 93FleetWB 04Cum
Anyone ever see those in person on a car, can they be made to look like the car is not a race car?

For that matter, does someone make a firebird or early TA version (without the full bodywork)?
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2005 | 01:22 AM
  #149  
DuronClocker's Avatar
Supreme Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,085
Likes: 2
From: Elgin, IL
Car: 1997 Corvette
Engine: LS1
Transmission: 4L60E
Axle/Gears: 2.73 IRS
While I had my engine out the last few weeks, I cut quite a bit off my wiring harness and removed my heater stuff from the car. The behind-the-dash stuff and my cut-down under-hood heaterbox (which weighed about half of stock) weighed in around 30lbs, including heater core and all ducting behind dash. There is a TON of room behind the dash now as well.

This car obviously will not be driven in the winter any longer, but is still a 100% street car.

I don't remember if I posted above, but my Corbeau Forza seats dropped something like 18lbs off between the two of them from my stock "deluxe" seats (not GTA seats though, step below them, but step above base).
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2005 | 09:22 AM
  #150  
jrmaatta's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: Marengo, IL
Car: 2011 Ranger
Engine: 2.3L
Transmission: Stick - Shift like a man!
Originally posted by 83 Crossfire TA
Anyone ever see those in person on a car, can they be made to look like the car is not a race car?

For that matter, does someone make a firebird or early TA version (without the full bodywork)?
I'd imagine that with some body work you'd be able to make it look pretty much stock. You would need to fab up some type of mount along the backside - it looks like there are not any stock mounting tabs/brackets. With some time & work, it could look really good and be much lighter than the stock metal front end. There are a couple other company's that sell basically the same thing as well.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:16 AM.